A few comments about the timing of the release of my election studies.
First, you need to understand that I have been aggressively doing these analyses since late December. As Mike Lindell said in the documentary, "Scientific Proof" (LindellTV.com), he could do ten hours of documentary on my work and still not cover it all. He is correct.
So why isn't it all out there already? The simple answer is legal, ethical, and strategic.
Some of my work is critically important to some legal proceedings, and cannot be officially released until it is formally entered into the legal record (e.g. Michigan today).
Some of it is ethical. I have made commitments to people who have retained my services to do certain work. They get to decide what appears when. I keep my word.
And some of it is strategic. We are in a battle to reclaim our country. Knowing that my work would soon become public, I have been working with several teams across the country to do the groundwork so that we have the data we need and the forces in place to capitalize on the bombshells as they are arriving, one at a time.
Because I am not working alone, but am part of a national effort, I also respect my team's efforts and will not undermine them.
I've done my best to tell you things along the way... leaving bread crumbs often enough so that you know that I am alive and well, and fighting on behalf of our country.
Often times it has been very hard for me to wait. Especially when I discover something remarkably important. But I believe in my soul that God has placed me precisely in this place at precisely this time.
And God knows the big picture. I'm doing my best to follow His timing, not mine.
First, you need to understand that I have been aggressively doing these analyses since late December. As Mike Lindell said in the documentary, "Scientific Proof" (LindellTV.com), he could do ten hours of documentary on my work and still not cover it all. He is correct.
So why isn't it all out there already? The simple answer is legal, ethical, and strategic.
Some of my work is critically important to some legal proceedings, and cannot be officially released until it is formally entered into the legal record (e.g. Michigan today).
Some of it is ethical. I have made commitments to people who have retained my services to do certain work. They get to decide what appears when. I keep my word.
And some of it is strategic. We are in a battle to reclaim our country. Knowing that my work would soon become public, I have been working with several teams across the country to do the groundwork so that we have the data we need and the forces in place to capitalize on the bombshells as they are arriving, one at a time.
Because I am not working alone, but am part of a national effort, I also respect my team's efforts and will not undermine them.
I've done my best to tell you things along the way... leaving bread crumbs often enough so that you know that I am alive and well, and fighting on behalf of our country.
Often times it has been very hard for me to wait. Especially when I discover something remarkably important. But I believe in my soul that God has placed me precisely in this place at precisely this time.
And God knows the big picture. I'm doing my best to follow His timing, not mine.
Here is a quick review of the analysis Matt DePerno included in his Antrim, Michigan case today.
https://youtu.be/G9J7D2at9OI
https://youtu.be/G9J7D2at9OI
Attention all troops!
Please view and "Like" this video. It summarizes my analysis of nine Michigan counties, and is now an official part of the Antrim County lawsuit being prosecuted by Matt DePerno.
This case is huge for the country because of the shenanigans in MI, and because DePerno has been granted subpoena authority to investigate election fraud in MI.
It is important that you "Like" and share this video because the cancel-culture out there is already busily trying to cancel it.
The nice thing is, it is just DATA. And as you know, following the DATA makes me very happy!
https://youtu.be/G9J7D2at9OI
Please view and "Like" this video. It summarizes my analysis of nine Michigan counties, and is now an official part of the Antrim County lawsuit being prosecuted by Matt DePerno.
This case is huge for the country because of the shenanigans in MI, and because DePerno has been granted subpoena authority to investigate election fraud in MI.
It is important that you "Like" and share this video because the cancel-culture out there is already busily trying to cancel it.
The nice thing is, it is just DATA. And as you know, following the DATA makes me very happy!
https://youtu.be/G9J7D2at9OI
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/huge-news-attorney-matthew-deperno-releases-michigan-elections-forensics-report-66194-unregistered-ballots-tallied-just-9-counties/?utm_source=Telegram&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons
HUGE NEWS: Attorney Matthew DePerno Releases Michigan Elections Forensics Report - 66,194 Unregistered Ballots Tallied in JUST 9 COUNTIES
HUGE NEWS: Attorney Matthew DePerno Releases Michigan Elections Forensics Report - 66,194 Unregistered Ballots Tallied in JUST 9 COUNTIES
The Gateway Pundit
HUGE NEWS: Attorney Matthew DePerno Releases Michigan Elections Forensics Report - 66,194 Unregistered Ballots Tallied in JUST…
Michigan Constitutional Attorney Matthew Deperno released his much anticipated Michigan Elections Forensics Report on Friday.
Happy Saturday, everyone!
All is going well. Please don't be concerned if you hear criticisms of my MI work. They are to be expected.
The best thing to remember about is that my work is entirely based upon DATA. Their OWN data.
They just didn't expect us to notice, because they made it difficult to find.
Well, I found it.
And now that I've shown everyone else how to find it, things are gonna get interesting.
Of course, I have much, *much* more to share. But first, let's watch them try to wriggle their way out this first bombshell.
A simple clue that things are amiss is that when DePerno subpoenaed copies of the current registration rolls back in February, not only has the MI Secretary of State not complied with the subpoena, but she immediately took down the webpage feature that allows individuals to request it.
If there was nothing to hide, then why hide it? Especially since it is LEGALLY a public record.
And there is more... much more.
When playing poker, sometimes you make a "teaser bet" to get your opponent to make a larger bet that gets them "pot committed."
And they've already tipped their hand a couple times. We are way ahead.
All is going well. Please don't be concerned if you hear criticisms of my MI work. They are to be expected.
The best thing to remember about is that my work is entirely based upon DATA. Their OWN data.
They just didn't expect us to notice, because they made it difficult to find.
Well, I found it.
And now that I've shown everyone else how to find it, things are gonna get interesting.
Of course, I have much, *much* more to share. But first, let's watch them try to wriggle their way out this first bombshell.
A simple clue that things are amiss is that when DePerno subpoenaed copies of the current registration rolls back in February, not only has the MI Secretary of State not complied with the subpoena, but she immediately took down the webpage feature that allows individuals to request it.
If there was nothing to hide, then why hide it? Especially since it is LEGALLY a public record.
And there is more... much more.
When playing poker, sometimes you make a "teaser bet" to get your opponent to make a larger bet that gets them "pot committed."
And they've already tipped their hand a couple times. We are way ahead.
"Blystone Update"
As I alerted you recently, an attempt to smear Joe Blystone has backfired. Because Joe's (and his wife and son) voting record was incorrect, he was accused of being a fraud, and not having voted in the November election.
Pretty sloppy journalism.
So Joe contacted the SoS, who has replied saying that it was a clerical error, and that they've now fixed it.
Riiiiight.
All three of them.
Anyway, I thought you would like to know that Joe Blystone is not a fraud after all. (Which you already knew, because I told you as much, and my word is good.)
As I alerted you recently, an attempt to smear Joe Blystone has backfired. Because Joe's (and his wife and son) voting record was incorrect, he was accused of being a fraud, and not having voted in the November election.
Pretty sloppy journalism.
So Joe contacted the SoS, who has replied saying that it was a clerical error, and that they've now fixed it.
Riiiiight.
All three of them.
Anyway, I thought you would like to know that Joe Blystone is not a fraud after all. (Which you already knew, because I told you as much, and my word is good.)
A common question I am hearing about my analyses is, "Why do you average to find the key?"
There is a simple way to understand this.
Think of the fingerprint sensor on your phone. Notice that the phone asks you to take multiple fingerprints with the same finger. Why? Your fingerprint doesn't change.
But each time you do a fingerprint, there are small smudges and omissions. So by combining several of them you learn what the *actual* fingerprint is.
By averaging a few counties, I can learn what the *actual* key is.
In the case of the MI data I showed you all yesterday, I could have just used Macomb County (R = 1.000), the fingerprint was so good. But unless one looks at several fingerprints, how do you know if you have the actual one?
(btw, thanks to Sarah Centers for suggesting the phone aspect of this illustration.)
There is a simple way to understand this.
Think of the fingerprint sensor on your phone. Notice that the phone asks you to take multiple fingerprints with the same finger. Why? Your fingerprint doesn't change.
But each time you do a fingerprint, there are small smudges and omissions. So by combining several of them you learn what the *actual* fingerprint is.
By averaging a few counties, I can learn what the *actual* key is.
In the case of the MI data I showed you all yesterday, I could have just used Macomb County (R = 1.000), the fingerprint was so good. But unless one looks at several fingerprints, how do you know if you have the actual one?
(btw, thanks to Sarah Centers for suggesting the phone aspect of this illustration.)
Think about it for a second... the Secretary of State has certified the election. But...
Since showing you guys how to check your own voting record (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB-C6WpV9Cg), I've already received several messages from folks informing me that their votes are not recorded there, for a total of about a dozen ballots so far, and you guys are only just getting started.
When Joe Blystone
wrote the Secretary of State, they assured him that it was a clerical error. If your vote is not recorded there, and you contact the Secretary of State, I imagine that you will receive the same excuse.
But think about it for a second... The ballots tallied by the machines matches the ballots tallied in the database. At least, that is what the Secretary of State has certified.
So then, whose ballots were actually tallied in the count?
I have been aggressively studying the election data since late December. Believe me, I have reams and reams of such forensic evidence. The fun part about this situation is that YOU can confirm in small part what I have proven in large part.
And now that you realize that I am not making this up, perhaps you will join the movement for election reform in our country.
Believe me, as serious as this is, this is only a minor symptom of the real problem.
For now, you need to understand at least these things, if you ever again want to have real elections:
1) We must have paper ballots, cast in person, with photo ID.
2) We must only count them after they are all turned in, manually, after the polls are closed.
3) Each precinct must maintain a paper poll-book, that is the arbiter of voting on election day (most precincts are only several hundred voters).
4) There are some valid reasons for absentee ballots, but they must be rare.
Since showing you guys how to check your own voting record (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB-C6WpV9Cg), I've already received several messages from folks informing me that their votes are not recorded there, for a total of about a dozen ballots so far, and you guys are only just getting started.
When Joe Blystone
wrote the Secretary of State, they assured him that it was a clerical error. If your vote is not recorded there, and you contact the Secretary of State, I imagine that you will receive the same excuse.
But think about it for a second... The ballots tallied by the machines matches the ballots tallied in the database. At least, that is what the Secretary of State has certified.
So then, whose ballots were actually tallied in the count?
I have been aggressively studying the election data since late December. Believe me, I have reams and reams of such forensic evidence. The fun part about this situation is that YOU can confirm in small part what I have proven in large part.
And now that you realize that I am not making this up, perhaps you will join the movement for election reform in our country.
Believe me, as serious as this is, this is only a minor symptom of the real problem.
For now, you need to understand at least these things, if you ever again want to have real elections:
1) We must have paper ballots, cast in person, with photo ID.
2) We must only count them after they are all turned in, manually, after the polls are closed.
3) Each precinct must maintain a paper poll-book, that is the arbiter of voting on election day (most precincts are only several hundred voters).
4) There are some valid reasons for absentee ballots, but they must be rare.
I took a break from some massive calculations on Sunday afternoon to visit Pete Santilli's studio for a live interview.
I've been giving radio and podcast interviews for almost a year now (starting with Covid), and have yet to decline an interview request. I've stopped keeping track, but it's near fifty.
And since Pete is a former marine, I was pleased to go the extra mile, and to be the inaugural guest in his fancy new studio.
People think that I am only accepting invitations from conservative hosts. Not true. There have been a few intelligent, open-minded left-leaning hosts who care enough about the truth to pursue it with me by Following the Data.
As a bonus, Pete gave me several bags of his signature beef jerky. I ate a whole bag on the way home. It was excellent!
I joked with him that we should advertise it for him on the DePresser, and said he'd give us a promo-code and everything. Well, I'd be delighted to support this guy and to promote his product regardless.
Thank you for your service, Pete.
thepetesantillishow.com
I've been giving radio and podcast interviews for almost a year now (starting with Covid), and have yet to decline an interview request. I've stopped keeping track, but it's near fifty.
And since Pete is a former marine, I was pleased to go the extra mile, and to be the inaugural guest in his fancy new studio.
People think that I am only accepting invitations from conservative hosts. Not true. There have been a few intelligent, open-minded left-leaning hosts who care enough about the truth to pursue it with me by Following the Data.
As a bonus, Pete gave me several bags of his signature beef jerky. I ate a whole bag on the way home. It was excellent!
I joked with him that we should advertise it for him on the DePresser, and said he'd give us a promo-code and everything. Well, I'd be delighted to support this guy and to promote his product regardless.
Thank you for your service, Pete.
thepetesantillishow.com
People ask me why I am suspicious of funny business regarding the voter rolls in Michigan.
1) They already have more people registered than their population according to their own database and the US Census.
2) They suddenly come up with hundreds of thousands of new voters at the last minute.
3) They refuse to provide a list of those voters, even though 1) it is legally public information; 2) the information has been legally subpoenaed; and, 3) once it was legally subpoenaed, the SoS took down the webpage feature that allowed the information to be legally requested.
Hmmmmmm...
All they would have to do is to provide the lists they are legally required to anyway, and the whole thing could be put to rest.
So, why don't they?
I don't know. Maybe they are hiding something?
1) They already have more people registered than their population according to their own database and the US Census.
2) They suddenly come up with hundreds of thousands of new voters at the last minute.
3) They refuse to provide a list of those voters, even though 1) it is legally public information; 2) the information has been legally subpoenaed; and, 3) once it was legally subpoenaed, the SoS took down the webpage feature that allowed the information to be legally requested.
Hmmmmmm...
All they would have to do is to provide the lists they are legally required to anyway, and the whole thing could be put to rest.
So, why don't they?
I don't know. Maybe they are hiding something?
Voter registration data is public information in most states, and every citizen is ennoscriptd to have access to it.
But...
Most states don't make it easy for you to see it. For example, they can charge money. If you want to see all of WI's data, it costs about $25,000. To see SD's, it is about $2500.
In OH and FL, it is free. Simply go to the Sec of State webpages, and download it.
But just because they provide access does not mean that they make it easy.
For example, FL (and many other states) separates the voting record from the registration record. And the files are VERY large, making them difficult for the average person to view.
So, all sorts of funny business escapes public notice.
Well, no more.
The cat is out of the bag.
But...
Most states don't make it easy for you to see it. For example, they can charge money. If you want to see all of WI's data, it costs about $25,000. To see SD's, it is about $2500.
In OH and FL, it is free. Simply go to the Sec of State webpages, and download it.
But just because they provide access does not mean that they make it easy.
For example, FL (and many other states) separates the voting record from the registration record. And the files are VERY large, making them difficult for the average person to view.
So, all sorts of funny business escapes public notice.
Well, no more.
The cat is out of the bag.
Hopefully, you've all heard about the new social media platform, called "Frank Speech."
I encourage everyone to sign up for VIP access by going to
https://frankspeech.com/
I will be in-studio with Mike Lindell on the day that "Frank" is launched (next Monday, 4/19/21).
Also, that is the day that "Absolute Interference" will be released to the public. It is sure to be another blockbuster documentary. I am looking forward to a fun day, spent with American patriots.
Lindell's first documentary, "Absolute Proof," has over 150 million views already. The documentary featuring my interview with Lindell is going viral on the internet, especially since my preliminary analysis of the MI data has been formally entered into the court record. https://youtu.be/G9J7D2at9OI
I encourage everyone to sign up for VIP access by going to
https://frankspeech.com/
I will be in-studio with Mike Lindell on the day that "Frank" is launched (next Monday, 4/19/21).
Also, that is the day that "Absolute Interference" will be released to the public. It is sure to be another blockbuster documentary. I am looking forward to a fun day, spent with American patriots.
Lindell's first documentary, "Absolute Proof," has over 150 million views already. The documentary featuring my interview with Lindell is going viral on the internet, especially since my preliminary analysis of the MI data has been formally entered into the court record. https://youtu.be/G9J7D2at9OI
LindellTV
Home - LindellTV
Explore new perspectives, engage in meaningful conversations, and stay informed on the topics shaping our world. LindellTV is your home for uncensored, unfiltered communication, where every voice is heard and diverse viewpoints thrive.
I've been reading some criticisms of Lindell's new social media platform, "FRANK." (No, Lindell did not name it after me... 🙂 )
VIP Sign up for Monday is here: http://frankspeech.com
Basically, Mike wants to enable free speech, but is not permitting swearing, pornography, or using the Lord's name in vain. Sounds like a place I'd like to hang out.
Kinda like my dinner table analogy.
Some people are criticizing these limits. I'm not. People can express their point of view but be expected to behave in a civil manner.
And even though free speech is protected by the constitution, we don't allow people to behave uncivilly in public or to yell, "Fire!" in a crowded theater.
VIP Sign up for Monday is here: http://frankspeech.com
Basically, Mike wants to enable free speech, but is not permitting swearing, pornography, or using the Lord's name in vain. Sounds like a place I'd like to hang out.
Kinda like my dinner table analogy.
Some people are criticizing these limits. I'm not. People can express their point of view but be expected to behave in a civil manner.
And even though free speech is protected by the constitution, we don't allow people to behave uncivilly in public or to yell, "Fire!" in a crowded theater.
LindellTV
Home - LindellTV
Explore new perspectives, engage in meaningful conversations, and stay informed on the topics shaping our world. LindellTV is your home for uncensored, unfiltered communication, where every voice is heard and diverse viewpoints thrive.
There is an Old Testament account where Moses struck a rock in order to provide water for the Israelites (Numbers 20).
God had instructed Moses to SPEAK to the rock, not to strike it. Instead, Moses became angry and struck it twice. Essentially, Moses' pride and arrogance revealed its ugly head, and God punished him for this by not allowing Moses to enter the promised land.
The punishment seems harsh. But God knows our hearts, and He forgives. He also knows our strengths and weaknesses, and He knows the future, because He is already there. So I defer to His judgment.
Well... when Americans have reclaimed our elections and therefore our country, I want to enter the 'promised land' along with them.
So, I am being very careful to acknowledge the fact that I am here and now, precisely placed and gifted, to speak the truth, and to perform a service that God has arranged.
And although I am getting a lot of attention because of this, God gets the credit, not me.
God had instructed Moses to SPEAK to the rock, not to strike it. Instead, Moses became angry and struck it twice. Essentially, Moses' pride and arrogance revealed its ugly head, and God punished him for this by not allowing Moses to enter the promised land.
The punishment seems harsh. But God knows our hearts, and He forgives. He also knows our strengths and weaknesses, and He knows the future, because He is already there. So I defer to His judgment.
Well... when Americans have reclaimed our elections and therefore our country, I want to enter the 'promised land' along with them.
So, I am being very careful to acknowledge the fact that I am here and now, precisely placed and gifted, to speak the truth, and to perform a service that God has arranged.
And although I am getting a lot of attention because of this, God gets the credit, not me.
Attention fellow patriots!
It's time for another round of sharing. The views per hour have dropped below 200...
Please share these links by email, and on all your social media platforms...
https://youtu.be/G9J7D2at9OI
https://youtu.be/106b-tpWMdM
We need to get the word out!
"Politicians don't start parades, they join them."
It's time for another round of sharing. The views per hour have dropped below 200...
Please share these links by email, and on all your social media platforms...
https://youtu.be/G9J7D2at9OI
https://youtu.be/106b-tpWMdM
We need to get the word out!
"Politicians don't start parades, they join them."