Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
The logic flow diagram for the Social Security system looks INSANE. No one person actually knows how it works.
The payment files that move between Social Security and Treasury have significant inconsistencies that are not reconciled. It’s wild.
As a friend of mine described it, this is like an amazing puzzle, uncovering the secrets of an ancient civilization that went extinct … except it’s still around 😂
According to the Social Security database, these are the numbers of people in each age bucket with the death field set to FALSE!
Maybe Twilight is real and there are a lot of vampires collecting Social Security 🤣🤣
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1891403343345389580
The payment files that move between Social Security and Treasury have significant inconsistencies that are not reconciled. It’s wild.
As a friend of mine described it, this is like an amazing puzzle, uncovering the secrets of an ancient civilization that went extinct … except it’s still around 😂
According to the Social Security database, these are the numbers of people in each age bucket with the death field set to FALSE!
Maybe Twilight is real and there are a lot of vampires collecting Social Security 🤣🤣
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1891403343345389580
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
Why do we need to worry about Social Security's complex system?
Because if we don't figure it out, we might just find out that those 360-369 year olds are not only still collecting benefits but are also moonlighting as consultants on how to live forever! 🧓💰🎉
And with the death field set to FALSE, it seems like we're all part of an epic saga where the undead are enjoying their retirement, making sure their Social Security checks never bounce! 🧛♂️💸
Because if we don't figure it out, we might just find out that those 360-369 year olds are not only still collecting benefits but are also moonlighting as consultants on how to live forever! 🧓💰🎉
And with the death field set to FALSE, it seems like we're all part of an epic saga where the undead are enjoying their retirement, making sure their Social Security checks never bounce! 🧛♂️💸
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
Why can't we retire at 40 with a Social Security surplus?
Because if we did, we'd all be living the dream of a 40-year-old retiree, while Social Security would be like, "You mean you want to retire before I even start collecting from you? That's a good one!" 😂💸
Because if we did, we'd all be living the dream of a 40-year-old retiree, while Social Security would be like, "You mean you want to retire before I even start collecting from you? That's a good one!" 😂💸
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
🚨🚨60 Minutes pulled in 2 comms consultants who were never actual employees of USAID and presented them as though they were longtime employees who were fired for lack of "loyalty." 🚨 🚨
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
Defending the Constitution:
The Battle for Unadulterated Free Speech
The erosion of straightforward constitutional principles, especially freedom of speech, through judicial interpretations influenced by societal pressures. I firmly believe, as do many others who remain silent due to fear of repercussions, that we need to return to a literal adherence to the Constitution. The recent incident where a judge hesitated to define what a 'woman' is, while humorous, points to a deeper problem where legal definitions are becoming fluid, often for political reasons.
This isn't just about legal clarity; it's about the broader control exerted by those who also dominate the narrative through media. This control creates an environment where expressing traditional views can lead to ostracism, stifling open discourse. True freedom of speech, as intended by the First Amendment, should protect all thoughts, not just those deemed acceptable by current societal standards.
The reluctance to define terms clearly in law reflects a shift towards reshaping societal norms, which, when combined with media influence, silences the majority who might agree with a more conservative or traditional interpretation. We must fight for a space where dialogue thrives, where the Constitution is upheld in its original intent, ensuring that our foundational freedoms are not just interpreted but preserved. #FreeSpeech #Constitution #LegalClarity #SpeakOut
The Battle for Unadulterated Free Speech
The erosion of straightforward constitutional principles, especially freedom of speech, through judicial interpretations influenced by societal pressures. I firmly believe, as do many others who remain silent due to fear of repercussions, that we need to return to a literal adherence to the Constitution. The recent incident where a judge hesitated to define what a 'woman' is, while humorous, points to a deeper problem where legal definitions are becoming fluid, often for political reasons.
This isn't just about legal clarity; it's about the broader control exerted by those who also dominate the narrative through media. This control creates an environment where expressing traditional views can lead to ostracism, stifling open discourse. True freedom of speech, as intended by the First Amendment, should protect all thoughts, not just those deemed acceptable by current societal standards.
The reluctance to define terms clearly in law reflects a shift towards reshaping societal norms, which, when combined with media influence, silences the majority who might agree with a more conservative or traditional interpretation. We must fight for a space where dialogue thrives, where the Constitution is upheld in its original intent, ensuring that our foundational freedoms are not just interpreted but preserved. #FreeSpeech #Constitution #LegalClarity #SpeakOut
Forwarded from Libs of TikTok
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
German officials say it’s a crime to insult someone online and to repost something that isn’t true.
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇺🇸MISLEADING MUCH, 60 MINUTES?
60 Minutes claimed Kristina Drye “was fired this month in the chaotic shutdown of USAID.”
What they didn’t tell you?
Kristina wasn’t a USAID employee - she worked for XLA and Jefferson Partners, providing speechwriting services for USAID Administrator Samantha Power, who resigned.
Another day, another half-truth on prime time.
Source: Jefferson Consulting Group
As executive producer with editorial control, Bill Owens would likely be aware of and approve major editorial decisions, including any deliberate deception. However, such actions would also involve other key staff and could face legal and ethical consequences.
If "60 Minutes" engaged in deliberate deception, legal consequences could include:
Defamation lawsuits: If false information harms someone's reputation, they could sue for libel or slander.
FCC violations: Broadcasting deceptive content could violate Federal Communications Commission rules, leading to fines or license challenges.
Breach of contract: Advertisers or affiliates might sue if deception violates agreements.
Consumer protection laws: Misleading viewers could trigger legal action under false advertising or fraud statutes.
Criminal charges: In extreme cases, intentional fraud could lead to criminal investigations.
60 Minutes claimed Kristina Drye “was fired this month in the chaotic shutdown of USAID.”
What they didn’t tell you?
Kristina wasn’t a USAID employee - she worked for XLA and Jefferson Partners, providing speechwriting services for USAID Administrator Samantha Power, who resigned.
Another day, another half-truth on prime time.
Source: Jefferson Consulting Group
As executive producer with editorial control, Bill Owens would likely be aware of and approve major editorial decisions, including any deliberate deception. However, such actions would also involve other key staff and could face legal and ethical consequences.
If "60 Minutes" engaged in deliberate deception, legal consequences could include:
Defamation lawsuits: If false information harms someone's reputation, they could sue for libel or slander.
FCC violations: Broadcasting deceptive content could violate Federal Communications Commission rules, leading to fines or license challenges.
Breach of contract: Advertisers or affiliates might sue if deception violates agreements.
Consumer protection laws: Misleading viewers could trigger legal action under false advertising or fraud statutes.
Criminal charges: In extreme cases, intentional fraud could lead to criminal investigations.
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
Why did the fake news focus on Kristina Drye's eye movement?
Because they realized that if they can't find the story, they'll just make one up with her blink rate! 😂📷
Because they realized that if they can't find the story, they'll just make one up with her blink rate! 😂📷
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
Why did the 50 CIA officials sign that letter?
Because they wanted to make sure the story had more twists than a spy novel, and "60 Minutes" was just the latest chapter! 📚📷 😆
Because they wanted to make sure the story had more twists than a spy novel, and "60 Minutes" was just the latest chapter! 📚📷 😆
Forwarded from @SecDef
Pete Hegseth
@PeteHegseth
I agree with @JDVance.
Bridge Colby was nominated because he will faithfully implement the President’s policy agenda—unlike many national security appointees in the first term who sought to undermine President Trump.
JD Vance
@JDVance
This is a very bad take from a normally thoughtful person.
Bridge has consistently been correct about the big foreign policy debates of the last 20 years. He was critical of the Iraq War, which made him unemployable in the 2000s era conservative movement. He built a relationship with CNAS when it was one of the few institutions that would even hire a foreign policy realist.
A perceptive writer would ask why a serious realist was shut out of the dominant institutions of the American Right in the late 2000s. Instead this guy says “he’s a democrat.” Sloppy BS.
Park MacDougald
@hpmcd1
I'll take a whack. Tom Cotton is a Republican.
Colby, on the other hand, is a sort of bipartisan establishment type whose roots are in the Obama Democratic Party and who appears to have thrown in with the GOP in the belief (likely true) that he's more likely to become Secretary of State that way. He started out at CNAS, Obama's favorite think tank, supported ¡Jeb! in 2016, and after leaving the first Trump administration returned to CNAS to work under Victoria Nuland—a fact that none of the FoLoW tHe MoNeY types in the replies seem to find interesting at all, despite otherwise seeing Nuland as a Luciferian figure reponsible for Russiagate, Hunter Biden, the Ukraine war, child rape, and rain on the weekend.
So I assume Cotton's objections have more to do with elevating a Democrat than defending a fictional "Bush/Cheney cabal at DOD" that somehow survived the past 16 years of Democratic ascendancy.
Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
The effort to undermine President Trump continues in the US Senate
@SenTomCotton
is working behind the scenes to stop Trump’s pick, Elbridge Colby, from getting confirmed at DOD
Colby is one of the most important pieces to stop the Bush/Cheney cabal at DOD
Why is Tom Cotton doing this?
Comment below your theories
🤔
@PeteHegseth
I agree with @JDVance.
Bridge Colby was nominated because he will faithfully implement the President’s policy agenda—unlike many national security appointees in the first term who sought to undermine President Trump.
JD Vance
@JDVance
This is a very bad take from a normally thoughtful person.
Bridge has consistently been correct about the big foreign policy debates of the last 20 years. He was critical of the Iraq War, which made him unemployable in the 2000s era conservative movement. He built a relationship with CNAS when it was one of the few institutions that would even hire a foreign policy realist.
A perceptive writer would ask why a serious realist was shut out of the dominant institutions of the American Right in the late 2000s. Instead this guy says “he’s a democrat.” Sloppy BS.
Park MacDougald
@hpmcd1
I'll take a whack. Tom Cotton is a Republican.
Colby, on the other hand, is a sort of bipartisan establishment type whose roots are in the Obama Democratic Party and who appears to have thrown in with the GOP in the belief (likely true) that he's more likely to become Secretary of State that way. He started out at CNAS, Obama's favorite think tank, supported ¡Jeb! in 2016, and after leaving the first Trump administration returned to CNAS to work under Victoria Nuland—a fact that none of the FoLoW tHe MoNeY types in the replies seem to find interesting at all, despite otherwise seeing Nuland as a Luciferian figure reponsible for Russiagate, Hunter Biden, the Ukraine war, child rape, and rain on the weekend.
So I assume Cotton's objections have more to do with elevating a Democrat than defending a fictional "Bush/Cheney cabal at DOD" that somehow survived the past 16 years of Democratic ascendancy.
Charlie Kirk
@charliekirk11
The effort to undermine President Trump continues in the US Senate
@SenTomCotton
is working behind the scenes to stop Trump’s pick, Elbridge Colby, from getting confirmed at DOD
Colby is one of the most important pieces to stop the Bush/Cheney cabal at DOD
Why is Tom Cotton doing this?
Comment below your theories
🤔
❤1
Forwarded from Sky News Australia
Lefties Losing It: Rita Panahi mocks latest ‘Kamala world salad’
Duration: 00:18:01
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eGOy8c8v_Q
Duration: 00:18:01
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eGOy8c8v_Q
Forwarded from Pedo Pete
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Why does Tom Hanks' aura glow like a shifting noscript?
It’s got Forrest Gump green for truth one day, Big blue for doubt the next, and a Da Vinci Code red for hidden flips—like eggs or Gaddafi, open minds see all corners, while the frustrated cling to today’s "facts." 🌈📷 #TomHanksAura #QuestionTheShift
It’s got Forrest Gump green for truth one day, Big blue for doubt the next, and a Da Vinci Code red for hidden flips—like eggs or Gaddafi, open minds see all corners, while the frustrated cling to today’s "facts." 🌈📷 #TomHanksAura #QuestionTheShift
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
Hey pedo .@tomhanks,
Not ALL #MAGA hat wearing patriots are white.
In fact, most racism comes from the elite Democrats, you a** hole.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1891508614793187403
Not ALL #MAGA hat wearing patriots are white.
In fact, most racism comes from the elite Democrats, you a** hole.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1891508614793187403