Let them keep their dumb machines.

Instead of fighting that battle, make sure that every person on the voter roll is a real person, who really lives at a real address, and make sure every ballot you have really came from who it says it came from.

Then, hand tally the ballots.

The machines can confirm the count afterward, no big deal.

Then, report the numbers upstream, and verify that the correct numbers were received and that the total counts are right.

Make sure to audit the precinct numbers all the way to the final numbers.

I really like Lindell's argument.

He says if someone accused him of having foreign objects inside his pillows, he would simply open them up and show them the lovely patented fill. Go ahead. Ask him. He'll do it.

If someone suspects that the voting machines have capabilities they aren't supposed to have, all you have to do is take the lid off and let people look. But they won't let you. Hmmmm.

If your Board of Elections isn't willing to do a hand-count election, and insists upon using machines instead, even suing the county commissions to buy new ones, despite county commissioners who have voted unanimously not to use the machines, then I have to wonder if the Board of Elections members have an agenda different than holding a fair election.

People often ask me which software platform I am using to analyze large sets of data. The answer is none. I write my own.

There are good reasons for this.

First, I love immersing myself in the data.

Second, I love immersing myself in the data.

Third, I love immersing myself in the data.

Because when you use someone else’s software, you are allowing their thinking to guide yours.

I call it “poisoning” my creativity. I take pains to protect myself from influences that distract me from Following The Data!

Note, that I discovered something others have overlooked, because I did not use the standard tools that are available.

I said, “Give me the raw data.”

And then, I let them teach me what to think about them.

I said in “Scientific Proof” that the algorithms need access to the databases *after* the election.

This is not hypothetical.

We have piles of forensic evidence showing tens of thousands of phantom voters being removed from the registration rolls *after* the election.

We also have piles of forensic evidence showing tens of thousands of phantom voters being added *before* and *during* the election.

So all you folks out there who have begun downloading state voting records (way to go, patriots!) need to keep in mind that what you are currently downloading is not what was being used last November.

It is normal for the rolls to change about 1% per month. People expire, and people move. Also, there are rules concerning who is supposed to be automatically removed due to inactivity.

Interestingly, some entities fight against rules that serve to clean the voter rolls. Hmmmm....

Some lessons Dr Frank learned (and re-learned) in 2020:

1) God’s timing is best.
2) Too many of our legislators are spineless eunuchs. We need to replace them.
3) Politicians think differently than the rest of us. They don’t ask, “What is the *right* thing to do?” Instead, “How can I use the situation to my advantage.” And, “What do I think is *possible* to do?” Too little morality, and too little vision.
4) Politicians don’t start parades, they join them.
5) Government doesn’t fix systems, because incompetence and inefficiency empowers it.
6) The judicial branch is deeply corrupted by the legislative branch.
7) Too many of our citizens have become fat and complacent.
8: Our elections were an illusion.
9) God’s timing is best.
10) God’s timing is best.
11) ibid...

I want to acknowledge something publicly. I am not working in a vacuum.

I am a member of several teams of people working in several states, mostly behind the scenes. Without them, I would not know and understand much of what I have learned.

When they are ready to be publicly acknowledged, they will come out. Until then, I am protecting their identities.

Because there are people out there playing this game for keeps.

One of my secret weapons, I affectionately refer to as my “supermoms.”

They admin my pages, nag me when I post something I shouldn’t, encourage me when I’m tired, pray for me constantly, scour the public discussion for me, and tolerate my ramblings while I think through stuff.

“Dr Frank” is not just one guy. He is empowered by a team of patriots and the Spirit if God.

In Mike Lindell’s upcoming sequel, “Absolute Interference,” he reveals more data which confirm the claims in his earlier documentaries, “Absolute Proof” (150 million views), and “Scientific Proof” ( 🙂, already millions of views).

In Absolute Interference, there are some serious whistleblowers. Their identities are being kept private until they are called to testify in court. These whistleblowers know what happened because they are on the inside. I spent several hours with these folks, and have seen some of their evidence with my own eyes. For now, ‘nuff said.

Lindell’s strategy is to make sure that others on the inside know that he knows who they are, and what they have done. And when they see the sequel, they will realize that he’s got the goods.

Lindell is not shy about this strategy, and he has been publicly encouraging whistleblowers to come forth now so that they might gain some leniency later.

So when you watch the sequel, keep in mind that some of the material is not aimed at the general public. It’s not all “proof.” Some of it is “lookie here what we know...”

Lindell is a generous guy. And I have personally witnessed how he is protecting his whistleblowers. Something tells me that there are going to more...

I appreciate the energy and intentions of those who are doing paper recount audits. They know something is up, and they are trying to discover anomalies. It is possible that they will find some things.

But experience teaches me that such efforts seldom lead to a productive end. Instead, they should be finding a download of the voter registration database (including voting record), dated soon after the November election.

You can download the current database in many states, but it doesn't tell you everything you need to know, because the database is dynamic; it changes about 1% per month.

And it changes even more in states where they need to clean up the mess they made in October and November.

Some people object to vaccinations for religious reasons. If they are then discriminated against for not being vaccinated, isn't that the same as religious discrimination?

From my perspective, it feels like the country is unraveling. It is kind of unnerving. Please keep me in your prayers. And pray for our country.

Keeping a level head. I wonder if this is how David felt when he was facing Goliath?

The grassfire has begun. The bonfires are coming. Patriots are emerging everywhere.

We are taking our country back.

One of my former pastors was also a chaplain, whose weekly routine included rounds at the hospital. Pastor Bob.

One day, Pastor Bob entered a hospital room where a little girl with Down Syndrome was recovering. As he leaned over the bed to pray for her, the cross hanging around his neck swung out toward her.

Suddenly, she reached up and grabbed the cross, trapping him close to her, and face to face.

She looked at him directly in the eyes and said softly, “God.”

“That’s right, little girl.” He answered, smiling.

Then, looking him straight in the eyes she said, “God died.”

Pastor Bob says, “This little girl is the most profound theologian he’s ever met in his life.”

The Good News of Jesus Christ is amazingly profound, but can be expressed clearly in just a few words...

God knew you, and loved you, before He created the universe.
God gave up His divine attributes for a short time to become human, to walk among us, and to show us the way.
God died an excruciating death in our stead in order to redeem us. But He was innocent, and we are not.
God raised Jesus Christ’s body from death, vanquishing death, and establishing that we might also have resurrected bodies one day.

What wondrous love is this, oh my soul.

What took me dozens of words to explain, this simple child explained in only three.

I'm going to be live on this program in 30 minutes.
worldviewradio.com/live

Woo Hoo! Run, Kathy, Run!

I absolutely LOVE this lady.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/04/06/black-republican-kathy-barnette-announces-run-senate-pennsylvania/

Oooh, baby. Finished my analysis of another state. Important one; spent night and day on it for almost a week. I will reveal after the EVIDENCE IS PRESENTED IN COURT, which is imminent.

Got 'em.

Because of my new found notoriety, patriots from all around the country are contacting me, and we've been collaborating.

From where I sit, the grassroots grassfire is taking off.

Have hope, my friends.

I don’t follow the media anymore. Instead, I follow the DATA.

Anyone in the media talking about this?

The DATA could be thought of this way: “The average global temperature in March was a bit lower than the average for the last forty years.”

Say you want to study the elections in a state. The Secretary of State takes you to a large room where all the materials from past elections are kept. He says, "Those boxes are the materials from 2002, those over there are from 2004, ..." and so on.
In other words, the election materials for each year are organized into piles by year, county, and precinct, making it straightforward to examine them.
Now imagine a different scenario. This time, when you enter the room you find twenty years worth of ballots all in one big pile in the center of the room.... shuffled.
When you download the election records from some states, they resemble the first scenario (e.g. OH, PA). Clearly, they are trying to keep the data organized and accessible.
But when you download election records from other states, they resemble the second scenario (e.g. FL, MI, NC). Clearly, these states are trying to *limit* the average person's ability to examine the data.
Some companies that sell and maintain election systems deliberately make the data difficult to view so that people will have to purchase their software. But since they write the software, they are also deciding how much access you have to the data, and in which ways it can be displayed.
Nearly every person I have spoken to who works in elections has never actually seen any of the data in these databases. Instead, nearly everyone uses the software provided by the companies that provide the election systems.
This explains why it has been so easy to hide the election manipulation, even from our election officials. Essentially, it takes a computer programmer and data analyst (like me) to even *look* at the data, because not only are the files shuffled, they are too large even to view with standard programs like Notepad and Excel.