📟 Media Monitoring: Pager attack on Hezbollah

Thousands of Hezbollah terrorists were hit in a precision pager attack, yet some media outlets downplayed it as a “bizarre” incident in Lebanon. Let’s stick to the facts: a globally recognized terror group was targeted, not random civilians. The media must get the story right.

Thousands of Hezbollah pagers explode, and social media’s misinformation machine goes into overdrive. From accusations of Israeli terrorism phones to claims of civilian targeting—none of it’s true. Here’s the reality: Hezbollah terrorists were the targets. Facts matter.

📰 Media Monitoring: Hezbollah is a proscribed terror organization. Its members are not considered civilians.

🚨REVEALED: Journalists working for foreign media in Gaza have participated in Hamas’ “Day of Loyalty to the Palestinian Journalist,” an annual event hosted by the terror org’s Government Media Office with the stated aim of aligning the media with Hamas’ agenda.

Israel targets Hezbollah’s terror infrastructure, but media headlines tell a different story. From claiming "indiscriminate" strikes to ignoring Hezbollah's rocket attacks, the spin distorts reality. Here’s a reminder: Hezbollah fired first, and Israel is defending its civilians. Facts matter.

▶️ WATCH: What's the "Blue Line?"

▶️ WATCH: Hezbollah is Iran’s puppet, not Lebanon’s protector. So why are the media whitewashing the truth?

Media outlets like The New York Times are painting Hezbollah’s Nasrallah as some 'charismatic leader'? Let’s not forget he’s a terrorist with blood on his hands. Media glorification of figures like this is disturbing and misleading. Journalism should be about truth, not soft obituaries.

▶️ WATCH: Hamas spent $1B on its tunnels but not on a future for Gaza’s people

▶️ WATCH: The Day the Music Stopped

▶️ WATCH: Growing Up Under Hamas: A Firsthand Account

On the one-year anniversary of Hamas' brutal attack on Israel, some media outlets shifted focus from the victims to Gaza. Why use a day of mourning for Israel to spotlight the war instead of the atrocities committed? Here's how it happened.

Qatari-funded Al Jazeera claims to have the scoop. While we've spent the past year (and many years before that) exposing anti-Israel media bias, we’ve apparently had it all wrong. According to Al Jazeera, both CNN and the BBC are pro-Israel. Not likely.

CBS reprimands a journalist for asking tough questions about Ta-Nehisi Coates' misleading claims on Israel. Why is challenging anti-Israel narratives treated as taboo? When facts are uncomfortable, integrity shouldn't take a back seat.

This is it. The New York Times has crossed the line into outright Holocaust distortion, comparing Gaza to Nazi concentration camps. This isn’t just bad journalism—it’s dangerous. Jews will suffer from this grotesque rewriting of history, and it cannot stand.

NYT’s Gaza piece featured X-ray images claiming to show 5.56 caliber bullets in children’s skulls, but weapons experts have debunked them. With no exit wounds or fractures, the claims don’t hold up. How did this slip through fact-checking?

The New York Times is doubling down on its essay by 65 doctors, despite mounting evidence of inconsistencies and questionable X-ray images. How did these unverified claims make it to print? When journalism fails to fact-check, credibility crumbles.

Invited to teach an undergraduate class, quietly reinstated after a ‘suspension,’ and a flattering feature in The New York Times—just a few of the rewards anti-Israel student protest leaders have snagged after stirring chaos across America’s Ivy Leagues.

CBS News or CBS Views? With ties to terror groups, punishing staff for challenging anti-Israel narratives, and guidelines denying Israel’s capital, CBS seems to have swapped journalism for activism.

Israeli soccer fans chased, beaten unconscious in Amsterdam while mobs yell "Free Palestine." Yet, NYT and others frame it as "soccer clashes," with pundits like Mehdi Hasan and Owen Jones almost justifying the attacks. Let's call it what it was—a modern-day pogrom.