Many Aryan traditions are cringe as they're not a perfect manifestation of the original perennial source of wisdom. That said, Abrahamist exclusivism is not something I would subscribe to either. We should exercise discernment when it comes to approaching what religion is right and what is wrong.

Western civilization was made possible by Indo-European traditions. Christian civilization is built upon the immense foundations of such traditions. That is why Africa, despite being 70% Abrahamist, 30% Christian, cannot compete with the cultural and technological prowess of East Asia which is 6% Abrahamist, ~3% Christian.

The modernist academic understanding of Vedic Dharma (aka proto-Hinduism) being polytheistic is wildly inaccurate.
There is nothing polytheistic about Vedism. It's actually very traditionally disrespectful to claim that millions of false idols that modern Hindus worship are actually somehow "Gods."
At the very top level, we see that Mahadharma is the wisdom of Brahman, later known by the Greeks as logos and the word.
The Trimurti is a very temporal manifestation of Brahman, representing the birth, stasis, degeneration and destruction of the cosmos. Hence Brahm, Vishnu, Shiv are all temporal manifestations of Brahman. Of course Devas exist, but they're unfathomably lower than Brahman, they're comparable to Fairies, Elves and Asparas. An symbolic manifestation of a more primitive stage of human development, but has not transcended the Trailokya.

Wow, you can't make this stuff up.
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

I love Russian Music, their children's book illustrations and the fact that Eastern Europeans understand that "progress," debt and consumerism suck.

<<Утренний Эскиз>>
Сегодня утром зяблики
Свистели и аукали,
А лодку и кораблики
Качели волн баюкали.
Над тихою деревнею
Дышали звуки вешние,
И пред избушкой древнею
Светлела даль поспешнее.
Хотелось жить и чувствовать
Зарей студено-ясною,
Смеяться и безумствовать
Мечтой - всегда напрасною!

Of course I respect Australian Aboriginals.
But we must also understand that groups with lower IQs are more likely to be influenced by ideological radicals.
People with lower IQs tend to believe things when told and react positively to highly superficial marketing buzzwords (including but not limited to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, etc).
So when Greens, SBS, NITV, Extinction Rebellion type people interact with Aboriginals, they often fail to rationalize and deconstruct the agenda embedded within their leftist orthodoxy.

Both materialism and kabbalistic spiritualism are like syphilis for the soul

It can all be broken down into 3 archetypical sets.

Irrationalism: Subjectivism, new-age spiritualism, expressionism, postmodernism, "the id", etc.

Rationalism: Objectivism, materialism, secular-humanism, atheism, skepticism, reductionism, scientific absolutism, the "ego", unfalsifiable-denialism, modernism etc.

Meta-rationalism: Perennialism, the "super-ego", moral objectivism, natural law, phenomenal extrapolation, implicative analysis, nonephemerality, unfalsifiable-agnosticism etc.

I'm not going to celebrate Australia day because it is offensive to aboriginals. I will instead be celebrating George Floyd day

Double digit IQ day.

Gnomes, fairies, elves ect have more truth than any modern ideology or philosophy

I've only drunk raw milk for the past few years and you should too.

On a personal and daily level, the "turning the other cheek" teaching is far more Indo-European than Jewish.

A Jewish person would believe it's morally acceptable hit back with an equal force, as to cause the same amount of pain due to the "eye for an eye" principle. The whole notion of "turning the other cheek" would've been a complete revolt against the Jewish system.

The whole notion of Kshama (forgiveness) was pretty much unheard of in the Jewish world until Jesus came along and proclaimed it was virtuous to do so.

That said, there are situations where hitting back would be acceptable in the Indo-European tradition (i.e. if someone attacks your family, or in a conflict between nations). But as a general rule, the concept of Karmic conservation was almost exclusively an Indo-European thought prior to Jesus' teachings.

Some people think that confrontation, aggression, "getting even" and offense (on a daily/personal level) are Aryan "virtues."

These people are at best misguided and at worst, subversive.

Screw modern medicine and doctors (with the exception of emergency surgeons). They're just obedient little servants of governments. Indulging in their so-called "science" which is in reality a crappy pseudoscience and a crappy imitation of real rigorous intelligence found in CompSci, Mathematics and Physics.
I'd rather die than go to a doctor.

A new, mostly online, heresy known as Aryanity has recently come to my attention. From what I have seen it is a Gnostic ideology intermingled with pagan ideas of occultism and reincarnation. This heresy must be avoided and condemned. One should not base their metaphysics on their politics but rather base their politics on their metaphysics. Aryanity is a metaphysically world view based on politics and nothing else.

It's well documented that most European traditions have been assimilated and dissolved by the Catholic church and muslam over the last millennium. Most modern "pagans" happen to fall into the "larper" category.
The only major living "Aryan" traditions are Santana Dharma and Orthodox Buddhism. Which most of those wignat larpers calls "Pajeet nonsense."

Nietzcheanism works with natural law, but not divine law. That is to say, subjugation of inferior humans should be socially accepted but not practiced by people who strive to exit Samsara.