🇱🇧l🇺🇸 Al-Akhbar learned that Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, during his meeting with the head of the committee supervising the implementation of the agreement, Jasper Jeffers, addressed US Ambassador Lisa Johnson, who was present at the meeting, and asked her to convey his words rejecting the extension of the 60-day deadline to US President Donald Trump.
He indicated that “Trump is capable of obligating Israel to implement the agreement within the specified deadline, just as he pushed it to reach an agreement in Gaza,” and that “Washington must exercise its role as a sponsor of the agreement,” considering that the failure of the enemy forces to withdraw “threatens the entire scene of stability and the new beginning that began with the election of President Joseph Aoun and the assignment of Judge Nawaf Salam to form the government.”
On the other hand, Israel had informed the UNIFIL leadership of its intention to keep its forces at several specific points (hills and heights) in the border area, in the eastern and western sectors, and attached to that maps, aerial photos, and coordinates of these sites.
These areas are capable of exposing the entirety of south Lebanon to better Israeli supervision
He indicated that “Trump is capable of obligating Israel to implement the agreement within the specified deadline, just as he pushed it to reach an agreement in Gaza,” and that “Washington must exercise its role as a sponsor of the agreement,” considering that the failure of the enemy forces to withdraw “threatens the entire scene of stability and the new beginning that began with the election of President Joseph Aoun and the assignment of Judge Nawaf Salam to form the government.”
On the other hand, Israel had informed the UNIFIL leadership of its intention to keep its forces at several specific points (hills and heights) in the border area, in the eastern and western sectors, and attached to that maps, aerial photos, and coordinates of these sites.
These areas are capable of exposing the entirety of south Lebanon to better Israeli supervision
👍35🤬12🫡9👎2
📸 A collection of photos showing the Israeli army bulldozing and destroying roads leading to the border towns.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/alichoeib1970/13261
https://news.1rj.ru/str/alichoeib1970/13261
🤬56🫡8👍7
Lebanese News and Updates
📹 Hezbullah released a promotional video of its Ridwan forces, who are one of its largest units with extensive experience and training.
🥀 From the martyrs of the Al-Fath Al-Mubin Project - The one for these Ridwan videos
- Ahmed Samir Deeb (Jihad)
- Ali Qasim Ayyad (Abu Saleh)
- Hisham Youssef Madlaj (Khomeini)
- Ali Hassan Ashour (Sayyid Mitham)
- Ahmed Samir Deeb (Jihad)
- Ali Qasim Ayyad (Abu Saleh)
- Hisham Youssef Madlaj (Khomeini)
- Ali Hassan Ashour (Sayyid Mitham)
💔65🫡9👍8👎7🤬2
🇱🇧l🇵🇸 In continuation of the army's process of taking over military centers that were occupied by Palestinian organizations inside Lebanese territory, army units took over a former center of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine - General Command, and two former centers of the Fatah Intifada organization, in the vicinity of the Beddawi camp - Tripoli.
Quantities of weapons and ammunition were also seized, in addition to military equipment and surveillance devices.
Quantities of weapons and ammunition were also seized, in addition to military equipment and surveillance devices.
👍30🤬15🫡6👎5👀1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
📹 The area between Shaqra and Hula was never desecrated in this war by the Jews, and only reached these few days.
🤬49👍11🫡4👎2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇱🇧 The Lebanese army started demolishing illegally built shops at the entrances to Burj al-Barajneh camp in Beirut.
You'd assume they might have something more important to do...
You'd assume they might have something more important to do...
🤬66👍29🫡6👎2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇱🇧 Shia-born Lebanese Journalist Dima Sadek, from the town of Khiyam, says her life dream was to see Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah eliminated or fallen.
She's only sad he was killed "in a very deep hole" and not by Lebanese.
She's only sad he was killed "in a very deep hole" and not by Lebanese.
🤬164👍61🫡20👎12
A thread on X by Edvardo, worth reading
Three methods used in negotiations during the Arab-Israeli conflict:
- The first, Abu Ammar's method during the signing of Oslo (and it ended with "Sign, you dog").
- The second, Hamas's method, which requires intransigence and not making concessions until the last breath.
- The third, Hezbullah's method, which relies on maneuvers and circumventing concessions.
There is no need to talk about the Arafatist method of negotiation, it is enough to look at the state of the security coordination traitorous Palestinian Authority.
As for Hezbullah, its method was exemplary until the extreme right took power in Israel.
It was no longer useful to confront it through the old strategy, meaning that what happened in July 2006 will not be repeated.
In 2006, the form of the decision was not in line with the victor and the vanquished, as Hezbullah recorded a clear military victory, but it was not translated into the final formula of the ceasefire decision, which was in Israel’s favor. As in 1701 adoption then was not fair and in line with reality. Our PM was Fouad Al-Sinioura.
However, Hezbullah's method of agreeing on the decision allowed Lebanon long years of calm with the party’s return to the south of the Litani.
After the right wing, led by Netanyahu, took power in Israel, the situation changed, as Israel adopted a different style in managing wars, and its army turned into a “determined enemy” that does not accept compromises and evasions.
October 7 contributed to strengthening the security theory that does not accept coexistence with military organizations on the borders, no matter the cost.
Meanwhile, Hamas had adopted a tough approach to negotiations, aided by several factors, most notably previous experiences with the occupation in past wars that ended in unclear results, in addition to the Israeli goal of eradicating Hamas, which contributed to increasing the toughness of the movement’s leadership.
As for Lebanon, Hezbullah fell captive to previous concepts (in several areas, not just in negotiations), and fell into the trap of the international decision, believing that it was possible to gradually return to the results of July 2006.
But it collided with an Israel that was different from before, and with complex international circumstances (the fall of Syria) and with great internal pressure...
From the Lebanese political parties that wanted to end Hezbullah and supress the Shia no matter the costs and no matter who does it.
Three methods used in negotiations during the Arab-Israeli conflict:
- The first, Abu Ammar's method during the signing of Oslo (and it ended with "Sign, you dog").
- The second, Hamas's method, which requires intransigence and not making concessions until the last breath.
- The third, Hezbullah's method, which relies on maneuvers and circumventing concessions.
There is no need to talk about the Arafatist method of negotiation, it is enough to look at the state of the security coordination traitorous Palestinian Authority.
As for Hezbullah, its method was exemplary until the extreme right took power in Israel.
It was no longer useful to confront it through the old strategy, meaning that what happened in July 2006 will not be repeated.
In 2006, the form of the decision was not in line with the victor and the vanquished, as Hezbullah recorded a clear military victory, but it was not translated into the final formula of the ceasefire decision, which was in Israel’s favor. As in 1701 adoption then was not fair and in line with reality. Our PM was Fouad Al-Sinioura.
However, Hezbullah's method of agreeing on the decision allowed Lebanon long years of calm with the party’s return to the south of the Litani.
After the right wing, led by Netanyahu, took power in Israel, the situation changed, as Israel adopted a different style in managing wars, and its army turned into a “determined enemy” that does not accept compromises and evasions.
October 7 contributed to strengthening the security theory that does not accept coexistence with military organizations on the borders, no matter the cost.
Meanwhile, Hamas had adopted a tough approach to negotiations, aided by several factors, most notably previous experiences with the occupation in past wars that ended in unclear results, in addition to the Israeli goal of eradicating Hamas, which contributed to increasing the toughness of the movement’s leadership.
As for Lebanon, Hezbullah fell captive to previous concepts (in several areas, not just in negotiations), and fell into the trap of the international decision, believing that it was possible to gradually return to the results of July 2006.
But it collided with an Israel that was different from before, and with complex international circumstances (the fall of Syria) and with great internal pressure...
From the Lebanese political parties that wanted to end Hezbullah and supress the Shia no matter the costs and no matter who does it.
2👍41💔6🤬3🫡2👀1
That I know too. There is still a long way for the war to truly end in Gaza without loss of land and people.
They still have leverage (hostages) that could help, but that'll depend on Israel.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LebUpdate/50169?comment=1069177
They still have leverage (hostages) that could help, but that'll depend on Israel.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LebUpdate/50169?comment=1069177
Telegram
Ali in Lebanese News and Updates Chat
This assumes Hamas can go back to north Gaza, not true. Hamas is screwed too
👎21👍7💔3🫡1