There’s no question or doubt they are ‘sanitising’ the net already.

Snowden is right.

Searching for something that may be politically or legally ‘problematic’ for the globalist government narrative is becoming harder and harder.

Search engines are pretty shit these days.

📥 Election Alert: Republican Daniel Rickenmann has won the mayor's race in Columbia, South Carolina, which went 71% Biden last year

BREAKING: Judge has read mistrial motion, says he has exchanged a lot of emails with lawyers over the weekend about the withheld video

Update:
1.) the high def video the prosecutors deliberately withheld had-
A.) entirely different filename
B.) entirely different creation date
C.) altered/different metadata
D.) much larger file size
E.) different file type/extension.

It’s undeniable that the prosecutors just lied to the judge about withholding evidence. Exculpatory evidence they KNEW destroys their closing arguments & their case.

2.) the current legal team for Kyle attempted to verify & get the video from the drone company. The company owner lied to the investigator the defense team sent, refused to provide it, and later dissolved the company to avoid efforts by Kyle’s defense to gain the evidence.

3.) the prosecutors lied about knowing about the video quality difference. Kraus himself said during closing arguments and i quote “our video is better quality”.

4.) this judge is weak: there is ample technical & testimonial cause to dismiss this case RIGHT NOW with prejudice due to prosecutorial misconduct. Even if you chalk this up to incompetence it doesn’t excuse the Brady failure. This judge is holding back out of fear of the mob because hes weak.

5.) The jury WILL SEE the high definition drone footage proving that:
A.) kyle did not point his rifle at anyone except the the people attacking him
B.) that he did not point or fire until he was attacked in all cases.

This is a huge development.

Big Questions:

does mob threats win out?

does the judge refer the prosecutors for misconduct?

BREAKING: Judge says he wants to take testimony under oath about the compressed video given to the defense

Binger's face when the judge said he wants to take testimony about the compressed video

As an IT Professional i want these two UNDER OATH explaining the obvious differences in the files.

Reminder: We still have never seen the FBI's HD surveillance footage that they 'lost'

FYI: kraus admitted sending files to the defense FROM HIS GMAIL. Why is a state official handling evidence WITH IN HIS PERSONAL EMAIL ACCOUNT?!?!👇 This is illegal & breaks the chain of custody.

Judge very upset about media coverage of this case, including personal attacks on himself. Took a lot of time in court today expressing how upset he was about how media is portraying him

NEW - Chaos at Rittenhouse trial: Defense says the filename of video sent earlier was not similar to the filename given over the weekend. Judge suggests an evidentiary hearing will be needed.

@disclosetv

The Prosecutors knowingly sent a much lower quality of video hoping the defense would never find out, in order to hide exculpatory evidence from the defendant. They intentionally violated his brady rights.

AND THIS IS WHY IT’S IMPORTANT: THE HIGH DEF FOOTAGE SHOWS ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL NOT KYLE RITTENHOUSE WHO IS ARMED WITH A RIFLE.

The defense was denied high definition footage showing an individual armed with a rifle & also shows Kyle’s actions & confirm the defense’s testimony about the events.

This is exculpatory evidence deliberately hidden from the defendant & from the Jury by the prosecution.

Judge was hoping for a quick acquittal but the holdouts didn’t want the media backlash

Now the holdouts want an acquittal hut the judge doesn’t want the media backlash

Everyone wants to pass the buck

And an 18-year-old’s life hangs in the balance

Of course it cratered. All these commies out here burning shit down.

Poll: Support For Stricter Gun Control Craters https://t.co/FfWeuqm1P1

It’s not about Kyle Rittenhouse for the Left: its about taking away your basic Human Right to self-defense & turning it into a criminal act.