Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
🏗 🇺🇸 🇨🇳 The U.S. Department of Defense has published its 2026 National Defense Strategy, featuring four key lines of effort under the Department’s Strategic Approach:
1. Defend the U.S. Homeland
2. Deter China in the Indo-Pacific Through Strength, Not Confrontation
3. Increase Burden-Sharing with U.S. Allies and Partners
4. Supercharge the U.S. Defense Industrial Base
📎 OSINTdefender
1. Defend the U.S. Homeland
2. Deter China in the Indo-Pacific Through Strength, Not Confrontation
3. Increase Burden-Sharing with U.S. Allies and Partners
4. Supercharge the U.S. Defense Industrial Base
📎 OSINTdefender
Forwarded from Rerum Novarum // Intel, Breaking News, and Alerts 🇺🇸
🇺🇸⚡- The Pentagon releases its new National Defense Strategy, NDS:
"Defend the US homeland: We will secure America’s borders and maritime approaches, and we will defend our nation’s skies through Golden Dome. We will actively and fearlessly defend America’s interests throughout the Western Hemisphere. We will guarantee U.S. military and commercial access to key terrain, especially the Panama Canal, Gulf of America, and Greenland. This is the Trump Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, and America’s military stands ready to enforce it with speed, power, and precision, as the world saw in Operation ABSOLUTE RESOLVE.
China: President Trump seeks a stable peace, fair trade, and respectful relations with China, and he has shown that he is willing to engage President Xi Jinping directly to achieve those goals. Our goal is simple: To prevent anyone, including China, from being able to dominate us or our allies. We will erect a strong denial defense along the First Island Chain.
Increase burden sharing with US allies: In the Indo-Pacific, where our allies share our desire for a free and open regional order, allies and partners’ contributions will be vital to deterring and balancing China. In Europe and other theaters, allies will take the lead against threats that are less severe for us but more so for them, with critical but more limited support from the United
States.
Russia: Russia will remain a persistent but manageable threat to NATO’s eastern members for the foreseeable future. Indeed, although Russia suffers from a variety of demographic and economic difficulties, its ongoing war in Ukraine shows that it still retains deep reservoirs of military and industrial power. European NATO dwarfs Russia in economic scale, population, and, thus, latent military power. Fortunately, our NATO allies are substantially more powerful than Russia—it is not even close. Germany’s economy alone dwarfs that of Russia.
Iran: President Trump has consistently made clear that Iran will not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. Iran’s “Axis of Resistance” is similarly devastated. Israeli operations have left Hezbollah and Hamas severely degraded. Although Iran has suffered severe setbacks over recent months, it appears intent on reconstituting its conventional military forces. Iran’s leaders have also left open the possibility that they will try again to obtain a nuclear weapon, including by refusing to engage in meaningful negotiations. Nor can we ignore the facts that the Iranian regime has the blood of Americans on its hands, and that it remains intent on destroying our close ally, Israel.
North Korea: The DPRK poses a direct military threat to South Korea as well as to Japan, both of which are U.S. treaty allies. Although many of North Korea’s large conventional forces
are aged or poorly maintained, South Korea must stay vigilant against the threat of a North
Korean invasion. North Korea’s missile forces are also capable of striking targets in the ROK
and Japan with conventional and nuclear weapons as well as other weapons of mass destruction. At the same time, the DPRK’s nuclear forces are increasingly capable of threatening the U.S. Homeland."
"Defend the US homeland: We will secure America’s borders and maritime approaches, and we will defend our nation’s skies through Golden Dome. We will actively and fearlessly defend America’s interests throughout the Western Hemisphere. We will guarantee U.S. military and commercial access to key terrain, especially the Panama Canal, Gulf of America, and Greenland. This is the Trump Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, and America’s military stands ready to enforce it with speed, power, and precision, as the world saw in Operation ABSOLUTE RESOLVE.
China: President Trump seeks a stable peace, fair trade, and respectful relations with China, and he has shown that he is willing to engage President Xi Jinping directly to achieve those goals. Our goal is simple: To prevent anyone, including China, from being able to dominate us or our allies. We will erect a strong denial defense along the First Island Chain.
Increase burden sharing with US allies: In the Indo-Pacific, where our allies share our desire for a free and open regional order, allies and partners’ contributions will be vital to deterring and balancing China. In Europe and other theaters, allies will take the lead against threats that are less severe for us but more so for them, with critical but more limited support from the United
States.
Russia: Russia will remain a persistent but manageable threat to NATO’s eastern members for the foreseeable future. Indeed, although Russia suffers from a variety of demographic and economic difficulties, its ongoing war in Ukraine shows that it still retains deep reservoirs of military and industrial power. European NATO dwarfs Russia in economic scale, population, and, thus, latent military power. Fortunately, our NATO allies are substantially more powerful than Russia—it is not even close. Germany’s economy alone dwarfs that of Russia.
Iran: President Trump has consistently made clear that Iran will not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. Iran’s “Axis of Resistance” is similarly devastated. Israeli operations have left Hezbollah and Hamas severely degraded. Although Iran has suffered severe setbacks over recent months, it appears intent on reconstituting its conventional military forces. Iran’s leaders have also left open the possibility that they will try again to obtain a nuclear weapon, including by refusing to engage in meaningful negotiations. Nor can we ignore the facts that the Iranian regime has the blood of Americans on its hands, and that it remains intent on destroying our close ally, Israel.
North Korea: The DPRK poses a direct military threat to South Korea as well as to Japan, both of which are U.S. treaty allies. Although many of North Korea’s large conventional forces
are aged or poorly maintained, South Korea must stay vigilant against the threat of a North
Korean invasion. North Korea’s missile forces are also capable of striking targets in the ROK
and Japan with conventional and nuclear weapons as well as other weapons of mass destruction. At the same time, the DPRK’s nuclear forces are increasingly capable of threatening the U.S. Homeland."
Forwarded from Tabz - Alternative Media (TabZ)
If Governor Carney thinks he is going to make Canada a “Drop Off Port” for China to send goods and products into the United States, he is sorely mistaken.
China will eat Canada alive, completely devour it, including the destruction of their businesses, social fabric, and general way of life.
If Canada makes a deal with China, it will immediately be hit with a 100% Tariff against all Canadian goods and products coming into the U.S.A. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
🇺🇸 Pentagon shifts focus away from China in new defense strategy
The previous National Defense Strategy, published in 2022, identified China as the most significant strategic competitor to the U.S.
The Defense Department said in an influential strategy document published Friday that the U.S. military’s top focus is no longer on China but instead the homeland and Western Hemisphere.
The priorities laid out in the 2026 National Defense Strategy, a quadrennial report last published in 2022, diverge significantly from those of the Biden administration, with efforts geared more inward such as securing the border and countering narcotics.
“We will ensure that the Monroe Doctrine is upheld in our time,” it adds, referring to the 19th-century foreign policy doctrine that asserts the U.S. sphere of influence extends throughout the Western Hemisphere.
The No. 2 priority for the Pentagon is now China, which was characterized in the 2022 report as the most significant strategic competitor to the U.S., due in part to Beijing’s territorial claims in the South China Sea and its aggressive behavior toward U.S. allies.
The new report says the U.S. does not seek to “strangle or humiliate” China, but rather should deter the country “through strength, not confrontation.” It says the Pentagon will “provide the military strength for President Trump’s visionary and realistic diplomacy, thereby setting conditions for a balance of power in the Indo-Pacific that allows all of us — the United States, China, and others in the region — to enjoy a decent peace.”
The Pentagon’s third priority is to increase allies’ burden sharing, including Canada and Mexico in the Western Hemisphere and Europeans on their continent. The fourth priority is rebuilding the defense industrial base.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-shifts-focus-away-china-new-defense-strategy-rcna255701
The previous National Defense Strategy, published in 2022, identified China as the most significant strategic competitor to the U.S.
The Defense Department said in an influential strategy document published Friday that the U.S. military’s top focus is no longer on China but instead the homeland and Western Hemisphere.
The priorities laid out in the 2026 National Defense Strategy, a quadrennial report last published in 2022, diverge significantly from those of the Biden administration, with efforts geared more inward such as securing the border and countering narcotics.
“We will ensure that the Monroe Doctrine is upheld in our time,” it adds, referring to the 19th-century foreign policy doctrine that asserts the U.S. sphere of influence extends throughout the Western Hemisphere.
The No. 2 priority for the Pentagon is now China, which was characterized in the 2022 report as the most significant strategic competitor to the U.S., due in part to Beijing’s territorial claims in the South China Sea and its aggressive behavior toward U.S. allies.
The new report says the U.S. does not seek to “strangle or humiliate” China, but rather should deter the country “through strength, not confrontation.” It says the Pentagon will “provide the military strength for President Trump’s visionary and realistic diplomacy, thereby setting conditions for a balance of power in the Indo-Pacific that allows all of us — the United States, China, and others in the region — to enjoy a decent peace.”
The Pentagon’s third priority is to increase allies’ burden sharing, including Canada and Mexico in the Western Hemisphere and Europeans on their continent. The fourth priority is rebuilding the defense industrial base.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-shifts-focus-away-china-new-defense-strategy-rcna255701
NBC News
Pentagon shifts focus away from China in new defense strategy
The previous National Defense Strategy, published in 2022, identified China as the most significant strategic competitor to the U.S.
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
🇺🇸 2026 U.S. National Defense Strategy
https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/2003864773/-1/-1/0/2026-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY.PDF
https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jan/23/2003864773/-1/-1/0/2026-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-STRATEGY.PDF
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
🇨🇳 🇹🇼 🇺🇸 Yun Sun, Director of the China Program at Stimson Center, writes it is increasingly convincing that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan will happen and could even be imminent in 2026.
So far, a fundamental reason Xi has not used force against Taiwan is that it is uncertain such an operation can succeed. This question of success has always depended on how the United States would respond to a Chinese attack. China is now convinced that it is unlikely to see a U.S. president more indifferent toward Taiwan and more unlikely to intervene militarily in the Taiwan Strait than Donald Trump. The recently released U.S. National Security Strategy, which prioritizes the Western Hemisphere and proclaims a “predisposition to non-interventionism,” supports this perception since it forgoes any designation of China as a threat or a challenge to the United States. The Trump administration’s mostly muted response to China’s December 2025 military exercise encircling Taiwan was also encouraging. Then, in early January, Trump’s decision to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro confirmed the United States’ Western Hemisphere priorities.
Yet this shift in U.S. strategic priorities—and its approach to China—may be present only for the next three years. The shift could even fade after the U.S. midterm elections in November this year if the Democrats take control of Congress and Trump’s base loses enough steam. The window of opportunity is therefore limited: China may never again have a moment when Washington is so reluctant to intervene on Taiwan’s behalf.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/perfect-storm-taiwan-2026#
https://archive.ph/8LFWC
So far, a fundamental reason Xi has not used force against Taiwan is that it is uncertain such an operation can succeed. This question of success has always depended on how the United States would respond to a Chinese attack. China is now convinced that it is unlikely to see a U.S. president more indifferent toward Taiwan and more unlikely to intervene militarily in the Taiwan Strait than Donald Trump. The recently released U.S. National Security Strategy, which prioritizes the Western Hemisphere and proclaims a “predisposition to non-interventionism,” supports this perception since it forgoes any designation of China as a threat or a challenge to the United States. The Trump administration’s mostly muted response to China’s December 2025 military exercise encircling Taiwan was also encouraging. Then, in early January, Trump’s decision to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro confirmed the United States’ Western Hemisphere priorities.
Yet this shift in U.S. strategic priorities—and its approach to China—may be present only for the next three years. The shift could even fade after the U.S. midterm elections in November this year if the Democrats take control of Congress and Trump’s base loses enough steam. The window of opportunity is therefore limited: China may never again have a moment when Washington is so reluctant to intervene on Taiwan’s behalf.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/perfect-storm-taiwan-2026#
https://archive.ph/8LFWC
Foreign Affairs
A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?
How a convergence of factors could tempt Beijing to act.
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
📖 🇨🇳 🇹🇼 Xi’s great purge is pre-war mobilisation strategy: Zhao Lanjian | Oct 26, 2025
In real conflicts—such as the China–India border clashes—this essence is revealed: rigid command, paralyzed decision-making, fear-driven passivity.
To prepare for a Taiwan conflict, Xi is turning China into a wartime society — where soldiers, intellectuals, businessmen, and civilians operate under one command structure.
https://sundayguardianlive.com/world/xis-great-purge-is-pre-war-mobilisation-strategy-zhao-lanjian-158136/
In real conflicts—such as the China–India border clashes—this essence is revealed: rigid command, paralyzed decision-making, fear-driven passivity.
To prepare for a Taiwan conflict, Xi is turning China into a wartime society — where soldiers, intellectuals, businessmen, and civilians operate under one command structure.
https://sundayguardianlive.com/world/xis-great-purge-is-pre-war-mobilisation-strategy-zhao-lanjian-158136/
The Sunday Guardian
Xi’s great purge is pre-war mobilisation strategy: Zhao Lanjian
Exiled journalist Zhao Lanjian claims China’s military purges are pre-war preparations, not reforms.
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (FRANCISCVS)
Tabz - Alternative Media
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇸 🇨🇦 🇨🇳 President Trump 8 Days Ago: "If Canada can get a trade deal with China, they should do that."
President Trump Today: "If Canada makes a deal with China, it will immediately be hit with a 100% tariff."
📎 KobeissiLetter
President Trump Today: "If Canada makes a deal with China, it will immediately be hit with a 100% tariff."
📎 KobeissiLetter
Forwarded from Geopolitics Watch (Hadi)
He declined to provide specific technical details, stating he is not authorized to discuss the weapon's nature.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
On X, Yang said:
The Ninth Bureau (Central Security Bureau) arrested Zhang Youxia along with his wife and son on charges of suspected collusion with the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and conspiracy to subvert state power.
After Zhang Youxia's son Zhang Sheng was detained, his office at the Army Academy of Sciences was also searched.
Thirteen subordinates of Zhang Youxia in the Central Military Commission and 17 fellow townsmen of his in Shaanxi were also arrested together.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤯1
Forwarded from Tabz - Alternative Media (TabZ)
The last thing the World needs is to have China take over Canada.
It’s NOT going to happen, or even come close to happening!
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
https://www.mako.co.il/news-money/2026_q1/Article-7964b523731fb91027.htm
🔗 Faytuks News (@Faytuks)
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from QVINTA ÆTAS
Bellum Acta - Intel, Urgent News and Archives ✝️ #FreeVenezuela
Trump denounces the UK's unilateral Chagos Islands deal, saying he was shocked by the UK's decision, saying that "There is no doubt that China and Russia have noticed this act of total weakness by the UK"
"Trump wins again - or rather, Europe caves again. On Friday UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer was forced into an abrupt and humiliating retreat after his plan for the Chagos Islands detonated backlash in Washington.
Starmer had been preparing to ram the controversial legislation through the House of Lords on Monday, only for the bill to be yanked late Friday on growing fears it could unravel a 60-year-old US-UK treaty, which is the foundational Cold War-era deal that allows the US to operate the Diego Garcia military base on the Chagos Islands, or what's known as the British Indian Ocean Territory.
The chain of events this week kicked off early Tuesday with President Trump's Truth Social onslaught. Among several geopolitical-related messages, mostly on Greenland, he went after the Starmer government."
🗄 Archive
🔗 Source:
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ZeroHedge
In Humiliating Retreat, Starmer Forced To Pull Chagos Bill After Trump Backlash
Trump wins again...
Forwarded from QVINTA ÆTAS
"After nearly four years of the Russia-Ukraine war, and the US having throughout poured billions into Kiev's military and civic services sector, there are signs that other American allies are experiencing extreme delays in pre-scheduled arms shipments because Washington's priorities are clearly elsewhere.
Israel over the past couple years has also been a high priority, amid its war in Gaza, which resulted in the US fast-tracking some bombs, ammo, and weapons deliveries. But countries like Japan are suffering from extreme delays, at a sensitive moment it is locked in an ongoing diplomatic standoff with China over the Japanese Prime Minister's Taiwan stance.
Nikkei has referenced a Japanese government internal investigation which found that "118 orders for U.S. military equipment worth 1.14 trillion yen ($7.21 billion) have not been delivered at least five years after the contracts were signed, in some cases forcing the Self-Defense Forces to use older equipment."
🗄 Archive
🔗 Source:
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ZeroHedge
Japan Left Waiting As $7.2BN US Arms Deliveries Stall, Ukraine Prioritized
Troops forced to revert to old military hardware...