"Thank you, Heavenly Father, for the gift of life, and for guiding me into this amazing adventure!
Thank you for a meaningful and challenging mission.
Thank you for each of the amazing patriots I meet along the way.
Pour out your spirit upon us, and help us to be united in love, intent on one purpose.
As we prepare for our various celebrations of the amazing event of your incarnation, cleanse us of all impurity, make our ways straight.
Come, Lord Jesus.
Amen"
Thank you for a meaningful and challenging mission.
Thank you for each of the amazing patriots I meet along the way.
Pour out your spirit upon us, and help us to be united in love, intent on one purpose.
As we prepare for our various celebrations of the amazing event of your incarnation, cleanse us of all impurity, make our ways straight.
Come, Lord Jesus.
Amen"
Check out Kentucky registrations... for all 120 counties. Note that I am showing the total number of registrants on the rolls for each county as a percent of its maximum value over this time period.
In 2019, Judicial Watch sued them for having too many voters in their voter rolls, so KY cleaned up the rolls. Then, there was another lawsuit, and they added them back.
Just in time for the 2019 election.
Hmmm.
Wait a sec... if they knew they needed to remove them, why would they deliberately dirty up the rolls again?
Then, notice the surge in registration rolls leading up to the November 2020 election, and the cleanup that follows.
Not suspicious at all.
(These data are publicly available from the elect.ky.gov website.)
In 2019, Judicial Watch sued them for having too many voters in their voter rolls, so KY cleaned up the rolls. Then, there was another lawsuit, and they added them back.
Just in time for the 2019 election.
Hmmm.
Wait a sec... if they knew they needed to remove them, why would they deliberately dirty up the rolls again?
Then, notice the surge in registration rolls leading up to the November 2020 election, and the cleanup that follows.
Not suspicious at all.
(These data are publicly available from the elect.ky.gov website.)
I added the current 18 and older population to the graph...
They have more voters registered than they have people of eligible age, and they are adding them faster than the rate of population growth.
Even when the 2019 lawsuit required the state to clean up their dirty voter rolls, they obviously hadn't done enough. (The decision was later reversed.)
They have more voters registered than they have people of eligible age, and they are adding them faster than the rate of population growth.
Even when the 2019 lawsuit required the state to clean up their dirty voter rolls, they obviously hadn't done enough. (The decision was later reversed.)
Since 2008 it's been particularly easy to inflate the voter rolls unreasonably. For example, filling them with illegal aliens and non-citizens. How? Motor-voter legislation.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again... every piece of legislation that purportedly is designed to make voting easier is actually making our elections easier to hack.
Vote in person on election day.
Require an ID and a signature.
No mail-in ballots except in special circumstances.
Paper poll-books... non electronic.
Count the ballots by hand.
Video record everything.
Save everything afterward.
Anyone is allowed to audit the fully transparent process.
This is the state of the art.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again... every piece of legislation that purportedly is designed to make voting easier is actually making our elections easier to hack.
Vote in person on election day.
Require an ID and a signature.
No mail-in ballots except in special circumstances.
Paper poll-books... non electronic.
Count the ballots by hand.
Video record everything.
Save everything afterward.
Anyone is allowed to audit the fully transparent process.
This is the state of the art.
👍1
"Mistakes"
By the way, I make mistakes all the time. Occasionally, you will see them here, since I often post my "stream of consciousness."
There is something about posting publicly that helps me be more self-critical; as soon as a graph goes up, I see the mistakes in it. Or, sometimes you folks point them out overtly, or I add clarifications because of your questions.
Sometimes after I fix something I will delete the suggestions you make, not because they are offensive, but because it keeps the comments clean and meaningful. (For example, spelling errors.)
As long as the questions and comments are polite and constructive, they are welcome.
Keep the comments coming; the end product is better when you interact with it.
By the way, I make mistakes all the time. Occasionally, you will see them here, since I often post my "stream of consciousness."
There is something about posting publicly that helps me be more self-critical; as soon as a graph goes up, I see the mistakes in it. Or, sometimes you folks point them out overtly, or I add clarifications because of your questions.
Sometimes after I fix something I will delete the suggestions you make, not because they are offensive, but because it keeps the comments clean and meaningful. (For example, spelling errors.)
As long as the questions and comments are polite and constructive, they are welcome.
Keep the comments coming; the end product is better when you interact with it.
"Blame"
Those of you who are following my work have probably noticed by now that I do not blame Republicans or Democrats for the mess we are in. I blame BOTH parties. BOTH are complicit in enabling and sustaining election systems that are undermining the integrity of our elections.
The government establishment is our enemy, affectionately referred to as the "swamp," or "RINOs," because once an institution is in place, it no longer serves its original purpose... it seeks to sustain itself.
This is why our founders were so wise... they understood that "We the People" needed to be the government, not an institution.
My favorite example of this is that we could pay someone else to raise our children, but the result is far better if we do it with our own hands. The results are far better because we take the proper care on such important matters.
Let's run our elections with our own hands.
Let's run our country with our own hands.
Those of you who are following my work have probably noticed by now that I do not blame Republicans or Democrats for the mess we are in. I blame BOTH parties. BOTH are complicit in enabling and sustaining election systems that are undermining the integrity of our elections.
The government establishment is our enemy, affectionately referred to as the "swamp," or "RINOs," because once an institution is in place, it no longer serves its original purpose... it seeks to sustain itself.
This is why our founders were so wise... they understood that "We the People" needed to be the government, not an institution.
My favorite example of this is that we could pay someone else to raise our children, but the result is far better if we do it with our own hands. The results are far better because we take the proper care on such important matters.
Let's run our elections with our own hands.
Let's run our country with our own hands.
During the Wisconsin hearing last week, the CTCL was implicated in a massive ballot-harvesting operation.
https://lindelltv.com/your-wake-up-call-help-save-our-country-share-this-everywhere/
https://lindelltv.com/your-wake-up-call-help-save-our-country-share-this-everywhere/
In my early studies of PA, we noticed that large numbers of people were added to the voter rolls around 1996. Later, in the early 2000's, these 'voters' started voting.
Looks like a similar narrative applies to Ohio, only the 'voters' were added more gradually (still at a much faster rate than the population growth).
Interestingly, Democrats sued in 2004 for election fraud. I can see why... that's when the stuffing started. The sudden 10% jump in ballots cast is similar to the number of phantom voters I predict in most states.
By the way, Ohio had 57% mail-in ballots in November, 2020. Yet the SoS calls it the most secure election in our history.
If you want a secure election, it needs to be one day, in-person, with paper poll books and no one knows anything until the polls close.
Looks like a similar narrative applies to Ohio, only the 'voters' were added more gradually (still at a much faster rate than the population growth).
Interestingly, Democrats sued in 2004 for election fraud. I can see why... that's when the stuffing started. The sudden 10% jump in ballots cast is similar to the number of phantom voters I predict in most states.
By the way, Ohio had 57% mail-in ballots in November, 2020. Yet the SoS calls it the most secure election in our history.
If you want a secure election, it needs to be one day, in-person, with paper poll books and no one knows anything until the polls close.
👍1
"US Postal Service"
You do know that the USPS scans every piece of mail it receives? So they have a record of every mail-in ballot.
But worse, they know ahead of time WHO has ordered a ballot, and who has returned their ballot by mail.
The Wisconsin testimony last week exposed the fact that the USPS database was being used in conjunction with the large ballot-harvesting operation in Milwaukee.
The corruption runs deep, my friends.
You do know that the USPS scans every piece of mail it receives? So they have a record of every mail-in ballot.
But worse, they know ahead of time WHO has ordered a ballot, and who has returned their ballot by mail.
The Wisconsin testimony last week exposed the fact that the USPS database was being used in conjunction with the large ballot-harvesting operation in Milwaukee.
The corruption runs deep, my friends.
"Vote Amish"
I've been using the simple phrase "Vote Amish" to suggest that we should vote all paper, no machines. This includes centralized electronic databases and scanners.
People ask, "How can we fix this?"
We have to go primitive. Which also happens to be the state of the art.
This approach does not stop voter fraud... we will always have that. But it does disable the *widespread* voter fraud that is enabled by our current electronic approaches.
And if people are engaged in their own elections we should be able to keep it to a minimum, and to prosecute the offenders with citizen witnesses instead of IT professionals.
I've been using the simple phrase "Vote Amish" to suggest that we should vote all paper, no machines. This includes centralized electronic databases and scanners.
People ask, "How can we fix this?"
We have to go primitive. Which also happens to be the state of the art.
This approach does not stop voter fraud... we will always have that. But it does disable the *widespread* voter fraud that is enabled by our current electronic approaches.
And if people are engaged in their own elections we should be able to keep it to a minimum, and to prosecute the offenders with citizen witnesses instead of IT professionals.
"Legislation"
I understand what is going on. To a carpenter with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Legislators see voter fraud, so they do what legislators do... they pass legislation.
But laws don't stop criminals. More gun laws won't stop gun violence, and more election legislation won't stop voter fraud.
What our legislators need is *us.* They need us to demand that the machines gotta go, and we need to return to paper.
Find out who your good legislators are, and get behind them. There are a few really good ones in just about every state, but they need you to enable them.
I understand what is going on. To a carpenter with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Legislators see voter fraud, so they do what legislators do... they pass legislation.
But laws don't stop criminals. More gun laws won't stop gun violence, and more election legislation won't stop voter fraud.
What our legislators need is *us.* They need us to demand that the machines gotta go, and we need to return to paper.
Find out who your good legislators are, and get behind them. There are a few really good ones in just about every state, but they need you to enable them.
"Confirmation"
I love it when I receive an email that goes something like this:
"Dr Frank, I've downloaded the registration rolls for my state and performed the analysis you've described in your talks. I'm having a bit of trouble with xxxx, can you look at my spreadsheet and tell me what I am missing?"
Or, like this:
"Dr Frank, I've downloaded the registration rolls for my state and performed the analysis you've described in your talks. The polynomial is there, just like you predicted. I'd like to add the 2019 population data to my graphs as well. Where did you get it?"
Or, like this:
"Dr Frank, I work for xxxx [businesses and government agencies] and I don't want anyone to know that I did this work, or I will lose my job. But here is my complete analysis of my state, along with the source data. It confirms precisely what you said it would. Use it as you will, just keep me out of it!"
There are about a dozen or so people around the country (that I know of) that have reproduced the county level Registration Key analysis for their state.
Math is math. 2 + 2 = 4. It doesn't matter who does it.
My work has been reproduced by many folks. If you don't believe it, try it yourself! Get the data for a single county in your state and get to work. Then send me your work at DrDouglasGFrank@outlook.com. I'll even give you a shout-out if you want it.
I love it when I receive an email that goes something like this:
"Dr Frank, I've downloaded the registration rolls for my state and performed the analysis you've described in your talks. I'm having a bit of trouble with xxxx, can you look at my spreadsheet and tell me what I am missing?"
Or, like this:
"Dr Frank, I've downloaded the registration rolls for my state and performed the analysis you've described in your talks. The polynomial is there, just like you predicted. I'd like to add the 2019 population data to my graphs as well. Where did you get it?"
Or, like this:
"Dr Frank, I work for xxxx [businesses and government agencies] and I don't want anyone to know that I did this work, or I will lose my job. But here is my complete analysis of my state, along with the source data. It confirms precisely what you said it would. Use it as you will, just keep me out of it!"
There are about a dozen or so people around the country (that I know of) that have reproduced the county level Registration Key analysis for their state.
Math is math. 2 + 2 = 4. It doesn't matter who does it.
My work has been reproduced by many folks. If you don't believe it, try it yourself! Get the data for a single county in your state and get to work. Then send me your work at DrDouglasGFrank@outlook.com. I'll even give you a shout-out if you want it.
I checked out a discussion of my work on another page, expecting to find some substantial criticisms of my work. Instead, it was a waste of my time. The same tired objections from people who don’t understand what I am doing.
I welcome genuine criticism of my work, but in order to understand it and participate meaningfully you will need to do some work. I suggest downloading a small Ohio county (free on the SoS website), and attempting to reproduce the graphs I’ve posted on Rumble. As you do this work, you will learn and understand what is going on.
I’ve described it plenty. But it’s like eating chocolate; I can describe the experience all day long, but you need to taste it for yourself in order to understand.
I welcome genuine criticism of my work, but in order to understand it and participate meaningfully you will need to do some work. I suggest downloading a small Ohio county (free on the SoS website), and attempting to reproduce the graphs I’ve posted on Rumble. As you do this work, you will learn and understand what is going on.
I’ve described it plenty. But it’s like eating chocolate; I can describe the experience all day long, but you need to taste it for yourself in order to understand.
👍1
“Reconciliation”
There are some key take-always from my analyses of state elections and voter rolls.
1) The numbers in the voter rolls do not reconcile with the official state reports, 10% errors are common;
2) The numbers in the voter rolls are manipulated by computer algorithms, making them highly predictable;
3) The voter rolls are not static; they are continuously in flux. Since election officials typically do not regularly back these up (archived snapshots) it provides a fertile environment for hiding election fraud;
4) To expose this situation, I typically ask election officials to provide a list of everyone who voted in the November 2020 election. It is shocking (and illegal) that our officials are incapable of answering this most basic of questions;
5) Voter registration rolls typically grow faster than the population growth, and county records in many states move synchronously, demonstrating that they are being centrally manipulated;
6) Since the databases are continuously in flux, one person’s analysis may differ than someone else’s because they are starting from different source data. This does not invalidate a particular analysis... in fact, it exposes a major flaw in the system.
How simple it would be to simply have a paper poll book... with one page per person. The problem with this is that politicians would have less access to the voter rolls, and cheaters would have less ability to cheat.
Wait... isn’t that what we want?
There are some key take-always from my analyses of state elections and voter rolls.
1) The numbers in the voter rolls do not reconcile with the official state reports, 10% errors are common;
2) The numbers in the voter rolls are manipulated by computer algorithms, making them highly predictable;
3) The voter rolls are not static; they are continuously in flux. Since election officials typically do not regularly back these up (archived snapshots) it provides a fertile environment for hiding election fraud;
4) To expose this situation, I typically ask election officials to provide a list of everyone who voted in the November 2020 election. It is shocking (and illegal) that our officials are incapable of answering this most basic of questions;
5) Voter registration rolls typically grow faster than the population growth, and county records in many states move synchronously, demonstrating that they are being centrally manipulated;
6) Since the databases are continuously in flux, one person’s analysis may differ than someone else’s because they are starting from different source data. This does not invalidate a particular analysis... in fact, it exposes a major flaw in the system.
How simple it would be to simply have a paper poll book... with one page per person. The problem with this is that politicians would have less access to the voter rolls, and cheaters would have less ability to cheat.
Wait... isn’t that what we want?
“Baby Steps”
I’ve been posting about our elections for about a year now. People that have been following me the whole time have had the opportunity to learn incrementally. People that are new to the concepts often find the amount of data and analyses overwhelming.
Newcomers who want to understand are going to have to do their homework in order to catch up, probably here and on my MeWe channel (same name), because my Facebook and YouTube pages have been censored.
It’s simply too much to repost everything, but I’ve reposted some critical pieces on the “DrFrank” Rumble channel. There is also a lot posted on this channel, and there are dozens of my talks posted all over the web.
People tend to be lazy, and they want everything handed to them on a silver platter. Well, sorry. Some concepts require work to understand; and you have to earn your understanding.
We’ve conditioned entire generations of people into thinking that they can just “google” things to learn. Well, this is simply not true. Profound, deep learning, requires discipline and effort.
As a scientist, I’ve learned that the most amazing concepts in the universe are not digestible and appreciated without effort. The same for theology and apologetics.
The diluted pablum you get on the Discovery channel, for instance, borders on professional malpractice. You are presented with cheap substitutes for the real thing... because they are easy and quick to understand. But the presentations are often misleading, intellectually deficient, and incorrect.
I am reminded of what the Apostle Paul wrote in Hebrews, chapter 5:
“11 About this we have much to say, and it is hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing. 12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the basic principles of the oracles of God. You need milk, not solid food, 13 for everyone who lives on milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, since he is a child. 14 But solid food is for the mature, for those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil.”
I’ve been posting about our elections for about a year now. People that have been following me the whole time have had the opportunity to learn incrementally. People that are new to the concepts often find the amount of data and analyses overwhelming.
Newcomers who want to understand are going to have to do their homework in order to catch up, probably here and on my MeWe channel (same name), because my Facebook and YouTube pages have been censored.
It’s simply too much to repost everything, but I’ve reposted some critical pieces on the “DrFrank” Rumble channel. There is also a lot posted on this channel, and there are dozens of my talks posted all over the web.
People tend to be lazy, and they want everything handed to them on a silver platter. Well, sorry. Some concepts require work to understand; and you have to earn your understanding.
We’ve conditioned entire generations of people into thinking that they can just “google” things to learn. Well, this is simply not true. Profound, deep learning, requires discipline and effort.
As a scientist, I’ve learned that the most amazing concepts in the universe are not digestible and appreciated without effort. The same for theology and apologetics.
The diluted pablum you get on the Discovery channel, for instance, borders on professional malpractice. You are presented with cheap substitutes for the real thing... because they are easy and quick to understand. But the presentations are often misleading, intellectually deficient, and incorrect.
I am reminded of what the Apostle Paul wrote in Hebrews, chapter 5:
“11 About this we have much to say, and it is hard to explain, since you have become dull of hearing. 12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the basic principles of the oracles of God. You need milk, not solid food, 13 for everyone who lives on milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, since he is a child. 14 But solid food is for the mature, for those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil.”