https://x.com/Ilhan

How many times can a naturalized U.S. citizen marry her own brothers to get them into the U.S. legally?

A naturalized U.S. citizen cannot marry their own brothers to facilitate their immigration into the United States because:

Incest Laws: Marrying one's brother is illegal in the United States due to incest laws. This applies across all states, though the specifics might slightly vary.

Immigration Law: Even if such a marriage were somehow legally possible, immigration laws do not support or recognize marriages between siblings for the purpose of immigration. U.S. immigration law allows citizens to sponsor certain family members for visas, but this does not extend to siblings through marriage where no legal marriage can exist.

Family-Based Immigration: A U.S. citizen can sponsor their siblings for immigration, but this is done through a different process (family-based immigration petitions) and does not require or involve marriage. The process for sponsoring a sibling is quite lengthy and involves different visa categories (like F4 for siblings) with significant waiting times based on country-specific quotas.

Therefore, the concept of marrying one's brothers multiple times to get them into the U.S. is not legally feasible or permissible under current U.S. law. If the intent is to help siblings immigrate, the naturalized citizen would need to look into legal family-based visa options available for siblings, which do not involve marriage.

The US Should Not Take Over Gaza

X22-3568-Report



Trump Narrative Shift, It’s Not Left vs Right, It’s About Right vs Wrong, Game Over – Ep. 3568
February 10, 2025

https://news.1rj.ru/str/X22ReportPod/3023

First Question: If the police catch the thief who stole from you and your stolen funds are recovered, can you claim that you have lost the funds and therefore declare yourself bankrupt?

No, you cannot claim that you have lost the funds and declare yourself bankrupt if the stolen funds have been recovered. Bankruptcy is a legal status that typically involves an inability to repay debts due to insufficient assets or income. If the funds stolen from you are recovered, they are returned to you, restoring your financial position to what it was before the theft. Therefore, you would not have a valid basis to claim a loss of those funds or declare bankruptcy solely on that premise, as the recovery negates the loss.

Second Question: Now if the US debt was not a debt but a money laundering, is the US in debt?

The classification of the US debt as money laundering rather than legitimate debt would depend on legal and financial investigations to substantiate such a claim. Here’s how this scenario could be analyzed:

Current Understanding of US Debt: The US national debt is the total amount of money the federal government owes, primarily from borrowing through Treasury securities to finance its operations and obligations. This debt is recorded and managed by the Treasury Department and is considered a legitimate financial obligation.

Money Laundering Allegation: If it were proven that what is recorded as US debt actually represents funds involved in money laundering (i.e., the illegal process of making large amounts of money generated by criminal activity appear to have come from legitimate sources), this would imply that these amounts are not genuine debts owed by the government. Instead, they could be seen as part of a criminal scheme to obscure the origins of illicit funds.

Impact on Debt Status: If such allegations were substantiated through rigorous audits and legal proceedings, and it was determined that a significant portion of the recorded debt was not a legitimate obligation but rather a result of fraudulent or criminal activities, then the US might not be considered "in debt" for those specific amounts. The genuine debt would be the remaining balance after excluding the fraudulent portions.

Practical Implications: However, reclassifying or eliminating parts of the national debt would require extensive legal, financial, and political processes. It would involve auditing government financial records, prosecuting those responsible for the money laundering, and potentially restructuring the national debt figures. This could also affect the US's credit rating, international financial relations, and economic policies.

Current Reality: As of now, there is no widely accepted or legally substantiated evidence that the US national debt is primarily a result of money laundering. The debt is recognized by financial institutions, markets, and international bodies as legitimate. Any claims to the contrary would need to be proven with concrete evidence and through appropriate legal channels.

In summary, if the US debt were proven to be largely a result of money laundering rather than legitimate borrowing, the US might not be considered in debt for those specific amounts, but this would require significant evidence and legal action to change the current understanding and accounting of the national debt.

Federal Judge Threatening Trump Admin With Criminal Charges Over Spending Freeze Used To Be A Major Dem Donor

https://dailycaller.com/2025/02/10/federal-judge-john-mcconnell-jr-trump-admin-criminal-charges-spending-freeze-dem-donor/

Democrats now want to IMPEACH "President Elon Musk?!"

Rep. Jamie Raskin just exposed their latest deranged plan:

"Some people have actually been talking about impeaching President Elon Musk... on the theory he's usurped the powers of the presidency."

Tonight at Club 47 in Palm Beach, General Flynn was asked what he could tell us about Q

His answer: “It’s the 17th letter of the alphabet”

With a GIANT smile on his face.

You decide…

🇺🇸🟨🇺🇸

Indeed, Q is the 17th letter in the English alphabet. 😁

Why did Elon Musk start a band called "The Deficit Reducers"?

Because he wanted to turn the national debt into a hit single, make democracy the rockstar frontman, and put bureaucracy on an indefinite hiatus tour!

"Elon Musk on Restoring Democracy, Reducing Bureaucracy, and Addressing the National Debt"

Elon Musk's statements highlight several key points regarding his vision for democracy, government efficiency, and fiscal responsibility in the United States:

1- Restoring Democracy: Musk emphasizes the need to restore democracy by ensuring there's a direct feedback loop from the people to the government. He suggests that without this, the government might resemble a bureaucracy rather than a democracy, where decisions are made by unelected officials rather than elected representatives.

2- Criticism of Bureaucracy: He critiques the current state where he believes the bureaucracy, which he describes as an "unelected 4th unconstitutional branch of government," holds significant power, potentially more than elected representatives. Musk argues this situation does not reflect the will of the people, which is contrary to democratic principles.

3- Role of Elected Representatives: Musk advocates for a system where the president, House, and Senate, as elected representatives, have the decision-making power, not an autonomous bureaucracy. He stresses the importance of these representatives being responsive to the public's will.

4- Fiscal Responsibility: Musk also addresses the economic aspect, pointing out the critical need to reduce the federal deficit. He mentions the alarming situation where interest payments on the national debt surpass the Defense Department budget, indicating the urgency of managing federal expenses to prevent national bankruptcy. He sees reducing federal expenses as essential for the country's solvency and to ensure resources are available for citizens' needs rather than just servicing debt.

Musk's perspective combines concerns about democratic governance with economic sustainability, suggesting that both are intertwined in ensuring the health of the nation. He calls for action to fix these systemic issues to align government operations more closely with democratic ideals and fiscal prudence.

Made them say my name 🤣🤣

I'm getting a lot of people telling me that Elon should stop his political work because its impacting the Tesla share price.
I'm letting them all know...I don't give a fig about the impact on the share price: if the Trump administration (and DOGE) does not fix the deficit, my Tesla shares - and everyone's US stocks and bonds will be worthless.
We are, as a country, in an existential crisis. Our 237 year old constitution is under enormous strain, threatened two dynamically reinforcing, but grave threats: profligate spending and the bureaucratic state that encourages it.
In my judgement these are more serious challenges to our nation than was even the Civil War.