"An unvaccinated driving instructor won a payout after his employer discriminated against his “sincerely held beliefs” about not taking medicine".

"Aaron Green successfully sued the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) for £6,336 after it refused him overtime because he had not been vaccinated twice against Covid".

"A tribunal heard that Jens Gavermark, Mr Green’s manager, rejected his request to work overtime in October 2021, claiming that the policy was “paused”.

"But after a colleague had a similar request approved the same day, Mr Green was told he could not work extra hours until a risk assessment had been carried out as he had not been double jabbed".

We said this would happen. Bring on the lawsuits but to be fair what is uber annoying and people DO NOT put two and two together on, is that if the employer discriminated because they were following the Government's "rules" then it's fecking obvious the Government discriminated too by making those rules and therefore acted unlawfully. Yet nothing is done about that fact!

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/08/12/driving-instructor-unvaxxed-overtime-wins-payout-dvsa/

What's the difference between CCTV cameras in supermarkets vs facial recognition cameras. Do you know? And is there an issue?

CCTV is video surveillance technology in which many cameras are used and are connected in parallel to several monitoring systems. It is generally a recording system that can preserve data and such systems are used in public places like airports, roads, public transport, town centers and supermarkets to monitor and detect security incidents and provide and preserve a feed of what may have happened during an incident.

Facial Recognition Technology is different because facial recognition is aimed at identifying or confirming a person’s identity BEFORE any incident occurs, by comparing different images against each other or to its own repository, rather than just being a tool to provide video evidence of an incident that has happened.

Facial recognition technology systems are quick and do not require any direct interaction with a person, say on a door, checking faces of people. This is because an algorithm learns a face, and the cameras find and detect it. Some analysis is done by the system and the data is converted into a faceprint and the system, NOT a human, confirms the identity of the person in the face print.

The issue with this is the use of a machine to make matches of faces, along with how your digital data is handled, for instance by a supermarket. How and why it is used and whether you have consented to the same. Frankly alot of time it is not used for security at all and is in fact used for advertising and marketing purposes. But you can see how it could also be used for nefarious reasons, to block entry if your face is on a list.

Further, for in-store payments, the facial recognition payment mechanism has now gained popularity. When making payments in a store, consumers scan their faces standing in front of point-of-sale devices equipped with cameras. Horrific!

Do we really want to move from having closed circuit cameras purely for security to this sort of system? Who is going to police it to make sure it is not used inappropriately? How can we be sure it is accurate? And most importantly did we consent to our faces and biometric data being taken and used in this way?

So the next time someone says to you that supermarkets have always had cameras so what is your problem, your answer should be "yes they have, but not facial recognition". The latter is very different and is a slippery slope in our opinion.

Here is an article from some months ago highlighting the issues. Personally we are just staying away from institutions that insist on using this kind of facial scanning software. And we do not believe it is just Hikivision that is the problem.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11853263/Facial-recognition-Sports-Direct-Spar-using-Chinese-cameras-spot-shoplifters.html

What else?! Of course they want to empower themselves and not protect us. Only we can stop this madness! 👍💪😀🚫

Taken From Heart Prints; The Connection Between Mother & Baby Is Eternal

A baby will heal their mother. A mother will heal their baby

For 41 weeks, the cells circulate and merge backwards and forwards, and after the baby is born, many of these cells stay in the mother’s body, leaving a permanent imprint in the mothers tissues, bones, brain, and skin, and often stay there for decades.

If a mother's heart is injured, fetal cells will rush to the site of the injury and change into different types of cells that specialize in mending the heart.

The baby helps repair the mother, while the mother builds the baby.

It’s incredible how mothers’ bodies protect the baby at all costs, and the baby protects & rebuilds the mother back - so that the baby can develop safely and survive.

This is called Fetal Maternal Microchimerism which we know is the universal connection of 2 souls who can physically heal one another through the energy of love

LOVE HEALS 💗💗💗

We are delighted to introduce our new additional distribution service
- Wake up your Neighbours
 
If you want The Light truthpaper to be delivered to homes right near you quickly and anonymously, please click here to make an order.
 
We have a team of area managers in many parts of the country waiting to deliver the uncensored truth to the streets you specify.
 
Go here to check if we cover your postcode, and if you'd like to deliver to an area not yet covered, please email The Light Recruit info@thelightrecruit.co.uk
 
Our normal distribution channels will still operate as before - this is simply another way of getting the news to the public who are being blindsided by what is being fed to them by corrupt governments and criminal corporations via every other media channel there is.

Thank you for your ongoing support,
 
The Light Paper Team
https://thelightpaper.co.uk/neighbours

FOX NEWS goes deeper into the gutter everyday 🤥

FOX News: "COVID vaccines and boosters shown to protect pregnant women and newborns: ‘Transferred protection"; No, ONLY antibody levels examined! not safety! the COVID mRNA technology gene based

https://palexander.substack.com/p/fox-news-covid-vaccines-and-boosters

#mRNAsafety #pregnancyvaccines #maternalhealth #newborns #antibodies #shedding #transmission

It’s should read if you have had your Birthday otherwise it be 2022. 💪🦁💜

Going on holiday? ULEZ expansion will cover Heathrow Airport

Yes, UK's largest airport, 29+ miles from Mayor of London's office, also covered by scheme public don't want

536 planes still land & take off there every single day; this about "clean air"?

https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/new-ulez-expansion-cover-heathrow-27517591

AARON SIRI'S DEBATE WITH PAUL OFFIT
https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/aaron-siris-debate-with-paul-offit/ 🔥Join us.. https://news.1rj.ru/str/Not_On_The_Beeb

This applies to anyone falling for any of the latest nonsense 😂😂

IS ANYONE SURPRISED?

What an utter disgrace.

"Professor Sir Jonathan Van-Tam, England’s former deputy chief medical officer who became one face of the government Covid pandemic response, has taken a job as senior medical consultant at vaccine giant Moderna"

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/jonathan-van-tam-job-moderna-vaccine-b2395006.html

'UK birth slump dubbed ‘good for planet’ as number of babies born hits 20-year low'

"Birth rate slump in West will address overconsumption, former government adviser says:

Professor Sarah Harper CBE, founder and director of the Oxford Institute of Population Ageing and a former government adviser, said falling birth rates in the West were “good for… our planet”.

Her comments came after official figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed there were 605,479 live births in England and Wales last year, the lowest number since 2002.

The total was down 3.1pc compared to 2021..

Prof Harper told the Telegraph: “I think it’s a good thing that the high-income, high-consuming countries of the world are reducing the number of children that they’re having. I’m quite positive about that.”

The academic said declining fertility in rich countries would help to address the “general overconsumption that we have at the moment”, which has a negative impact on the planet.
Prof Harper served on the Prime Minister’s Council for Science and Technology between 2014 and 2017. She was awarded a CBE for services to demography in 2018.

She said: “We will see smaller populations in high-income countries going forward. It’s just going to be a trend of the 21st century and that will actually be good for general overall overconsumption that we have at the moment and our planet.”
Research has found that wealthy nations tend to have much larger carbon footprints than poorer countries, as rich people can afford to buy more goods, travel more and do other activities that generate emissions.

Carbon emissions from high-income countries were 29 times larger than low-income countries on a per capita basis in 2020, World Bank figures show.

While slowing population growth may reduce carbon emissions, analysts have warned that it also poses significant challenges for economic growth.
A shrinking workforce puts pressure on younger generations to pay more tax for the healthcare of older people. It can also lead to worker shortages that can slow growth."

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2023/08/17/20-year-low-for-baby-born-in-england-good-news-for-planet/