The reason Biden uses this bizarre virtual set for televised meetings—and not an actual room like East Room, Cabinet, Oval, Roosevelt, Sit Room, etc.—is because it allows him to read a noscript directly from a face-on monitor (& w/out teleprompter glass that can be seen on camera).@stevenmiller

The snap polling must havd been disastrous. AP to the rescue with a false fact check.
When an organization asks for the Patriot Act to be invoked, yes that means they are saying it is domestic terrorism.

Next up, media will call it a conspiracy theory, and Big Tech will censor the original letter.

https://twitter.com/APFactCheck/status/1445805808298733573?t=RkzQGV2IAjhJXYm4Jc3VLA&s=19

And, since we know they’ll try to censor the documents, we in The Library are going to share the screenshots of those documents with you, here, so it’s impossible to them to disappear.

Young Mother Who Died from COVID Vaccine Was Coerced Into Receiving Shot by Government Mandate, Obituary Says

READ: http://w-j.co/s/4b333

Remember the 25 phones that the Special Council team zeroed out when they were subpoenaed?

Totes legit, not suspect AT ALL.

Just remember, kids: Hillary Clinton can do it. The rabid leftists of the Special Council can do it.

But thanks to our dual system of "justice," if you erase or destroy a phone or device under subpoena from the fed govt they will prosecute YOU (whose taxes pay for it all) to the fullest extent of the law.

So why is Adam Schiff coming out today saying that if he had know that Mueller had this bad of Dementia that he would not have had him testify. Now that seems to me like Schiff and WAPO are protecting Mueller from some certain bad news that will be coming out. Could it be that DURHAM is looking into the Mueller team and Mueller himself for conspiracy to defraud the United States. RICO baby. https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1445869713490276354?s=20

FYI $3.5T Reconciliation Update

-Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) reaffirms his stance has "not changed" and he only supports a "top line number of $1.5T" maximum, per Newsmax.

-Also, he said he has been "very, very clear" about his opposition to "any change" of the filibuster. In short, previous reports that he was open to carving out an exception are false.

-This follows Cocain Mitch's offer to support a short debt ceiling hike.

-IMO McConnell made a deal with Manchin (given the tremendous pressure he is under) to back a short debt ceiling fix in exchange for his continued opposition to 1) Filibuster reform and 2) backing any deal above $1.5T.

-That keeps progressives very unhappy, Schumer impotent, and Biden's Agenda stalled.

-The longer it takes, the more it unravels. And before long, we are up to December and the debt ceiling is in the way again.

-And even if something passes - which I've said would happen - a greatly scalled back Reconciliation bill, it will be soooo different than what Progressives want, they've really achieved nothing.

No, today is a good day. You're welcome. 😊

Ⓜ️

I have an MBA from a top tier university (educated), 4 half Asian kids, 3 half black half brothers, an Asian fiance & an Asian ex wife (race ain't a thing in my house).

I still saw fraud on Nov 3, 2020 NYT.

GFY. Hard.

👇🏼

Another New York Times Columnist and Those Conducting Progressive Polling and Analysis Want Us to Believe That Those Of Us Who Saw the Cheating in the 2020 Election Are Driven by Race, a Lack of Education, and Religion - Opinion: Trump True Believers Have Their Reasons (New York Times)

Comment: Mr. Edsall: You enjoy piecing together overly long essays by picking quotes from progressive sources that allow you to build your narrative from survey data and miscellaneous political jargon.

Let me offer a different perspective, sir.

Why do I believe the 2020 Presidential election, and possibly several downballot elections were stolen?

First, I saw it happen in front of me as the election results came in on 3 and 4 November and in the video evidence of malfeasance in key Democratically-controlled precincts and cities.

Second, I read and saw the planning in advance of the election that described the playbook that unfolded.

Third, I see and hear and read how hard Democratic and anti-Trump Republicans are resisting the proper conduct of audits that 'should' only show that the election was conducted properly and that ballots submitted were indeed proper ballots.

And finally, the Arizona forensic audit results validate the concerns I hold.

So, I am of the mind that my reasoning and my true beliefs are supported by facts. I do wonder, Mr. Edsall, what your 'true beliefs' are supported by? Might you be the person susceptible to "epistemic hubris — the expression of unwarranted factual certitude"?

A person like yourself, convinced of your factual certitude, should welcome the opportunity to thoroughly prove your position via independent, verified, and detailed audits in the several states that were suspected of fraud in November, and remain questioned by 'tens of millions' of voters today.

To paraphrase your closing, "There are credible reasons to find" your adamancy to look askance at my opinion, based on facts, in favor of your own views that are reliant upon not verifying the 'factual certitude' that you possess.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/06/opinion/trump-voters-2020-election.html