The judges order in the Missouri v Biden injunction provided a specific carveout for the Intel Community to talk to social media regarding national security or foreign threats.
The MSM, however, was full of legal & NatSec "experts" following talking points that it prevented the IC from discussing those exact things.
When do they get their demerits for spreading the dreaded disinformation?
The MSM, however, was full of legal & NatSec "experts" following talking points that it prevented the IC from discussing those exact things.
When do they get their demerits for spreading the dreaded disinformation?
👆 there is power in numbers. The left & media (same same) lie incessantly.
One of the biggest lies is always about the actual political leanings of a state/region.
Vermont is the only blue state in the nation.
The rest are red states with dark blue urban areas. The red majority in the state doesn't bother to vote, but the leftist NGOs get every blue vote in those urban areas (and then some).
Get those who align with your values to actually vote.
One of the biggest lies is always about the actual political leanings of a state/region.
Vermont is the only blue state in the nation.
The rest are red states with dark blue urban areas. The red majority in the state doesn't bother to vote, but the leftist NGOs get every blue vote in those urban areas (and then some).
Get those who align with your values to actually vote.
It's not hard to see the let's game plan if you have eyes to see:
Destroy SCOTUS, trash Constiution, enact CBDCs to make what Trudeau did to the Freedom Convoy look like child's play.
Destroy SCOTUS, trash Constiution, enact CBDCs to make what Trudeau did to the Freedom Convoy look like child's play.
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
The US Government perjured itself, AGAIN, in Federal court in its filing requesting a stay of the Federal Injunction against them censoring YOU online.
Read the Plaintiff’s blistering response to the defendant’s (the US Government) perjury here:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.189520/gov.uscourts.lawd.189520.299.0.pdf
Read the Plaintiff’s blistering response to the defendant’s (the US Government) perjury here:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.lawd.189520/gov.uscourts.lawd.189520.299.0.pdf
CourtListener
Memorandum in Opposition to Motion – #299 in Missouri v. Biden (W.D. La., 3:22-cv-01213) – CourtListener.com
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 297 MOTION to Stay re 294 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Jayanta Bhattacharya, Jill Hines, Jim Hoft, Aaron Kheriaty, Martin Kulldorff, State of Louisiana, State of Missouri. (aty,Sauer, Dean) Modified to reflect…
Forwarded from The Library (Harold Finch)
I love the analogy used here: they did a great job illustrating how easy this is, and how mendacious & disingenuous the government is being.