❤️🤩❤️🔥🔥The link to this recording has changed! 🔥🔥❤️🤩❤️

Do you have medical conditions, allergies, and/or take drugs that may interfere with emergency treatment or surgery?

Do you worry about what would happen if you or a family member were unconscious and unable to discuss treatment options?

Do you want to protect you and your family from unwanted medical procedures, including blood transfusions & vaccinations, in case of an emergency or accident?

Join Lisa Dunnington & Gio Castagno to understand how My Medical Choice can protect you & your loved ones in these times of medical tyranny & misinformation. The ultimate insurance policy to give you the peace of mind that is priceless! Follow this link: https://youtu.be/0Q8wCs31kHw

The annual membership to MY MEDICAL CHOICE is £25 but you can receive a 20% discount off your 1st year using the code PHAMMC.

MMC have provided a comprehensive, concise & easy to follow set of FAQ’s https://www.my-medical-choice.org/faq and you can find 'How to' videos here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLtkIEDejMG1sLfeNUQdcjV1zyydjE1OFt

"Supreme Court ruling: Covid vaccines are not vaccines.

Hardly anyone noticed that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. won the case against all the pharmaceutical lobbyists. Covid vaccines are not vaccines. In its ruling, the Supreme Court confirms that the damage caused by Covid's mRNA gene therapies is irreparable. Since the Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, there are no further appeals and the appeal possibilities have been exhausted.  Robert F. Kennedy emphasised in a first statement that this was a success that was only possible thanks to the international cooperation of a large number of lawyers and scientists. Of course, this judgement opens something internationally, especially here in Switzerland this judgement should make waves, because Switzerland has a special position here with its federal constitution.  For one thing, the Nuremberg Code is in the constitution with Article 118b, and the misuse of genetic engineering on humans is prohibited in Switzerland under Article 119 of the Federal Constitution.  This is supplemented by Article 230bis of the Criminal Code, ... The perpetrators thus face up to 10 years in prison.  However, this ruling should also make the rest of the world sit up and take notice, because the Nuremberg Code has international validity and is also included in Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In the case of criminal charges, reference must be made in the declaration to the thalidomide scandal in order to lend special weight to the significance of this charge. So politics is in for a hot autumn. One should also know that the German lawyer Dr. Rainer Füllmich and more than 100 other German lawyers were involved in these trials.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-york-supreme-court-reinstates-all-employees-fired-being-unvaccinated-orders-backpay

No media is talking about it, neither in Switzerland nor in Europe.
Unfortunately, this only comes with a time delay again.

So forward the resolution to your family members, friends & acquaintances."

‘Our Baby Was Killed By 4-Month Vaccines’

When Willow went in for her well-check visit at 4 months old, she was given the Hepatitis B, DTaP, Prevnar 13 and Rotavirus vaccines.

After the first injection, her “face turned bloody red and she started screaming,” mother Priscilla Zielinski recounts. The nurse then requested help to hold Willow down for the remaining injections, a memory still that haunts Zielinski to this day.

The following Thursday, a fatal brain hemorrhage took Willow’s life.

“Do your research.” Willow’s parents warn others, “They're not safe ... there are no double [blind] placebos.” Willow’s photograph is placed in memoriam at the front of the #CHDBUS.

‘We’re going to keep asking the same question,’ remarked CHD.TV Director Polly Tommey. ‘When will it be enough?’

Watch the FULL STORY on #CHDTV 👇

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/bermuda-freedom-fighters/

Coordinated Information Control - UK Column News - 11th August 2023

- Childrens Health Defense: Centralizing Information Control! Inside the EU’s Latest Proposal to Censor the Media
- Reclaim The Net: X CEO Linda Yaccarino: “Lawful But Awful” Content To Be Hidden
- Reclaim The Net: Australia’s Intelligence Agencies Are Instructed To Tackle Online “Misinformation”
- Reclaim The Net: Australian Communications Minister Michelle Rowland Tries To Justify New Censorship Law
- AusGov Infrastructure Dept: New ACMA powers to combat misinformation and disinformation
- ExcessDeathsAU on Substack: Full-spectrum dominance: Western Australia’s leadership engaged in psychological warfare during Covid
- Deutsche Welle: German intel: AfD taken over by extremist factions
- Deutsche Welle: German AfD: Revival of far-right a 'threat to Jewish life'
- The Washington Stand: UN Expert Argues Religious Beliefs Must Change to Accommodate LGBT Ideology
- Victor Madrigal-Borloz' report for the United Nations
- Madrigal-Borloz:
“In some cases, religious narratives have been deliberately used to justify violence and discrimination — often in defiance of the doctrine of those faiths, and also beyond the scope of the right freedom of religion or belief.”
- Human Rights Council: Freedom of religion or belief, and freedom from violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (Document)
- Persuasion on Substack: The United Nations vs Free Speech
- The HE Byte: Vocal Peers Press for Swift Action on Unregistered Schools and Home Education Registers
- The Cradle: A leap toward totalitarianism: Jordan adopts cybercrime law seen as threat to free speech (Reuters Archive)
- Stroud News and Journal: Stroud MP: "The Light seems to sow division and create fear"
- UK Column Article: Mainstream Press: Is the worm actually turning?

Sources: www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-11th-august-2023

This is the way....... Join us.. https://news.1rj.ru/str/Not_On_The_Beeb

“From my memory, if you got 90% of your staff vaccinated, then the government would give you money. So, I put the puzzle pieces together and there was a financial motivation.” — Danielle Baker

Baker later found out that because of the CARES Act, Ohio’s Hospice received $7.2 million.

#TheDefender

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/danielle-baker-pfizer-covid-vaccine-lawsuit/

HORROR: All Cause Mortality hits epidemic levels.

Children under the age of 24 are dying at 40% excess mortality over the last TWO years.

There is only one explanation for this. The untested and mandated Covid vaccine is killing young people slowly.

No more excuses. It’s time for arrests.

Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES

If you are interested in homeopathy for teeth issues I found this website really useful about the various remedies

https://cristinavillacorta.com/blog/dental-works/

"An unvaccinated driving instructor won a payout after his employer discriminated against his “sincerely held beliefs” about not taking medicine".

"Aaron Green successfully sued the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) for £6,336 after it refused him overtime because he had not been vaccinated twice against Covid".

"A tribunal heard that Jens Gavermark, Mr Green’s manager, rejected his request to work overtime in October 2021, claiming that the policy was “paused”.

"But after a colleague had a similar request approved the same day, Mr Green was told he could not work extra hours until a risk assessment had been carried out as he had not been double jabbed".

We said this would happen. Bring on the lawsuits but to be fair what is uber annoying and people DO NOT put two and two together on, is that if the employer discriminated because they were following the Government's "rules" then it's fecking obvious the Government discriminated too by making those rules and therefore acted unlawfully. Yet nothing is done about that fact!

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/08/12/driving-instructor-unvaxxed-overtime-wins-payout-dvsa/

What's the difference between CCTV cameras in supermarkets vs facial recognition cameras. Do you know? And is there an issue?

CCTV is video surveillance technology in which many cameras are used and are connected in parallel to several monitoring systems. It is generally a recording system that can preserve data and such systems are used in public places like airports, roads, public transport, town centers and supermarkets to monitor and detect security incidents and provide and preserve a feed of what may have happened during an incident.

Facial Recognition Technology is different because facial recognition is aimed at identifying or confirming a person’s identity BEFORE any incident occurs, by comparing different images against each other or to its own repository, rather than just being a tool to provide video evidence of an incident that has happened.

Facial recognition technology systems are quick and do not require any direct interaction with a person, say on a door, checking faces of people. This is because an algorithm learns a face, and the cameras find and detect it. Some analysis is done by the system and the data is converted into a faceprint and the system, NOT a human, confirms the identity of the person in the face print.

The issue with this is the use of a machine to make matches of faces, along with how your digital data is handled, for instance by a supermarket. How and why it is used and whether you have consented to the same. Frankly alot of time it is not used for security at all and is in fact used for advertising and marketing purposes. But you can see how it could also be used for nefarious reasons, to block entry if your face is on a list.

Further, for in-store payments, the facial recognition payment mechanism has now gained popularity. When making payments in a store, consumers scan their faces standing in front of point-of-sale devices equipped with cameras. Horrific!

Do we really want to move from having closed circuit cameras purely for security to this sort of system? Who is going to police it to make sure it is not used inappropriately? How can we be sure it is accurate? And most importantly did we consent to our faces and biometric data being taken and used in this way?

So the next time someone says to you that supermarkets have always had cameras so what is your problem, your answer should be "yes they have, but not facial recognition". The latter is very different and is a slippery slope in our opinion.

Here is an article from some months ago highlighting the issues. Personally we are just staying away from institutions that insist on using this kind of facial scanning software. And we do not believe it is just Hikivision that is the problem.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11853263/Facial-recognition-Sports-Direct-Spar-using-Chinese-cameras-spot-shoplifters.html

What else?! Of course they want to empower themselves and not protect us. Only we can stop this madness! 👍💪😀🚫