Fussilat 41:51
وَإِذَآ أَنۡعَمۡنَا عَلَى ٱلۡإِنسَٰنِ أَعۡرَضَ وَنَـَٔا بِجَانِبِهِۦ وَإِذَا مَسَّهُ ٱلشَّرُّ فَذُو دُعَآءٍ عَرِيضٍ
And when We show favour to man, he withdraws and turns away, but when evil touches him, then he has recourse to long supplications.
Divehi - Abu Bakr Ibrahim Ali (Bakurube)
(51) އަދި عامّ ކޮށް އިންސާނާގެ قواعد އަކީ ތިމަން ރަސްކަލާނގެ އޭނާއަށް نعمة އެއް ދެއްވައި، ތަނަވަސްކަމެއް ދެއްވައިފިއްޔާ އެނބުރި ފުރަގަސް ދިނުމެވެ. އެބަހީ ތިމަން ރަސްކަލާނގެއަށް شكر ކުރުން ފިޔަވައި އެނބުރި ނުކިޔަމަންތެރިވެގަނެއެވެ. އަދި ތިމާ އަމިއްލައަށް ބޮޑާވެ كبر ވެރިވެ މަތިހަށިނަގައެވެ. އެހެން އުޅެނިކޮށްވެސް އޭނާއަށް ނުބައެއް އަދި ދެރަކަމެއް ދިމާވެއްޖެއްޔާ ދެން އޭނާ ވަރަށް ފުޅާކޮށް، ދިގުކޮށް، ތަނަވަސްކޮށް دعاء ކޮށް ހަދައެވެ.
وَإِذَآ أَنۡعَمۡنَا عَلَى ٱلۡإِنسَٰنِ أَعۡرَضَ وَنَـَٔا بِجَانِبِهِۦ وَإِذَا مَسَّهُ ٱلشَّرُّ فَذُو دُعَآءٍ عَرِيضٍ
And when We show favour to man, he withdraws and turns away, but when evil touches him, then he has recourse to long supplications.
Divehi - Abu Bakr Ibrahim Ali (Bakurube)
(51) އަދި عامّ ކޮށް އިންސާނާގެ قواعد އަކީ ތިމަން ރަސްކަލާނގެ އޭނާއަށް نعمة އެއް ދެއްވައި، ތަނަވަސްކަމެއް ދެއްވައިފިއްޔާ އެނބުރި ފުރަގަސް ދިނުމެވެ. އެބަހީ ތިމަން ރަސްކަލާނގެއަށް شكر ކުރުން ފިޔަވައި އެނބުރި ނުކިޔަމަންތެރިވެގަނެއެވެ. އަދި ތިމާ އަމިއްލައަށް ބޮޑާވެ كبر ވެރިވެ މަތިހަށިނަގައެވެ. އެހެން އުޅެނިކޮށްވެސް އޭނާއަށް ނުބައެއް އަދި ދެރަކަމެއް ދިމާވެއްޖެއްޔާ ދެން އޭނާ ވަރަށް ފުޅާކޮށް، ދިގުކޮށް، ތަނަވަސްކޮށް دعاء ކޮށް ހަދައެވެ.
Forwarded from Lanterns of Tawheed
VEILING IN FRONT OF A MURTADD WOMAN? | #IslamQA with Shaykh Ahmad Mūsā Jibrīl (حفظه الله تعالى) | #AskAMJ
Question: In many Tafāsīr, it’s stated that the word “Nisā’ihinna” in the Āyāt of Hijāb in Surat An-Noor refers to Muslim women only, and subsequently some ‘Ulamā’ hold the opinion that that a Muslim woman must veil and cover herself in front of non-Muslim women the same way she veils in front of non-Mahram men.
According to this opinion, would a Muslimah be required to veil herself in front of a Murtaddah as well, who still believes herself to be upon Islām and claims to be Muslim?
For example, if a sister adopts the opinion that “Nisā’ihinna” refers to Muslim women only, and she has a distant female relative who holds beliefs that remove her from Islām and commits actions of Shirk/Kufr, and persists in them even after the sister has advised her and given her extensive proof, but this relative is arrogant and denies and ignores and continues in her transgressions and clear Kufr. According to the opinion that the sister follows (mentioned above), would she be required to veil herself in front of this Murtadd female relative, who still claims to be Muslim and upon Islām, or does she only veil in front of Kitābi women and those who openly are not Muslims by their own proclamation?
JazakAllāhu Khayra, May Allāh bless you.
———————————————
Answer: Yes, for sure, if she believes in the correct opinion of Nisā’ehin as [being] believing women, she should veil in front of a Murtaddah, because she’s not Muslim.
When I was in my first year in Medina, I had a younger teacher teach me private classes, and he told me something I will never forget, and it’s what I believe pertaining to that verse. He said “nisāee’hin’ is not only believers, it’s actually [limited to] the few of her close believer friends that she trusts.
Because if it was general believing women, the verse would state “An-Nisā’ Al-Mum’mināt” or something of that nature. But when it said “Nisā’hin”, their women, it’s their close trustworthy friends of the believing women.
Even in practice that’s true. How many women who may be on the Haqq shamelessly and freely describe women they sat with to their brothers or usually to husbands?
But as to your specific question, yes, Murtaddah takes the ruling of an organically Kāfirah.
— Answered by Ash-Shaykh Al-Imām Ahmad Mūsā Jibrīl حفظه لله
Question: In many Tafāsīr, it’s stated that the word “Nisā’ihinna” in the Āyāt of Hijāb in Surat An-Noor refers to Muslim women only, and subsequently some ‘Ulamā’ hold the opinion that that a Muslim woman must veil and cover herself in front of non-Muslim women the same way she veils in front of non-Mahram men.
According to this opinion, would a Muslimah be required to veil herself in front of a Murtaddah as well, who still believes herself to be upon Islām and claims to be Muslim?
For example, if a sister adopts the opinion that “Nisā’ihinna” refers to Muslim women only, and she has a distant female relative who holds beliefs that remove her from Islām and commits actions of Shirk/Kufr, and persists in them even after the sister has advised her and given her extensive proof, but this relative is arrogant and denies and ignores and continues in her transgressions and clear Kufr. According to the opinion that the sister follows (mentioned above), would she be required to veil herself in front of this Murtadd female relative, who still claims to be Muslim and upon Islām, or does she only veil in front of Kitābi women and those who openly are not Muslims by their own proclamation?
JazakAllāhu Khayra, May Allāh bless you.
———————————————
Answer: Yes, for sure, if she believes in the correct opinion of Nisā’ehin as [being] believing women, she should veil in front of a Murtaddah, because she’s not Muslim.
When I was in my first year in Medina, I had a younger teacher teach me private classes, and he told me something I will never forget, and it’s what I believe pertaining to that verse. He said “nisāee’hin’ is not only believers, it’s actually [limited to] the few of her close believer friends that she trusts.
Because if it was general believing women, the verse would state “An-Nisā’ Al-Mum’mināt” or something of that nature. But when it said “Nisā’hin”, their women, it’s their close trustworthy friends of the believing women.
Even in practice that’s true. How many women who may be on the Haqq shamelessly and freely describe women they sat with to their brothers or usually to husbands?
But as to your specific question, yes, Murtaddah takes the ruling of an organically Kāfirah.
— Answered by Ash-Shaykh Al-Imām Ahmad Mūsā Jibrīl حفظه لله
❤2
Forwarded from Lanterns of Tawheed
WHICH WOMEN CAN A MUSLIMAH UNCOVER BEFORE? | #IslamQA with Shaykh Ahmad Mūsā Jibrīl (حفظه الله تعالى) | #AskAMJ
Answer: As to the follow up issue on “Nisā’ehin”, I answered based on the opinion of someone who believes it’s only believing women, and they have the right to do so because it’s a very strong opinion. If someone looked into the proof and came to that conclusion, they have a strong opinion and an opinion many of the Salaf of Islām adopted. Based on that, a Murtaddah is a Kāfirah, and one who feels they will meet Allāh with that opinion - and it’s strong - should not uncover in front of a Kāfirah or one they believe to be a Murtaddah.
I have not ever read that the [non-Muslim] women who entered upon Ā’ishah رضي الله عنها was prior to Hijāb being ordained. That would be something I couldn’t say without a Salaf in it, and I have never heard of anyone saying that. If I did, I would clearly adopt the opinion of the person in the question (previous post) and [be even] more restricted to women of believers who are known and trustworthy.
My personal opinion that I lean towards, is “Nisā’ehin” is not just believing women, it’s trusted believing women AND trusted (in this matter) Kafir women. Why? Because that opinion combines between the proof. The rule in Usool is to combine between before doing Tarjeeh of one of them when possible.
The Malikiyyah said the reason for Hijāb from a woman is the 3ared of being described, not that she’s 'Awrah.
Someone will say how can you trust a woman who is a Kāfirah? This is not pertaining to Walā' and Barā', this is a limited, narrow issue of not being described. [For example] some old Kāfirah woman, who has no relatives, lives alone, no one visits her of men, and she has a Muslimah friend, I believe based on the Ahādeeth it’s permissible to be more relaxed, and that’s like the trust of a Jews in the Qur’ān pertaining to wealth:
وَمِنْ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ مَنْ إِنْ تَأْمَنْهُ بِقِنْطَارٍ يُؤَدِّهِ إِلَيْكَ وَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ إِنْ تَأْمَنْهُ بِدِينَارٍ لا يُؤَدِّهِ إِلَيْكَ
“There are some among the People of the Book who, if entrusted with a stack of gold, will readily return it. Yet there are others who, if entrusted with a single coin, will not repay it...”
I don’t think women should uncover in front of other Muslimāt women, due to the wording of the verse as I said, when they don’t know them, because it’s common for women describe each other.
In summary I believe the Illah (reason) behind a women having to [observe] Hijab in front of another is her being described, not her being 'Awrah. The safest route is not to show anything except in front of a Muslimah [who] one fully knows her credibility, because of “Nisā’ehin”. But due to Ahādeeth where Kāfir women entered upon the wife of the Messenger ﷺ and no one mentioning it’s abrogated, it would [also] allow a Kāfir women to enter if she appears trustworthy in this matter.
I’ve had many cases recently from sisters with problems because they described other sisters or something of them for their husbands which caused problems later on, and they appear to be on the pure Manhaj. So just imagine others.
— Answered by Ash-Shaykh Al-Imām Ahmad Mūsā Jibrīl حفظه الله
Answer: As to the follow up issue on “Nisā’ehin”, I answered based on the opinion of someone who believes it’s only believing women, and they have the right to do so because it’s a very strong opinion. If someone looked into the proof and came to that conclusion, they have a strong opinion and an opinion many of the Salaf of Islām adopted. Based on that, a Murtaddah is a Kāfirah, and one who feels they will meet Allāh with that opinion - and it’s strong - should not uncover in front of a Kāfirah or one they believe to be a Murtaddah.
I have not ever read that the [non-Muslim] women who entered upon Ā’ishah رضي الله عنها was prior to Hijāb being ordained. That would be something I couldn’t say without a Salaf in it, and I have never heard of anyone saying that. If I did, I would clearly adopt the opinion of the person in the question (previous post) and [be even] more restricted to women of believers who are known and trustworthy.
My personal opinion that I lean towards, is “Nisā’ehin” is not just believing women, it’s trusted believing women AND trusted (in this matter) Kafir women. Why? Because that opinion combines between the proof. The rule in Usool is to combine between before doing Tarjeeh of one of them when possible.
The Malikiyyah said the reason for Hijāb from a woman is the 3ared of being described, not that she’s 'Awrah.
Someone will say how can you trust a woman who is a Kāfirah? This is not pertaining to Walā' and Barā', this is a limited, narrow issue of not being described. [For example] some old Kāfirah woman, who has no relatives, lives alone, no one visits her of men, and she has a Muslimah friend, I believe based on the Ahādeeth it’s permissible to be more relaxed, and that’s like the trust of a Jews in the Qur’ān pertaining to wealth:
وَمِنْ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ مَنْ إِنْ تَأْمَنْهُ بِقِنْطَارٍ يُؤَدِّهِ إِلَيْكَ وَمِنْهُمْ مَنْ إِنْ تَأْمَنْهُ بِدِينَارٍ لا يُؤَدِّهِ إِلَيْكَ
“There are some among the People of the Book who, if entrusted with a stack of gold, will readily return it. Yet there are others who, if entrusted with a single coin, will not repay it...”
I don’t think women should uncover in front of other Muslimāt women, due to the wording of the verse as I said, when they don’t know them, because it’s common for women describe each other.
In summary I believe the Illah (reason) behind a women having to [observe] Hijab in front of another is her being described, not her being 'Awrah. The safest route is not to show anything except in front of a Muslimah [who] one fully knows her credibility, because of “Nisā’ehin”. But due to Ahādeeth where Kāfir women entered upon the wife of the Messenger ﷺ and no one mentioning it’s abrogated, it would [also] allow a Kāfir women to enter if she appears trustworthy in this matter.
I’ve had many cases recently from sisters with problems because they described other sisters or something of them for their husbands which caused problems later on, and they appear to be on the pure Manhaj. So just imagine others.
— Answered by Ash-Shaykh Al-Imām Ahmad Mūsā Jibrīl حفظه الله
Forwarded from Haqq Hurts Hypocrites
🚫 Kuffār have New Year’s Resolutions
✅ Muslims have Ramadān Resolutions
“They, the others, have worthless New Year’s resolutions that they never keep – and we have honourable Ramadān resolutions to Allāh.”
— Shaykh Ahmad Jibril (حفظه الله)
Ramadān is in less than 3 months. Start preparing now!
✅ Muslims have Ramadān Resolutions
“They, the others, have worthless New Year’s resolutions that they never keep – and we have honourable Ramadān resolutions to Allāh.”
— Shaykh Ahmad Jibril (حفظه الله)
Ramadān is in less than 3 months. Start preparing now!
Forwarded from Galandān ގަލަންދާނު
⚠️
This is a mistake I have made in this print, may Allah forgive me. It should be as known and clear from the text of the ḥadīth thrice [x3]
Insha Allah , we will repost it with corrections.
~ ގަލަންދާނު
This is a mistake I have made in this print, may Allah forgive me. It should be as known and clear from the text of the ḥadīth thrice [x3]
Insha Allah , we will repost it with corrections.
~ ގަލަންދާނު
❤3
Forwarded from Lanterns of Tawheed
🎥 #NEW | Fairness Between Children in Islām | Ash-Shaykh Al-Imām Ahmad Mūsā Jibrīl (حفظه الله) | #AskAMJ #IslamQA
🔗 https://youtu.be/iqj8Be7wyrY
A new #IslamQA in which Shaykh Ahmad حفظه الله answers a question regarding the ruling on practicing fairness and justice between children.
*Please note: Questions posted on this channel are posed to the Shaykh by various individuals. We simply share the responses received, after permission.*
🔗 https://youtu.be/iqj8Be7wyrY
A new #IslamQA in which Shaykh Ahmad حفظه الله answers a question regarding the ruling on practicing fairness and justice between children.
*Please note: Questions posted on this channel are posed to the Shaykh by various individuals. We simply share the responses received, after permission.*
YouTube
#NEW | Fairness Between Children in Islām | Ash-Shaykh Al-Imām Ahmad حفظه الله | #AskAMJ #IslamQA
A new #IslamQA in which Shaykh Ahmad حفظه الله answers a question regarding the ruling on practicing fairness and justice between children.
*Please note: Questions posted on this channel are posed to the Shaykh by various individuals. We simply share the…
*Please note: Questions posted on this channel are posed to the Shaykh by various individuals. We simply share the…
AYAT OF THE DAY 🔥
Al-Mulk 67:13
وَأَسِرُّواْ قَوۡلَكُمۡ أَوِ ٱجۡهَرُواْ بِهِۦٓۖ إِنَّهُۥ عَلِيمٌۢ بِذَاتِ ٱلصُّدُورِ
And whether you keep your talk secret or disclose it, verily, He is the All-Knower of what is in the breasts (of men).
Divehi - Abu Bakr Ibrahim Ali (Bakurube)
(13) (އޭމީސްތަކުންނޭވެ!) ކަލޭމެން ބަސްބާރަށް ބުނެ އަޑުހަރުކުރުމެކޭ އަދި އަޑު މަޑުކޮށް ސިއްރުން ބަސްބުނުމެކޭ އެކަލާނގެ حَضْرَةُ އަށް ހަމަހަމަވެގެންވެއެވެ. ހަމަކަށަވަރުން ހިތްތަކުގެ އަޑީގައި ވާހާ ތަކެއްޗަށް ދާނދެން އެކަލާނގެ ދެނެވޮޑިގެންވެއެވެ.
Al-Mulk 67:13
وَأَسِرُّواْ قَوۡلَكُمۡ أَوِ ٱجۡهَرُواْ بِهِۦٓۖ إِنَّهُۥ عَلِيمٌۢ بِذَاتِ ٱلصُّدُورِ
And whether you keep your talk secret or disclose it, verily, He is the All-Knower of what is in the breasts (of men).
Divehi - Abu Bakr Ibrahim Ali (Bakurube)
(13) (އޭމީސްތަކުންނޭވެ!) ކަލޭމެން ބަސްބާރަށް ބުނެ އަޑުހަރުކުރުމެކޭ އަދި އަޑު މަޑުކޮށް ސިއްރުން ބަސްބުނުމެކޭ އެކަލާނގެ حَضْرَةُ އަށް ހަމަހަމަވެގެންވެއެވެ. ހަމަކަށަވަރުން ހިތްތަކުގެ އަޑީގައި ވާހާ ތަކެއްޗަށް ދާނދެން އެކަލާނގެ ދެނެވޮޑިގެންވެއެވެ.