KEIN 30 KM/H WENN KEINEN SINN MACHT! Also Deutschland, 30 km/h wegnehmen und 100 - 120 km/h Limit implementieren, bzw. RESPEKTIEREN!

STOP THIS NO SENSE THING! No matter if Italy, Germany or whatever ..

a) Stop to use cars for every shit!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/209
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/1121

b) Start to use electric bus, trains etc.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/507
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/508
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EnergyFactsTelegram/509
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/99
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/672
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/662
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/898
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/888

c) 30 km/h only for dangerous places! not the whole city or whatever! THIS IS JUST POLLUTION!!!!

OK, 30 km/h means less deaths with car accidents
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/112
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/152
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/132

BUT THIS MEANS EVEN MORE CO2 POLLUTION
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/827
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/817

and we need to remember Italy is not the best country related to cars
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/858
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/838

let we remember how 🇮🇹 are lazy too, using cars for every shit ..
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LetzteGenerationFakten/45
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LetzteGenerationFakten/46
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LetzteGenerationFakten/59
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LetzteGenerationFakten/60
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/204
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/205

so again 🙅‍♂️ 30 km/h everywhere 🙅‍♂️120+ km/h = YES GERMANY SHOULD BAN 120+ and implement max 100-120 km/h!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/827

✅ 30 km/h in specific places ✅ (*) cars adapt max speed based on gps location
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/52
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/53
✅ that artificial intelligence can check all your driving data (if * will not be implemented) and when km/h is too high, an human control can verify and in case remove you driving license

No matter what, we noticed that Germany has already some with max speed, BUT ALMOST NO ONE IS RESPECTING SUCH KM/H!

More
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeutschlandBullshit/243

Let we check km/h based on AfD
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AfDFakten/1103

🤦‍♂️ obviously .... KEIN TEMPOLIMIT???!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/827
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/817

Only four countries out of 28 EU Member States were responsible for 51.3% of the EU total GHG emissions (Italy 9.8%; France 10.8%; the United Kingdom 11.3% and Germany 20.9%). The greenhouse emissions were the highest in Germany (21.9 thousand tonnes) and the United Kingdom (11.3 thousand tonnes) among the EU Member States in 2017.

Figure 6 shows the emissions curve over the road speed for gasoline vehicles using Equation (10). Equation (10) is relevant to the vehicles sampled in 2000. Of course, this curve differs by vehicle.
The emissions factor takes a minimum value around 60–70 km/h and higher values at lower speed ranges.

Figure 3(a) shows that, at low speed, car emits the highest CO while higher speed emits minimum pollutant. The greener speed range is 60–100 km/h in terms of emission.

Finally we can conclude by analyzing all those graphs that 60–80 km/h is the best average speed both in terms of energy effciency and in terms of greener environment.

Although the number of vehicles in the EU increased by 11% from 2010 to 2018, the average CO2 emissions per kilometre from new passenger cars decreased by at least 10% in all EU Member States (Fig. 4.). The most significant decrease occurred in Bulgaria, Latvia, Cyprus, Finland, Netherlands and Greece by 20%, 20.4%, 20.9%, 21.8%, 22.3% and 22.7%, respectively.

✅ 50 km/h in cities
❌ 120 km/h 🏎
✅ 100-120 km/h
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AfDFakten/1103

Next epic fail by "die Grüne"

So related to the F-35 bullshit / AHV
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/1040
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/1068

Related to elderly
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FinanceFactsTelegram/882
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/FinanceFactsTelegram/912

Related to migration
https://news.1rj.ru/str/StopRightsAbuseinSwitzerland

Related to airplanes
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AfDFakten/567
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/1035
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/144
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/159
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/173
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ElonMuskPollution/175

Related to cars
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/629
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/649
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PolitikTelegram/23

Plus just one point. IF SOMEONE NEED TO GO FROM A TO B, he will do that, no matter if with a mega xxxl street or a xxxs street ...

This will NOT fix the issue of car pollution!
Especially knowing that people use the car for every shit ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/204
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/205
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LetzteGenerationFakten/45
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LetzteGenerationFakten/46

We need to change lifestyle!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BenShapiroBullshit/12
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BenShapiroBullshit/13

Stop being indifferent and ignoring things
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AspergerSyndromeTelegram/53
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MissionPlaneta/55
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/116

Stop thinking that electric cars are the only solution, because they pollute too!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MissionPlaneta/57
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MissionPlaneta/58

We need to implement max 100-120 km/h automatically based on GPS!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/52
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/53
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram/105
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/109

We need to implement huge expensive fines if someone is doing too much km without providing a valid reason!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/119
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/120

Related
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SciencePoliticalParty/19
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SciencePoliticalParty/11
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SciencePoliticalParty/10
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SciencePoliticalParty/50
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SciencePoliticalParty/55

Plus exactly, why do we need a top speed of 150 km/h+ ... what is the sense of having that .. even if a car is able to do?! They should block that per default.

It's time to stop seeing such idiot people
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/47
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/44
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/77
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/101
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/102
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/104
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/107
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/109
& rich people
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CarAccidentsFacts/178

Not just related to the topic pollution, but even for the safety of other people, for the safety of animals and because there is NO REASON you need to go 150 km/h!

150 km/h for 2 hours = 300 km
120 km/h for 2 hours = 240 km —> 2.5h trip ... seriously do you have not 30 minutes more for the safety and the love of our planet?
100 km/h for 2 hours = 200 km —> 3 h trip

Let we say for example 140 g/km with 100 km/h, 150 g/km with 120 km/h and 190 g/km with 150 km/h

this means for 300 km 42k vs 45k vs 57k

so 1.07x with 120 km/h and 1.35x with 150 km/h if we consider 100 km/h as default = 1 hour more of trip

If we consider 120 km/h as default —> 1.26x with 150 km/h! now if everyone is doing that ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PollutionFacts/1186

Several studies have found that the carbon intensity of the electricity in the operation phase determines the advantage – or disadvantage – of adopting BEVs over ICEVs with regard to GHG emissions. While relatively similar lifecycle emissions are achieved by charging BEVs with electricity from natural gas, wind-based electricity results in significantly lower lifecycle emissions compared to ICEVs. By contrast, coal-based electricity yields higher lifecycle emissions for BEVs than ICEVs. Hence, in areas where electricity is primarily produced from thermal power plants fired by lignite, coal or heavy oil, BEVs serve as a means of improving urban air quality and shifting emissions away from the densely populated urban centres, rather than reducing emissions.