OUT OF DATE CHECK NEW PDF

Updated PDF file.

Changelog 1.01

Fixed and improved information in and drawn conclusions from figure 5b.
Equalised conclusions.
Added more citations.
Fixed any grammatical or spelling errors that were observed.

Interesting facts about the genetic 🧬 profile of the Afrikaners 🟧⬜️🟦 (AKA the Boerevolk 👨🏻‍🌾):

Sources: ⁽¹⁾ ⁽²⁾

- Afrikaners 🟧⬜️🟦 have a median average European 🇪🇺 ancestry of 98.9%, with over 1/4 being entirely 💯 European 🇪🇺.

- Around 1/2 of this European ancestry is genetically Dutch 🇳🇱, with the remainder being about a 1/4 genetically French 🇫🇷, and a 1/5 genetically German 🇩🇪, with the remaining 1/20 being the domain of other European nationalities 🇪🇺🇩🇰🇧🇪🇬🇧.

- Although this is the average, few Afrikaners 🟧⬜️🟦 will fit this pattern, for they are very heteregenous in this regard ❌👨‍❤️‍💋‍👨❌, with the contribution from any of the first 3 nationalities 🇳🇱🇫🇷🇩🇪 to an individual ranging from 10-80%

- Their non European ❌⬜️❌ ancestry is almost equally split between Africa 🌍 and Asia 🌏, with the majority of their Asian 😑 contribution being South Asian 🇮🇳, rather than Southeast 🇮🇩 or East 🇨🇳 Asian, and the majority of their African 🧑🏿‍🦲 contribution being from imported African slaves, rather than indigenous Khoisan or bantu settlers ❌🇿🇦❌.

- Although almost all of their paternal 👨🏻 haplogroups are most common in Europe, about 12% of their maternal 👩🏼 haplogroups are most common outside of Europe ⬅️🇪🇺, however, many are these were still contributed by women 👯‍♀️ known to be European 🇪🇺.

- Afrikaners 🟧⬜️🟦 have one of the highest rates of blue eyes 🧿🔵👀 in the world, with over 54% having such pigmentation, they dethrone Poland 🇵🇱 from 4️⃣th place in the world.

- Although their eyes 👁️👃👁️ are some of the lightest in the world 🗺️, the same cannot be said for their hair. They are most similar to Germans 🇩🇪 when it comes to hair colour, with about 1/4 having blond hair 🧑🏼👩🏼, 2/3 having brown hair 🧑🏽👩🏽, and the remainder having mostly black hair 🧑🏻👩🏻 and less 1/50 having red hair 👩🏻‍🦰🧑🏻‍🦰.

- Afrikaners 🟧⬜️🟦 are extremely endogamous 🧑‍🧑‍🧒‍🧒✖️🧑‍🧑‍🧒‍🧒, sharing on average more than twice 2️⃣ as much DNA 🧬 with one another than the average Ashkenazi Jew ✡️ does with another Ashkenazi Jew 🪙🕍. Their average relationship is similar to that of a 3️⃣rd or 4️⃣th cousin 🧑‍🧑‍🧒‍🧒, which is much closer than other European 🇪🇺population, who are rarely closer than 🎱th cousins 🧑‍🧑‍🧒‍🧒 on average.

- This is due to their very small ⚛️ effective genetic founding population of 440 individuals, which is similar to the effective genetic founding population of 500 for Ashkenazi Jews ✡️.

- Another consequence of this has been founder effects, leading to an increased prevalence of many rare diseases 🦠🤧🤒. Although these are negative ➖, in a minority of cases, they have been positive ➕.

- Around 89% of Afrikaners are Lactose 🥛🐮 persistent 🛡️. This is slightly higher than the Lactose 🥛🐮 persistence 🛡️rates observed in the Netherlands 🇳🇱, but still within the margin of error.

- Afrikaners 🟧⬜️🟦 have a higher 📈genetic 🧬predisposition to autism 🧩 and empathy ☺️, and a lower predisposition to anger 🤬, obesity 🫃, and a high resting heart rate ❤️. A higher predisposition to autism 🧩 is typical for Eurasians , but the rest are not typical.

- Alleles linked to decreased penis size 🍆🤏are not present 🥳 in Afrikaners 🟧⬜️🟦.

- It has been observed that Afrikaners 🟧⬜️🟦 are 6x more likely to have skin cancer 🖐🏻♋️ in their lifetime, and some have suggested this is due to higher sun exposure 🌞. Interestingly, Afrikaners 🟧⬜️🟦 are 8️⃣ times more genetically predisposed to skin cancer than other European 🇪🇺populations, suggesting that this increased frequency may be genetic ✅🧬✅ rather than environmental ❌🏞️❌.

Minor: Input error in figure 1, multiple sclerosis. It should read EU: 0.658 rather than EU: 0.0658. Releasing update soon. This is not of great importance, as neither the results nor the conclusions drawn from them were affected in any way.

OUT OF DATE CHECK NEW PDF

Updated PDF file.

Changelog 1.02

Expanded glossary.
Expanded, fixed, and improved figure 1.
Added more citations.

OUT OF DATE CHECK NEW PDF

Updated PDF file.

Changelog 1.03

Updated Xander's pseudonym.
Improved formatting and consistency of quotation marks.

OUT OF DATE CHECK NEW PDF

Updated PDF file.

Changelog 1.04

Replaced Xander's old pseudonym with his new one in the acknowledgments section.

OUT OF DATE CHECK NEW PDF

Updated PDF file.

Changelog 1.05

Added more citations and corrected incorrect information.

Updated PDF file.

Changelog 1.06

Fixed some spelling mistakes and graphical errors.

The "Far-Right" Genius: An Investigation into the Intelligence of the "Far-Right", by Johan Oosthuizen.

https://www.academia.edu/125602308/Johan_Oosthuizen_The_Far_Right_Genius_16_11_24_V

PDF attached. May be subject to future updates.

Highlights to follow.

Highlights:

High IQ Among the "Far-Right": The "far-right" individuals had an average Full Scale IQ of 125.7 (SD = 14.1), markedly above population averages.

Contradictory to General Trends: Unlike prior findings of a negative correlation between intelligence and "right-wing" beliefs, this study found high cognitive ability among "far-right" individuals.

Minimal Racial IQ Variation: Racial background did not at all predict IQ variation within the far-right, contrary to global patterns, suggesting intelligence is a more significant driver of ideological affiliation.

Sexual and Religious Variability: Substantial variations in IQ were observed, particularly among sexes and religious subgroups, with Christian Identitarian & Kinist men scoring highest (average IQ: 140.3) and Völkisch Pagan women scoring lowest (average IQ: 114). Overall, "far-right" men had an average IQ of 126.9 (SD = 12.7), whereas "far-right" women had a substantially lower average of 117.8 (SD = 19.8).

Ideological Implications: Findings and memetic analyses suggest high intelligence may not only correlate with but potentially catalyse "far-right" beliefs.

Significant Internal Heterogeneity: Demographic and religious sub-groups within the "far-right" showed substantial diversity, against the common perception of a White, Christian, male "far-right".

The latter two are coming, in due course. The first of the latter two has been completed, but will be gatekept for release alongside the second. The first two are unlikely to happen any time soon unless I receive thousands of DNA samples with verified height and IQ phenotypes, which I do not foresee.

The Aryan Hypothesis: a Multidisciplinary Genetic, Archaeological, Linguistic, Historical, Scriptural, and Cultural Identification of the Israelites

https://www.academia.edu/127415126/

Abstract:

The Israelites are an enigmatic Biblio-historical population whose origins have been the topic of much debate for millennia. The present scholarly consensus regarding the Israelites and their origin is that the Israelites were indigenous to and originated from within Canaan, contrary to the Biblical narrative. This interdisciplinary study challenges the prevailing consensus that the ancient Israelites were an indigenous Canaanite population. Drawing upon archaeogenetics, historical linguistics, noscriptural analysis, and material culture, it presents evidence that the Israelites were a genetically and phenotypically distinct population closely related to Steppe Middle to Late Bronze Age (MLBA) cultures of Northern and Western Europe. Using qpAdm admixture modelling, correlation and regression analyses, linkage disequilibrium analysis, and Y-DNA haplogroup tracking across time in the Levant, the study identifies a sudden and statistically significant influx of Steppe_MLBA-like ancestry into the Lebanese genome beginning around 1750 BC (observed mostly in the Y-DNA), peaking around 960 BC, and gradually increasing thereafter. This genetic input, unexplainable by previously proposed regional conquests, such as those by the Assyrians, Persians, Macedonians, or Sea Peoples, is best modelled by a direct migration of an unadmixed population bearing a composite Steppe, WHG, and ANF profile corresponding almost exactly with the expansion of the Israelites and other Abrahamic and related peoples. Scriptural, phenotypical, and cultural evidence further corroborate this origin hypothesis, suggesting that the Israelites were a Northern European-descended population who migrated to Canaan before 1750 BC and subsequently admixed with local groups. These findings necessitate a reevaluation of the Israelites' origins and their genetic legacy in the Levant.

Manunoscript may be subject to future updates.

Manunoscript has been significantly updated.

Previous projects (including but not limited to the effect of admixture upon phenotype in various populations, including the Afrikaner population) still under way.

The Cimmero-Scythian Origin Theory for the Celto-Germanic Peoples:
Novel Archaeological and Genetic Evidence.

https://www.academia.edu/143678436/

Excerpt from abstract:

This study re-examines prevailing paradigms regarding the origins of the Celto-Germanic peoples in light of ancient historical records, archaeology, and aDNA data, demonstrating that the Celto-Germanic peoples of Northern and Western Europe are, in their primary descent, of Cimmero-Scythian origin.

Manunoscript may be subject to future updates.

@J_Oosthuizen

A Eurocentric Refutation of the Kurgan Hypothesis

https://www.academia.edu/145225575/

One paragraph summary (click to expand):

The Kurgan Hypothesis (KH), proposing genealogical continuity from Yamnaya (3300-2700/2400 BC) through the Corded Ware Culture (CWC) (3000-2300 BC) to Bell Beaker Culture (BBC) (consolidated 2900-2800 BC), is refuted by evidence demonstrating the methodological flaw of qpAdm, which axiomatically forces admixture even if admixture is not the historical truth, e.g. estimating Czechia Hallstatt as 65.8% Netherlands_MBA and 34.2% Bulgaria_EIA (P=0.265) despite strong in situ continuity (P-value 0.317 when modeled as 100% Czechian BBC), and by archaeological discontinuity, where strontium isotope analysis in South Bavarian BBC contexts showed ≈52.63% of remains were non-local (using regional cut-offs 0.70992-0.70899), confirming demic diffusion, with 17.5-25% exceeding the conservative 0.7103 cut-off. Uniparental markers show no genealogical descent: Yamnaya (n=31) is ≈64.5% R1b1a1b1b* (which shows strong continuity with Catacomb (2500-1950 BC) at 100% R1b1a1b1b*), but CWC (n=53) is ≈56.6% R1a1a* (Yamnaya lineage is 1/53), and BBC (n=132) is ≈73.49% R1b1a1b1a1a2* (CWC R1a is 0/132), leading to rapid replacement, such as R1a* lineages dropping from ≈90.9% (Germany CWC) to 0% (Germany BBC) in ≈175 years, and from 50.0% (Czechia CWC) to 0% (Czechia BBC) in ≈250 years, while R1b1a1b1a1a2* rose to 94.6%. Autosomal data further supports discontinuity, as the BBC mean EHG:CHG ratio [n=regions] (n=9, 2.658) is ≈58.7% larger than the CWC mean (n=5, 1.674), with no range overlap (CWC max 1.97, BBC min 2.09), despite regional variations (e.g., England 3.17, Germany 3.15, Sicily 3.24, Poland 2.09, Czechia 2.27), and expected phenotypes failed decisively for CWC eye colour (p=0.0000536) and for BBC hair (p=0.0000000000186), eyes (p=0.0000166), and skin (p=0.0181). Additionally, the BBC profile predates the KH narrative, with numerous samples, including but not limited to I3035 (England, 3750 BC) showing 46% EHG+CHG, appearing nearly 1000 years before CWC formation, and craniometry confirms the incompatibility of dolicocephalic CWC (71.0) and EEF (71.7 or 76.2) progenitors with the Brachycephalic BBC (82.5); the genetic, archaeological, historical, and craniometric data instead strongly links the BBC to the Eastern Mediterranean Caliciform culture (starting ≈2850 BC or ≈2500 BC), ancestral to the Historical "Amorites"/Amurru/Martu, evidenced by qpAdm requiring a German Bell Beaker source (25.7%) for Syrian Eblaite samples (2700-1800 BC) (P-value 0.973 when modeled as 42.4% Chalcolithic Levantine, 30.4% Chalcolithic Iranian, 1.5% Early Bronze Age Caucasian, and 25.7% German Bell Beaker), with linkage disequilibrium dating the acquisition of this DNA to around 2737-2574 BC (mean date 2070 BC, using 23.2-30.7 years per generation).

Manunoscript may be subject to future updates.

@J_Oosthuizen

Pretty much, there was no "Yamnaya invasion" of Europe.

The Israelite Population in the Roman Province of Judaea during the 1st Century AD

https://www.academia.edu/145245296/

Abstract (click to expand):

This study investigates the proportion of the Israelite-descended population within the Roman province of Judaea during the 1st century AD. Using archaeological data, biblio-historical texts, and demographic modelling, the paper reconstructs long-term population trajectories from the Persian period (5th century BC) through the Hasmonean and early Roman periods. Population baselines are established for Yehud (12,000-30,000 in 432 BC), Samaria (43,000 in 432 BC), and Idumaea (100,000-200,000 in 177 BC), with growth projected under worldwide and regional rates (0.12%-0.21% per annum). The ethnic composition of Samaria before the Assyrian deportation campaigns is assessed through settlement archaeology, pig-avoidance patterns, architectural markers, and Biblio-historical testimonies. Some of these are also used to assess the Assyrian deportations and Hasmonean conversions. Results suggest that, of an estimated total provincial population of c. 552,000 by the mid-1st century AD, approximately 35,000-120,000 individuals (6.4-21.8%) retained at least partial Israelite ancestry, whilst as much as 95% of the population of Judaea may have adhered to Judaean customs and religion (being thus considered Judaean). Stricter definitions of "pure" descent yield a narrower range of 19,000-74,000 (3.5-13.4%). Biblical figures, if taken at face value, produce higher proportions (17.5-29.9%), though archaeological modelling, and Biblio-historical context, suggests that the Biblical figures for the people who returned to Jerusalem from exile in Babylonia, are merely snapshots that don't account for the later expulsions of foreigners, their offspring, and those who cohabited with them, under the regimes of Ezra and Nehemiah, as described later in the Biblical record. All the preceding figures are to some degree overestimates. This research highlights the gap between ethnic ancestry and religious-cultural identity in late Second Temple-and Roman-period Judaea. This has profound implications for the narratives surrounding the ethnogenesis and historical claims of various Jewish diaspora groups.

Manunoscript may be subject to future updates.

@J_Oosthuizen

Hightlights:
• Archaeological estimates suggest 6.4-21.8% of the population of Roman-period Judaea retained at least partial Israelite ancestry.
• In spite of this, archaeological estimates suggest as much as 95% of the population of Judaea may have adhered to Judaean customs and religion.
• Archaeological estimates using stricter definitions of "pure" Israelite descent yield a narrower range of 3.5-13.4%.
• Archaeological estimates suggest over 50% of the population of Roman-period Judaea was of Idumaean origin.
• Key Conclusion: There is a profound gap between ethnic ancestry and religious-cultural identity in late Second Temple- and Roman-period Judaea, which has significant implications for narratives concerning Jewish diaspora groups.