Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: unlawful or arbitrary killings; arbitrary detention, often extraterritorial detention of Palestinians from the occupied territories in Israel; restrictions on Palestinians residing in Jerusalem including arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy, family, and home; substantial interference with the freedom of association; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; harassment of nongovernmental organizations; significant restrictions on freedom of movement within the country; violence against asylum seekers and irregular migrants; violence or threats of violence against national, racial, or ethnic minority groups; and labor rights abuses against foreign workers and Palestinians from the West Bank.

Israeli law does not include a specific prohibition on torture, although Israel signed the UN Convention against Torture in 1986 and signed it in 1991. Israeli domestic law prohibits the application of physical force, assault, or pressure by a public official.

A variety of Israeli, Palestinian, and international human rights groups generally operated without government restriction, investigating and publishing their findings on human rights cases.

Palestinian journalists who were able to obtain entry permits as well as Jerusalem-based Arab journalists reported incidents of harassment, racism, and occasional violence when they sought to cover news in Jerusalem, especially in the Old City and its vicinity.

In June the Journalists’ Support Committee, a nonprofit journalist advocacy organization, stated security forces committed more than 50 human rights violations against Palestinian journalists working in Jerusalem in the first half of the year, including arrests and expulsions from the city. 62 incidents of physical attacks against journalists in one year

Human rights groups condemned Hamas’s and Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s targeting of civilians as well as Israel’s targeting of civilian infrastructure.

More https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraelWarRights

Now let we relate this topic to the walls in Israel ...

Is wrong to do a control of the people coming inside a country? NOPE, this is perfectly fine, if there is no discrimination based on that.

At the end every country has the right to choice how much foreigners to keep, for how much time, etc. Such people need to respect laws available in different countries, like if we visit arabian country, we need to respect their rules ....

Seeing a "nope, you cannot enter" as discrimination is just bullshit!

Like an employer cannot hire infinite employees, the same happens with a country ...

We forgot about such things due to the EU, where people can move without problems between countries.

Do you know that Switzerland "created exactly walls like Israel" in the past?

Yes, and they still do it now in some ways, where people get controlled when they arrive by train, plane, or other.

Does this now means Switzerland implements Apartheid just because they control who is coming ... NOPE!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ApartheidPalestine

So we need to be honest, Israel has the full right to keep customs to control who is coming, like other countries are doing too.

About the walls is another point .... In Switzerland we already talked about creating walls against all Italians and migrants multiple times in the past too, but they never did that until now.

The point is not to abuse that or to decide what is going on other countries, that are not part of their control.

For example this doesn't mean that now Switzerland could block all food transport to Italy, because camions need to travel via San Gottardo and Switzerland has something against Italy ... They can implement fees and similar for the pollution, etc. generated by such camions, but cannot block that, because this would be just crime and discrimination.

Just to make it clear, we don't mean that immigration is devil, since we already shared previously positive points too, and this DOESN'T mean we are supporting Anders Behring Breivik ideas too. We always keep a neutral point showing pro and contras. At the end we are 🇨🇭, neutrality is our blood!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/TerrorismTelegram/415
It's about immigration in general, not related to Islam or whatever. So not what Breivik said.

Goal is even not to see "migrants as a power", when at the end we don't respect human rights! like we do with disabled people, which are simply exploited. This is a real story we saw directly during our ZIVI (= alternative to military in Switzerland)! If we use such migrants for 0.5 cents each hour, this is against rights ... and so is not a real power. Is human abuse! Such topic is available in Prison Break too ...

Plus we need to consider that there is migrant and migrant, depending from the origin country ... with different knowledges / abilities etc. Criminality depends from this too. Currently there is a 50/50
https://news.1rj.ru/str/TerrorismTelegram/448

High criminality is available in 🇺🇸, 🇫🇷, 🇨🇦, etc. in general.

As we said, we build walls against immigration or similar things
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ApartheidPalestine/70

Grensegjerder bygges nå over hele Europa. På Storskog grensestasjon i Sør-Varanger, settes det opp et 3,5 meter høyt ståltrådgjerde langs den norsk-russiske grensen.

Border fences are now being built across Europe. At Storskog border station in Sør-Varanger, a 3.5 meter high steel wire fence is being erected along the Norwegian-Russian border https://perma.cc/P69E-PVRD

Las vallas dividen a Europa: radiografía de los muros con los que la UE trata de contener la migración irregular https://perma.cc/BLX9-MGYF

Now let we check the pictures.

Sweden, Germany think they do something +, but increase terrorism.

DE, Sweden, Japan, UK, Canada, Australia think they are +, but are ready to deport them ...

DE, UK, Australia, Spain think the same: migrant don't want to adapt ..