Forwarded from unfolded.
Mid-October is shaping up to become hectic and volatile in the market.
The SEC's 45-day window expiry to request a rehearing in the Grayscale case coincides with:
- The next deadline for the spot-based ETF filings
- And the ultimate deadline for the futures-based Ether ETFs — link
The SEC's 45-day window expiry to request a rehearing in the Grayscale case coincides with:
- The next deadline for the spot-based ETF filings
- And the ultimate deadline for the futures-based Ether ETFs — link
Forwarded from Watcher Guru
JUST IN: 🇲🇽 Mexican billionaire says he only holds Bitcoin, MicroStrategy, Bitcoin miners, oil companies and gold miners in his portfolio.
@WatcherGuru
@WatcherGuru
Forwarded from ZeroHedge
Bitcoin Up 365,999% Since Krugman Dismissed It At $7 Exactly 12 Years Ago
Authored by Reed MacDonald via BitcoinMagazine.com,
Krugman's dismissal of Bitcoin at $7.00 serves as a reminder of the potential for revolutionary technologies to reshape the world...
Twelve years ago, economist and Nobel laureate Paul Krugman first addressed Bitcoin and his opinion was skeptical to say the least.
In that now-famous article, penned for The New York Times on September 7, 2011, Krugman criticized and dismissed the cryptocurrency, which was then trading at an average of $7.03 per Bitcoin across exchanges.
Fast forward to today, and Bitcoin's remarkable journey has proven Krugman's skepticism to be one of the most costly missed opportunities in financial history, as demonstrated by the reaction to an X post today by Bitcoin Historian Pete Rizzo.
When Krugman's article was published, Bitcoin was still in its infancy. The digital money, created by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto, had only been around for a couple of years. It was largely unknown to the mainstream, with a small but passionate community of early adopters and tech enthusiasts.
In his article, Krugman argued that Bitcoin was a bubble waiting to burst. He questioned its viability as a currency, criticized its decentralized nature, and expressed skepticism about its long-term prospects.
At the time, Bitcoin's price of $7.00 seemed trivial, and many shared Krugman's doubts.
However, history has proven Krugman and other early Bitcoin skeptics wrong. Bitcoin has not only survived but thrived over the past 12 years. Its price has experienced unprecedented growth, reaching highs of over $69,000 in early 2021.
At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at around $25,000 per coin, representing a staggering 365,999% increase from its price when Krugman penned his critique.
Still, it's worth noting that Krugman acknowledged at the time that Bitcoin had been a good investment, even while he questioned it could serve as a currency, writing:
"The dollar value of that cybercurrency has fluctuated sharply, but overall it has soared. So buying into Bitcoin has, at least so far, been a good investment. But does that make the experiment a success? Um, no. What we want from a monetary system isn’t to make people holding money rich; we want it to facilitate transactions and make the economy as a whole rich.
👉 Read full
Authored by Reed MacDonald via BitcoinMagazine.com,
Krugman's dismissal of Bitcoin at $7.00 serves as a reminder of the potential for revolutionary technologies to reshape the world...
Twelve years ago, economist and Nobel laureate Paul Krugman first addressed Bitcoin and his opinion was skeptical to say the least.
In that now-famous article, penned for The New York Times on September 7, 2011, Krugman criticized and dismissed the cryptocurrency, which was then trading at an average of $7.03 per Bitcoin across exchanges.
Fast forward to today, and Bitcoin's remarkable journey has proven Krugman's skepticism to be one of the most costly missed opportunities in financial history, as demonstrated by the reaction to an X post today by Bitcoin Historian Pete Rizzo.
When Krugman's article was published, Bitcoin was still in its infancy. The digital money, created by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto, had only been around for a couple of years. It was largely unknown to the mainstream, with a small but passionate community of early adopters and tech enthusiasts.
In his article, Krugman argued that Bitcoin was a bubble waiting to burst. He questioned its viability as a currency, criticized its decentralized nature, and expressed skepticism about its long-term prospects.
At the time, Bitcoin's price of $7.00 seemed trivial, and many shared Krugman's doubts.
However, history has proven Krugman and other early Bitcoin skeptics wrong. Bitcoin has not only survived but thrived over the past 12 years. Its price has experienced unprecedented growth, reaching highs of over $69,000 in early 2021.
At the time of writing, Bitcoin is trading at around $25,000 per coin, representing a staggering 365,999% increase from its price when Krugman penned his critique.
Still, it's worth noting that Krugman acknowledged at the time that Bitcoin had been a good investment, even while he questioned it could serve as a currency, writing:
"The dollar value of that cybercurrency has fluctuated sharply, but overall it has soared. So buying into Bitcoin has, at least so far, been a good investment. But does that make the experiment a success? Um, no. What we want from a monetary system isn’t to make people holding money rich; we want it to facilitate transactions and make the economy as a whole rich.
👉 Read full
Forwarded from Watcher Guru
JUST IN: 🇨🇳 Apple lost $200 billion in market value over the past two days after China banned its government from using iPhones.
@WatcherGuru
@WatcherGuru
Forwarded from Crypto News - Fast Market Moving⚡️
🌍 Top Crypto Tax-Free Countries 2023 🌍
🇸🇻 El Salvador
🇦🇪 UAE
🇧🇾 Belarus
🇹🇭 Thailand
🇬🇪 Georgia
🇵🇹 Portugal
🇸🇬 Singapore
🇭🇰 Hong Kong
🇲🇹 Malta
🇵🇷 Puerto Rico
@Crypto_News 🔥
🇸🇻 El Salvador
🇦🇪 UAE
🇧🇾 Belarus
🇹🇭 Thailand
🇬🇪 Georgia
🇵🇹 Portugal
🇸🇬 Singapore
🇭🇰 Hong Kong
🇲🇹 Malta
🇵🇷 Puerto Rico
@Crypto_News 🔥
Forwarded from Watcher Guru
Forwarded from ZeroHedge
NATO Chief Openly Admits Russia Invaded Ukraine Because Of NATO Expansion
Authored by Caitlin Johnstone
During a speech at the E.U. Parliament’s foreign affairs committee on Thursday, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg clearly and repeatedly acknowledged that Putin made the decision to invade Ukraine because of fears of NATO expansionism.
His comments, initially flagged by journalist Thomas Fazi, read as follows:
"The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that.
The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO.
👉 Read full
Authored by Caitlin Johnstone
During a speech at the E.U. Parliament’s foreign affairs committee on Thursday, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg clearly and repeatedly acknowledged that Putin made the decision to invade Ukraine because of fears of NATO expansionism.
His comments, initially flagged by journalist Thomas Fazi, read as follows:
"The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition for not invade Ukraine. Of course we didn’t sign that.
The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign that promise, never to enlarge NATO.
👉 Read full
It happened again, on the very same place. Yes.
🪖 🎮 🎮 📃 — On August 28, 2023, this week, it was reported by netizens that yet another military secret leak took place on the famous War similuator game War Thunder's forum.
According to media and netizens, the Limited export documents leaked on the War Thunder forum were this time related to the Eurofighter Typhoon DA7.
This very dedicated gamer uploaded the complete 730-page combat manual for the Eurofighter Typhoon DA7 fighter jet, the current Standard Pan-European Fighter Jet used by European Union Military Forces, noting that he hoped to help the developers and that he "can't wait to get it into the game"
Warthunder players are infamous for their reputation for leaking military data for nothing but fun during their in-depth discussions about details of the vehicles and combat aircraft featured in the game.
Literally people like us.
According to media and netizens, the Limited export documents leaked on the War Thunder forum were this time related to the Eurofighter Typhoon DA7.
This very dedicated gamer uploaded the complete 730-page combat manual for the Eurofighter Typhoon DA7 fighter jet, the current Standard Pan-European Fighter Jet used by European Union Military Forces, noting that he hoped to help the developers and that he "can't wait to get it into the game"
Warthunder players are infamous for their reputation for leaking military data for nothing but fun during their in-depth discussions about details of the vehicles and combat aircraft featured in the game.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
JUST IN - CIA rewarded multiple "analysts with significant financial incentives" to change their COVID origins conclusion from a lab-leak to zoonosis, according to a "highly credible" whistleblower — U.S. House Select Subcommittee
https://oversight.house.gov/release/testimony-from-cia-whistleblower-alleges-new-information-on-covid-19-origins/
@disclosetv
https://oversight.house.gov/release/testimony-from-cia-whistleblower-alleges-new-information-on-covid-19-origins/
@disclosetv
United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Testimony From CIA Whistleblower Alleges New Information on COVID-19 Origins - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government…
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NOW - Speaker of the U.S. House Kevin McCarthy announces a formal impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden.
@disclosetv
@disclosetv