Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
From my colleague in Australia, Elizabeth Hart, independent researcher.
Looks like Australian injectors do not have liability protection, which they do in several countries, especially USA.
If correct, gene-based injection victims or their relatives ought to seek redress in court. It could be awkward for the authorities. They can’t protect individuals from their legal failings. Yet they don’t want a precedent to be set.
Best wishes
Mike
Hi Mike - Charles Kovess kindly invited me onto his TNT Mind Medicine program recently to discuss the Covid vax debacle, starts around seven minutes in on this link: https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/elizabeth-hart-on-mind-medicine-with-charles-kovess-24-june-2023/ (Charles' intro to his program also includes reference to other interesting topics...)
We had a broad-ranging discussion on the disastrous Covid vaccination issue, particularly about voluntary informed consent in Australia and vaccination mandates.
I’ve transcribed the last bit of our discussion, during which Charles highlights ‘valid consent’ - please see trannoscript excerpt below.
Our discussion referred to my recent notification/complaint to AHPRA, the regulator of medical practitioners, about Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the violation of voluntary informed consent via Covid vaccination mandates, at the behest of then Australian prime minister Scott Morrison and National Cabinet, see: Notification to AHPRA re medical practitioner Paul Kelly... 16 June 2023.
A catastrophe is looming for the medical profession when people wake up to what's been done to them via vaccination mandates - vaccination without valid/voluntary informed consent...
Please see trannoscript excerpt below.
Elizabeth
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net
TNT Radio discussion excerpt:
Charles Kovess: We've got four minutes left, what about the liability of doctors now, what about people that have been harmed by these Covid jabs? And with no informed consent. What's your advice to people who have either lost loved ones, or who have been, had serious adverse events? What's the liability of the doctors?
Elizabeth Hart: Well I mean it's clear, they're supposed to be getting informed consent, we've got that in writing, I've got it in writing from the government. Because my colleague Emma McArthur and I, we asked for clarification from both the Morrison Government, and now the Albanese Government - do they have protection? Because that's what the Morrison Government announced. And they had to confess that, no, they don't have it. There's a vaccine claims scheme, but the individual practitioners do not have liability protection. Now the way the courts are at the moment, which is highly biased and skewed - what we need is, we need this out in the court of public opinion. For people to find out what is going on, about what we've been talking about today, about how informed consent has been trashed. That's what we need, to get this talked about. And I've written to the medical insurers, as well as these doctors' organisations, and I've made it clear to them what's going on. These people - I think it's negligence that they're just ignoring what I'm saying.
Charles Kovess: Elizabeth, I want to take it one step further, ok. And here's an important distinction that I bring to your attention, and to listeners' attention. A patient can only be jabbed if they have given informed, voluntary informed consent. But, a doctor is only allowed to jab someone if they have valid consent, ok. An important distinction in terms. So as a matter of law I'm telling you this. So, a valid consent. So, first the patient has to give informed consent. And the patient might say, "look, I'm here, I know this is risky, but I'm having it" and then he says, or she says, to the doctor, "but I'm here under coercion...I'm here under coercion". Now suddenly, that means that the doctor has not got valid consent.
Looks like Australian injectors do not have liability protection, which they do in several countries, especially USA.
If correct, gene-based injection victims or their relatives ought to seek redress in court. It could be awkward for the authorities. They can’t protect individuals from their legal failings. Yet they don’t want a precedent to be set.
Best wishes
Mike
Hi Mike - Charles Kovess kindly invited me onto his TNT Mind Medicine program recently to discuss the Covid vax debacle, starts around seven minutes in on this link: https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/elizabeth-hart-on-mind-medicine-with-charles-kovess-24-june-2023/ (Charles' intro to his program also includes reference to other interesting topics...)
We had a broad-ranging discussion on the disastrous Covid vaccination issue, particularly about voluntary informed consent in Australia and vaccination mandates.
I’ve transcribed the last bit of our discussion, during which Charles highlights ‘valid consent’ - please see trannoscript excerpt below.
Our discussion referred to my recent notification/complaint to AHPRA, the regulator of medical practitioners, about Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the violation of voluntary informed consent via Covid vaccination mandates, at the behest of then Australian prime minister Scott Morrison and National Cabinet, see: Notification to AHPRA re medical practitioner Paul Kelly... 16 June 2023.
A catastrophe is looming for the medical profession when people wake up to what's been done to them via vaccination mandates - vaccination without valid/voluntary informed consent...
Please see trannoscript excerpt below.
Elizabeth
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net
TNT Radio discussion excerpt:
Charles Kovess: We've got four minutes left, what about the liability of doctors now, what about people that have been harmed by these Covid jabs? And with no informed consent. What's your advice to people who have either lost loved ones, or who have been, had serious adverse events? What's the liability of the doctors?
Elizabeth Hart: Well I mean it's clear, they're supposed to be getting informed consent, we've got that in writing, I've got it in writing from the government. Because my colleague Emma McArthur and I, we asked for clarification from both the Morrison Government, and now the Albanese Government - do they have protection? Because that's what the Morrison Government announced. And they had to confess that, no, they don't have it. There's a vaccine claims scheme, but the individual practitioners do not have liability protection. Now the way the courts are at the moment, which is highly biased and skewed - what we need is, we need this out in the court of public opinion. For people to find out what is going on, about what we've been talking about today, about how informed consent has been trashed. That's what we need, to get this talked about. And I've written to the medical insurers, as well as these doctors' organisations, and I've made it clear to them what's going on. These people - I think it's negligence that they're just ignoring what I'm saying.
Charles Kovess: Elizabeth, I want to take it one step further, ok. And here's an important distinction that I bring to your attention, and to listeners' attention. A patient can only be jabbed if they have given informed, voluntary informed consent. But, a doctor is only allowed to jab someone if they have valid consent, ok. An important distinction in terms. So as a matter of law I'm telling you this. So, a valid consent. So, first the patient has to give informed consent. And the patient might say, "look, I'm here, I know this is risky, but I'm having it" and then he says, or she says, to the doctor, "but I'm here under coercion...I'm here under coercion". Now suddenly, that means that the doctor has not got valid consent.
Podbean
Login to your Podbean Account | Podbean
Log into Podbean to start podcasting. Get everything you need for a successful podcast.
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Now, that is where I urge every single person who told their doctor or their health professional that they're here under coercion, that they should complain to AHPRA about that injecting person. Because they broke the law applying to them - they're not allowed to just jab someone without valid consent.
Elizabeth Hart: That's the major point - once they knew the person was there under a mandate, they should have stood back and said "I can't do this under a mandate".
Charles Kovess: “I can't do this by law. I cannot do this.”
Elizabeth Hart: But this is important, if we can just fit this in, because it's really important. We're talking about doctors here - it's often not going to be doctors. It's often going to be nurses and pharmacists. And this is a much more subtle thing that we've got to get into, to think about Rogers v Whitaker. This is not a medical expert discussing a medical intervention with a patient. These people aren't 'patients'. Most of the people were not going to be badly affected by Covid. They've been called upon and dictated to by governments and employers and what have you to front up in front of a practitioner. This is complicated now. We've got to say these practitioners have been sort of menaced into giving these interventions themselves. AHPRA has threatened these practitioners not to question anything. This has all got to be teased out for the public. It's really quite complicated. But those practitioners are not qualified to get informed consent, because they're not, nobody is an expert in Covid, and nobody is an expert in Covid injections.
Charles Kovess: Well, well they could arguably say, it's informed, "I know I'm taking the risk, but I have to keep my job". As soon as they say "I have to keep my job", then there's no valid consent from the doctor's perspective. Now, we've got one more minute, what do you, in fact I've got 30 seconds with you, what do you say about these public servants, these bureaucrats, who refuse to answer your questions? Or ministers of government! They're our servants Elizabeth, how dare they not answer your letters!
Elizabeth Hart: They've got to be accountable. And I'm coming for them. I'm going after the individuals who are accountable. That's what we've got to do. Hold them to account.
Charles Kovess: Absolutely. Everybody, we have to hold them to account. And these, the fraud that's been perpetrated on humanity is so egregious, we all have to decide - do not comply, because these government bodies, these public servants are not acting lawfully.
Elizabeth Hart: That's the major point - once they knew the person was there under a mandate, they should have stood back and said "I can't do this under a mandate".
Charles Kovess: “I can't do this by law. I cannot do this.”
Elizabeth Hart: But this is important, if we can just fit this in, because it's really important. We're talking about doctors here - it's often not going to be doctors. It's often going to be nurses and pharmacists. And this is a much more subtle thing that we've got to get into, to think about Rogers v Whitaker. This is not a medical expert discussing a medical intervention with a patient. These people aren't 'patients'. Most of the people were not going to be badly affected by Covid. They've been called upon and dictated to by governments and employers and what have you to front up in front of a practitioner. This is complicated now. We've got to say these practitioners have been sort of menaced into giving these interventions themselves. AHPRA has threatened these practitioners not to question anything. This has all got to be teased out for the public. It's really quite complicated. But those practitioners are not qualified to get informed consent, because they're not, nobody is an expert in Covid, and nobody is an expert in Covid injections.
Charles Kovess: Well, well they could arguably say, it's informed, "I know I'm taking the risk, but I have to keep my job". As soon as they say "I have to keep my job", then there's no valid consent from the doctor's perspective. Now, we've got one more minute, what do you, in fact I've got 30 seconds with you, what do you say about these public servants, these bureaucrats, who refuse to answer your questions? Or ministers of government! They're our servants Elizabeth, how dare they not answer your letters!
Elizabeth Hart: They've got to be accountable. And I'm coming for them. I'm going after the individuals who are accountable. That's what we've got to do. Hold them to account.
Charles Kovess: Absolutely. Everybody, we have to hold them to account. And these, the fraud that's been perpetrated on humanity is so egregious, we all have to decide - do not comply, because these government bodies, these public servants are not acting lawfully.
Forwarded from Chief Nerd
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥 Robert F. Kennedy Jr Calls Out Bill Gates & Peter Hotez at PorcFest 2023 for Their 'Pump-and-Dump' Scheme
"That same week Bill Gates, who was overseeing this [Event 201] simulation, bought 1.1 Million shares of BioNTech vaccine which later became the Pfizer vaccine. He then sold almost all that stock, 87%, two years later at a $242,000,000 profit. And a week after that he announced the vaccine didn't work. That's what you call a 'pump-and-dump' scheme."
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1672949155998707713
https://rumble.com/v2wd3qo--rfk-jr-calls-out-bill-gates-and-peter-hotez-at-porcfest-2023-for-their-pum.html
@ChiefNerd
"That same week Bill Gates, who was overseeing this [Event 201] simulation, bought 1.1 Million shares of BioNTech vaccine which later became the Pfizer vaccine. He then sold almost all that stock, 87%, two years later at a $242,000,000 profit. And a week after that he announced the vaccine didn't work. That's what you call a 'pump-and-dump' scheme."
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1672949155998707713
https://rumble.com/v2wd3qo--rfk-jr-calls-out-bill-gates-and-peter-hotez-at-porcfest-2023-for-their-pum.html
@ChiefNerd
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
Don't give up!
You can begin to exit the system and start reclaiming and living in sovereignty. It just takes a little effort before it becomes natural.
Top tips to promote living in freedom:
1. Use cash as much as possible and use it locally. Not only does it help you budget but it keeps cash king
2. Commit to talking control and personal responsibility for your own health. Take some exercise, meditate, get enough sleep, and watch what you put into and onto your body. The less interaction you have with pharma sponsored medical agencies the better.
3. Look for alternative health practitioners to support you if you do ever become unwell, or better still study to become one yourself. Consider homeopathy, herbalism, naturopathy, functional medicine, German new medicine, essential oil remedies and bach flower remedies to name but a few.
4. Connect with and buy from or use the services of freedom supporting groups. There are many food alliances now, as well as the peoples health alliance, that can connect you to like minded individuals, and alternative health practitioners.
5. Form your own groups or connections where you can. Even if you only find one other like minded person near you, its better than being alone. Try to grow your connections into a community and then consider trading with each other. You can trade skills, food, services, kindness credits etc.
6. Grow as much of your own food as you can. Gardening is good exercise, therapeutic, and rewarding. Knowing where your food has come from and what is in it, is very important to your health.
7. If you have children and are able to home school, do. Schools are indoctrination camps, no matter how "nice" you think the teachers are. I am proud to say that we are the only local business that I know of that offers staff flexibility in their roles to enable them to homeschool children. If you have a business, consider such a flexibility initiative too. Let's support each other.
8. Be a conscious consumer. Stop giving money to Amazon because it is convenient. Convenience is the death knell of freedom. These people only understand money and control so starve them of both. Also, break free of the marketing and brain washing that is designed to make us keep purchasing stuff we do not need. Lots of things can be upcycled or refurbished/repurposed.
9. Learn a new skill that might be useful to you. This could be sewing, foraging, archery, cooking, woodworking, fixing engines, repairing roofs. Anything! You get the idea. In addition to this have a basic store of items that would be needed in a short term worst case scenario such as batteries, oil lamps, tinned food, first aid kit, basic camping equipment, extra water and purification methods, a store of fuel, a generator if you can afford one, spare blankets etc. Having these things simply means you don't need to worry about "what if".
10. Free yourself of debt as much as you can. Do you really need that subnoscription to Netflix. Do you really need satellite TV or any TV at all? Have you cancelled your TV licence? Go through your bank statement and commit to ending payments for things that you simply do not need in order to live an enjoyable life, especially if those payments are to companies supporting the current state of affairs.
Finally, don't forget to smile and live. Most of the point of what they are doing is to strip every bit of joy out of your life. You can easily stop that from happening by finding joy in the things that you do, and doing things that bring you joy.
You can begin to exit the system and start reclaiming and living in sovereignty. It just takes a little effort before it becomes natural.
Top tips to promote living in freedom:
1. Use cash as much as possible and use it locally. Not only does it help you budget but it keeps cash king
2. Commit to talking control and personal responsibility for your own health. Take some exercise, meditate, get enough sleep, and watch what you put into and onto your body. The less interaction you have with pharma sponsored medical agencies the better.
3. Look for alternative health practitioners to support you if you do ever become unwell, or better still study to become one yourself. Consider homeopathy, herbalism, naturopathy, functional medicine, German new medicine, essential oil remedies and bach flower remedies to name but a few.
4. Connect with and buy from or use the services of freedom supporting groups. There are many food alliances now, as well as the peoples health alliance, that can connect you to like minded individuals, and alternative health practitioners.
5. Form your own groups or connections where you can. Even if you only find one other like minded person near you, its better than being alone. Try to grow your connections into a community and then consider trading with each other. You can trade skills, food, services, kindness credits etc.
6. Grow as much of your own food as you can. Gardening is good exercise, therapeutic, and rewarding. Knowing where your food has come from and what is in it, is very important to your health.
7. If you have children and are able to home school, do. Schools are indoctrination camps, no matter how "nice" you think the teachers are. I am proud to say that we are the only local business that I know of that offers staff flexibility in their roles to enable them to homeschool children. If you have a business, consider such a flexibility initiative too. Let's support each other.
8. Be a conscious consumer. Stop giving money to Amazon because it is convenient. Convenience is the death knell of freedom. These people only understand money and control so starve them of both. Also, break free of the marketing and brain washing that is designed to make us keep purchasing stuff we do not need. Lots of things can be upcycled or refurbished/repurposed.
9. Learn a new skill that might be useful to you. This could be sewing, foraging, archery, cooking, woodworking, fixing engines, repairing roofs. Anything! You get the idea. In addition to this have a basic store of items that would be needed in a short term worst case scenario such as batteries, oil lamps, tinned food, first aid kit, basic camping equipment, extra water and purification methods, a store of fuel, a generator if you can afford one, spare blankets etc. Having these things simply means you don't need to worry about "what if".
10. Free yourself of debt as much as you can. Do you really need that subnoscription to Netflix. Do you really need satellite TV or any TV at all? Have you cancelled your TV licence? Go through your bank statement and commit to ending payments for things that you simply do not need in order to live an enjoyable life, especially if those payments are to companies supporting the current state of affairs.
Finally, don't forget to smile and live. Most of the point of what they are doing is to strip every bit of joy out of your life. You can easily stop that from happening by finding joy in the things that you do, and doing things that bring you joy.
👍1
Forwarded from The People’s Health Alliance UK
We saw what happened 3 years ago.
Many of us felt attacked and our health threatened.
Don’t feel like that again. Do what you must to protect yourself and your family.
We’ve got solutions.
Find out more now and feel content you are supported. 🌟🔥🌟
my-medical-choice.org
Please remember to use referral code ‘PHAMMC’ when signing up.
Many of us felt attacked and our health threatened.
Don’t feel like that again. Do what you must to protect yourself and your family.
We’ve got solutions.
Find out more now and feel content you are supported. 🌟🔥🌟
my-medical-choice.org
Please remember to use referral code ‘PHAMMC’ when signing up.
Forwarded from Tommy Robinson News
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Andrew Bridgen tried to get his “Child Protection Bill” in motion in parliament which seeks to prevent children from being socially "transitioned" without their parents knowledge in school.
Not only did Labour block it, many "conservatives" did too!
Calling Andrew a "conspiracy theorist" and "far right" as they went, absolutely sickening!
Not only did Labour block it, many "conservatives" did too!
Calling Andrew a "conspiracy theorist" and "far right" as they went, absolutely sickening!
Department of Health and Social Care - Tweet - https://twitter.com/DHSCgovuk/status/1673292524889284608?s=20
See comments and replies....
See comments and replies....
Forwarded from Fifi 4 Freedom_A Stand in the Park UK (FiFi Rose)
These Keep Cash flyers are my favourite for getting the message across! Very effective as people pounce on them believing them to be real £20 notes! I've left them all over the place. 🤣 You can download them for printing along with many other flyers outlining the dangers of CBDCs here: https://www.cashisfreedom.uk/#downloads-1
@astandintheparkuk
@astandintheparkuk
Forwarded from Fighting 4 AZ
The Control Group Data - Vaccinated / Unvaccinated:
• Chronic Conditions - 60% / 5.71%
• Arthritis - 16.67% / 0%
• Heart Disease - 48% / 0%
• Diabetes - 10% / 0%
• Asthma - 7.7% / 0%
• Autism - 2.5% / 0%
• ADHD - 9.4% / 0.47%
• Cancer - 6.0% / 0%
• Chronic Conditions - 60% / 5.71%
• Arthritis - 16.67% / 0%
• Heart Disease - 48% / 0%
• Diabetes - 10% / 0%
• Asthma - 7.7% / 0%
• Autism - 2.5% / 0%
• ADHD - 9.4% / 0.47%
• Cancer - 6.0% / 0%
Forwarded from Big Brother Watch
British public vehemently opposes a digital pound, according to polling data.
But the Government & the Bank of England are still pushing for a CBDC.
We have until TOMORROW to call out these plans.
Have your say today: https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/campaigns/no-spycoin/#TAKEACTION
Subscribe | @BigBrotherWatchHQ
But the Government & the Bank of England are still pushing for a CBDC.
We have until TOMORROW to call out these plans.
Have your say today: https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/campaigns/no-spycoin/#TAKEACTION
Subscribe | @BigBrotherWatchHQ
Forwarded from Natural News
MEDICAL MURDER whistleblower: NHS ordered EUTHANASIA to inflate COVID-19 deaths in hospitals
An anonymous whistleblower has revealed that officials at the U.K. National Health Service (NHS) ordered medical staff to euthanize patients to artificially inflate the number of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths.
The whistleblower, who went by the pseudonym Dr. John, also shared that NHS hospitals were far from being overwhelmed during the COVID-19 pandemic, contrary to reports by authorities and the mainstream media. Moreover, he disclosed how NHS executives cooked the books regarding COVID-19 fatalities using two methods.
First, they instructed medical staff to provide minimal care to patients and just let them die – a move that amounted to negligence. Second, they instructed staff to euthanize patients by means of the End of Life Care program with the help of the drug midazolam.
According to the Daily Expose, Dr. John's testimony "highlights the negative impact of changes in care policies, leading to patients not receiving proper follow-up care and negative outcomes for patients and their families." It also reveals how the British government "authorized the essential 'mass murder' of the elderly and vulnerable by midazolam injection and then told the public that COVID-19 was to blame."
The whistleblower's claims are supported by a report penned by the U.K. Care Quality Commission (CQC) released in November 2020. According to the said report, 34 percent of NHS staff were pressured into placing Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders on COVID-19 patients with disabilities and learning difficulties.
Incidentally, the report stressed that every decision about DNR "must be made on the basis of a careful assessment of each individual's situation and should never be dictated by 'blanket' policies." But based on Dr. John's disclosures, the NHS's blanket policies played a big role in these DNRs that were used to manipulate the actual number of COVID-19 fatalities.
Fear of COVID caused patients to miss much-needed medical care
Dr. John also pointed out how the neglectful policies in hospitals have led to patients not receiving proper follow-up care, resulting in worse outcomes.
"I used to see an average of 20 patients per day, that dropped to one to two patients during the first lockdown. I have even witnessed an elderly lady with horrific broken bones come into the hospital three weeks after her accident as she was too scared of catching the coronavirus to visit the hospital sooner. In the end, the pain overcame the fear."
The whistleblower added that he also performed assessments on people with chest pains in their homes. According to him, these patients feared COVID-19 so much that they would rather suffer a heart attack than catch SARS-CoV-2.
Moreover, he stressed that due to the follow-up visits failing to happen, parents often took things into their own hands – including removing casts from their children's broken limbs. Dr. John also cited the case of an elderly woman who underwent a hip operation. After her surgery, she only had a single face-to-face follow up with a physiologist and a single phone follow-up.
"I found her laid in her mess on incontinence pads, her dignity taken because she was bed-bound with a fixed rotated leg, unable to transfer to a commode," he recalled. "Her family was extremely upset."
Dr. John's testimony against the NHS was grounded on personal experience, as one of his family members died of cancer because he wasn't given the required care. The said relative was given seven years to live, but only lasted one year under the new system.
"I've also witnessed the desperation of families witnessing their own relatives dying sooner than they should have due to the lack of professional care that should have been provided," Dr. John said "It has been a very sad year in which I have witnessed the demise of the health service."
https://www.brighteon.com/9e96b769-5097-41f3-b9ec-a9cdb2fa0c29
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
An anonymous whistleblower has revealed that officials at the U.K. National Health Service (NHS) ordered medical staff to euthanize patients to artificially inflate the number of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths.
The whistleblower, who went by the pseudonym Dr. John, also shared that NHS hospitals were far from being overwhelmed during the COVID-19 pandemic, contrary to reports by authorities and the mainstream media. Moreover, he disclosed how NHS executives cooked the books regarding COVID-19 fatalities using two methods.
First, they instructed medical staff to provide minimal care to patients and just let them die – a move that amounted to negligence. Second, they instructed staff to euthanize patients by means of the End of Life Care program with the help of the drug midazolam.
According to the Daily Expose, Dr. John's testimony "highlights the negative impact of changes in care policies, leading to patients not receiving proper follow-up care and negative outcomes for patients and their families." It also reveals how the British government "authorized the essential 'mass murder' of the elderly and vulnerable by midazolam injection and then told the public that COVID-19 was to blame."
The whistleblower's claims are supported by a report penned by the U.K. Care Quality Commission (CQC) released in November 2020. According to the said report, 34 percent of NHS staff were pressured into placing Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders on COVID-19 patients with disabilities and learning difficulties.
Incidentally, the report stressed that every decision about DNR "must be made on the basis of a careful assessment of each individual's situation and should never be dictated by 'blanket' policies." But based on Dr. John's disclosures, the NHS's blanket policies played a big role in these DNRs that were used to manipulate the actual number of COVID-19 fatalities.
Fear of COVID caused patients to miss much-needed medical care
Dr. John also pointed out how the neglectful policies in hospitals have led to patients not receiving proper follow-up care, resulting in worse outcomes.
"I used to see an average of 20 patients per day, that dropped to one to two patients during the first lockdown. I have even witnessed an elderly lady with horrific broken bones come into the hospital three weeks after her accident as she was too scared of catching the coronavirus to visit the hospital sooner. In the end, the pain overcame the fear."
The whistleblower added that he also performed assessments on people with chest pains in their homes. According to him, these patients feared COVID-19 so much that they would rather suffer a heart attack than catch SARS-CoV-2.
Moreover, he stressed that due to the follow-up visits failing to happen, parents often took things into their own hands – including removing casts from their children's broken limbs. Dr. John also cited the case of an elderly woman who underwent a hip operation. After her surgery, she only had a single face-to-face follow up with a physiologist and a single phone follow-up.
"I found her laid in her mess on incontinence pads, her dignity taken because she was bed-bound with a fixed rotated leg, unable to transfer to a commode," he recalled. "Her family was extremely upset."
Dr. John's testimony against the NHS was grounded on personal experience, as one of his family members died of cancer because he wasn't given the required care. The said relative was given seven years to live, but only lasted one year under the new system.
"I've also witnessed the desperation of families witnessing their own relatives dying sooner than they should have due to the lack of professional care that should have been provided," Dr. John said "It has been a very sad year in which I have witnessed the demise of the health service."
https://www.brighteon.com/9e96b769-5097-41f3-b9ec-a9cdb2fa0c29
Join and share 👉@NaturalNewsMedia
Brighteon
Lawsuit Brings Hope For Justice: Father Fights Mission To END Hospital CDC Protocol Killings
Stew Peters ShowJune 23, 2023Scott Schara is a man on a mission. A heroic mission, straight from God.Scott Schara, the father of murdered Grace Schara, joins Paul Harrell to talk about Ascension Hospitals response to his lawsuit that accuses them of killing…
❤1