At school today, one of my students asked a question I've heard a lot. She asked, "Dr Frank, why are you putting so much effort into analyzing the election? It's been five months already, all the evidence has been debunked, and you're not going to be able to flip the election."
Imagine that a murder has taken place. You're not going to be able to resurrect the murdered person. Does that mean you don't investigate? Of course not.
You need to investigate for a number of reasons, regardless of the consequences.
You need to know how the murder was committed in order to prevent future murders.
You'd like to discover who the murderer was so that you can put them in jail, and prevent them from attempting additional murders.
And you need the evidence to *actually* be presented in court, so that it can be legally investigated.
So far, despite what you hear in the media, very little of the evidence has actually been presented and scrutinized in a court of law.
Nearly all of the election cases were not taken up by the courts due a legal principle know as the "Political Doctrine," where judges view the problem as a legislative problem, not a legal one.
And they are correct. The problem with our elections is a legislative problem.
Our problem is that our legislators have different priorities that those of us in the general public. We want justice, good policy, and fair elections. Politicians typically seek power and advantage.
So, we citizens are the last resort. We have to decide whether we want to have fair elections or not, and demand that our legislatures address the core issues.
Politicians do not start parades, they join them. Citizens have to start the parade.
So the answer for my student is, "I am pursuing this so that the American public will understand that their elections are an illusion, and then demand reform. Also, to have the evidence presented and vindicated in court so that truth and justice can prevail. What happens after that is up to us as a nation to decide."

Here is the essence of the algorithm that is determining the outcome of our elections:

1) Over-registration. Gives a "credit-line" of voters who seldom, if ever, vote.
2) Decide how you want the election to turn out. (Including down-ballot races.)
3) Estimate what you think is going to happen.
4) Decide the demographics (key) and turnout you need to accomplish the prescribed outcome.
5) Inject phantom ballots into the system. Phantom ballots are produced in a variety of ways, including the printing of ballots.
6) Monitor the election status at all times. Who is voting, and who is not.
7) Monitor the ballot and vote tally at all times. Use the algorithm to adjust the turnout and the number of phantom ballots. Leading up to the election. Even the day of the election. Even after the day of the election.
8) Adjust the registration and voter databases as needed throughout to make things reconcile and so they can survive a post-election audit.
9) Clean up the databases afterward.
10) Get your election officials to tell everyone that the election was the "most secure election in our history."

By the way, I have hard forensic evidence for every one of these steps... and more.

Mr Lindell and I were having a great time together that day; hopefully you can see that in his "shrug," which is one of my favorite parts...

I'm going to be with Mr Lindell and the producers again in two weeks for the release of the sequel, "Absolute Interference." I haven't seen it yet, and don't know how much more of my interview with Mr Lindell will be included.

It's not Hollywood, and there won't be a red carpet... but it is certainly fun, and great to be with so many patriots.

https://youtu.be/LPigMBBhyrI

I just spoke to Joe Blystone, Ohio candidate for governor. Because of all the election shenanigans in 2020, someone looked up his voting record in the state database.

Turns out, his vote is not recorded. Nor is his wife's, nor his son's. Yet, they all voted together.

Joe is approaching the Sec'y of state to gain access to the poll book, where the signatures in the book will clearly confirm that he and his family voted.

People!

We are not having real elections... it is just an illusion.

How much longer are you willing to put up with this?

To be clear, don't invite me to your church or other event and expect me to wear a mask or be vaccinated. Ain't gonna happen.

I'm a scientist and a Christian. I follow the data and the science and what is taught in noscripture.

I am not about to support groups that oppose these.

It's sad, but kinda funny...

One of the states is objecting to my election analysis, claiming that I'm using the "wrong" data, and demanding to see it.

Funny thing is, it's their own data file. They just don't like me showing it to people. Especially right after the election, before they've had the opportunity to clean up the discrepancies. (Some counties are removing tens of thousands of voters after the election... far more than normal.)

Most of the states do not keep archives of their voter registration databases. It changes day by day, month by month, without permanent records of it.

This allows them to hide their shenanigans.

Fortunately for us, several patriots across the country were on to them, and were downloading copies of their databases in real time.

Got 'em.

I'm going to be interviewed on Mark Blazor's radio show today at 5:07
https://610wtvn.iheart.com/featured/mark-blazor/
Since I just posted the Ohio video (https://youtu.be/106b-tpWMdM), Mark is going to scoop everyone else in the state reporting it.
He deserves it. He's been tracking and reporting honestly on all sorts of issues.

My preliminary MI election analysis is now formally public, filed in a court of Law. I will post it on YouTube shortly with verbal explanation. It is devastating.

So now, when people say, "There is no legal evidence of election fraud." They are simply incorrect.

Legal. Court. Documents.

My analysis for Matt DePerno, in the nationally famous Antrim case.

Boom.

A few comments about the timing of the release of my election studies.
First, you need to understand that I have been aggressively doing these analyses since late December. As Mike Lindell said in the documentary, "Scientific Proof" (LindellTV.com), he could do ten hours of documentary on my work and still not cover it all. He is correct.
So why isn't it all out there already? The simple answer is legal, ethical, and strategic.
Some of my work is critically important to some legal proceedings, and cannot be officially released until it is formally entered into the legal record (e.g. Michigan today).
Some of it is ethical. I have made commitments to people who have retained my services to do certain work. They get to decide what appears when. I keep my word.
And some of it is strategic. We are in a battle to reclaim our country. Knowing that my work would soon become public, I have been working with several teams across the country to do the groundwork so that we have the data we need and the forces in place to capitalize on the bombshells as they are arriving, one at a time.
Because I am not working alone, but am part of a national effort, I also respect my team's efforts and will not undermine them.
I've done my best to tell you things along the way... leaving bread crumbs often enough so that you know that I am alive and well, and fighting on behalf of our country.
Often times it has been very hard for me to wait. Especially when I discover something remarkably important. But I believe in my soul that God has placed me precisely in this place at precisely this time.
And God knows the big picture. I'm doing my best to follow His timing, not mine.

Here is a quick review of the analysis Matt DePerno included in his Antrim, Michigan case today.

https://youtu.be/G9J7D2at9OI

Attention all troops!

Please view and "Like" this video. It summarizes my analysis of nine Michigan counties, and is now an official part of the Antrim County lawsuit being prosecuted by Matt DePerno.

This case is huge for the country because of the shenanigans in MI, and because DePerno has been granted subpoena authority to investigate election fraud in MI.

It is important that you "Like" and share this video because the cancel-culture out there is already busily trying to cancel it.

The nice thing is, it is just DATA. And as you know, following the DATA makes me very happy!

https://youtu.be/G9J7D2at9OI

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/huge-news-attorney-matthew-deperno-releases-michigan-elections-forensics-report-66194-unregistered-ballots-tallied-just-9-counties/?utm_source=Telegram&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons
HUGE NEWS: Attorney Matthew DePerno Releases Michigan Elections Forensics Report - 66,194 Unregistered Ballots Tallied in JUST 9 COUNTIES

Happy Saturday, everyone!

All is going well. Please don't be concerned if you hear criticisms of my MI work. They are to be expected.

The best thing to remember about is that my work is entirely based upon DATA. Their OWN data.

They just didn't expect us to notice, because they made it difficult to find.

Well, I found it.

And now that I've shown everyone else how to find it, things are gonna get interesting.

Of course, I have much, *much* more to share. But first, let's watch them try to wriggle their way out this first bombshell.

A simple clue that things are amiss is that when DePerno subpoenaed copies of the current registration rolls back in February, not only has the MI Secretary of State not complied with the subpoena, but she immediately took down the webpage feature that allows individuals to request it.

If there was nothing to hide, then why hide it? Especially since it is LEGALLY a public record.

And there is more... much more.

When playing poker, sometimes you make a "teaser bet" to get your opponent to make a larger bet that gets them "pot committed."

And they've already tipped their hand a couple times. We are way ahead.

"Blystone Update"

As I alerted you recently, an attempt to smear Joe Blystone has backfired. Because Joe's (and his wife and son) voting record was incorrect, he was accused of being a fraud, and not having voted in the November election.

Pretty sloppy journalism.

So Joe contacted the SoS, who has replied saying that it was a clerical error, and that they've now fixed it.

Riiiiight.

All three of them.

Anyway, I thought you would like to know that Joe Blystone is not a fraud after all. (Which you already knew, because I told you as much, and my word is good.)

A common question I am hearing about my analyses is, "Why do you average to find the key?"
There is a simple way to understand this.
Think of the fingerprint sensor on your phone. Notice that the phone asks you to take multiple fingerprints with the same finger. Why? Your fingerprint doesn't change.
But each time you do a fingerprint, there are small smudges and omissions. So by combining several of them you learn what the *actual* fingerprint is.
By averaging a few counties, I can learn what the *actual* key is.
In the case of the MI data I showed you all yesterday, I could have just used Macomb County (R = 1.000), the fingerprint was so good. But unless one looks at several fingerprints, how do you know if you have the actual one?

(btw, thanks to Sarah Centers for suggesting the phone aspect of this illustration.)

Gotta love those inflection points! (MI Summary Video)

I haven't seen this yet