During WWII there was an unprecedented amount of mass labour death camps throughout Eurasia. Both the Soviet and Chinese camps were controlled by Zionist forces, in which Russia suffered the loss of more than 100 million Aryan souls, somtimes referred to by its broad term: the Holodomor.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7mCaeiKI5EvR/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zKimazbm6XkX/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7mCaeiKI5EvR/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zKimazbm6XkX/
BitChute
BitChute is a peer-to-peer social video platform.
BitChute aims to put creators first and provide them with a service that they can use to flourish and express their ideas freely.
👍1
How does this pertain to the mudflood truth?
As my friend had well said it, a peculiar glitch in the narrative is always the bug one must be on alert and lookout for for it is which points us away from the illusion, and closer to the truth.
Here the glitch in the narrative is the Holocaust which never happened. Obviously the ZOG Holodomor and Laogai labour camps existed, but what of the German ones? Why did the allies cover this up?
We will be making a deep dive into this topic very soon...
http://www.holohoax101.org/
As my friend had well said it, a peculiar glitch in the narrative is always the bug one must be on alert and lookout for for it is which points us away from the illusion, and closer to the truth.
Here the glitch in the narrative is the Holocaust which never happened. Obviously the ZOG Holodomor and Laogai labour camps existed, but what of the German ones? Why did the allies cover this up?
We will be making a deep dive into this topic very soon...
http://www.holohoax101.org/
Maps are faked. We cannot trust modern maps. We truly live in a Orwellian autocracy.
Forwarded from The Conspiracy Hole (Brody Hyde)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Link__Crazy Mandela Effect Geography Changes
I want to show you some of the biggest geography changes due to the Mandela Effect and explain to you how this is not a psy op. - Brian S
I want to show you some of the biggest geography changes due to the Mandela Effect and explain to you how this is not a psy op. - Brian S
It is key to understand the role, which the blue-blooded elites undertook during the World Wars in Europe. When I say world wars, I am referring to all conflicts between The beginning of the 7 Year War (which was the first real world war) up until the second world war because they were as integral to the subversion of European folk integrity as much as both WWI and WWII was.
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/fcs0p9/destroying_the_narrative_mudfossils_the_mudflood/
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/fcs0p9/destroying_the_narrative_mudfossils_the_mudflood/
Reddit
From the conspiracy community on Reddit: Destroying the narrative, Mudfossils, The Mudflood, Tartaria, Phoenicians, giants, Ancient…
Explore this post and more from the conspiracy community
👍1
This post is a must read. It highlights all the key points of the worldwide historical deception of the agreed narrative.
Due to the hours of knowledge one must sift through in order to Understand the timelime, I will only be posting the main points, or a tldr; version for people who have dug into the theory, but are not efficient enough at grasping the chronology.
Mudflood "cultural layer" evidence in Tallinn Estonia.
👍3
Channel name was changed to «Mudflood Research, Tartaria»
Forwarded from TARKH PERUNOVICH
Well you need to understand why the claim that animals evolved from one another exists. It comes from the fact that almost all life on Earth shares more than half of it's genetic material. All mammals share 90% of their DNA with one another. Even with plants it's around 50%.
They say that this is proof that have a common origin, that we must have evolved from the same source, but why?
Saying that common DNA is proof of evolution is literally an assumption. People who say this don't consider that there can be other reasons for why this DNA is shared, they assume evolution is the only theory that can explain this and thus it must be true.
Common DNA does not mean common origin. All it means is just that; common DNA.
To me it simply means that the genetic engineers of this realm borrowed the genetic coding between various lifeforms to repopulate it. Perhaps using various templates for lifeforms, importing DNA from one lifeform to another. They most likely created many creatures some thousands of years ago to populate the Earth, and then let natural selection do it's work, meaning that many of these creatures most likely died, others adapted. They're also designed to have their DNA be chimeric, break itself and mutate, to create new subspecies. It's not like they created every single subspecies that we see today of course, given a span of thousands of years I'm certain they could have come about naturally.
They say that this is proof that have a common origin, that we must have evolved from the same source, but why?
Saying that common DNA is proof of evolution is literally an assumption. People who say this don't consider that there can be other reasons for why this DNA is shared, they assume evolution is the only theory that can explain this and thus it must be true.
Common DNA does not mean common origin. All it means is just that; common DNA.
To me it simply means that the genetic engineers of this realm borrowed the genetic coding between various lifeforms to repopulate it. Perhaps using various templates for lifeforms, importing DNA from one lifeform to another. They most likely created many creatures some thousands of years ago to populate the Earth, and then let natural selection do it's work, meaning that many of these creatures most likely died, others adapted. They're also designed to have their DNA be chimeric, break itself and mutate, to create new subspecies. It's not like they created every single subspecies that we see today of course, given a span of thousands of years I'm certain they could have come about naturally.