Lebanese News and Updates
Some reports claim it might be a work accident, where war remnants exploded in the car
In the Nabatieh incident, it was a work incident for the Lebanese army
They were carrying some weapon that's exploded.
The incident caused several deaths including civilians. 4 were killed and 4 were injured.
They were carrying some weapon that's exploded.
The incident caused several deaths including civilians. 4 were killed and 4 were injured.
🤬67💔21👍18👀7🫡3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The attack in Kawthareyet el-Seyyed murdered one and the attack in Hula killed one.
The attack in Hula targeted a prefab house.
The first attack, penetrated about 40 cm which is a first such deep observation for Israeli drone-launched missiles
The attack in Hula targeted a prefab house.
The first attack, penetrated about 40 cm which is a first such deep observation for Israeli drone-launched missiles
👍32🤬28🫡5💔4👎1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
📹 No secondaries reported
1🤬49👍21💔6👎2👀2🫡2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
📹 CCTV footage of the Israeli attacks on Arnoun
🤬70👍32🫡10👎1
Lebanese News and Updates
These two will soon issue a statement of condolences to the work incident of the Lebanese army that killed 4
Do you think they will have a shred of decency to also offer condolences to those murdered in Hula and Kawthareyet el-Seyyed?
Do you think they will have a shred of decency to also offer condolences to those murdered in Hula and Kawthareyet el-Seyyed?
As expected, president Aoun didn't offer condolences to the casualties of the Israeli attacks in Hula, Nabatieh, and Kawthareyet el-Seyyed.
He only talked about the 3 Lebanese soldiers and not even the civilian killed next to them
Tweet: https://x.com/LBpresidency/status/1913965603343229195
He only talked about the 3 Lebanese soldiers and not even the civilian killed next to them
Tweet: https://x.com/LBpresidency/status/1913965603343229195
🤬102👍28🫡5👎3💔2👀1
The people saying the speech of his eminence was the cause of today's attacks are not delusional, they are ignorant hateful Fs.
Israeli attacks have been ongoing daily for months now without any Lebanese provocation, before and after the speech.
The only thing you want is full Lebanese submission then surrender to Israel.
My planned thread is worthless now because the Sheikh made the future clear.
What's important now? The rhetoric that Israel is the enemy ffs and that our lack of security is because their aggression not out reaction.
Israeli attacks have been ongoing daily for months now without any Lebanese provocation, before and after the speech.
The only thing you want is full Lebanese submission then surrender to Israel.
My planned thread is worthless now because the Sheikh made the future clear.
What's important now? The rhetoric that Israel is the enemy ffs and that our lack of security is because their aggression not out reaction.
👍58👎17🫡5
Syria..the fall is Syria is the limitation of Hezbullah.
Without Syria hezbullah cannot send fighters like before to Iran to train, cannot send leadership to Iran to meet officials, Iranian officers cannot easily come to Lebanon again
Weapon manufacturing capabilities of Syria are not accessable anymore,truck transport of tons of weapons is not possible anymore
Without Syria, Lebanon is like Gaza but with a functional port and airport...both in the hands of a non-friendly government.
Hezbullah has been limited not because of the lack of ability or will but by the reality of his surrounding
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LebUpdate/52269?comment=1268223
Without Syria hezbullah cannot send fighters like before to Iran to train, cannot send leadership to Iran to meet officials, Iranian officers cannot easily come to Lebanon again
Weapon manufacturing capabilities of Syria are not accessable anymore,truck transport of tons of weapons is not possible anymore
Without Syria, Lebanon is like Gaza but with a functional port and airport...both in the hands of a non-friendly government.
Hezbullah has been limited not because of the lack of ability or will but by the reality of his surrounding
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LebUpdate/52269?comment=1268223
1👍66💔17👎7
Lebanese News and Updates
As expected, president Aoun didn't offer condolences to the casualties of the Israeli attacks in Hula, Nabatieh, and Kawthareyet el-Seyyed.
He only talked about the 3 Lebanese soldiers and not even the civilian killed next to them
He only talked about the 3 Lebanese soldiers and not even the civilian killed next to them
The C Nawaf Salam also gave condolences to the Lebanese army soldiers only
🤬65👍21💔4👀3👎2
What is remarkable about the attack on Arnon today?
Arnon and Shqeef are located north of the Litani river.
In the US-French map of the cease-fire understandings, they were added to the procedures south of the Litani.
But the Lebanese side did not agree to that. The Council of Ministers (chaired by President Mikati) took note of the American-French declaration, which attached to the American Embassy a map extending the procedures south of the Litani to what the Israeli enemy calls the "Wadi al-Shaqif", that is, Yohmor and Arnon and their extension towards the Litani River to the south and east.
Nevertheless, President Nabih Berri informed the American side before the end of the war that any understanding does not include them.
After the announcement of the ceasefire, the Lebanese army, led by General Joseph Aoun, submitted to the Cabinet a plan for its deployment in the southern Litani area.
Naturally, the army's plan did not include Yohmor and Arnon.
What does that mean? It means that the army, led by General Joseph Aoun, was not in agreement with the inclusion of of these towns in the measures south of the Litani.
The matter remained this way, until American delegates came, and the last of them (the Sharshuha) Morgan Ortagos, to demand that the Lebanese army take over "a military tunnel belonging to Hezbullah in Yahamar al-Shaqif".
The Yohmor tunnel remained the focus of discussions between the Americans and the Lebanese side, knowing that it is a destroyed tunnel.
Despite this, Hezbullah informed the army that it does not object to handing over the tunnel to the army.
In doing so, the army took charge of the security of the two towns (knowing that Arnon does not have any regular positions for the party) and the Lebanese army has established 3 points in the towns
Conclusion: Yohmor and Arnon are under the complete control of the Lebanese army.
And Arnon has no positions for Hezbollah, and the position that the Americans demanded in Yahmar was taken over by the army already, knowing that it was destroyed.
Why all these details?
Because what happened in Arnon and Yohmor is a model for the behavior of the enemy (the American Israelis) as well as the behavior of the Lebanese state and the government.
The state asked Hezbullaj and so it responded within the framework of the understanding with the army commander and the president of the republic.
The state made a concession on the "withdrawal of grounds" rule.
How did the enemy respond? Responded aggressively to Arnon today. They didnt even target any individual or Hezbullah assets.
How will the state recover? What is its position?
Hezbullah did everything the government asked within 1701. Hezbullah and south Lebanon got zero security and only more Israeli violations and weakness from the government.
✍ If the war ended in a declaration of defeat I'll tell you the government cannot be blamed. But the war ended with 1701 which Hezbullah fully obeyed and disarmed in the south while Israeli violated 3,000 times and wipes out towns and continues to attack and kill daily
Arnon and Shqeef are located north of the Litani river.
In the US-French map of the cease-fire understandings, they were added to the procedures south of the Litani.
But the Lebanese side did not agree to that. The Council of Ministers (chaired by President Mikati) took note of the American-French declaration, which attached to the American Embassy a map extending the procedures south of the Litani to what the Israeli enemy calls the "Wadi al-Shaqif", that is, Yohmor and Arnon and their extension towards the Litani River to the south and east.
Nevertheless, President Nabih Berri informed the American side before the end of the war that any understanding does not include them.
After the announcement of the ceasefire, the Lebanese army, led by General Joseph Aoun, submitted to the Cabinet a plan for its deployment in the southern Litani area.
Naturally, the army's plan did not include Yohmor and Arnon.
What does that mean? It means that the army, led by General Joseph Aoun, was not in agreement with the inclusion of of these towns in the measures south of the Litani.
The matter remained this way, until American delegates came, and the last of them (the Sharshuha) Morgan Ortagos, to demand that the Lebanese army take over "a military tunnel belonging to Hezbullah in Yahamar al-Shaqif".
The Yohmor tunnel remained the focus of discussions between the Americans and the Lebanese side, knowing that it is a destroyed tunnel.
Despite this, Hezbullah informed the army that it does not object to handing over the tunnel to the army.
In doing so, the army took charge of the security of the two towns (knowing that Arnon does not have any regular positions for the party) and the Lebanese army has established 3 points in the towns
Conclusion: Yohmor and Arnon are under the complete control of the Lebanese army.
And Arnon has no positions for Hezbollah, and the position that the Americans demanded in Yahmar was taken over by the army already, knowing that it was destroyed.
Why all these details?
Because what happened in Arnon and Yohmor is a model for the behavior of the enemy (the American Israelis) as well as the behavior of the Lebanese state and the government.
The state asked Hezbullaj and so it responded within the framework of the understanding with the army commander and the president of the republic.
The state made a concession on the "withdrawal of grounds" rule.
How did the enemy respond? Responded aggressively to Arnon today. They didnt even target any individual or Hezbullah assets.
How will the state recover? What is its position?
Hezbullah did everything the government asked within 1701. Hezbullah and south Lebanon got zero security and only more Israeli violations and weakness from the government.
✍ If the war ended in a declaration of defeat I'll tell you the government cannot be blamed. But the war ended with 1701 which Hezbullah fully obeyed and disarmed in the south while Israeli violated 3,000 times and wipes out towns and continues to attack and kill daily
2👍40💔11👎3👀2