"The $5 Million Challenge"
At Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium in August 2021, he offered a $5 million challenge to dozens of cyber experts to prove that the cyber evidence he provided "unequivocally does NOT reflect information related to the November 2020 election." I am intimately familiar with the details of the event and the challenge. Not only did I emcee the event, I participated in the preparation and daily management of it.
I also served on the panel that evaluated the three claims for the prize. None of the claims even came close to meeting the challenge criteria. I also gave testimony under oath during the recent arbitration. (A four-day process.) I am intimately familiar with all the details of this situation, so I am one of the most qualified to discuss it. I can assure you, the media reporting is full of errors and misrepresentations.
"Unequivocallly" is a very high bar. And the challenge was not to validate the data, but instead to *prove a negative...* which is also a VERY high bar.
In his own submission, in his own words, Zeidman admits that he was unable to decrypt the data files that were provided to him at the Symposium, referring to them as "gibberish."
How can someone prove unequivocally that data are not related to the 2020 election if they can't even read it?
And how can arbitrators not understand this? We decrypted the same files during the arbitration using the same tools we provided the participants at the Symposium.
Not surprisingly, the media is spinning this.
At least now, you know the facts.
At Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium in August 2021, he offered a $5 million challenge to dozens of cyber experts to prove that the cyber evidence he provided "unequivocally does NOT reflect information related to the November 2020 election." I am intimately familiar with the details of the event and the challenge. Not only did I emcee the event, I participated in the preparation and daily management of it.
I also served on the panel that evaluated the three claims for the prize. None of the claims even came close to meeting the challenge criteria. I also gave testimony under oath during the recent arbitration. (A four-day process.) I am intimately familiar with all the details of this situation, so I am one of the most qualified to discuss it. I can assure you, the media reporting is full of errors and misrepresentations.
"Unequivocallly" is a very high bar. And the challenge was not to validate the data, but instead to *prove a negative...* which is also a VERY high bar.
In his own submission, in his own words, Zeidman admits that he was unable to decrypt the data files that were provided to him at the Symposium, referring to them as "gibberish."
How can someone prove unequivocally that data are not related to the 2020 election if they can't even read it?
And how can arbitrators not understand this? We decrypted the same files during the arbitration using the same tools we provided the participants at the Symposium.
Not surprisingly, the media is spinning this.
At least now, you know the facts.
🔥121👍50❤21🤬5🤣1
"FOX vs. Dominion"
I've been publicly stating for over a year that FOX News is no friend to conservatives because FOX News hosts may only report incomplete and filtered news.
I know this because of personal phone calls with the most prominent hosts where they have listed fifteen topics that are contractually off-limits, and may not be discussed on the air. (e.g. Soros, election fraud, vaccine risk, etc.)
Recently, the Dominion lawsuit discovery process has exposed that these same hosts are insincerely reporting the filtered leftovers and are in fact opposed to our grassroots reform movements.
I say again, FOX News is not our friend.
And now that these hypocrites have been exposed, FOX is in damage control mode to protect their most valuable assets (e.g. Hannity, Tucker, and Ingraham)... Which is why they quickly settled.
May I suggest that you never give FOX News another minute of your viewing time.
Instead, watch RSBN, OAN, or other networks willing to report and discuss the issues we most care about.
I've been publicly stating for over a year that FOX News is no friend to conservatives because FOX News hosts may only report incomplete and filtered news.
I know this because of personal phone calls with the most prominent hosts where they have listed fifteen topics that are contractually off-limits, and may not be discussed on the air. (e.g. Soros, election fraud, vaccine risk, etc.)
Recently, the Dominion lawsuit discovery process has exposed that these same hosts are insincerely reporting the filtered leftovers and are in fact opposed to our grassroots reform movements.
I say again, FOX News is not our friend.
And now that these hypocrites have been exposed, FOX is in damage control mode to protect their most valuable assets (e.g. Hannity, Tucker, and Ingraham)... Which is why they quickly settled.
May I suggest that you never give FOX News another minute of your viewing time.
Instead, watch RSBN, OAN, or other networks willing to report and discuss the issues we most care about.
💯137❤78👍42🔥9🤣2
"Fox News host Dan Bongino is leaving the network after the conservative commentator said he and the outlet could not come to terms on a new contract."
TERMS... matter.
TERMS... matter.
👍174❤19🤔8🤣2
"Real News"
One of the most frustrating things I experience when I am speaking to patriot groups around the country is that they have no idea the progress we are making all over the country.
I've resorted to devoting a portion of each of my talks to updating everyone.
I keep telling folks that they need to watch the Lindell Report each weeknight at 6pm central to keep up.
Kinda like tuning in to Rush for ten minutes throughout the week kept you up to date what was REALLY going on.
Boy, do I miss Rush.
Frankspeech.com
Otherwise, you're just another victim of the mainstream propaganda media.
Stop being duped.
Sorry, but that's the straight-up truth.
One of the most frustrating things I experience when I am speaking to patriot groups around the country is that they have no idea the progress we are making all over the country.
I've resorted to devoting a portion of each of my talks to updating everyone.
I keep telling folks that they need to watch the Lindell Report each weeknight at 6pm central to keep up.
Kinda like tuning in to Rush for ten minutes throughout the week kept you up to date what was REALLY going on.
Boy, do I miss Rush.
Frankspeech.com
Otherwise, you're just another victim of the mainstream propaganda media.
Stop being duped.
Sorry, but that's the straight-up truth.
❤161👍42🔥19💯7🤡1
“Setting the Record Straight re Lindell’s $5 Million Challenge”
No, Zeidman did not debunk Lindell’s cyber data. He was only given a tiny sample slice of it, and he was unable to decrypt what he was given, calling it “jibberish.”
I was a judge in the contest, and I testified and was present for the entire arbitration. The judges had nearly zero understanding of cyber data, and Zeidman had a team of high-powered, expensive lawyers.
I had the impression that the claim was intended to harass Mr. Lindell and to gain access to additional information during discovery, because the challenge set an extremely high bar in order to win the prize. The entrant had to prove that the data Mike provided was “unequivocally not related to the 2020 General election.”
How can someone prove that data are unequivocally not related when they weren’t even able to read it?
During the arbitration we decrypted the data slice we’d provided using the resources we’d also provided. Then, the judges themselves noted that the decrypted files had many references to the 2020 General Election.
Hypothetically, even if the data slice provided was fake, it was still *related* to the 2020 election, listing dates, IP addresses, and election tallies directly affiliated with it.
Mike has stated publicly that he intends to challenge the results of the arbitration. Challenging a “binding arbitration” requires a very high bar for evidence. It will not be an easy battle, even though the facts are on his side.
I think the facts speak for themselves, and am flabbergasted that the arbitration panel has ruled in this way. The only plausible explanation I have come up with is that the arbitration panel themselves did not understand the data, and so did not understand themselves how the data were relevant to the election.
But the judges were not the contestants in the challenge, Zeidman was. It was not their job to decide the veracity of the data (unqualified as they are), but to decide whether Zeidman had unequivocally proven that the data were NOT related, which they obviously were, although Zeidman had never even had the opportunity to read it, so of course he did not.
The whole thing smells like a setup.
https://youtu.be/g-F_A1m6oHc
No, Zeidman did not debunk Lindell’s cyber data. He was only given a tiny sample slice of it, and he was unable to decrypt what he was given, calling it “jibberish.”
I was a judge in the contest, and I testified and was present for the entire arbitration. The judges had nearly zero understanding of cyber data, and Zeidman had a team of high-powered, expensive lawyers.
I had the impression that the claim was intended to harass Mr. Lindell and to gain access to additional information during discovery, because the challenge set an extremely high bar in order to win the prize. The entrant had to prove that the data Mike provided was “unequivocally not related to the 2020 General election.”
How can someone prove that data are unequivocally not related when they weren’t even able to read it?
During the arbitration we decrypted the data slice we’d provided using the resources we’d also provided. Then, the judges themselves noted that the decrypted files had many references to the 2020 General Election.
Hypothetically, even if the data slice provided was fake, it was still *related* to the 2020 election, listing dates, IP addresses, and election tallies directly affiliated with it.
Mike has stated publicly that he intends to challenge the results of the arbitration. Challenging a “binding arbitration” requires a very high bar for evidence. It will not be an easy battle, even though the facts are on his side.
I think the facts speak for themselves, and am flabbergasted that the arbitration panel has ruled in this way. The only plausible explanation I have come up with is that the arbitration panel themselves did not understand the data, and so did not understand themselves how the data were relevant to the election.
But the judges were not the contestants in the challenge, Zeidman was. It was not their job to decide the veracity of the data (unqualified as they are), but to decide whether Zeidman had unequivocally proven that the data were NOT related, which they obviously were, although Zeidman had never even had the opportunity to read it, so of course he did not.
The whole thing smells like a setup.
https://youtu.be/g-F_A1m6oHc
YouTube
Expert awarded $5 million for debunking Mike Lindell's election data
MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell has been ordered to shell out $5 million to an expert, Robert Zeidman, who debunked his data related to the 2020 election, according to a decision by the arbitration panel obtained by CNN. Zeidman, who has decades in software development…
👍65🤬38❤17🙏8😱7🤔4👎2🤮2😁1🥱1🤣1
Louisiana's Voting Machine Vulnerabilities from Webcam meeting with Audit the Vote PA's Toni Shuppe and Karen Taylor... https://rumble.com/v2l0x0g-dr.-douglas-frank-breaks-silence-regarding-louisiana-voting-machine-vulnera.html
Rumble
Dr. Douglas Frank breaks silence regarding Louisiana Voting machine vulnerability
Audit the Vote PA CEO, Toni Shupp, and CFO, Karen Taylor hosted a webcam meeting with Dr. Douglas Frank. During the meeting Dr. Frank recounted his six hour private June 2022 meeting with S.O.S. Kyle
👍43🔥20❤1🤡1
"The Rules"
My father taught me, "Rules serve people. People don't serve rules."
Suppose that someone is breaking into your home every day, molesting your children and stealing your money...
But the rules in your state say that you are not allowed to lock your doors, nor arm yourself.
What are you gonna do?
Of course, you are gonna arm yourself and lock the doors.
Well, this situation is analogous to our elections, and I'm tired of hearing local officials say, "We have to run our elections this way, because those are the rules."
Folks, our corrupted elections are allowing them to steal our money and molest our children.
It's time to arm ourselves and lock the doors.
We need to be voting Amish.
My father taught me, "Rules serve people. People don't serve rules."
Suppose that someone is breaking into your home every day, molesting your children and stealing your money...
But the rules in your state say that you are not allowed to lock your doors, nor arm yourself.
What are you gonna do?
Of course, you are gonna arm yourself and lock the doors.
Well, this situation is analogous to our elections, and I'm tired of hearing local officials say, "We have to run our elections this way, because those are the rules."
Folks, our corrupted elections are allowing them to steal our money and molest our children.
It's time to arm ourselves and lock the doors.
We need to be voting Amish.
🔥138👍48❤26
https://rumble.com/v2lk46y-kentucky-county-general-elections-by-voter-age-2020-and-2022-v2.html
Important update which includes graphs for both 2020 and 2022 for the entire state of Kentucky.
These graphs make it obvious how poorly the KY Secretary of State is maintaining their rolls.
Important update which includes graphs for both 2020 and 2022 for the entire state of Kentucky.
These graphs make it obvious how poorly the KY Secretary of State is maintaining their rolls.
Rumble
Kentucky County General Elections by Voter Age (2020 and 2022) v2
Graphs for every Kentucky county illustrating population, registration, and voting. The graphs make it clear how bloated Kentucky Voter Rolls are. (This update includes repairs to Pike, Bell, and Jeff
🔥35🤔24👍13❤1🥰1