Forwarded from Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💢 Ukrainian farmer says that previously, he took Anhydrous ammonia in Russia with delivery for 9,000 hryvnias a ton, and now this fertilizer in Ukraine costs 59,000 hryvnias. So farmers simply will not sow the fields. This suggests that there will be famine in the country.
@NewResistance
@NewResistance
😱1
Forwarded from Wartime Media - Ukraine / Russia / China / Etc
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It may be a different kind of memory problem after all. 🤖
😱2
Forwarded from TransFormator
Is the Challenger 2 a Good Tank For Ukraine? Strengths and Drawbacks of British Armour in the Donbas
As the first Western-built tank class pledged in an aid package to Ukraine, the British Challenger 2 is expected to see the first units delivered by mid-April as Ukrainian personnel continue to train to operate and maintain the class in United Kingdom. Deliveries will make Ukraine only the second foreign operator of the Challenger 2 after Oman, with the vehicle having failed to compete for contracts against the much more widely used German Leopard 2 and American M1 Abrams. This and the low availability rates in the British Army mean that the numbers currently available are relatively limited, with under 450 ever built, although plans to cut British Army numbers to just 148 vehicles mean that there could eventually be room to supply Ukraine with up to 200. As the only tank class in the Western world to enter service after the end of the Cold War, the Challenger 2s is most prized for its armour particularly on its turret, which is significantly heavier than on other Western tank classes. Nevertheless the tank’s suitability for Ukraine’s defence needs has frequently been called into question.
Join us 👉@TrFormer
Read the complete version here
As the first Western-built tank class pledged in an aid package to Ukraine, the British Challenger 2 is expected to see the first units delivered by mid-April as Ukrainian personnel continue to train to operate and maintain the class in United Kingdom. Deliveries will make Ukraine only the second foreign operator of the Challenger 2 after Oman, with the vehicle having failed to compete for contracts against the much more widely used German Leopard 2 and American M1 Abrams. This and the low availability rates in the British Army mean that the numbers currently available are relatively limited, with under 450 ever built, although plans to cut British Army numbers to just 148 vehicles mean that there could eventually be room to supply Ukraine with up to 200. As the only tank class in the Western world to enter service after the end of the Cold War, the Challenger 2s is most prized for its armour particularly on its turret, which is significantly heavier than on other Western tank classes. Nevertheless the tank’s suitability for Ukraine’s defence needs has frequently been called into question.
Join us 👉@TrFormer
Read the complete version here
Forwarded from New Age Order Channel (Mars)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Woman has a meltdown after Trump refers to his supporters as an ‘army’ in an e-mail. This TikTok account is real. Not a parody. https://t.co/USyBJ9lWVK
Meanwhile in Ukraine Joe Biden and NATO are starting world war 3. And this is what she cries about???
Meanwhile in Ukraine Joe Biden and NATO are starting world war 3. And this is what she cries about???
🤣3😢1
Forwarded from New Age Order Channel (Mars)
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
🔥7
The above tweet from #German Chancellor #Scholz causes me to wonder:
"Just how bad is the #blackmail material they have on him?"
"Just how bad is the #blackmail material they have on him?"
👍3🤡3
Forwarded from Working Brother
🧿Drago Bosnić joins the WB for a talk about the SU57's combat effectiveness, a possible naval landing, Prigozhin working for the NY Times and the situation around Bahmut as well as many other current topics.
➡️https://youtu.be/EPp7LFNp2aM ⬅️
➡️https://youtu.be/EPp7LFNp2aM ⬅️
YouTube
SU57 is useless, RF Naval landing, Bahmut roads, Prigozhin/NYTimes - WB Talks (38) to Drago Bosnić
Drago Bosnić stopped by for another Talk with the WB, this time we cover some more recent events, reactions from the west, as well as some exclusive footage of Prigozhin trolling the NYT.
The Sukhoi 57 and it's combat role and effectiveness is also discussed.…
The Sukhoi 57 and it's combat role and effectiveness is also discussed.…
👍2
Forwarded from Fearless John - @European_dissident
The Western War Against Russian Art....
This same gallery renamed a painting by #French #Impressionist Edgar #Degas from “Russian Dancers” to “Ukrainian Dancers”, at the request of the Ukrainian diaspora living in Great Britain.
This was done for purely political reasons, as a response to Russia’s Special Military Operation.
In 1899 Degas created a series of 18 works dedicated to Russian folk dancers.
One of the works, located in the Metropolitan Museum, was renamed to “Dancer in Ukrainian Costume”.
These changes went farther than just fiddling with the scholarly annotations placed underneath a painting:
These museums actually had the gall to change the noscript given to his work by the artist himself!
As if chiding Degas: “Non non, Monsieur, you are mistaken, these girls are Ukrainians!”
If they felt that Degas had made a mistake, they could have just said that in the annotation, but they should have left his noscript alone.
This same gallery renamed a painting by #French #Impressionist Edgar #Degas from “Russian Dancers” to “Ukrainian Dancers”, at the request of the Ukrainian diaspora living in Great Britain.
This was done for purely political reasons, as a response to Russia’s Special Military Operation.
In 1899 Degas created a series of 18 works dedicated to Russian folk dancers.
One of the works, located in the Metropolitan Museum, was renamed to “Dancer in Ukrainian Costume”.
These changes went farther than just fiddling with the scholarly annotations placed underneath a painting:
These museums actually had the gall to change the noscript given to his work by the artist himself!
As if chiding Degas: “Non non, Monsieur, you are mistaken, these girls are Ukrainians!”
If they felt that Degas had made a mistake, they could have just said that in the annotation, but they should have left his noscript alone.
👍1