Forwarded from Documentaries
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
FORT KNOX
The Enigma of Fort Knox: A Deep Dive into the 1974 Gold Vault Inspection
Introduction:
In the fall of 1974, under the glare of skepticism and a backdrop of economic uncertainty, the United States Mint opened the doors of Fort Knox for a select group of journalists and lawmakers. This was not just any tour; it was the first public inspection of America's gold reserves since Franklin D. Roosevelt sealed them away in 1937. The event, meant to reassure an anxious public about the country's gold reserves post-Nixon's gold standard abandonment in 1971, instead opened a Pandora's box of doubts and conspiracy theories. Here's an investigative look into what happened, what was seen, and what remains unseen.
Background:
Gold Standard Dismantlement: In 1971, President Richard Nixon announced that the U.S. would no longer convert dollars to gold at a fixed rate, effectively ending the Bretton Woods system. This decision was partly a response to France's de Gaulle converting dollars into gold, leading to a significant drain on U.S. gold reserves.
Public Distrust: The removal from the gold standard, combined with the Watergate scandal, fueled public mistrust in government transparency and economic policy, prompting calls for proof of America's gold wealth.
The 1974 Inspection:
The Tour: On September 23, 1974, led by U.S. Mint Director Mary Brooks, a group including members of Congress and journalists was taken to Fort Knox. They were shown one of the 13 vaults, specifically Vault No. 13, where gold bars were displayed under heavy security.
Observations and Anomalies:
Limited Access: Only one vault was opened, raising questions about what was in the other 12 vaults or if there were more vaults not shown.
Gold Bar Authenticity: Some attendees noted that the gold bars did not appear as expected; some questioned their color and weight, with discrepancies noted between reported weights and those seen in photographs.
Sealed Compartments: Each vault door was sealed with a ribbon and wax, suggesting a method of ensuring no tampering but also highlighting the control over access.
Post-Event Analysis:
Public Reaction: Instead of quelling rumors, the event led to more questions. The selective nature of the tour, the small amount of gold shown relative to claims of reserves, and the photographic evidence of the gold led to speculation about the authenticity and quantity of the gold.
Conspiracy Theories:
Hidden Vaults: General John Ryan's later revelations about a 'Central Core Vault' suggested by his map indicated there might be more gold hidden away, not shown during the tour.
Gold Substitution: Theories emerged that what was shown might not be real gold or might be a minor portion of what was claimed.
Government Response: The Treasury released statements attempting to clarify discrepancies, like the accuracy of the scales used, but these were met with skepticism, especially when photographic evidence suggested otherwise.
Theories and Investigations:
Investigative Journalism: Post-event, attempts to get further access or more detailed information were largely rebuffed, increasing the mystique around Fort Knox.
Current Status: There have been no subsequent public inspections, and the narrative around Fort Knox remains one of secrecy, with only official statements providing updates on gold reserves.
Implications:
Economic Security: The event and its aftermath highlight the delicate balance between national security and public trust in financial stability.
Transparency vs. Secrecy: The case exemplifies the tension between the need for government secrecy for security reasons and the public's right to know about national assets.
Conclusion:
The 1974 Fort Knox inspection did not resolve doubts but rather amplified them, turning a moment of intended transparency into a legend of mystery. While the U.S. government maintains that the gold reserves are secure and as reported, the lack of further public access or independent audits keeps the door open for speculation. Until another, more comprehensive inspection is allowed, Fort Knox will
The Enigma of Fort Knox: A Deep Dive into the 1974 Gold Vault Inspection
Introduction:
In the fall of 1974, under the glare of skepticism and a backdrop of economic uncertainty, the United States Mint opened the doors of Fort Knox for a select group of journalists and lawmakers. This was not just any tour; it was the first public inspection of America's gold reserves since Franklin D. Roosevelt sealed them away in 1937. The event, meant to reassure an anxious public about the country's gold reserves post-Nixon's gold standard abandonment in 1971, instead opened a Pandora's box of doubts and conspiracy theories. Here's an investigative look into what happened, what was seen, and what remains unseen.
Background:
Gold Standard Dismantlement: In 1971, President Richard Nixon announced that the U.S. would no longer convert dollars to gold at a fixed rate, effectively ending the Bretton Woods system. This decision was partly a response to France's de Gaulle converting dollars into gold, leading to a significant drain on U.S. gold reserves.
Public Distrust: The removal from the gold standard, combined with the Watergate scandal, fueled public mistrust in government transparency and economic policy, prompting calls for proof of America's gold wealth.
The 1974 Inspection:
The Tour: On September 23, 1974, led by U.S. Mint Director Mary Brooks, a group including members of Congress and journalists was taken to Fort Knox. They were shown one of the 13 vaults, specifically Vault No. 13, where gold bars were displayed under heavy security.
Observations and Anomalies:
Limited Access: Only one vault was opened, raising questions about what was in the other 12 vaults or if there were more vaults not shown.
Gold Bar Authenticity: Some attendees noted that the gold bars did not appear as expected; some questioned their color and weight, with discrepancies noted between reported weights and those seen in photographs.
Sealed Compartments: Each vault door was sealed with a ribbon and wax, suggesting a method of ensuring no tampering but also highlighting the control over access.
Post-Event Analysis:
Public Reaction: Instead of quelling rumors, the event led to more questions. The selective nature of the tour, the small amount of gold shown relative to claims of reserves, and the photographic evidence of the gold led to speculation about the authenticity and quantity of the gold.
Conspiracy Theories:
Hidden Vaults: General John Ryan's later revelations about a 'Central Core Vault' suggested by his map indicated there might be more gold hidden away, not shown during the tour.
Gold Substitution: Theories emerged that what was shown might not be real gold or might be a minor portion of what was claimed.
Government Response: The Treasury released statements attempting to clarify discrepancies, like the accuracy of the scales used, but these were met with skepticism, especially when photographic evidence suggested otherwise.
Theories and Investigations:
Investigative Journalism: Post-event, attempts to get further access or more detailed information were largely rebuffed, increasing the mystique around Fort Knox.
Current Status: There have been no subsequent public inspections, and the narrative around Fort Knox remains one of secrecy, with only official statements providing updates on gold reserves.
Implications:
Economic Security: The event and its aftermath highlight the delicate balance between national security and public trust in financial stability.
Transparency vs. Secrecy: The case exemplifies the tension between the need for government secrecy for security reasons and the public's right to know about national assets.
Conclusion:
The 1974 Fort Knox inspection did not resolve doubts but rather amplified them, turning a moment of intended transparency into a legend of mystery. While the U.S. government maintains that the gold reserves are secure and as reported, the lack of further public access or independent audits keeps the door open for speculation. Until another, more comprehensive inspection is allowed, Fort Knox will
Forwarded from Documentaries
Conclusion:
The 1974 Fort Knox inspection did not resolve doubts but rather amplified them, turning a moment of intended transparency into a legend of mystery. While the U.S. government maintains that the gold reserves are secure and as reported, the lack of further public access or independent audits keeps the door open for speculation. Until another, more comprehensive inspection is allowed, Fort Knox will continue to be a symbol of both American wealth and governmental enigma.
The 1974 Fort Knox inspection did not resolve doubts but rather amplified them, turning a moment of intended transparency into a legend of mystery. While the U.S. government maintains that the gold reserves are secure and as reported, the lack of further public access or independent audits keeps the door open for speculation. Until another, more comprehensive inspection is allowed, Fort Knox will continue to be a symbol of both American wealth and governmental enigma.
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
Why Did the Uniparty Oppose Elon Musk's Fort Knox Audit?
Elon Musk, the guy who thinks space is the final frontier, decided he wanted to explore another kind of frontier: the gold vaults of Fort Knox. Now, imagine this - Musk, with his DOGE crew, is like a kid with a new toy, eager to check if there's really a pot of gold under America's mattress.
But here's the twist - the Uniparty, that mythical beast of bipartisanship where Republicans and Democrats form a secret club to keep the political circus running smoothly, isn't thrilled about Musk's treasure hunt.
Why?
Because they've got more secrets in those vaults than there are stars in the night sky!
According to the grapevine, or rather, the posts on X, the Uniparty fears Musk's audit might reveal:
1- The Gold's Gone: Maybe there's less gold than what's been claimed, or perhaps it's been replaced with tungsten painted gold for a laugh. Either way, an audit by Musk could turn Fort Knox into "Fort Oops."
2- The Secret Vault: There's talk of a hidden vault, deeper than a politician's promise, where they keep all the stuff they don't want you to know about. Musk poking around with his "transparency" stick could expose that!
3- The Real Reason They Hate BTC: Some say the Uniparty's dislike for Bitcoin isn't just about hating innovation; it's because Bitcoin's transparency would make their gold games look like a child's piggy bank.
4- The Party's Over: If Musk, with his penchant for efficiency, audits Fort Knox, he might streamline government so much that the Uniparty wouldn't have enough pork to go around, and where's the fun in that?
So, the Uniparty, with their collective gasp, is like, "Elon, you can go to Mars, but leave our gold mysteries alone!" Because, in the end, why risk showing the world that the emperor might not only have no clothes but no gold either?
But remember, this is all in jest, because if there's one thing we know, it's that politics and gold are like peanut butter and jelly - they stick together in the most mysterious ways.
Elon Musk, the guy who thinks space is the final frontier, decided he wanted to explore another kind of frontier: the gold vaults of Fort Knox. Now, imagine this - Musk, with his DOGE crew, is like a kid with a new toy, eager to check if there's really a pot of gold under America's mattress.
But here's the twist - the Uniparty, that mythical beast of bipartisanship where Republicans and Democrats form a secret club to keep the political circus running smoothly, isn't thrilled about Musk's treasure hunt.
Why?
Because they've got more secrets in those vaults than there are stars in the night sky!
According to the grapevine, or rather, the posts on X, the Uniparty fears Musk's audit might reveal:
1- The Gold's Gone: Maybe there's less gold than what's been claimed, or perhaps it's been replaced with tungsten painted gold for a laugh. Either way, an audit by Musk could turn Fort Knox into "Fort Oops."
2- The Secret Vault: There's talk of a hidden vault, deeper than a politician's promise, where they keep all the stuff they don't want you to know about. Musk poking around with his "transparency" stick could expose that!
3- The Real Reason They Hate BTC: Some say the Uniparty's dislike for Bitcoin isn't just about hating innovation; it's because Bitcoin's transparency would make their gold games look like a child's piggy bank.
4- The Party's Over: If Musk, with his penchant for efficiency, audits Fort Knox, he might streamline government so much that the Uniparty wouldn't have enough pork to go around, and where's the fun in that?
So, the Uniparty, with their collective gasp, is like, "Elon, you can go to Mars, but leave our gold mysteries alone!" Because, in the end, why risk showing the world that the emperor might not only have no clothes but no gold either?
But remember, this is all in jest, because if there's one thing we know, it's that politics and gold are like peanut butter and jelly - they stick together in the most mysterious ways.
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
Why did the U.S. government outlaw owning gold in 1933?
Because they wanted to say, "Hey England, remember when you left? Well, here's your gold back — with interest!" They scooped up all the gold, shipped it across the pond, and said, "Thanks for the Great Depression, here's your shiny repayment!"
"Uncle Sam's Golden Heist: When Your Shiny Treasure Became Government's New Toy"
The U.S. government outlawed private gold ownership in 1933 under President Franklin D. Roosevelt with Executive Order 6102. Here's a brief overview of why this happened:
1- Economic Crisis: The Great Depression was in full swing, and there were significant economic issues, including bank failures and deflation.
2- Currency Devaluation: Gold was the basis for the U.S. dollar under the gold standard. By outlawing private ownership, the government aimed to increase its gold reserves, allowing for a potential devaluation of the dollar to stimulate the economy. This was seen as a way to reflate the economy by making U.S. goods cheaper abroad and reducing domestic price levels.
3- Hoarding: There was a fear that individuals hoarding gold would exacerbate deflation by reducing the money supply. By forcing people to turn in gold for paper currency, the government aimed to increase the money supply.
4- Stabilizing the Banking System: Confidence in banks was low, and many people were withdrawing their gold from banks, which could lead to a collapse of the banking system. By controlling gold, the government could stabilize this situation.
5- Control Over Monetary Policy: Removing gold from private hands gave the government more control over monetary policy, which was crucial during such tumultuous economic times.
Executive Order 6102 required citizens to turn in their gold to Federal Reserve Banks, with some exceptions like jewelry and certain gold coins. Violators faced fines or imprisonment.
Gold Reserve Act of 1934: This act followed, which officially took the U.S. off the gold standard for domestic transactions, although international transactions remained on the gold standard until 1971.
The policy was controversial and debated for its legality and effects. Critics argued it was an overreach of government authority, while supporters saw it as necessary to combat the economic crisis. Gold ownership was later re-legalized in the U.S. in 1974 with the passage of Public Law 93-373, reflecting a shift back towards allowing private gold investment as part of broader economic policy changes.
This historical event provides insight into how economic policies can dramatically shift in response to crises, often with significant implications for individual rights and economic freedom.
Because they wanted to say, "Hey England, remember when you left? Well, here's your gold back — with interest!" They scooped up all the gold, shipped it across the pond, and said, "Thanks for the Great Depression, here's your shiny repayment!"
"Uncle Sam's Golden Heist: When Your Shiny Treasure Became Government's New Toy"
The U.S. government outlawed private gold ownership in 1933 under President Franklin D. Roosevelt with Executive Order 6102. Here's a brief overview of why this happened:
1- Economic Crisis: The Great Depression was in full swing, and there were significant economic issues, including bank failures and deflation.
2- Currency Devaluation: Gold was the basis for the U.S. dollar under the gold standard. By outlawing private ownership, the government aimed to increase its gold reserves, allowing for a potential devaluation of the dollar to stimulate the economy. This was seen as a way to reflate the economy by making U.S. goods cheaper abroad and reducing domestic price levels.
3- Hoarding: There was a fear that individuals hoarding gold would exacerbate deflation by reducing the money supply. By forcing people to turn in gold for paper currency, the government aimed to increase the money supply.
4- Stabilizing the Banking System: Confidence in banks was low, and many people were withdrawing their gold from banks, which could lead to a collapse of the banking system. By controlling gold, the government could stabilize this situation.
5- Control Over Monetary Policy: Removing gold from private hands gave the government more control over monetary policy, which was crucial during such tumultuous economic times.
Executive Order 6102 required citizens to turn in their gold to Federal Reserve Banks, with some exceptions like jewelry and certain gold coins. Violators faced fines or imprisonment.
Gold Reserve Act of 1934: This act followed, which officially took the U.S. off the gold standard for domestic transactions, although international transactions remained on the gold standard until 1971.
The policy was controversial and debated for its legality and effects. Critics argued it was an overreach of government authority, while supporters saw it as necessary to combat the economic crisis. Gold ownership was later re-legalized in the U.S. in 1974 with the passage of Public Law 93-373, reflecting a shift back towards allowing private gold investment as part of broader economic policy changes.
This historical event provides insight into how economic policies can dramatically shift in response to crises, often with significant implications for individual rights and economic freedom.
Forwarded from Candace Owens
Our episode today was explosive.
Remember— the mainstream media is worse than dishonest. They went through great lengths to cover up a story ridden with statutory rape, pedophilia, and transgenderism in an effort to protect power.
Watch exclusively at http://Candaceowens.com
Remember— the mainstream media is worse than dishonest. They went through great lengths to cover up a story ridden with statutory rape, pedophilia, and transgenderism in an effort to protect power.
Watch exclusively at http://Candaceowens.com
Forwarded from Sky News Australia
Mainstream media ‘covered up’ the truth of JFK assassination
Duration: 00:17:08
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=921hRZKkwOk
Duration: 00:17:08
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=921hRZKkwOk
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
They used USAID to change the judiciary in Brazil, Romania, Ukraine, Israel and now they are working on doing it in the United States.
NGOs, Internews global media cartel, the ABA, street protests… it is all intrinsically linked.
Norm Eisen literally wrote the book on this.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1891646779105440134
NGOs, Internews global media cartel, the ABA, street protests… it is all intrinsically linked.
Norm Eisen literally wrote the book on this.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1891646779105440134
Forwarded from Pedo Pete
Forwarded from Jesse Watters
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jesse Watters Primetime February 17, 2025
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This will blow your mind
If this doesn't make your blood boil, nothing will.
Thank God for Elon Musk and DOGE!
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1891776468897718546
If this doesn't make your blood boil, nothing will.
Thank God for Elon Musk and DOGE!
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1891776468897718546
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
Why did Rory Stewart’s wife stop teaching Afghanis about urinals as art?
Because Trump flushed the million-dollar contract down the toilet!
Because Trump flushed the million-dollar contract down the toilet!
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Why did the USAID budget meeting end in chaos?
Because they couldn’t decide if polar bears needed sex changes more than Iraqi slumber parties needed Smarties—or if Saudi witches deserved Easy Bake Ovens over North Korean accountants sipping Kool-Aid!
Because they couldn’t decide if polar bears needed sex changes more than Iraqi slumber parties needed Smarties—or if Saudi witches deserved Easy Bake Ovens over North Korean accountants sipping Kool-Aid!
Forwarded from TrumpRelay
WARNING! Our fears have come true: the globalist-liberal-Soros NGO network is fleeing to Brussels, after President Trump dealt a huge blow to their activities in the US. Now 63 of them are asking Brussels for money, under the guise of various human rights projects. Not going to happen! We will not let them find safe haven in Europe! The USAID-files exposed the dark practices of the globalist network. We will not take the bait again!
https://x.com/PM_ViktorOrban/status/1891788592730476821
https://x.com/PM_ViktorOrban/status/1891788592730476821