On the Ryugyong hotel (North Korea):

The construction of this building is said to have begun in 1987, reaching it's final height in 1992, with little developments being made since besides the addition of some windows and other touches.

The first thing that stands out is there are no photographs of it's early construction, that being the solid structure itself before 1992.

The first image is the oldest photograph I could find, and it is immediately observed that there is a massive hill surrounding it, with no means of construction anywhere near - not even paved roads.

My conclusion is that this is an ancient building, possibly many hundreds of years old (no less than 300). That has not be constructed but repurposed by the new world, after being dug out of a hill. Although it does not bear much resemblance to the neoclassical "Tartarian" style, I think this is a result of their attempt to modernize it.

Is this one of many reasons why the people in power do not allow us to travel there?

The creators of so called ISIS probably didn't expect their actors to reveal the fraud that is the history we are taught in schools, through their propaganda videos.

Why is it that supposed 2000 year old ancient Sumerian statues consist of metal rebar, a material which was only invented in the beginning of the 20th century. Are these statues as old as they tell us? Or were they simply casted in the 1930s for us to believe that they are as old as they say.

This was America

Do you know about the corn palace of Sioux City? On the left is the original structure, complete with the onion dome designs found in Russia and Eurasia, built to a much higher spec and quality than it's modern counterpart on the right, which was built recently in modern times. Those who rewrite the history books want to convince you that this structure was originally built to celebrate corn.

It's clear that the technologies which we used to construct the buildings of the past are no longer here. We can only mimic, or rather mock their style. But it's evident that the old world architecture was made to a much higher standard than we know of today.

The 1907 corn palace. Asides from the obvious mocking of Tartarian architecture (check forwarded message above for context), the use of the Swastika further demonstrates that worldwide Aryan 卐 culture was still present in America post flood, and only recently for the past 70 years have they been seriously attempting to scrub any evidence of it. It's not just "An Indian Goodluck symbol", it is a cosmic sign of Gods. It was not only used by Hindus and Nazis, but all across this plane and beyond.

They do not want you to see this symbol.

Mudfloods do STILL happen. It's not a single isolated historical event, they're known to swallow entire buildings and towns even. Surely nothing of such scale has occurred within the last two centuries, but this is just to demonstrate that the physics of the phenomena are legitimate.

The medieval skyscrapers of Bologna Italy, they were built supposedly almost a thousand summers ago (between the 12 and 13th centuries) during the middle ages. It's not known what their purpose was or exactly how they were built. As of now only remains two of the towers, but according to older depictions and accounts (which model reconstructions were made off of), the entire city was sprawling in such towers. The remaining ones are in very poor shape and lack much of the detail that they had when first built. It can only be assumed that these structures were destroyed in the cataclysms of the last few centuries, as were almost all ancient buildings. What we have today is only a very miniscule amount of what sprawled the ancient world.