Forwarded from Keith Woods
X just nuked almost every big groyper account over pushback against this pro-immigration push from Silicon Valley
💩91😁19👻8🤬6🤣5🙈2⚡1👎1🥰1🫡1
Forwarded from Nathan Damigo
Path to victory: Criticize, disrupt, attack!
Path to extinction: Apologize, excuse, downplay.
Path to extinction: Apologize, excuse, downplay.
👏62
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
JUST IN - Trump supports Musk, Ramaswamy on H-1B visas, says he uses them himself — NY Post
@disclosetv
@disclosetv
🤬70🤪12🤡11🤣7🖕4🍾1😡1
Forwarded from Mike Peinovich⚡️⚡️🔻
It's highly frustrating to be banned from twitter in the midst of a debate where the opponent is making laughable and specious claims, but can rely on censorship to pull their fat out of the fire. Technically, you are not even allowed to argue the other side of the holocaust on twitter, something that fabulists and frauds dine out on.
At issue this time was an account who asserted that deniers cannot evince an alternative story to the gassing narrative, therefore the gassing narrative must be accepted by default. This is absurd. Not only is this logically just wrong, but there is a readily available alternative narrative and ample evidence.
Limiting things to Auschwitz for the sake of argument, literally all the existing documentary and physical evidence at Auschwitz-Birkenau supports an alternative narrative to the gassing of Jews. The alleged gas chambers were labeled as morgues in the construction documents and blueprints, of which there are many. Gas chambers are not mentioned anywhere. The gas chambers could not have possibly worked as described, and key components of the gassing device, like the holes in the roof and mesh columns, do not exist and there is no evidence they ever did. There is no chemical residue of the poison gas, which would be present if the gas was used in large quantities in these spaces. So the case is proven, they could not have been gas chambers. The book is closed on that.
This means that we simply accept the documents and physical evidence for what they are and do not try to impose secret codes, telepathic commands, conspiracies and disappearing bodies on top of them. There is your alternative narrative staring you in the face. It's just all the evidence that has been lied about and misconstrued for all these years. It simply tells a different story than the bizarre gassing conspiracy.
As far as the question of "where did the jews go then" this is more of a rhetorical strategy than a genuine question. it is meant to switch the burden of proof and put the fabulist in the position of being able to deconstruct speculation. Again, there is ample evidence of Jews being shipped to various camps and many of them left for the USA, USSR and occupied Palestine. There is no need for some complex or elaborate theory. But answering this question must start from the point that there were no gassings, because that tale has been decisively disproven.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/holocaustclaims/1129
At issue this time was an account who asserted that deniers cannot evince an alternative story to the gassing narrative, therefore the gassing narrative must be accepted by default. This is absurd. Not only is this logically just wrong, but there is a readily available alternative narrative and ample evidence.
Limiting things to Auschwitz for the sake of argument, literally all the existing documentary and physical evidence at Auschwitz-Birkenau supports an alternative narrative to the gassing of Jews. The alleged gas chambers were labeled as morgues in the construction documents and blueprints, of which there are many. Gas chambers are not mentioned anywhere. The gas chambers could not have possibly worked as described, and key components of the gassing device, like the holes in the roof and mesh columns, do not exist and there is no evidence they ever did. There is no chemical residue of the poison gas, which would be present if the gas was used in large quantities in these spaces. So the case is proven, they could not have been gas chambers. The book is closed on that.
This means that we simply accept the documents and physical evidence for what they are and do not try to impose secret codes, telepathic commands, conspiracies and disappearing bodies on top of them. There is your alternative narrative staring you in the face. It's just all the evidence that has been lied about and misconstrued for all these years. It simply tells a different story than the bizarre gassing conspiracy.
As far as the question of "where did the jews go then" this is more of a rhetorical strategy than a genuine question. it is meant to switch the burden of proof and put the fabulist in the position of being able to deconstruct speculation. Again, there is ample evidence of Jews being shipped to various camps and many of them left for the USA, USSR and occupied Palestine. There is no need for some complex or elaborate theory. But answering this question must start from the point that there were no gassings, because that tale has been decisively disproven.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/holocaustclaims/1129
Telegram
Holocaust.claims
Mike Peinovich was banned from twitter (again) today, but he just had to jump in on a particularly absurd statement from Nessie.
https://x.com/FanoftheEraGal/status/1873865009715101727
https://x.com/FanoftheEraGal/status/1873865009715101727
👍33⚡17🤡4❤2🥱1😭1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
David Irving on decades of historical research.
Correction, this appears to be a speech given around late 2016 or thereafter.
It was posted by David Irving on X on January 2, 2025.
@Fashposting
Correction, this appears to be a speech given around late 2016 or thereafter.
It was posted by David Irving on X on January 2, 2025.
@Fashposting
⚡51