THE Philosopher – Telegram
THE Philosopher
1.83K subscribers
4.5K photos
836 videos
14 files
201 links
Posts written by a the wisest man on Telegram.
Download Telegram
There's so much in this article...

First, apparently this is a soda with dietary fiber in it. I am confounded and disgusted by this notion.

Second, zoomer faggot on the left claims that it's "illegal" to drink two of them in a day. He inferred this because they made him have watery poops. Add "illegal" to the list of words zoomers don't understand.

Third, the "expert" on the right claims that the reason Americans have diabetes and heart disease is because they don't get enough fiber.

Fiber is now for rich people. All Daily Poor subscribers are to get less than 10g of fiber per day
Observe the complete lack of care for the truth of the matter. If you ever find yourself saying something like "verity renders you my adversary," then you should probably take some time to introspect on how you got yourself to such a shameful place
Omw to Wisconsin
Forwarded from Theodulfo Borfoni
I think the poor pill also includes a modesty about the scope of our own agency, which is both terrifying and freeing, because we are still accountable for what we do with our smallness
Some of 'yall are so racist against Haitians in particular that you overlooked that eating animals in an inappropriate way is something blacks generally tend to do.... Sad
Disgusting
Forwarded from H F
Manmade “Freedom” just created more opportunities to be a slave.
If you really like your team winning, then you should probably be a progressive
My fellow right wingers, let's participate in occultism and plaster demonic iconography around our city... just for pretend... to scare away the migrants.
The set of relations conceptualized is called the relational basis set.
Lol, this is amusing. Not too difficult, but funny.
Corretto!
Another win for the emoji ban
You have the opportunity to win a prize. There are three prizes for you to pick from, all three hidden in boxes. You get to pick one of the boxes, but without knowing what's inside.

Two of the boxes each contain $1 million. The third box contains a delicious, toasted ham and cheddar sandwich. You don't know which is which, and as a member of the internet's 's most vibrant, ham-loving poor community, you want that sandwich. And the game show host knows you want it.

You pick a box. Then, the game show host opens one of the boxes you didn't pick and reveals that it contains $1 million. He then offers you the ability to switch. He's willing to trade you the unopened box you didn't pick for the one that you had chosen. You can keep your previously selected box, or switch to the other unopened box. He taunts you, "what if you chose wrong? What if your box is the other $1 million? Don't you want that ham? You should switch!"

(Note: this is all a part of the show; both the reveal and the opportunity to switch would happened regardless of whether your initial pick was correct and does not indicate that he's trying to trick you.)

Wanting that sandwich to satisfy your ravenous hunger for ham, should you switch to the other box, stay with your initial choice, or does it not matter?
Nobody has sent me a single Trump thing. Ergo, this debate did not go well for him. Those who watched, is this inference correct?