Forwarded from Loy Brunson
Raland’s Facebook post
While Plan D is in motion, let me tell you about...
Plan E!!
It took two months of preparation and with the help of my younger brother Deron, I was able to successfully file a law suit against three of the members of the US Supreme Court Justices. They were legally and officially served March 17, 2023.
* Elena Kagan
* Sonia Sotomayor
* Ketanji Brown Jackson
I'm accusing them of aiding and supporting enemies of the United States Government by refusing to protect the constitution by denying my petition regarding the allegations that there was interference in 2020 Presidential Election. My three defendants knew full well regarding the allegations, and for reasons that they need to explain, denied my petition. They are guilty of misprision of treason, which is "the deliberate concealment of one's knowledge of a treasonable act or a felony."
As of a few days ago, and in response to my lawsuit against them, they (like anyone else being sued) had to secure attorneys to represent them. They had no choice but to lawyer up, because by themselves, a US Supreme Court Judge does not have the power of influence over a lower court (unless an application for a temporary stay order is filed by a losing party regarding a decision made in the Federal Court, which of course, has nothing to do with the action of this case). Let me repeat. My defendants by themselves cannot and do not have any influence over a lower court. None. They are individuals who have to defend themselves, and in response to my action they acted accordingly. They lawyered up, and by doing so submitted to the future judgment of my local US District Court.
I want them to either grant me a hearing or be removed from office. Now, does my judge have the power to remove them from office? Yes, he actually does. So far there is nowhere in the rules, or statutes, or the Constitution that shows or indicates that my defendants have to be impeached first. In my study of law and how our government is structured, there is no legal power other than congress doing a majority vote that can stop the judicial branch from removing my three defendants from office. But, what if I prevail with my Federal Court Judge? My three defendants can appeal it. What if I win in the appellate court? They can appeal it to the US Supreme Court.
This means if I lose I can also appeal it. All the way to the US Supreme Court. What happens when it gets there? Clarence Thomas and colleagues will then have the opportunity (if they want) to grant me a hearing, and if I prevail, they could, with a court order, have them removed from office. Who and what power can stop them? An executive order from the U.S. President? No. Judges have often stopped Executive Orders. What about the DOJ? No again. They are also part of the executive branch. Outside of the rule that comes from the majority vote of congress, there is nothing more powerful in this country than a court order.
What's my next step?
Deron and I are now preparing an offer. A settlement offer that by law, must be delivered to my three defendants personally through their legal counsel. (This is pretty cool because I now have a direct path of communication to my defendants.) Anyway, my offer is going to be this: If they can acquire the vote of another associate Justice, which will give me the four needed votes, and grant me a hearing, I will drop my case against them!
While Plan D is in motion, let me tell you about...
Plan E!!
It took two months of preparation and with the help of my younger brother Deron, I was able to successfully file a law suit against three of the members of the US Supreme Court Justices. They were legally and officially served March 17, 2023.
* Elena Kagan
* Sonia Sotomayor
* Ketanji Brown Jackson
I'm accusing them of aiding and supporting enemies of the United States Government by refusing to protect the constitution by denying my petition regarding the allegations that there was interference in 2020 Presidential Election. My three defendants knew full well regarding the allegations, and for reasons that they need to explain, denied my petition. They are guilty of misprision of treason, which is "the deliberate concealment of one's knowledge of a treasonable act or a felony."
As of a few days ago, and in response to my lawsuit against them, they (like anyone else being sued) had to secure attorneys to represent them. They had no choice but to lawyer up, because by themselves, a US Supreme Court Judge does not have the power of influence over a lower court (unless an application for a temporary stay order is filed by a losing party regarding a decision made in the Federal Court, which of course, has nothing to do with the action of this case). Let me repeat. My defendants by themselves cannot and do not have any influence over a lower court. None. They are individuals who have to defend themselves, and in response to my action they acted accordingly. They lawyered up, and by doing so submitted to the future judgment of my local US District Court.
I want them to either grant me a hearing or be removed from office. Now, does my judge have the power to remove them from office? Yes, he actually does. So far there is nowhere in the rules, or statutes, or the Constitution that shows or indicates that my defendants have to be impeached first. In my study of law and how our government is structured, there is no legal power other than congress doing a majority vote that can stop the judicial branch from removing my three defendants from office. But, what if I prevail with my Federal Court Judge? My three defendants can appeal it. What if I win in the appellate court? They can appeal it to the US Supreme Court.
This means if I lose I can also appeal it. All the way to the US Supreme Court. What happens when it gets there? Clarence Thomas and colleagues will then have the opportunity (if they want) to grant me a hearing, and if I prevail, they could, with a court order, have them removed from office. Who and what power can stop them? An executive order from the U.S. President? No. Judges have often stopped Executive Orders. What about the DOJ? No again. They are also part of the executive branch. Outside of the rule that comes from the majority vote of congress, there is nothing more powerful in this country than a court order.
What's my next step?
Deron and I are now preparing an offer. A settlement offer that by law, must be delivered to my three defendants personally through their legal counsel. (This is pretty cool because I now have a direct path of communication to my defendants.) Anyway, my offer is going to be this: If they can acquire the vote of another associate Justice, which will give me the four needed votes, and grant me a hearing, I will drop my case against them!
👍4
Forwarded from West Coast News & Discussion
‘We’re Going to See a Lot of Bankruptcies’: Former CEO
The first quarter of 2023 saw job cuts rise by 396 percent compared to the same period a year ago.
Read More: https://bit.ly/3GW25IK
The first quarter of 2023 saw job cuts rise by 396 percent compared to the same period a year ago.
Read More: https://bit.ly/3GW25IK
www.theepochtimes.com
‘We’re Going to See a Lot of Bankruptcies’: Former CEO
Bob Nardelli, the former CEO of Home Depot, is warning about more bankruptcies hitting the United States’ economy, and blames lawmakers for their delay in coming to terms regarding the country’s debt ceiling.
❤2
Forwarded from The Mess Hall (DARKHORSE728)
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸...
Forwarded from World Doctors Alliance
YouTube
What’s in the Pfizer Documents? | Naomi Wolf
Watch the full speech at https://freedomlibrary.hillsdale.edu/programs/cca-iv-big-pharma/what-s-in-the-pfizer-documents/?utm_campaign=ea_15min&utm_medium=youtube&utm_source=youtube&utm_content=Wolf_030623
“What’s in the Pfizer Documents?”
Naomi Wolf
CEO…
“What’s in the Pfizer Documents?”
Naomi Wolf
CEO…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU7yl9R9bkY I'VE PLAYED THIS MORE THAN ANY OTHER MELLO MUSIC FROM MY FAVORITE TIMES IN THE 70's
YouTube
STEELY DAN - Hey Nineteen (Official Video) (HD Vinyl)
Steely Dan - Hey Nineteen (vinyl + video + lyrics)
Album: Gaucho
Release Date: September 23, 2008
Number of Discs: 1
Label: Geffen
EQUIPMENT USED:
Audio-Technica AT-LP120-USB (Internal Preamp Removed)
VM540ML Cartridge
VMN40ML Stylus
Focusrite Scarlett…
Album: Gaucho
Release Date: September 23, 2008
Number of Discs: 1
Label: Geffen
EQUIPMENT USED:
Audio-Technica AT-LP120-USB (Internal Preamp Removed)
VM540ML Cartridge
VMN40ML Stylus
Focusrite Scarlett…
❤3
Forwarded from JenniferMac
Join SpaceShot76 and Juan o Savin at 10:15pm eastern tonite. Always a fun show ✌️
Foxhole
https://pilled.net/foxhole/15193
Rumble
https://rumble.com/v2isokl-ss76-w-juan-07-let-there-be-light-41723.html
Dlive
https://dlive.tv/spaceshot76
Foxhole
https://pilled.net/foxhole/15193
Rumble
https://rumble.com/v2isokl-ss76-w-juan-07-let-there-be-light-41723.html
Dlive
https://dlive.tv/spaceshot76
Hey everyone...gotta keep the vibes up today...seriously, thanks to SLY...I'll have a "NEVER LET ANYTHING RAIN ON YOUR SUNSHINE MOMENT"
