"LIFE or DEATH" Always choose life NO matter what the outcome! Remember, remember the 5th of November!

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) is a U.S. federal law that grants the President significant authority to address international threats through economic measures. Enacted on December 28, 1977, as Title II of Public Law 95-223 and signed by President Jimmy Carter, it was designed to curb the overly broad emergency powers under the earlier Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) of 1917, which had been invoked for domestic issues like the 1933 banking crisis and the 1970 postal strike. IEEPA is codified in 50 U.S.C. §§ 1701–1707 and operates in tandem with the National Emergencies Act (NEA) of 1977, which requires congressional notification and annual renewal of any declared emergency.

Tomorrow, November 5, 2025, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in consolidated cases (e.g., Liberty Justice Center v. Trump) challenging Trump's use of IEEPA for his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs—10-50% duties on imports from China, Mexico, Canada, the EU, and others, justified as responses to trade deficits, fentanyl, and migration as "extraordinary threats." These tariffs, imposed via executive orders in early 2025, have generated ~$144 billion in revenue year-to-date but face lower court blocks as unconstitutional overreach, bypassing Congress's Article I commerce powers. The tariffs stay in effect pending SCOTUS review. Trump calls it "one of the most important cases in U.S. history," warning a loss could leave America "defenseless" and "reduced to third-world status" by gutting his trade agenda.

It's not just tariffs; it's about who controls America's wallet.

I was speaking in kayfabe as high probability it is all based on outcomes of an event driven by effects of the wartime posture to protect the population as long as the Eagles head is facing the arrows (Sec of War) = Offense instead of playing from a defensive posture. It's live !
7:31 PM · Nov 4, 2025.

Let you eyes - do the deep dive on this image knowing it is a real place & true original bldg.

MY FELLOW AMERICANS
“AND SO IT BEGINS” ON 11.4.
We The People,
In God We Trust,
United We Stand,
One Nation,
Indivisible,
Sovereign,
And FREE,
AGAIN!
- DJT

With all glory to God.

The number 17 = Q...holds various symbolic meanings across numerology, mathematics, and cultural contexts, but the specific claim that it represents "victory" (often tied to "overcoming the enemy" or "complete victory") originates primarily from biblical numerology and Christian interpretive traditions. 17 is frequently interpreted as emblematic of victory, spi17 ritual perfection, resurrection, and divine triumph over evil or adversity. This stems from several key noscriptural references and numerical patterns:Key Events Tied to the 17th:Noah's Ark rested on the mountains of Ararat on the 17th day of the 7th month (Genesis 8:4), symbolizing God's victory over the flood's destruction and a fresh start for humanity.
The Israelites crossed the Jordan River into the Promised Land on the 10th day of the 1st month, but the priests carrying the Ark stood in the riverbed for 17 days before the waters receded (Joshua 4:19, inferred from timing), marking victory over Canaanite enemies and entry into rest.
Jesus' resurrection is linked to the 17th in some chronologies (e.g., crucifixion preparations on the 14th, resurrection on the 17th of Nisan), representing ultimate victory over sin and death.

Get read for the "Musical Chairs" in Congress! Look it up ... don't take my word for it!

The term "Musical Chairs" is a metaphor often used to describe a problematic feature of the U.S. Presidential Succession Act of 1947, specifically its "bumping provision," which can lead to rapid and destabilizing shifts in the line of presidential succession during a crisis. This provision applies to the statutory order of succession established by Congress, which follows the Vice President with the Speaker of the House, the President pro tempore of the Senate, and then Cabinet secretaries (in the order their departments were created). Here's a breakdown of the key aspects:The Bumping ProvisionHow it works: If a lower-ranking official in the succession line (e.g., a Cabinet secretary) assumes the role of acting President due to the disability, death, or disqualification of all higher-ranking officials, they serve only temporarily. Once a higher-ranking official (e.g., the Speaker of the House) recovers, qualifies, or becomes available, they can immediately "bump" the acting President and take over the role. This creates a chain reaction where multiple individuals could cycle through the presidency in quick succession.
Why it's called "Musical Chairs": Critics argue this setup resembles the children's game of musical chairs, where participants scramble for limited seats as the music stops, potentially causing chaos. In a national emergency—such as a simultaneous incapacitation of the President and Vice President—it could result in frequent handovers, eroding public confidence, disrupting governance, and inviting political maneuvering (e.g., Congress pressuring a Cabinet acting President by threatening to install a new Speaker).

Relation to CongressThe Speaker of the House (third in line) and President pro tempore of the Senate (fourth in line) are congressional leaders, making Congress's internal dynamics directly impactful. For instance, a change in House majority could shift the Speakership, potentially bumping an acting President mid-term. This congressional influence over the executive branch has raised separation-of-powers concerns.
Historical examples of near-instability include vice presidential vacancies (e.g., after John F. Kennedy's assassination in 1963 or Spiro Agnew's resignation in 1973), though the 25th Amendment (ratified in 1967) has since allowed faster VP replacements, reducing reliance on deeper succession. The provision has never been invoked, but events like 9/11 highlighted vulnerabilities.

Criticisms and ReformsInstability risks: In a 2011 op-ed, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) warned that it "creates a game of musical chairs with the presidency and would cause great instability," emphasizing the need for a clear, steady leader during crises.
Constitutional debates: Some scholars, including Akhil Reed Amar, contend the provision violates Article II of the Constitution, which implies acting presidents serve until a disability ends or an election occurs—without mid-term displacements. A 2009 Continuity of Government Commission report recommended reforms to eliminate bumping and prioritize stability.
Proposed changes: Bipartisan efforts, including bills in the 2000s and 2010s, have sought to remove the bumping clause or clarify acting presidents' terms, but none have passed. The Act has been amended 10+ times (most recently in 2006) to add new Cabinet roles, but the core provision persists.

Overall, while the succession law ensures continuity, the "Musical Chairs" dynamic underscores ongoing debates about balancing flexibility with reliability in America's constitutional framework!

The term "Musical Chairs" is a metaphor often used to describe a problematic feature of the U.S. Presidential Succession Act of 1947, specifically its "bumping provision," which can lead to rapid and destabilizing shifts in the line of presidential succession during a crisis. This provision applies to the statutory order of succession established by Congress, which follows the Vice President with the Speaker of the House, the President pro tempore of the Senate, and then Cabinet secretaries (in the order their departments were created). Here's a breakdown of the key aspects:The Bumping ProvisionHow it works: If a lower-ranking official in the succession line (e.g., a Cabinet secretary) assumes the role of acting President due to the disability, death, or disqualification of all higher-ranking officials, they serve only temporarily. Once a higher-ranking official (e.g., the Speaker of the House) recovers, qualifies, or becomes available, they can immediately "bump" the acting President and take over the role. This creates a chain reaction where multiple individuals could cycle through the presidency in quick succession.
Why it's called "Musical Chairs": Critics argue this setup resembles the children's game of musical chairs, where participants scramble for limited seats as the music stops, potentially causing chaos. In a national emergency—such as a simultaneous incapacitation of the President and Vice President—it could result in frequent handovers, eroding public confidence, disrupting governance, and inviting political maneuvering (e.g., Congress pressuring a Cabinet acting President by threatening to install a new Speaker).

Relation to CongressThe Speaker of the House (third in line) and President pro tempore of the Senate (fourth in line) are congressional leaders, making Congress's internal dynamics directly impactful. For instance, a change in House majority could shift the Speakership, potentially bumping an acting President mid-term. This congressional influence over the executive branch has raised separation-of-powers concerns.
Historical examples of near-instability include vice presidential vacancies (e.g., after John F. Kennedy's assassination in 1963 or Spiro Agnew's resignation in 1973), though the 25th Amendment (ratified in 1967) has since allowed faster VP replacements, reducing reliance on deeper succession. The provision has never been invoked, but events like 9/11 highlighted vulnerabilities.

Criticisms and ReformsInstability risks: In a 2011 op-ed, Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) warned that it "creates a game of musical chairs with the presidency and would cause great instability," emphasizing the need for a clear, steady leader during crises.
Constitutional debates: Some scholars, including Akhil Reed Amar, contend the provision violates Article II of the Constitution, which implies acting presidents serve until a disability ends or an election occurs—without mid-term displacements. A 2009 Continuity of Government Commission report recommended reforms to eliminate bumping and prioritize stability.
Proposed changes: Bipartisan efforts, including bills in the 2000s and 2010s, have sought to remove the bumping clause or clarify acting presidents' terms, but none have passed. The Act has been amended 10+ times (most recently in 2006) to add new Cabinet roles, but the core provision persists.

Overall, while the succession law ensures continuity, the "Musical Chairs" dynamic underscores ongoing debates about balancing flexibility with reliability in America's constitutional framework. NOW YOU KNOW...we've been talking about this relating to the Governance aspect for a couple of years. 107 has mentioned it was coming as well!

Message posted by Malisa Boone

THE INTERNET HAS BEEN HIJACKED UPDATE ALL DEVICES RIGHT NOW