What I've been observing is that right wing people tend to have introverted empathy and extroverted psychopathy.
Whereas leftists have extroverted empathy and introverted psychopathy.
In terms of contemporary Japanese archetypes, this would make:
Leftists - yandere
Conservatives - tsundere
Libertarians - kuudere
Whereas leftists have extroverted empathy and introverted psychopathy.
In terms of contemporary Japanese archetypes, this would make:
Leftists - yandere
Conservatives - tsundere
Libertarians - kuudere
It would make sense that low IQ people and XSFX types would be more easily influenced by leftists. Since they cannot deconstruct pretentious personalities or shallow words, instead interpreting them as sincere.
The Taiping Rebellion was a
Anonymous Poll
40%
Christian fanatical rebellion
60%
Han nationalist rebellion
The term "criminal" is a statist propaganda phrase. There are no such things as "criminals" or "crime," just like how there's no such thing as "hate speech."
Both conservatives and liberals need to deprogram themselves from believing "criminal" = bad person.
Edit: Criminals do exist, but "criminal" ≠ bad person. A "criminal" is just someone the state doesn't like, just like how "hate speech" is just speech leftists don't like. Of course, this doesn't mean that all "hate speech" is righteous speech or that all "criminals" are angels.
Both conservatives and liberals need to deprogram themselves from believing "criminal" = bad person.
Edit: Criminals do exist, but "criminal" ≠ bad person. A "criminal" is just someone the state doesn't like, just like how "hate speech" is just speech leftists don't like. Of course, this doesn't mean that all "hate speech" is righteous speech or that all "criminals" are angels.
👍3👎1
I strive to be truly consistent with my principles and not to bootlick the state when it suits me or my views.
If my enemy's rights get violated, I will defend them just like I wish to be defended when my rights become violated. There are no exceptions.
If my enemy's rights get violated, I will defend them just like I wish to be defended when my rights become violated. There are no exceptions.
👍2
Of course it's sad for the third-parties involved. Call me cynical, but this is a similar argument to justify reparations in my opinion.
I.e. (a: white people) should (b: pay) for (c: black people) because of (d: the injustices) (e: their ancestors) (f: perpetrated).
Transposed. (a: the building) should (b: be demolished) for (c: the parents) because of (d: the murder of their children) (e: someone who is not the building) (f: perpetrated).
It seems like an odd secular religious ritual that's not inferred from any religion. Also, it's at the taxpayers expense.
I.e. (a: white people) should (b: pay) for (c: black people) because of (d: the injustices) (e: their ancestors) (f: perpetrated).
Transposed. (a: the building) should (b: be demolished) for (c: the parents) because of (d: the murder of their children) (e: someone who is not the building) (f: perpetrated).
It seems like an odd secular religious ritual that's not inferred from any religion. Also, it's at the taxpayers expense.
You will eat bugs and you will ride the self driving taxis in the walled smart city and you will rent your home from Blackrock and you will pay your 90% tax rate and you will cheer for the Current Thing and you will believe in green energy and you will like it, comrade. And of you speak out, your ID will change to red and you won't be able to access your basic needs :)
🤮1
Anyone who thinks CBDCs will be Blockchain based are very sadly mistaken.
The whole point of a Blockchain is to validate transactions such that no currency is maliciously created or destroyed as per the law of conservation: (ΣRx = ΣTx - fees).
This process is enormously power consuming and will likely not be adopted by governments - aka the biggest malicious creator of currency.
My prediction is that CBDCs will be based on legacy ledgers used by banks to keep track of balances, transactions and Treasury bonds.
The whole point of a Blockchain is to validate transactions such that no currency is maliciously created or destroyed as per the law of conservation: (ΣRx = ΣTx - fees).
This process is enormously power consuming and will likely not be adopted by governments - aka the biggest malicious creator of currency.
My prediction is that CBDCs will be based on legacy ledgers used by banks to keep track of balances, transactions and Treasury bonds.