The two people who I am following for signal on Israel are Barak Ravid and Amos Hochstein.

It’s not about taking everything they say or relay as definitive truth. It’s about taking in all the information and distilling it to discern the most pragmatic truth, based on what we already know. But those two seem to provide insight that is missed by mainstream reporting.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has pledged to increase trade flows between Türkiye and Russia following a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sunday.

In a statement released after the call, Erdogan’s office said that he and Putin discussed “Türkiye-Russia bilateral relations as well as regional and global issues,” with Erdogan stating that he aims “to further the cooperation between Türkiye and Russia in many areas, particularly by expanding the trade volume” between the two countries.

The Kremlin released a similar statement, confirming that Erdogan and Putin talked about “a number of international topics,” and placed “an emphasis on increasing the effectiveness of trade and economic cooperation.”

Although Türkiye is a member of the US-led NATO bloc and an aspiring member of the EU, Erdogan has adopted a policy of neutrality on the Ukraine conflict. In addition to hosting peace talks in 2022, Türkiye brokered the now-defunct Black Sea Grain Initiative, and has rebuffed US requests to impose economic sanctions on Moscow.

LOL so after denying Turkey full membership into the EU for decades, Erdogan is now pivoting away from Europe and making frens with Russia.

Turkey is arguably the most important member of NATO, since the Turkish Straits are the leverage point that the Globalist Syndicate needs to control in order to suffocate a major trade/transport route for Russia.

https://www.rt.com/news/608135-erdogan-putin-increase-trade/

The solution is to disagree with all of it. All of it.

This is one of the most based things I’ve ever read.
__
“There is no "good life for man" (in general) — or if there is we know nothing of it, or not enough. Even those persuaded that they do, on the contrary, know what such a life should be, promote its universality only at the expense of being denied the opportunity to pursue it. If we need to agree on the broad contours of such a model for human existence, then reaching agreement will precede it—and "reaching agreement" is politics. Some much wider world acquires a veto over the way of life you select, or accept, or inherit (the details need not detain us). We have seen how that works. Global communism is the inevitable destination.

The alcernative to agreement is schism. Secession, geopolitical disintegration, fragmentation, splitting - disagreement escapes dialectics and separates in space.
Anti-universalism, concretely, is not a philosophical position but an effectively defensible assertion of diversity. From the perspective of the universal (which belongs only to Gnon, and never to man), it is an experiment. The degree to which it believes in itself is of no concern that matters to anything beyond itself. It is not answerable to anything but Gon. What anyone, anywhere, thinks about it counts for nothing. If it fails, it dies, which should mean nothing to you. If you are compelled to care about someone else's experiment, then a schism is missing. Of course, you are free to tell it that you think it will fail, if it is listening, but there is absolutely no need to reach agreement on the question. This is what, in the end,
non-communism means.

Non-universalism is hygiene. It is practical avoidance of other people's stupid shit. There is no higher principle in political philosophy. Every attempt to install an alternative, and impose a universal, reverts to dialectics, communization, global evangelism, and totalitarian politics.

This is being said here now, because NRx is horribly bad at it, and degenerates into a clash of universalisms, as into an instinctive equilibrium. There are even those who confidently propose an "NRx solution" for the world. Nothing could be more absurd. The world—as a whole— is an entropy bin. The most profoundly degraded communism is its only possible "universal consensus." (Everyone knows this, when they permit themselves to think.)

All order is local —which is to say, the negation of the universal. That is merely to re-state the second law of thermodynamics, which "we" generally profess to accept. The only thing that could ever be universally and equally distributed is noise.

Kill the universalism in your soul, and you are immediately (objectively) a neo-reactionary. Protect it, and you are an obstacle to the escape of differences. That is communism —whether you recognize it, or not.

Nick Land, Xenosystems

Audio: https://youtu.be/0bpQuU98nKw?si=bIRchCuM_qs0jaWm