Over half of the moslems in the world are inbred due to their love of cousin-marriage. Their mamzer rate ranges from a third in Turkey to seven tenths in Pakistan. Despite being 3% of the country's births, Pakis were responsible for 30% of the diseased children in Britain. In other words, Islam is retarded—its followers are rabidly unintelligent, even when provided with years of education.

These foreigners make up a third of the disabled in Copenhagen, in addition to being highly criminal and perverted. The Mohammedan owns a considerable portion of Russia and wishes to take the rest of the continent using his rapeish militance.

The 'people' that helped let in these freaks are quite similar. Altho much smarter and less brown than moslems, Ashkenazim are relatively inbred, rife with disorder and disease, and predisposed to schizophrenia and pedophilia. The same goes for slant-eyed races, none of whom deserve any excuses or praise.

80% of the first Soviet government was Jewish, which was confirmed by the US embassy in 1921. The Soviet leader in Hungary was a Jew, as were almost all the marxist icons in Germany and Poland. In America, a third of the Reds were Jews, yet they were also over 60% of the subverters and 90% of the Soviet spies.

Over half of today's influential liberals have been Jews. Jews largely pioneered modern Libertarianism, Feminism, the LGBT, the CCP, formed the Frankfurt School, and created—still run—Hollywood. Their role in the MSM goes without saying. Even Fascism and the Right has notable Jewish input, their intellect is broad.

Remarkably, between the 19th to 20th century, 44% of the richest Prussians and 23% of the wealthiest Germans were Jews. At least half of that wealth was derived from banking, finance. In the 2010s, about 20% of the super-rich in Britain were Jews. In 2010, 35% of the Forbes Top 400 were Jews. In 2013, Jews were 17% of top 1400 billionaires. In 2020, 35% of the Forbes Top 100 were Jewish.

America is at its core genuinely English, derived from Britain. New England stock peopled and produced the Midwest, the West and Rockies, and has birthed the brightest minds for over three centuries. Below that, the greater South was ran by a Tidewater elite, borne from North & West England, defended by Ulster vigour and Anglo ideals. Britain spread Englishmen of the greatest stock abroad, around which we had a common origin and an actual identity we fought to keep. Only fellow NWE, e.g. the Dutch, could blend in.

Those who only semi-assimilate—say some Irish or most Italians—inadvertantly upset the balance. 1780s and 1840s Germans for example leaned left. That appealed to Catholic migrants, who in turn brought unintelligent, criminal co-ethnics and aligned with intruder Jews. This foreigner coalition was behind Lincoln, FDR, JFK, Obama, Biden, and many wars. Alien organisations like the Italian Mafia pushed and financed porn, sexual deviance, even race-mixing. Such decline shows how 'diversity' takes over.

“It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”

Speech at the Sorbonne, Paris, Theodore Roosevelt, 23.04.1910

Real Americans come from the natural selection of relentless kin seeking more, making better. Jamestown, Plymouth, the Bay Colony—settlements of well-picked middle class men from England. Men from northern counties, most of whom were low class and South bound, still displayed an exceptional quality surpassing that of Europe.

Our fertility was between six to nine kids a family for over two centuries: thousands of Founding Stock turned to millions that now span a continent. At the time, and today in many ways, proper Americans outmatched the old world in physique, brain, and behaviour. Descendants of the Americans persevere, be it our persistent Puritan, Southern holdout, affluent Mormon, or any other WASP.

Welcomed into the fold were sympathetic tough folk from Europe. No losers, popish, or unfit. The free and fair persons who left the old world to win this land were far more wolf-like than the idle. The American, with Northern coolness, like an English pioneer, is pragmatic, a winner.

The Founding Fathers, contrary to remarks of this being a nation of immigrants, generally were against immigration altogether. In truth, the Fathers knew full well the implications of race and ethnicity. Shortly after Thomas Jefferson had penned ‘All Men are Created Equal’, he made his own observations that ‘the inferiority of coloured races is not merely the effect of life conditions', he acknowledged an inherent mental and physical disparity.

This is perfectly consistent with American views. Men were afforded ten bedrock rights, over which the government cannot step, which never implies characteristic equality. Classical Liberalism as they knew it was inseparable from Racial Realism. John Stuart Mill understood that ‘Free institutions are practically impossible in a country of different nationalities’, meaning even intraracial mingling was too diverse.

If the slave-owning did not make this obvious, the notion of Liberty was philosophically exclusive to those who can comprehend and function with it, hence the nation was for free White men only. John Adams rightly did not believe in ‘Democracy’, America never was one. There would always be a natural aristocracy of sorts, but a democratic tendency amongst fellow Westerners.

The concept of an ‘American Dream’ for immigrants was itself conceived by immigrants, mainly appealing to the Irish, Italian, et cetera. The term ‘Melting Pot’ was coined by a man named Israel Zangwill. And the libelous ‘Nation of Immigrants’ was popularised by our first Irish Catholic president. For all his faults, even Abraham Lincoln accepted race realities.

It is foolish to believe America was devoid of racial thought or a community mind. The Puritans placed their blood covenant as the highest ordeal and leaned more and more into a Darwinist mentality, which could have made a wholly eugenic state. Southern Culture took pride in its hospitality, its family bond above all else.

American individualism thrived with such conscientiousness, spreading far and famously. The nation was intended for one people, “drawn together by religion, blood, language, manners, and customs”, in which case, as Benjamin Franklin had wished, the core and common American would be a thoroughbred middle-class Englishman.

“With Jews, You Lose”. Problem is, you will never not have Jews on both sides.

Every relevant nationalist group is Zionist. Putin and Ukraine both are Jew-backed. Churchill sided with Zionists against Bolsheviks. The NSDAP helped create Israel. During the Civil War, the Confederacy was staffed by Jews and the Union had Jewish support. Frederick II, Bismarck, Russian monarchs, most kings have compromised with Jews. The Alt-Right is full of Jews, they appear in all movements.

Napoleon emancipated, empowered, and integrated Jews. He also put Jewry on trial and ‘fought Rothschilds’. Cromwell ‘let’ Jews into England, yet he did not enfranchise them—the Royalists would have. Jews work with Protestants, they mingle with Catholics, Orthodox, Pagans, Muslims.

Jews lead anti-immigration today. Jews even popularised race realism. They ‘control’ Trump, yet wholly oppose him. Look at Nixon or Truman. Jews are influential, Israel memes won't end that. The only option then is to do nothing. Or, stop being so dogmatic.

The argument that Zionist interests influence both sides is understandable. But, what matters is the actual results. Joe Biden has been an aggressive defender of Israel for over 50 years, receiving 11x more zionist money than Trump. Hillary raised 40x what Trump did at one point and spent 2x what he did in 2016, she lost.

So far, Harris has twice the funding and full support from Soros, but Trump's support is disproportionately from decent White people, Adelson aside. Harris does not oppose Israel, she wants mass amnesty, and she praised the original bill to give Israel 3 billion a year. Behind that bill was president Obama, who was significantly more pro-Israel than Trump.

Uniquely, Obama was at war his entire presidency. Trump, in contrast, ended wars, made deals, and started no new wars. In all, Trump is actually worse for Israel. He only gave them symbolic gestures, barely added to the money Obama signed off, and will not fight Iran. The notion that both outcomes are the same is demoralised delusion.

Immigration restriction in American history took both ethnicity and fitness into consideration. Reason being, aliens of non-NWE descent over-occupied jails, asylums, and shelters. Their crime, dependency, and insanity was twice and more the native rate.

Illiteracy and retardation was highest amongst South and East Euros, many of whom still can't assimilate. Ethnics such as “Italians, [Slavs], and Asiatics” were highly injurious to America, hurting our wages, ruining our cities, and degrading the mental and moral quality of the nation.

America responded, albeit too late, with laws banning the Chinese, stupid, perverse, anarchic, dependent, mentally ill, sick, and non-assimilable—laws we must invoke today. Trump's senior advisor, Stephen Miller, has noted this. He worked to end H1B visas and backed the RAISE act to block over 50% of all legals. He helped impose a wealth test to deny poors, and sought legislation to exclude non-English-speakers. Miller also had a role in the Travel Ban, barring Muslim entry.

There are doubts that Trump will accomplish anything—projecting that most of the right does nothing—citing previous failures and promises unkept. Rats like Kushner, blocking and baiting from Congress and courts, and stabs in the back from anti-White Republicans did all they could to derail the 'Trump Train'.

This time around, Trump appears to have learned a bit. He has called out ‘the enemy within’ and established a team of loyalists with whom he may clean house. Trump has made more waves than anyone by normalising better ideals, and his first term offered a high standard of immigration restriction, his second should radically improve upon that.

The inclusion of Elon Musk, who has amplified racial concerns and whose platform has given us a major free speech win, expands the potential we have to succeed, only if we are pragmatic.

White Hierarchical Individualist Males define the impetus which makes History. Men with exceptional personality and a sense of purpose—the ‘doers’. Theirs isn't a libertine, egotistic attitude, but an urge to go out on their own. Going-out is a high risk endeavour, whether literally or figuratively, it requires self-control and assertion.

They become great sailors, statesmen, adventurers, inventors, ultimately pioneers in some respect. They usher the founding of empires, the advancement of ideas and nations. These hierarchical individualists operate in a democratic fashion amongst their peers, careful of what he offends. Over others, they govern with an aristocratic attitude.

The ‘WHIM’ is overall a fearless man, his highest expression being the WASP. What disturbs him the most is the idea of being infringed. His energy falters under terrible pressures such as diversity, foreign suggestions, or feminine intervention. A foward-thinking community must recognise and cultivate this type, lest it dies out.

The Anglo-Saxon is the “aryan of the aryans”, the most civilised, the best, with an international legacy. In Anglos, the Chinese see world-spanning ‘brutality against inferior indigenous groups’; Russians see the image of western aggression; Ashkenazim see their one true competitor, and nons see an Elite they envy.

While the core Anglo is an Englishman, every White whose character commands the same respect, and whose blood agrees with the kin, can assimilate. Uniting around this identity is a much needed and explicit act of Whiteness, the only basis of Western culture. Detractors consider Anglo-Saxon to be too exclusive, but this is ideal.

Asia affords excellent PR in the eyes of many, a reputation it does not deserve. Not just because they pollute our water, dirty our air, peddle drugs, engage in disgusting sexual habits, and race-mix obscenely. It's that the “Asian” hype is a fabrication.

China's faults are up front: they lack inventive capacity, their strengths are in receiving and repeating, and the ‘people’ act like ants. At best, the Chinese master rote thinking and can name a few studied accomplishments—the nation puts out plenty, practically all worthless, like South Korea, the leader of plastic surgery.

Alone is Japan, a culture in pure escape, but neat and innovative, arguably the best the East can offer. Asians as a species have smaller glands and testicles, which may explain the modesty, but they are not quite human in many respects. This makes the East Asian the tranny of the world. A disingenuous mess pushing all boundaries, pursuing nothing, and abusing everything.

Deviance loves company. While external pressure is hardly the sole cause, negative actors do corrupt the vulnerable, especially the genetically predisposed, and sexual deviance is the worst outcome. It is an illness comorbid with all others, and when the victim accepts poison such as porn, their condition only worsens.

This alone makes non-heteros a problem. In their sickness, they often try to share the misery. This is why half of criminal troons are sex offenders; troons offend 5x the rate of cis-men, 600x that of women. And furries and zoophiles, many of whom are LGBT, tend to be an animal abuse risk.

Pedophiles, bestialists, race-mixers, and non-heteros overlap greatly, from their fetishes to their criminality and defects. Likewise, domestic violence, animal abuse, and child abuse are strongly linked. One may spark the other, a cycle of abuse common in Non-NWE. Not coincidentally, leftists champion all of this, giving credence to Spiteful Mutant Theory and indicating a serious socio-biological concern.

A winner is not one to accept a pathetic position. This is the problem Nietzsche had with anti-Semites, most of whom he saw as underprivileged and unpleasant ideologues with impotent tendencies. A century later, we still see vulgar positions and stupid methods being tried. These types love being the hater, the reaction, the victim, they take pride in being the ‘noticer’. The face of this has become Third-Worldists, multinational nationalists allied in inadequacy.

That does not win, and neither does refusing to seize the game because “there are no political solutions”. If you prefer to resort to accelerationism, see South Africa. Or if you'd rather concede your nation and its ideas, you have already lost. The Anglo-Saxon won the world because of his will to advance however reasonably possible, which means considering multiple solutions, that is what is necessary. We can only call ourselves serious if we are practical optimists, in that we expect better and extract the best results.

“Very often, they are defective people. Either they are people who simply can't function successfully in society—that is, they are losers or anti-social misfits looking for company—or they are escapists, or adventurers, who don't really want to serve our cause, but who are looking for some politically incorrect diversion.

“... They are poison to us ... it took me a few years to learn the hard way to shun hobbyists, to have zero tolerance for people who like to dress up in uniforms and shout ‘1488’. ... zero tolerance for these freaks. ... Ultimately, we need many more people than we have now. But we need winners, not losers. If we begin tolerating losers now ... we never will get the winners, and then we ourselves will become losers.”

Dr. William Luther Pierce

Demography is destiny. This stays true on an ethnic level as well. Each ethnicity has its thought pattern and intellectual quirks, its tendencies, its ethics and envies. Every ethnicity within the race has innate qualities that will influence the manner in which they participate in society. Northwest Europeans for instance selected against dullness, disorder, and in many cases darkness.

Northwest Europeans are the only group to overwhelmingly support founding principles and vote for native interests in America. And Northwest Europeans have greater brains than South and East Euros, among other things. Such characteristics help explain why Non-NWE have not assimilated in most respects, and why non-Europeans are virtually unable. To ensure WHIM wellbeing requires considering this all.

I am a believer in the fact that it is for the good of the world that the English-speaking race in all its branches should hold as much of the world's surface as possible. The spread of the little kingdom of Wessex into more than a country, more than an empire, into a race which has conquered half the earth and holds a quarter of it is perhaps the greatest fact in all of history.

Letter to F.C. Selous, Teddy Roosevelt, 1900

It is our duty to seize every opportunity of acquiring more territory and we should keep this one idea steadily before our eyes that more territory simply means more of the Anglo-Saxon race more of the best the most human, most honorable race the world possesses. [...] I contend that we are the finest race in the world and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race.

Confession of Faith, Cecil Rhodes, 1877

Complementary channel for contemporary politics and real world thinking: https://news.1rj.ru/str/PracticalPolitics

Jared Taylor on the Jewish Question,

“I'm not convinced that saying this is a problem [because of] Jews . . . changes any of our arguments . . . I don't think you ‘gain any points’ by pointing out the Jewish element”

Acknowledging that there is in fact Jewish over-representation in great areas, Jared Taylor makes a good point. First most, there are always Jews on both sides. Jews that incidentally benefit our side tend to be radically productive, whatever extent you are reluctant to tolerate that, the focus should be on their outcomes.

As for the negative ones, which may be most of them, Jews, alongside all bad actors, are already affected when you attack corruption, fraud, leftism, etc., it should not be an expectation to be specific, since whatever issue is in question will be largely answered by doing the right thing.

Thanksgiving is a perfectly American-held tradition. An early celebration can be found in 1619, coming off the ship Margaret of Bristol, arriving in Jamestown, VA with 36 surviving Englishmen. Their charter declared Thanks to God for their safe arrival and the continuation of their offspring.

A time later, most famously, the Mayflower landed up North, establishing Plymouth Colony, celebrating their Thanksgiving in 1621. And they had a lot to be grateful for. Of the 102 passengers on the Mayflower, nearly half perished. Of the remaining, only 51 bore children, who alone went on to become over 85,000 three centuries later.

Today, there are over 30 million connected descendants from that one single ship, and millions from the others. Those of Colonial descent belong to a rich, powerful Nation, one that excels in science and business up North, and breeds soldiers and statements down South. Be thankful for your blood and the struggle it has gone through.