Forwarded from THE Philosopher
One of the most common criticisms I've received when my content gets posted on other channels is in the context of real estate posting. Critics will ask, "how deep in Coon Town is this house?" They'll speculate, "that town must be in Niggerville."
If that were the case, if a house being cheap implies that it's in a highly black area, then we'd expect the correlation between how white an area is and the median home price in that area to be positive. Heck, if it's a general rule, we'd expect the correlation to be both strong and positive.
However, when we check the data, that's not what we find. I ran data from different census levels, assessing the correlation between the percentage of an area that is non-Hispanic White and the median cost of a house in said area.
At high levels--regional, division, and state--the correlation is fairly strong but negative; that is, it's significantly cheaper on average to live in states with a larger white population.
At lower levels--counties, places, zip code tabulation areas, county subdivisions, and census tracts--the trend is weak but universally negative. The pattern tends to be that the trend line starts low, the least white places are cheap, rises significantly as you approach the national average of 60% white, and then it declines, with the whitest areas pulling the trend line under the starting point.
It's definitely not wrong to say that areas with a large amount of blacks tend to be cheap. However, areas with a mixture of whites and other races are what tend to pull the line up, with 90% or higher white areas being even cheaper than the mostly non-white areas on average.
An area being cheap does not imply that it is Coontown. Many of the cheapest areas in terms of real estate are 90+% white.
If that were the case, if a house being cheap implies that it's in a highly black area, then we'd expect the correlation between how white an area is and the median home price in that area to be positive. Heck, if it's a general rule, we'd expect the correlation to be both strong and positive.
However, when we check the data, that's not what we find. I ran data from different census levels, assessing the correlation between the percentage of an area that is non-Hispanic White and the median cost of a house in said area.
At high levels--regional, division, and state--the correlation is fairly strong but negative; that is, it's significantly cheaper on average to live in states with a larger white population.
At lower levels--counties, places, zip code tabulation areas, county subdivisions, and census tracts--the trend is weak but universally negative. The pattern tends to be that the trend line starts low, the least white places are cheap, rises significantly as you approach the national average of 60% white, and then it declines, with the whitest areas pulling the trend line under the starting point.
It's definitely not wrong to say that areas with a large amount of blacks tend to be cheap. However, areas with a mixture of whites and other races are what tend to pull the line up, with 90% or higher white areas being even cheaper than the mostly non-white areas on average.
An area being cheap does not imply that it is Coontown. Many of the cheapest areas in terms of real estate are 90+% white.
Forwarded from Voter Apatia OSINT
I went through the local ghetto in the nearest city where I grew up. The homes near the picture (used to ascertain the zip code) were going for around $260K after someone went through and cleaned the floors and painted all the walls white.
The non-"renovated" houses didn't look as appealing and were listed between $110,000 and $180,000.
None of the houses were something anyone here would live in. I speculate that the renovated homes are meant to appeal to shitlibs looking to live in an unfamiliar city.
I find the TDP correct in its housing assessment.
The non-"renovated" houses didn't look as appealing and were listed between $110,000 and $180,000.
None of the houses were something anyone here would live in. I speculate that the renovated homes are meant to appeal to shitlibs looking to live in an unfamiliar city.
I find the TDP correct in its housing assessment.
Voter Apatia OSINT
I went through the local ghetto in the nearest city where I grew up. The homes near the picture (used to ascertain the zip code) were going for around $260K after someone went through and cleaned the floors and painted all the walls white. The non-"renovated"…
It's easy to forget that in current America, with its Opinion Factories controlled by libs, whiteness is essentially unfashionable. Especially a certain type of whiteness that's rural, hick, redneck, &c. If you're living in such an unfashionable place, other people (normies) aren't going to want to live there, which is going to bring down prices.
Well folks, it's that time of year where summer is winding down and the Mackinac Bridge Authority starts covering up the bridge to tuck her away for the winter. As you can see, they've started at the south end this year based on current winds. They say it's much easier when there's a south wind because the tarp "pretty much lays itself down". The tarp itself is approximately 9 miles long and weighs 30 tons. It can withstand up to 300 mph winds. Rolling it out, this process can take up to 2 weeks to complete as long as the weather cooperates. It keeps the bridge in tip top shape throughout the wicked weather we get here in the Straits throughout the winter months. Photo courtesy of Roy Cole. Enjoy the Day!
THE Philosopher
This bobcat has a message for you all: "Get out of the cities."
I'm looking around, desperately, trying to find this creature. I need to hear more of what he has to say.