PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP, vaccines are NOT SAFE nor are they effective! You can easily prevent these illnesses people vaccinate for, WITHOUT VACCINES, and if you happen to contract one of these illnesses, you can also easily cure them! Stop being afraid of these illnesses, they're called CHILDHOOD illnesses for a reason. Children are supposed to get them during childhood! These illnesses help STRENGTHEN the immune system! Educate yourself about these illnesses and you will realize what little risk these illnesses might have does not outweigh what little benefits vaccines may have...but the risk of vaccinating surely does though. You can always decide WHEN to vaccinate, but you can never undo it once it's done. You're playing literal Russian roulette with your child's health. Health does not come in a needle! Educate BEFORE you vaccinate!

- Erica Lynn -

Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES

👆👆 over 1million signatures...

"Simplicity boils down to two steps: Identify the essential. Eliminate the rest."
​ ~ Leo Babauta

1,656,598 signatures...

🚨 We've just written to Keir Starmer urging him to ABANDON any plans for a mandatory digital ID

A digital ID would tear up our rights & make us all reliant on a digital pass to go about our daily lives

We're saying no to digital ID & a checkpoint Britain. Read our joint letter⤵️
https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/press-releases/rights-groups-urge-starmer-to-abandon-plans-for-mandatory-digital-id/

Subscribe | @BigBrotherWatchHQ

1,824,568 signatures

‼️ DIGITAL ID TUBE OUTREACH - THE BRITS ARE FIGHTING THIS HARD

Yesterday, as a team of young minds, we hit the tubes to fight back and take this message directly to the people. Reaching the public face-to-face is the best and only way to wake people up to this incoming dystopia!

This is not about “convenience” or “security” – it is about control. Digital ID is the gateway to a Chinese-style social credit system where your freedoms depend on compliance. It means censorship, debanking, restrictions on protest and free speech, no-driving zones, constant tracking, and mass data breaches waiting to happen.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🇨🇦PCN | t.me/PrivateCanadianNews
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

WOW! Secretary Bobby Kennedy just took a MAJOR victory lap on Big Pharma and the medical establishment by listing major MAHA victories.

"Removing harmful chemicals from our food, including petroleum-based food dyes...defining ultra-processed foods, front-of-package labeling for ultra-processed foods, requiring nutrition and metabolic health courses for medical schools...improving food for military, schools and hospitals, updating water quality standards...reforming SNAP by removing soda and candy from the program."

2,000,056

🇬🇧 Labour Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy’s poor attempt to justify Digital ID. (1 min, 54 sec)

2,163,169 signatures - if you agree, please share 🙂

I've analysed pro digital ID posts/talking points from politicians over the last 3 days for psychological manipulation and it's of course there

Here's some examples

Framing

Starmer and other Labour politicians presenting the policy in a positive, narrow lens (e.g., as "security" or "modernisation"), while omitting broader and serious implications. This is a common tactic to shift focus to the "common good" idea. In this case, digital ID is framed as a fix to illegal migration. This is manipulative because it exploits public anxiety about this issue. Also the attempt to link digital ID to "fairness" and "modernity," is reframing authoritarian-leaning policy as benevolent, making opposition seem irrational and backward. This is evident in Starmer's empathetic opener in his speech ("I know you're worried"), which co-opts public fears

Carrot and stick

This was obvious in Lisa Nandy's Sky interview. She offered incentives (convenience, security) for adoption, while implying penalties (inability to work/access services) for non-compliance. This creates a false binary: comply for "benefits" or face exclusion from society/economy. This preys on economic fears and goes for those root needs at the base of Maslow's heirachy of needs (I discussed this in my video on Friday)

Gaslighting

This is a common one. Lots of minimising or invalidating concerns (e.g., privacy fears) by portraying critics as alarmist, misinformed or our old fave, conspiracy theorists, through the process of "normalisation" ("all these countries have it"). This undermines legitimate privacy/surveillance and control concerns by equating them to paranoia

Over the coming weeks I expect to see the leveraging of "official voices" or "influencers" in an attempt to build credibility around this issue, in order to reduce scrutiny. This will be to play to reliance on trust in authority in order to bypass debate, making the policy seem inevitable (creates loss of hope and acceptance via "inevitability mindset)

It's important to know all this so that you do not get caught out by it, do not get angry or fearful, and that you call it out for what it is. Please also consider teaching others about it

Cont'd below