Does a vegan diet help animals? ✅ YES
SURE! and CO2? ✅ YES
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FoodWasteTelegram
Now what about other topics?
- Is financial possible? ✅ and ❔ (depending)
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/9
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/10
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/11
Prices are huge different between countries, a product by a brand != another brand (related to protein), wage is different etc.
- Can be applied to all people? 🙅♂️, already about the topic protein there is too less evidence, even if position papers are writing bullshit citing not valid sources
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/47
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/62
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/63
- Can be applied in all countries? ❔since there is huge difference between countries ... already the fact that inside the same country people eat in different way, some eating 1x pro day other 7x ... etc.
- Can be applied in hospital? ✅ for people that maybe have no problems, more a 🙅♂️ for specific patients
- Is vegan bullshit? 🙅♂️ https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganFactsTelegram
So what is the best solution? For people that really focus on what they eat, by tracking them, making blood test, etc. a vegan diet definitely can help to improve CO2, health and animal welfare. For other, for example specific groups with particular needs, there is still a risk, even if this is not related to everyone.
One thing is sure, a lot more research is needed to cover all missing informations looking even what happen after 70 years being vegan, instead of just looking what happen after 3 seconds ... and considering almost just adults.
Plus it's time to think about alternative approaches, like a 1/3 or 2/3 vegan or an interval vegan diet or whatever.
More:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganFactsTelegram/266
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganFactsTelegram/276
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganFactsTelegram/281
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/31
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/32
SURE! and CO2? ✅ YES
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FoodWasteTelegram
Now what about other topics?
- Is financial possible? ✅ and ❔ (depending)
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/9
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/10
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/11
Prices are huge different between countries, a product by a brand != another brand (related to protein), wage is different etc.
- Can be applied to all people? 🙅♂️, already about the topic protein there is too less evidence, even if position papers are writing bullshit citing not valid sources
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/47
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/62
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/63
- Can be applied in all countries? ❔since there is huge difference between countries ... already the fact that inside the same country people eat in different way, some eating 1x pro day other 7x ... etc.
- Can be applied in hospital? ✅ for people that maybe have no problems, more a 🙅♂️ for specific patients
- Is vegan bullshit? 🙅♂️ https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganFactsTelegram
So what is the best solution? For people that really focus on what they eat, by tracking them, making blood test, etc. a vegan diet definitely can help to improve CO2, health and animal welfare. For other, for example specific groups with particular needs, there is still a risk, even if this is not related to everyone.
One thing is sure, a lot more research is needed to cover all missing informations looking even what happen after 70 years being vegan, instead of just looking what happen after 3 seconds ... and considering almost just adults.
Plus it's time to think about alternative approaches, like a 1/3 or 2/3 vegan or an interval vegan diet or whatever.
More:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganFactsTelegram/266
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganFactsTelegram/276
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganFactsTelegram/281
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/31
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/32
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
'If We Don't Protect Nature We Can't Protect Ourselves' Harrison Ford | Extinction Rebellion
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is an example Musicians, Compositors, Gamers, Videomakers, Photographers, Designers, Journalists, Scientists based DataHoarders should produce - We as DataHoarder should transmit a clear message
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MeteoTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ClimateChangeTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FoodWasteTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MissionWillowProject
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MeteoTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ClimateChangeTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FoodWasteTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MissionWillowProject
When even other dietitians don't know what a position paper is ... and without checking what they wrote or investing even just 3 seconds to read that (compared to the days we did just to verify the topic protein intake, a topic we are already tracking since 2013, not just about vegan food). Near facts, they still want to say "no, this is scientific correctly", like many other bullshit dietitians or other professionals are telling.
All our comments are available here
First comment:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/62
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/63
Second:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/113
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/114
About protein intake:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/106
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SwitzerlandFacts/265
Final comment about study quality:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/105
More about that:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FoodWasteTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WWFFacts
Backup: https://perma.cc/F9XN-E2EU https://perma.cc/X7GL-38VH https://perma.cc/RK8W-KASS https://perma.cc/HA5D-6VJF
All our comments are available here
First comment:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/62
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/63
Second:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/113
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/114
About protein intake:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/106
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SwitzerlandFacts/265
Final comment about study quality:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram/105
More about that:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/VeganNutritionTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FoodWasteTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WWFFacts
Backup: https://perma.cc/F9XN-E2EU https://perma.cc/X7GL-38VH https://perma.cc/RK8W-KASS https://perma.cc/HA5D-6VJF
Do you don't believe us when we say that Twitter is banning tons of legit accounts? Here we go again, since we don't report bullshit! Another account for Oceanic and Atmospheric science just banned, like many other, no matter which topic or languages! Just a shame like Facebook and many other social networks! The only decent social is and remains TELEGRAM!
Between the worse like we previously reported we find Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit, Flickr, Tumblr.
Between the worse like we previously reported we find Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit, Flickr, Tumblr.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is the sad reality of our planet. Most people just want to believe the shit they want to believe, even if you prove with facts the opposite. This researcher is saying that for climate change, but in reality this happens for all aspects of their lifes, from their social network usage, to nutrition, to their behaviour when disasters happen, to their social pression behaviour changes, to their shopping behaviour to ...
Almost everyone is thinking to be an expert in every field, by knowing how to use / search / etc. something, when the reality is the whole opposite, and for example stats related to social network behaviours / usage / etc. we shared multiple times in the past with various our brands confirm that, especially since we track what it's happening on all socials on almost all topics and languages, by doing various test on people social behaviour too. Even now with AI everyone is thinking to be an expert, when ... (we don't talk about that now).
Their shopping behaviour is nothing better, just impulsive without using the brain and proper shopping strategies. Stats show such impulsive behaviour too.
Would be time that people start to think to the future (even when they buy something ...) by looking things from various perspectives, so like researchers and pro users are doing, instead of checking all that with a tube in front of their eyes. Obviously by comparing things properly or using that with properly strategies. And yes, even by verifying informations before they get shared to someone other.
Almost everyone is thinking to be an expert in every field, by knowing how to use / search / etc. something, when the reality is the whole opposite, and for example stats related to social network behaviours / usage / etc. we shared multiple times in the past with various our brands confirm that, especially since we track what it's happening on all socials on almost all topics and languages, by doing various test on people social behaviour too. Even now with AI everyone is thinking to be an expert, when ... (we don't talk about that now).
Their shopping behaviour is nothing better, just impulsive without using the brain and proper shopping strategies. Stats show such impulsive behaviour too.
Would be time that people start to think to the future (even when they buy something ...) by looking things from various perspectives, so like researchers and pro users are doing, instead of checking all that with a tube in front of their eyes. Obviously by comparing things properly or using that with properly strategies. And yes, even by verifying informations before they get shared to someone other.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Don't forget that, since Telegram is just full of child pornography (but not just Telegram, like we previously shared here https://news.1rj.ru/str/GenRevolutionOfficial/38) - So sharing content is criminal like posting!
You can report such crime to Telegram and the police @ourtelegramsafety
You can report such crime to Telegram and the police @ourtelegramsafety
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is true women discrimination! Not just trans crying because they are not considered as a third gender!
It's time to talk about such bullshit some influencers are sharing with https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1682 video
Our answer
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1682
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1683
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1693
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1698
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SwitzerlandFacts/357
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1718
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1728
It's time to talk about such bullshit some influencers are sharing with https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1682 video
Our answer
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1682
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1683
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1693
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1698
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SwitzerlandFacts/357
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1718
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1728
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
We launched the brand for women rights - It's time to stop discriminate people!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram
Yes, this is exactly what the world and even Elon Musk are doing with our planet. Great work WWF, showing that in a simply epic picture! Be ready Elon Musk, our project against your pollution bullshit will be launched soon. Between all men in the world, you are one of the worse.
@ElonMuskPollution @WWFFacts
@ElonMuskPollution @WWFFacts
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Yesterday (....), Interior gave the Willow Project a preliminary green light. Now, President Biden has the chance to make a final call. It's not too late to stop this carbon bomb.
If we don't, Willow will emit an estimated 280 million metric tons of climate pollution over the next 30 years. It's a make or break moment.
@MissionWillowProject
America, a country already in bankrupt with 31 trillions debts! and wasting money day by day for shit. Almost 300k most rich people in the world need to give all money to pay US debts! So financial crisis will really come in the next months or years, considering that many EU countries are in huge debts too. American billionaires and brands are classified as one of the worse biggest polluters in the world, taking excuses to do nothing and comparing that with China, which still pollute less per capita than Americans.
Willow Project is just another of many things, where the focus is only on money
@FinanceFactsTelegram
If we don't, Willow will emit an estimated 280 million metric tons of climate pollution over the next 30 years. It's a make or break moment.
@MissionWillowProject
America, a country already in bankrupt with 31 trillions debts! and wasting money day by day for shit. Almost 300k most rich people in the world need to give all money to pay US debts! So financial crisis will really come in the next months or years, considering that many EU countries are in huge debts too. American billionaires and brands are classified as one of the worse biggest polluters in the world, taking excuses to do nothing and comparing that with China, which still pollute less per capita than Americans.
Willow Project is just another of many things, where the focus is only on money
@FinanceFactsTelegram
Average = the most shitty useless information on this planet! ø data is saying ANYTHING, like per capita or total! This happens even related to finance / CO2 pollution and all other aspects in your life.
Previously https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/517 we talked about mean, mode and median, now let we go to the next step, talking about mean (= ø), total and per capita.
As you can see in this picture, total CO2 pollution from China is greater than USA, but a lot of traffic is available from China to USA. In the yellow graphic we can see how GDP in China increased a lot compared to years ago. 2000 there were 1.2 bio people, now 1.4 = 4.5x than USA (+0.058 bio in 23 years, GDP +29k 1.7x compared to +11k 12x in China)
Now let we check the per capita. China has a low per capita, considering the crazy population they have. Can we say that per capita pollution is a great way to measure pollution? Nope.
First per capita is the same shit like ø money you own used by Credit Suisse
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FinanceFactsTelegram/302
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FinanceFactsTelegram/314
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FinanceFactsTelegram/324
because it's enough 3 people earn 30000000 mio, and the ø is already 💩. In such case the median is better https://news.1rj.ru/str/FinanceFactsTelegram/332 but not perfect!
ø is shit in all other topics too, because at the end is saying anything, it's just cool and nothing more.
Back to the pollution per capita. Ok, China has 1.4 mio people, BUT around 5% with less than 4 years, 12% with less than 14, 5% < 19, 19% < 35, 8.5% more than 70 years, 27% more than 50 years https://perma.cc/FT2J-95AG
So a baby or kid is for sure not polluting like a 50+ with tons of money ....
About money, about 1.7 mio people in China have more than 1.2 mio CHF https://perma.cc/ML38-X87E
Some studies are reporting "Air pollution in China is falling — but there is a long way to go". Forecast are saying a decrease too, so what US said "we do nothing, because China is doing nothing"
Previously https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/517 we talked about mean, mode and median, now let we go to the next step, talking about mean (= ø), total and per capita.
As you can see in this picture, total CO2 pollution from China is greater than USA, but a lot of traffic is available from China to USA. In the yellow graphic we can see how GDP in China increased a lot compared to years ago. 2000 there were 1.2 bio people, now 1.4 = 4.5x than USA (+0.058 bio in 23 years, GDP +29k 1.7x compared to +11k 12x in China)
Now let we check the per capita. China has a low per capita, considering the crazy population they have. Can we say that per capita pollution is a great way to measure pollution? Nope.
First per capita is the same shit like ø money you own used by Credit Suisse
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FinanceFactsTelegram/302
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FinanceFactsTelegram/314
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FinanceFactsTelegram/324
because it's enough 3 people earn 30000000 mio, and the ø is already 💩. In such case the median is better https://news.1rj.ru/str/FinanceFactsTelegram/332 but not perfect!
ø is shit in all other topics too, because at the end is saying anything, it's just cool and nothing more.
Back to the pollution per capita. Ok, China has 1.4 mio people, BUT around 5% with less than 4 years, 12% with less than 14, 5% < 19, 19% < 35, 8.5% more than 70 years, 27% more than 50 years https://perma.cc/FT2J-95AG
So a baby or kid is for sure not polluting like a 50+ with tons of money ....
About money, about 1.7 mio people in China have more than 1.2 mio CHF https://perma.cc/ML38-X87E
Some studies are reporting "Air pollution in China is falling — but there is a long way to go". Forecast are saying a decrease too, so what US said "we do nothing, because China is doing nothing"
When people say "you cannot trust forecast". Yes, sure. Let we check now France with a forecast made in 2010!!!! So 13 years ago ... with over 3000 bio debts, one of the worse countries in Europe, near especially Italy, Germany, Luxemburg, Latvia, Słovenia, Lithuania, Ireland, Belgium, Austria and Greece.
Well done Éric Heyer, Mathieu Plane et Xavier Timbeau. Scenario Noir is exactly showing that. Plus this is just about %PIB. France released a document showing what they want to do to fix that, but in the next years it will be still over 100% and this still doesn't consider the fact, that the total debt continues and continues to increase! All countries are happy "yes, we reduced %" meanwhile the debt increase and increase. Remember that a debt need to be paid! Thinking "yes i will do it in future" or "yes, in 2030 we will reduce that", but then maybe another virus will be available or climate change will create huge costs, without any way to pay such debts at all, like USA.
@DebtTelegram
Well done Éric Heyer, Mathieu Plane et Xavier Timbeau. Scenario Noir is exactly showing that. Plus this is just about %PIB. France released a document showing what they want to do to fix that, but in the next years it will be still over 100% and this still doesn't consider the fact, that the total debt continues and continues to increase! All countries are happy "yes, we reduced %" meanwhile the debt increase and increase. Remember that a debt need to be paid! Thinking "yes i will do it in future" or "yes, in 2030 we will reduce that", but then maybe another virus will be available or climate change will create huge costs, without any way to pay such debts at all, like USA.
@DebtTelegram
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It's time to wake up! But people still prefer to keep tomatoes on their eyes about all topics (not just climate change) ... because doing nothing and not reflect about such things is much easier. Even if you provide facts after investing weeks / months on searching such informations for them
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚙🩸Car Accident Facts🚙💥
Slow down, please
Slow down, please