Forwarded from Universal NEWS (Kathy...)
🚨🚨Trump says tax returns release will ‘lead to horrible things for so many people’
live | US politics | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2022/dec/30/donald-trump-tax-returns-us-politics-live
t.me/realUniversalNEWS
live | US politics | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2022/dec/30/donald-trump-tax-returns-us-politics-live
t.me/realUniversalNEWS
the Guardian
Trump says tax returns release will ‘lead to horrible things for so many people’ – as it happened
Former president says documents ‘show how proudly successful I have been’ – follow the latest
👍8❤3🤔3💯2
Forwarded from Maria Benardis
🛑🛑🛑NEW VIDEO🛑🛑🛑
January 2023 & You with Teymara – Reproduced with Permission from Teymara
https://rumble.com/v234wp6-january-2023-and-you-with-teymara-reproduced-with-permission-from-teymara.html
Health store:
https://greekalicious.nyc/product-category/books-and-courses/
X39 LifeWave stem cell activation:
https://lifewave.com/MariaBenardis
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/c-1013195
UGETUBE
https://ugetube.com/@Maria%20Benardis
Maria Benardis Telegram Group
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MariaBenardisGroup
January 2023 & You with Teymara – Reproduced with Permission from Teymara
https://rumble.com/v234wp6-january-2023-and-you-with-teymara-reproduced-with-permission-from-teymara.html
Health store:
https://greekalicious.nyc/product-category/books-and-courses/
X39 LifeWave stem cell activation:
https://lifewave.com/MariaBenardis
Rumble:
https://rumble.com/c/c-1013195
UGETUBE
https://ugetube.com/@Maria%20Benardis
Maria Benardis Telegram Group
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MariaBenardisGroup
Forwarded from Ezra A. Cohen
The CIA attack against Samsung smart TVs was developed in cooperation with the MI5. Weeping Angel places TVs in a 'Fake-Off' mode, so the owner believes the TV is off. In this mode the TV records conversations in the room and sends them over the Internet to a covert CIA server.
Join: Ezra A. Cohen
Join: Ezra A. Cohen
👍10🤬9🔥3
ATTENTION: Below is the form letter to print and send to SCOTUS and Brunson Bothers both. One copy to each.
I will send the addresses as well.
Date it. Sign it.
Put a personal note on the bottom.
Y’all are asking, “But, what can WE do?”.
THIS. This is as easy as it gets. STAND UP. LET’S TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK.
Send these letters.
The one going to the Brunson’s is to give them a more accurate count of the number received by SCOTUS.
I included a dollar in my letter to the Brunson’s to help offset their attorneys fees.
There is no excuse not to do something this easy.
I will send the addresses as well.
Date it. Sign it.
Put a personal note on the bottom.
Y’all are asking, “But, what can WE do?”.
THIS. This is as easy as it gets. STAND UP. LET’S TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK.
Send these letters.
The one going to the Brunson’s is to give them a more accurate count of the number received by SCOTUS.
I included a dollar in my letter to the Brunson’s to help offset their attorneys fees.
There is no excuse not to do something this easy.
👍13
Forwarded from Universal NEWS (Kathy...)
In text:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice
Date:
United States Supreme Court
1 First St NE
Washington, DC 20543
Dear Chief Justice Roberts and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court:
I am petitioning the Court that you hear, adjudicate and, if appropriate, sentence the defendants in Raland J. Brunson v. Alma S.
Adams, et, al., docket No. 22-380.
This is a critical case that summarizes many issues for the United States with regards to respect for the Constitution and for the Oath of Office that our officials take when sworn into office. Many of these officials take both their allegiance to the Constitution and their Oath of Office lightly. A ruling on this, could make all of them much more careful about our Constitution, their Oath of Office and their responsibilities as government officials to the citizenry that elected them.
This was a serious breach of National Security. Two years later, we understand clearly that there are many questions surrounding how many of our states execute their elections. These defendants rebuffed any suggestion to at least review the issues, thus foisting their choice for President on us. If not remedied, this will recur in perpetuity as the elected officials will feel that they have no accountability for their actions. This is how we've ended up with a vote like this about not investigating an election.
These defendants are, like each one of us, responsible for their actions and should be treated equal before the law. Each of us, in our daily lives, takes risks making decisions with everything we do, from driving our cars to operating our businesses. We accept the liability of living a free life where we are responsible for what we do and what our actions cause. Ordinary people are sued every day for traffic accidents and legal work responsibilities. This is no different.
Treating these defendants with the object principal of justice is something that we feel must be exercised. The remedy that the defendants will be permanently barred from public office is only appropriate for the magnitude and effect of this crime. This crime of not following the Constitution and the laws of the United States and forcing the defendant's choice of who is President of the United States on all citizens is clearly treasonous. It is, as if a warring faction placed a candidate into the Office of the Presidency. The economic penalty should be a reminder that this is a serious offense and a warning to all future persons that try to interfere in our free and fair elections.
Since these conflicts involve both the Executive and Legislative branches of our country, this is not something a lower Court should be ruling on. I believe that only the Supreme Court has the supervisory power to adjudicate a case like this.
This is not a case that the Supreme Court can acquiesce to others for a decision. Accept this case for hearing and accept your responsibility to adjudicate this case and determine the appropriate punishments for the defendants that is equitable for not only the plaintiff, but all the citizens of the United States.
This is an emergency for us. It is highly probable that the defendants have foisted on us, the citizens of the United States, their pick, not ours, for President of the United States and this must be remedied immediately.
God Bless America,
John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice
Date:
United States Supreme Court
1 First St NE
Washington, DC 20543
Dear Chief Justice Roberts and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court:
I am petitioning the Court that you hear, adjudicate and, if appropriate, sentence the defendants in Raland J. Brunson v. Alma S.
Adams, et, al., docket No. 22-380.
This is a critical case that summarizes many issues for the United States with regards to respect for the Constitution and for the Oath of Office that our officials take when sworn into office. Many of these officials take both their allegiance to the Constitution and their Oath of Office lightly. A ruling on this, could make all of them much more careful about our Constitution, their Oath of Office and their responsibilities as government officials to the citizenry that elected them.
This was a serious breach of National Security. Two years later, we understand clearly that there are many questions surrounding how many of our states execute their elections. These defendants rebuffed any suggestion to at least review the issues, thus foisting their choice for President on us. If not remedied, this will recur in perpetuity as the elected officials will feel that they have no accountability for their actions. This is how we've ended up with a vote like this about not investigating an election.
These defendants are, like each one of us, responsible for their actions and should be treated equal before the law. Each of us, in our daily lives, takes risks making decisions with everything we do, from driving our cars to operating our businesses. We accept the liability of living a free life where we are responsible for what we do and what our actions cause. Ordinary people are sued every day for traffic accidents and legal work responsibilities. This is no different.
Treating these defendants with the object principal of justice is something that we feel must be exercised. The remedy that the defendants will be permanently barred from public office is only appropriate for the magnitude and effect of this crime. This crime of not following the Constitution and the laws of the United States and forcing the defendant's choice of who is President of the United States on all citizens is clearly treasonous. It is, as if a warring faction placed a candidate into the Office of the Presidency. The economic penalty should be a reminder that this is a serious offense and a warning to all future persons that try to interfere in our free and fair elections.
Since these conflicts involve both the Executive and Legislative branches of our country, this is not something a lower Court should be ruling on. I believe that only the Supreme Court has the supervisory power to adjudicate a case like this.
This is not a case that the Supreme Court can acquiesce to others for a decision. Accept this case for hearing and accept your responsibility to adjudicate this case and determine the appropriate punishments for the defendants that is equitable for not only the plaintiff, but all the citizens of the United States.
This is an emergency for us. It is highly probable that the defendants have foisted on us, the citizens of the United States, their pick, not ours, for President of the United States and this must be remedied immediately.
God Bless America,
👍23
United States Supreme Court
1 First Street NE
Washington, DC 20543
1 First Street NE
Washington, DC 20543
Loy & Raland Brunson
4287 South Harrison Blvd
Apt. 132
Ogden, Utah 84403
4287 South Harrison Blvd
Apt. 132
Ogden, Utah 84403
👍6
WE THE PEOPLE!!!!!
LFG!! 🇺🇸💥
— Jules 🇺🇸🐸⭐️⭐️⭐️
LFG!! 🇺🇸💥
— Jules 🇺🇸🐸⭐️⭐️⭐️
Forwarded from D & Frenz ✝️ (D Anon)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
PART 2. MY MIND IS COMPLETELY BLOWN. THIS IS WHY THEY WILL KILL ETH AND GO WITH XRP.....TRUMP CARD. FUCKING GENUIS
👏7👍5
And another snake 🐍 they picked up....Gets a fine vacation to Gitmo 🏝 https://realrawnews.com/2022/12/military-arrests-former-fda-commisioner-stephen-hahn/
👏34👍13❤🔥1
OK, I watched Bolsonaro's live announcement today. It was a State of the Union and sounded much like one of Trump's rallies, without the theatrics. There were lots of comms, but I was waiting to catch a BOOM. Well, I didn't catch one. However, as soon as the live was over and they changed the status from live to uploaded video, I downloaded the video. Before I could even re-watch the downloaded video, someone else posted a short clip of the end. The cameraman continued filming for another couple of minutes after the live feed was cut. At the end, he points the camera to the floor and someone is clearly heard saying the word "Selva". This means jungle. But it is a military comm. It is usually used as "roger, or 5:5", but that depends on the context. It can also be used for "war". It is also part of another term: "Selva e Aço" (Jungle and Steel). This is the battle cry of the Brazilian Armed Forces. When do you shout the battlecry? When going into battle. B💥💥M!! - Karen
👍38🔥22⚡2