🔴131 terrorists active in J&K, 122 of them Pakistani, say sources
Despite a series of coordinated raids and arrests throughout the Union Territory in recent weeks, the entrenched terror infrastructure remains a major security concern. Security forces have neutralised 31 terrorists so far this year in various encounters☠️

⬆️Borders are porous :India is surrounded by either hostile or shady neighbours :First target of Home ministry should be securing the Western border with advanced defenses (israel) did it they even used to bust tunnel boring through seismic and acoustic sensors . Nepal and Bangladesh are also a problem and bhutan was used by Ulfa jn past though it was handled . Myanmar gifted us manipur conflict: Sri Lanka killed our prime minister ‼️


Aik Ladli behna scheme ka gala ghot ke 🙂 Border pe invest kro (trump is not wrong with it )

In past there has been a lot of investment for border infra , but this is not enough

➡️Search Ops was launched in Arnas,Dharmari,Thuroo in District Reasi by JKP & Army - regular ops though Trt movement is frequent in the area.

➡️

CASO launched by 9 RR, 18 BN CRPF, and SOG Kulgam in Mutalhama village.Trts movement was reported

➡️

The Border Security Force (BSF) Jammu along with personnel from the Border Police Post conducted a joint Cordon & search operation (CASO) in the Haria Chak area of Marheen tehsil in Kathua district J&K, Regular ops or related to cross border Drone package

➡️Movement data for LeT/JeM elements (2024–2025) was spatially overlaid on NASA VIIRS NTL (Nighttime Lights) radiance grids.
➡️NTL intensity was used as a proxy for population density, infrastructural activity, and civilian presence.
➡️Patterns were examined across urban centers, peri-urban zones, rural settlements, forested areas, and high-altitude hinterlands.

~75% of observed insurgent movement occurs in low radiance zones, which correlate with:

➡️

Sparse or negligible human habitation.

➡️

Limited infrastructure

➡️

Forested or mountainous terrain

➡️

The remaining ~25% tracks along:

➡️

Peripheral villages

➡️

Semi-urban transit corridors

➡️

Areas with intermittent civilian activity

➡️

Notably, high-radiance urban cores show minimal to no insurgent presence, suggesting deliberate route selection to avoid exposure.

The avoidance of cities reflects high perceived risk due to:

➡️

Concentration of security forces

➡️

Surveillance density

➡️

Lower likelihood of covert support networks

Reliance on hinterland routes highlights:

➡️

Use of terrain masking

➡️

Need for low-signature mobility

➡️

Dependence on natural cover for logistics, communication, and evasion.

Pattern indicates operational decentralization, consistent with groups facing attrition pressures and diminished local facilitation networks.