Color of Law Law and Legal Definition
Color of law refers to an act done under the appearance of legal authorization, when in fact, no such right existed. It applies when a person is acting under real or apparent government authority. The term is used in the federal Civil Rights Act, which gives citizens the right to sue government officials and their agents who use their authority to violate rights guaranteed by federal law.
The following is from the Civil Rights Act:
"Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress."
Acting under color of [state] law is misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law Thompson v. Zirkle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77654 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 17, 2007)
Color of law refers to an act done under the appearance of legal authorization, when in fact, no such right existed. It applies when a person is acting under real or apparent government authority. The term is used in the federal Civil Rights Act, which gives citizens the right to sue government officials and their agents who use their authority to violate rights guaranteed by federal law.
The following is from the Civil Rights Act:
"Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress."
Acting under color of [state] law is misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law Thompson v. Zirkle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77654 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 17, 2007)
42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights = Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. (R.S. § 1979; Pub. L. 96–170, § 1, Dec. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 1284; Pub. L. 104–317, noscript III, § 309(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3853.)
The following statutory language warns public officials of the consequences of denying constitutional rights to others:
Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
Forwarded from Patriot Works Announcements, Schedules, Media
Tonight: Special report on the shipping and supply chain crisis.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/patriotworkschat
https://news.1rj.ru/str/patriotworkschat
Forwarded from Qtips
China is a export country, they only get paid when they off load their exported goods here. Guess what? They are not getting paid! At the same time they have the Evergrande situation. Evergrande will lead to a dozen more institutions going bankrupt within China. This will destroy their economy and meanwhile they have no income coming in. Double whammy!! The economic fallout will spread to the USA so prepare, stock up on essential items.
There may be as many as half dozen countries that committed acts of war against the United States (Five Eyes) but the main aggressor is China. They unleashed a bioweapon on us and took part in the election steal. They have bought all of our politicians, judges and AG's. For this reason China became the main target. This is why we see 4 of our battle groups floating in the seas surrounding China.
Q spelled out the plan in the most simple term in Q post 4524. "[D] + China = 11.3" https://qanon.pub/#4524
Democrats + China = 11.3. You have to fill in what this simple equation means. 11.3 is not a date, its a chapter out of the Department of Defense Law of War Manual. If you have not read it, I suggest you do, here is the link. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf
Chapter 11.3 starts on page 750
11.3 END OF OCCUPATION AND DURATION OF GC OBLIGATIONS
The fact that democrats joined forces with a foreign country(China) to steal our election from us and now Biden Admin has assumed power, this makes them a Belligerent Occupier. Its like the USA setting down in Iraq 20 years ago, we became a occupier of Iraq. China (with cooperation from the democraps) has become a occupier of the USA. This is a act of war.
There are international codes for war. These are expected to be followed by all nations. If these codes are not followed you can expect United Nations/NATO involvement especially if they see human rights abuses. These codes are called the Geneva Convention Articles (GC). Here is the link. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.33_GC-IV-EN.pdf
If you look at 11.3 in the DOD manual you see they talk about GC. Trump does everything by the book. You may not like it but in order for us to get to the finish line we must play be the rules set down for us. If we break GC code we risk the globalists getting involved using NATO, remember we are also at war with the globalists and they would not hesitate getting involved if given a reason.
The DOD Law of War Manual (11.3) explains that GC code applies to both the belligerent occupier and the occupied territory(USA). After one year the GC obligation expires for the occupied territory. Remember China and Biden took control on 1/20/2021. One year will be 1/20/2022. After that date our military has the legal authority to take our country back, this is when 11.3 goes in to effect.
There may be as many as half dozen countries that committed acts of war against the United States (Five Eyes) but the main aggressor is China. They unleashed a bioweapon on us and took part in the election steal. They have bought all of our politicians, judges and AG's. For this reason China became the main target. This is why we see 4 of our battle groups floating in the seas surrounding China.
Q spelled out the plan in the most simple term in Q post 4524. "[D] + China = 11.3" https://qanon.pub/#4524
Democrats + China = 11.3. You have to fill in what this simple equation means. 11.3 is not a date, its a chapter out of the Department of Defense Law of War Manual. If you have not read it, I suggest you do, here is the link. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf
Chapter 11.3 starts on page 750
11.3 END OF OCCUPATION AND DURATION OF GC OBLIGATIONS
The fact that democrats joined forces with a foreign country(China) to steal our election from us and now Biden Admin has assumed power, this makes them a Belligerent Occupier. Its like the USA setting down in Iraq 20 years ago, we became a occupier of Iraq. China (with cooperation from the democraps) has become a occupier of the USA. This is a act of war.
There are international codes for war. These are expected to be followed by all nations. If these codes are not followed you can expect United Nations/NATO involvement especially if they see human rights abuses. These codes are called the Geneva Convention Articles (GC). Here is the link. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.33_GC-IV-EN.pdf
If you look at 11.3 in the DOD manual you see they talk about GC. Trump does everything by the book. You may not like it but in order for us to get to the finish line we must play be the rules set down for us. If we break GC code we risk the globalists getting involved using NATO, remember we are also at war with the globalists and they would not hesitate getting involved if given a reason.
The DOD Law of War Manual (11.3) explains that GC code applies to both the belligerent occupier and the occupied territory(USA). After one year the GC obligation expires for the occupied territory. Remember China and Biden took control on 1/20/2021. One year will be 1/20/2022. After that date our military has the legal authority to take our country back, this is when 11.3 goes in to effect.
www.qanon.pub
qanon.pub :: posts by 𝒬
Where we go one, we go all.
Forwarded from DavidNinoRodriguez
Former President Bill Clinton Admitted to Hospital: Spokesman
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/former-president-bill-clinton-admitted-to-hospital-spokesman_4050310.html
Download our app to read more at https://ept.ms/DownloadApp
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/former-president-bill-clinton-admitted-to-hospital-spokesman_4050310.html
Download our app to read more at https://ept.ms/DownloadApp
The Epoch Times
Former President Bill Clinton Admitted to Hospital: Spokesman
Former President Bill Clinton has been admitted to hospital with a non-COVID-related infection but is “on the mend,” ...
Forwarded from 💊 ℝ𝕖𝕕.ℙ𝕚𝕝𝕝.ℙ𝕙𝕒𝕣𝕞𝕒𝕔𝕚𝕤𝕥 💊
Forwarded from Patriot Works Announcements, Schedules, Media
You have your food, or you’re trying to get those non-perishables stocked as fast as possible. Supplemental nutrition may be a needed component of your prep?
Avoid scurvy and beriberi!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/patriotworkschat
Avoid scurvy and beriberi!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/patriotworkschat
I’m pretty sure this is a signal that everything is right on track and fixing to head bright like a freight train in the face of some pretty bad people
Forwarded from Praying Medic (Dave Hayes)
Guess who's about to be indicted?
😎
https://news.yahoo.com/michael-steele-comes-shadows-stephanopoulos-161100382.html
😎
https://news.yahoo.com/michael-steele-comes-shadows-stephanopoulos-161100382.html