You might also need to search “Dr Frank.”
https://rumble.com/vjwotb-digital-talks-to-dr-frank-july-12-2021.html
https://rumble.com/vjwotb-digital-talks-to-dr-frank-july-12-2021.html
Rumble
Digital talks to Dr Frank July 12, 2021
Digital and Dr Frank talk about the 2020 election; what happened, where we are now, and where we go from here. Website: www.digital1776.com Digital's Telegram: https://news.1rj.ru/str/Digital1776Chat Digital's T
“Censorship”
During covid in 2020 and the first half of 2021, I had large followings on Facebook and YouTube.
After the third time Facebook shut down a large page (over 50k followers) I gave up and started new pages on MeWe, Parker, Gab, Twitter, and here.
Telegram seems to be the most effective these days.
It is sad to me that we have to work so hard to “pierce the media.”
During covid in 2020 and the first half of 2021, I had large followings on Facebook and YouTube.
After the third time Facebook shut down a large page (over 50k followers) I gave up and started new pages on MeWe, Parker, Gab, Twitter, and here.
Telegram seems to be the most effective these days.
It is sad to me that we have to work so hard to “pierce the media.”
“Drama”
My awesome admin Ally (AAA) posted something about me today that bears repeating:
“This is Ally Rose... [Dr Frank] does not engage in petty games or silly antics. He is well respected among all Patriots... He likes to focus on the work and that is why I love working for him... No drama.”
My motto is “Follow the Data,” because the data speak for themselves. My job is to gather and explore it, and then present it in ways that people can understand so that they can act upon it. I am working to equip the patriots.
All the infighting just detracts from the goal.
I liken it to a real war (because it is). I imagine that I am a commander behind the lines, and soldiers in a front line foxhole are having a squabble. We don’t have time for their silliness.
We cannot abide traitors in the foxholes. All our weapons need to be directed toward the enemy. In wartime, traitors are quickly tried and summarily executed.
We also cannot afford the situation where well-intentioned soldiers are unintentionally dropping hand grenades. They need to be rearmed with a broom and sent back home.
Thus, I try to stay focused on my work, and try to ignore the drama.
I stand with all patriots.
My awesome admin Ally (AAA) posted something about me today that bears repeating:
“This is Ally Rose... [Dr Frank] does not engage in petty games or silly antics. He is well respected among all Patriots... He likes to focus on the work and that is why I love working for him... No drama.”
My motto is “Follow the Data,” because the data speak for themselves. My job is to gather and explore it, and then present it in ways that people can understand so that they can act upon it. I am working to equip the patriots.
All the infighting just detracts from the goal.
I liken it to a real war (because it is). I imagine that I am a commander behind the lines, and soldiers in a front line foxhole are having a squabble. We don’t have time for their silliness.
We cannot abide traitors in the foxholes. All our weapons need to be directed toward the enemy. In wartime, traitors are quickly tried and summarily executed.
We also cannot afford the situation where well-intentioned soldiers are unintentionally dropping hand grenades. They need to be rearmed with a broom and sent back home.
Thus, I try to stay focused on my work, and try to ignore the drama.
I stand with all patriots.
👍2
“Infiltration”
While I do my best to avoid the ‘drama,’ it is evident that we do have enemy infiltrators in the ranks. We also have soldiers who are in the battle for reasons other than altruistic.
I tolerate soldiers who are mercenaries in our fight (for now), because their weapons are pointed in the right direction.
I also tolerate soldiers who have different world views, so long as they stay focused on the tasks at hand, and don’t allow their differences to interfere with our progress.
The challenge we face is that most of our groups are grassroots and volunteer. It’s not like we can just discharge soldiers from the service.
So my approach is to empower and support those that are moving the effort forward, ignore the drama, and call out the traitors. Most of the time I don’t need to say anything; if you give traitors enough rope they will hang themselves.
Occasionally I need to address issues to clear up misunderstandings. Like last night with Tore. She was not getting the straight scoop from her followers. A phone call resolved the matter.
Social media is not the place to clean up such matters... it just promotes drama. Matthew 18 provides a good model... go directly to the person first. Only if they refuse to address your concerns do you take it to a public level.
Yes, we have infiltrators, and stirring up drama is one of their main weapons. Don’t empower them.
While I do my best to avoid the ‘drama,’ it is evident that we do have enemy infiltrators in the ranks. We also have soldiers who are in the battle for reasons other than altruistic.
I tolerate soldiers who are mercenaries in our fight (for now), because their weapons are pointed in the right direction.
I also tolerate soldiers who have different world views, so long as they stay focused on the tasks at hand, and don’t allow their differences to interfere with our progress.
The challenge we face is that most of our groups are grassroots and volunteer. It’s not like we can just discharge soldiers from the service.
So my approach is to empower and support those that are moving the effort forward, ignore the drama, and call out the traitors. Most of the time I don’t need to say anything; if you give traitors enough rope they will hang themselves.
Occasionally I need to address issues to clear up misunderstandings. Like last night with Tore. She was not getting the straight scoop from her followers. A phone call resolved the matter.
Social media is not the place to clean up such matters... it just promotes drama. Matthew 18 provides a good model... go directly to the person first. Only if they refuse to address your concerns do you take it to a public level.
Yes, we have infiltrators, and stirring up drama is one of their main weapons. Don’t empower them.
“Dr Frank”
Some people think my first name is “Frank.” Been dealing with this all my life... having two first names.
My first name is “Douglas,” which means “from the black lagoon.”
My middle name is “Geauwanna,” which is Cherokee for “big black horse.”
My last name is “Frank,” which means “free man.”
I mostly go by “Dr Frank,” since that’s what my students have been calling me affectionately and respectfully for decades, and because it has become my national and social media shtick. Along with the bow tie...
I also like “Dr Frank,” because of the affectionate way that Marty referred to “Doc Brown” in Back to the Future.
Names are powerful things, and they tell a story. Call me what you like, just don’t call me “late for dinner.”
Some people think my first name is “Frank.” Been dealing with this all my life... having two first names.
My first name is “Douglas,” which means “from the black lagoon.”
My middle name is “Geauwanna,” which is Cherokee for “big black horse.”
My last name is “Frank,” which means “free man.”
I mostly go by “Dr Frank,” since that’s what my students have been calling me affectionately and respectfully for decades, and because it has become my national and social media shtick. Along with the bow tie...
I also like “Dr Frank,” because of the affectionate way that Marty referred to “Doc Brown” in Back to the Future.
Names are powerful things, and they tell a story. Call me what you like, just don’t call me “late for dinner.”
👍1
“Traitors”
Hillary was livid and would not concede in 2016 when the election was insufficiently rigged. Our white-hat hackers blocked it just in time. They are heroes.
Afterwards, Democrats made lots of noise about it, even testifying before Congress that our election systems are readily hackable. They were politically motivated.
President Trump (still) addressed the problem with our elections by executive order, establishing an advisory committee headed by Pence. Good idea, bad implementation. Pence is a traitor.
Democrats got quiet about it when they realized that the corrupt system could be used to remove the “bad orange man” from office. The Democrat party is the enemy of the people.
Our white-hats were busy in 2020 as well, but this time the bad guys were ready, and they simply unplugged the machines and reset them at the last minute. You can’t hack a machine when it’s been disconnected.
The Republican Party stood by and allowed it to happen. And now they continue to thwart efforts to fix 2020. The establishment Republican party is the enemy of the people, which is why they are opposing our current election reform efforts.
I’m surprised that the Bernie folks have not joined the effort. They’ve had two of their elections in a row stolen from them.
None of this is news, people have been shouting from the rooftops about election fraud for decades. But the citizens have been complacent, so our legal system and legislators have responded in kind. I have only recently become red-pilled.
I think the public is waking up to the fact that our election outcomes are being determined by whose hackers have the best access to the election systems at any given time. These are not free and fair elections. Is this the America we want? No.
But the courts and the legislatures will continue to remain obstinate until the people finally get loud enough.
The message is simple... all paper systems, all in-person, all transparent and auditable, and severe punishments for anyone involved in fraud.
Vote Amish... all paper, no machines.
Hillary was livid and would not concede in 2016 when the election was insufficiently rigged. Our white-hat hackers blocked it just in time. They are heroes.
Afterwards, Democrats made lots of noise about it, even testifying before Congress that our election systems are readily hackable. They were politically motivated.
President Trump (still) addressed the problem with our elections by executive order, establishing an advisory committee headed by Pence. Good idea, bad implementation. Pence is a traitor.
Democrats got quiet about it when they realized that the corrupt system could be used to remove the “bad orange man” from office. The Democrat party is the enemy of the people.
Our white-hats were busy in 2020 as well, but this time the bad guys were ready, and they simply unplugged the machines and reset them at the last minute. You can’t hack a machine when it’s been disconnected.
The Republican Party stood by and allowed it to happen. And now they continue to thwart efforts to fix 2020. The establishment Republican party is the enemy of the people, which is why they are opposing our current election reform efforts.
I’m surprised that the Bernie folks have not joined the effort. They’ve had two of their elections in a row stolen from them.
None of this is news, people have been shouting from the rooftops about election fraud for decades. But the citizens have been complacent, so our legal system and legislators have responded in kind. I have only recently become red-pilled.
I think the public is waking up to the fact that our election outcomes are being determined by whose hackers have the best access to the election systems at any given time. These are not free and fair elections. Is this the America we want? No.
But the courts and the legislatures will continue to remain obstinate until the people finally get loud enough.
The message is simple... all paper systems, all in-person, all transparent and auditable, and severe punishments for anyone involved in fraud.
Vote Amish... all paper, no machines.
👍1
Interesting reading. I’ve been referring to this law lately because we seem to have forgotten it. I hear veterans refer to it often, because their buddies gave their lives for our freedom, so they don’t abide traitors.
Unless and until we begin enforcing our laws, and holding accountable those who are stealing our elections, we will continue in decline.
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@noscript18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim
Unless and until we begin enforcing our laws, and holding accountable those who are stealing our elections, we will continue in decline.
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@noscript18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim
Some advice from one of my favorite scientists...
"Let your discourse be more in queries and doubtings than peremptory assertions or disputings."
Asking the right question is an art, especially when you are trying to expose something.
For example, after assuring an election official that I am not their enemy, I like asking them a simple question:
"Can you provide me a list of everyone who voted in the November 2020 election?"
The question is simple, the response is not.
And it leads to a natural progression of questions and answers that exposes the fraud that is taking place in our elections.
Notice... questions, not accusations.
"Let your discourse be more in queries and doubtings than peremptory assertions or disputings."
Asking the right question is an art, especially when you are trying to expose something.
For example, after assuring an election official that I am not their enemy, I like asking them a simple question:
"Can you provide me a list of everyone who voted in the November 2020 election?"
The question is simple, the response is not.
And it leads to a natural progression of questions and answers that exposes the fraud that is taking place in our elections.
Notice... questions, not accusations.
👍1
"Virtue Signaling"
Some people object to my including noscripture in my posts, or when I share my faith. "Just the facts, ma'am!" Is the plea. They think I am "virtue signaling."
Nope.
The reason I include such things is to provide context for my thoughts. You will understand what I am saying better when you know why I am thinking what I am. If the process of my thoughts is transparent, then you will understand my conclusions better. Since my faith and noscripture are integral to who I am (i.e. world view), noscripture passages naturally underpin much of my thinking.
For example, during internal conflicts (like now) I remember Matthew chapter 18. So I referred to it recently when cleaning up a misunderstanding.
During Advent and Christmas, my mind is full of passages from Isaiah, John, Luke, and Philippians. So I recently quoted a passage from Philippians.
When discussing scientific topics, I often bring up the words of the scientists who introduced us to the topics at hand. You can understand their science better if you know what they were thinking.
Some people object to my including noscripture in my posts, or when I share my faith. "Just the facts, ma'am!" Is the plea. They think I am "virtue signaling."
Nope.
The reason I include such things is to provide context for my thoughts. You will understand what I am saying better when you know why I am thinking what I am. If the process of my thoughts is transparent, then you will understand my conclusions better. Since my faith and noscripture are integral to who I am (i.e. world view), noscripture passages naturally underpin much of my thinking.
For example, during internal conflicts (like now) I remember Matthew chapter 18. So I referred to it recently when cleaning up a misunderstanding.
During Advent and Christmas, my mind is full of passages from Isaiah, John, Luke, and Philippians. So I recently quoted a passage from Philippians.
When discussing scientific topics, I often bring up the words of the scientists who introduced us to the topics at hand. You can understand their science better if you know what they were thinking.
"The Power of Ideas"
I needed a break today from calculating, so I've been reading portions of Sir Isaac Newton's Principia. He wrote something that helped me understand myself and what I have been doing for the last year more clearly. Here is what he wrote:
"Geometry does not teach us to draw lines, but requires them to be drawn, for it requires that the learner should first be taught to describe these accurately before he enters upon geometry, then it shows how by these operations problems may be solved."
My approach to election reform has been first to explain the principles of what has happened to us as a nation, because once we truly understand the principles, the solutions become obvious and we are able to solve the problem of election fraud, applying the general principles we have learned.
I am a teacher. It is in my nature. Ideas compel me.
I love the notion that understanding what a line is demands that we attempt to draw one, albeit an imperfect one.
I believe that if enough of us truly understand what has happened to our elections, we will be compelled to address the issue.
My rose-colored glasses.
I needed a break today from calculating, so I've been reading portions of Sir Isaac Newton's Principia. He wrote something that helped me understand myself and what I have been doing for the last year more clearly. Here is what he wrote:
"Geometry does not teach us to draw lines, but requires them to be drawn, for it requires that the learner should first be taught to describe these accurately before he enters upon geometry, then it shows how by these operations problems may be solved."
My approach to election reform has been first to explain the principles of what has happened to us as a nation, because once we truly understand the principles, the solutions become obvious and we are able to solve the problem of election fraud, applying the general principles we have learned.
I am a teacher. It is in my nature. Ideas compel me.
I love the notion that understanding what a line is demands that we attempt to draw one, albeit an imperfect one.
I believe that if enough of us truly understand what has happened to our elections, we will be compelled to address the issue.
My rose-colored glasses.
"Anthrax"
I've been getting several calls expressing concern for my health.
Tired, but fine.
But always pleased to have your prayers!
Regarding prayer, I like the way CS Lewis discusses it. Since God already knows what we need and what we are going to pray about, the real purpose of prayer is to meditate on God, be open to the Holy Spirit, and to align our hearts and minds with His perfect will.
O Lord, hear our prayer!
I've been getting several calls expressing concern for my health.
Tired, but fine.
But always pleased to have your prayers!
Regarding prayer, I like the way CS Lewis discusses it. Since God already knows what we need and what we are going to pray about, the real purpose of prayer is to meditate on God, be open to the Holy Spirit, and to align our hearts and minds with His perfect will.
O Lord, hear our prayer!
👍3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It's been a year since I updated this graph. I show it sorted in two different ways. First, alphabetically, and then in decreasing total number of deaths.
The initial infection, the main wave, and then the subsequent wave a year later (smaller, in front), are clearly seen.
As is typical for viruses, they mutate themselves out of relevancy.
This is not what politics does, however.
Science and politics do not play well together.
The initial infection, the main wave, and then the subsequent wave a year later (smaller, in front), are clearly seen.
As is typical for viruses, they mutate themselves out of relevancy.
This is not what politics does, however.
Science and politics do not play well together.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I appreciate a good data visualization...
"Washington Post"
There's a new hit piece out there on me and Mike Lindell. It contains several errors and important misrepresentations. I've sent Ms Brown some suggestions. I'm hoping that she fixes the article. I've been giving her the benefit of the doubt so far, because so far she has repaired every mistake I have shown her.
If she fixes her piece, then she is proving that she cares about the truth. If she doesn't fix it, then she proves to everyone that she is merely a mercenary.
I don't mind someone having a different point of view and expressing it clearly. I don't even mind an editorial spin. This is America, and I relish differences of opinion. But I strongly object to MY views being misrepresented.
And I am a decent communicator, so if someone is misrepresenting me, even after attempts at clarification, then they are either dull or they are lying. I can forgive dull, but not deliberate deception.
There's a new hit piece out there on me and Mike Lindell. It contains several errors and important misrepresentations. I've sent Ms Brown some suggestions. I'm hoping that she fixes the article. I've been giving her the benefit of the doubt so far, because so far she has repaired every mistake I have shown her.
If she fixes her piece, then she is proving that she cares about the truth. If she doesn't fix it, then she proves to everyone that she is merely a mercenary.
I don't mind someone having a different point of view and expressing it clearly. I don't even mind an editorial spin. This is America, and I relish differences of opinion. But I strongly object to MY views being misrepresented.
And I am a decent communicator, so if someone is misrepresenting me, even after attempts at clarification, then they are either dull or they are lying. I can forgive dull, but not deliberate deception.
"Warning vs Threat"
If you are driving sixty miles per hour toward a brick wall, and I say, "You'd better change course, or you will die. I am warning you." This is not a threat, it is a warning. I am not suggesting that I am going to do anything to harm you. Rather, you are about to harm yourself. And if my intentions are good, I might even recommend a safer course.
In my meeting with the Secretary of State of Ohio, I warned him that there were imminent election fraud cases that were going to be popping up all over the country that would expose the type of election fraud that took place in Ohio. I also offered them help, because if they did not engage an election reform effort, and kept insisting that the Ohio election was clean, that the fraud would become exposed in Ohio and they would have egg on their faces.
But they prefer to continue speeding toward the wall.
Gonna be scrambled eggs.
If you are driving sixty miles per hour toward a brick wall, and I say, "You'd better change course, or you will die. I am warning you." This is not a threat, it is a warning. I am not suggesting that I am going to do anything to harm you. Rather, you are about to harm yourself. And if my intentions are good, I might even recommend a safer course.
In my meeting with the Secretary of State of Ohio, I warned him that there were imminent election fraud cases that were going to be popping up all over the country that would expose the type of election fraud that took place in Ohio. I also offered them help, because if they did not engage an election reform effort, and kept insisting that the Ohio election was clean, that the fraud would become exposed in Ohio and they would have egg on their faces.
But they prefer to continue speeding toward the wall.
Gonna be scrambled eggs.
👍3🔥1
"Washington Post, II"
Ms Brown has already made some revisions to her Washington Post article in response to my suggestions and corrections. There were some factual errors and some egregious errors.
That's a good sign, but there are still some issues. I sent her some suggestions.
She is ennoscriptd to her opinion, but it is not OK to misrepresent mine.
Ms Brown has already made some revisions to her Washington Post article in response to my suggestions and corrections. There were some factual errors and some egregious errors.
That's a good sign, but there are still some issues. I sent her some suggestions.
She is ennoscriptd to her opinion, but it is not OK to misrepresent mine.
states-v-us-and-states-compl-2021-11-23.pdf
512.8 KB
"Supreme Court Complaint"
You owe it to yourself to have a copy of this complaint (an older version). Kurt Olsen did a masterful job.
Anyone who says that there is no evidence of election fraud is either lying or misinformed.
You owe it to yourself to have a copy of this complaint (an older version). Kurt Olsen did a masterful job.
Anyone who says that there is no evidence of election fraud is either lying or misinformed.