Should one wear a cross necklace?
In principle, there is nothing wrong with wearing a cross necklace - It helps to channel energy through the heart chakra, and wearing one can be beneficial for many people. The cross in itself is a very ancient symbol, often symbolizing the full set of human chakras, in fact it was worn by people for thousands of years before any alien religions were forcibly imposed upon our lands.
The issue arises when the cross depicts a crucified Jesus on it - the ultimate Jewish scapegoat blood ritual. DO NOT wear this under any circumstances.
When Christianity was introduced, people were already wearing crosses, the (((enemies))) very mischievously took this as an opportunity to weaponize this symbol against the gentiles - by putting a scapegoat on it, the fictional one whom they call the Nazarene, Rabbi Joshua. This is a form of Kabbalah magick. Not only mocking the late Vedic teacher Radomir, but cursing him. Even worse is when one puts such necklaces on children, who are bioenergetically far more sensitive to the damages that will be caused from wearing such crosses, that is pure child abuse.
There are many factors one has to consider if they wear a cross, the kind of cross, the shape, material, the intentions of the wearer, whether it has been charged and how, because ultimately - the cross is a tool. I do encourage people to adorn such symbols, just be cautious of these facts.
In principle, there is nothing wrong with wearing a cross necklace - It helps to channel energy through the heart chakra, and wearing one can be beneficial for many people. The cross in itself is a very ancient symbol, often symbolizing the full set of human chakras, in fact it was worn by people for thousands of years before any alien religions were forcibly imposed upon our lands.
The issue arises when the cross depicts a crucified Jesus on it - the ultimate Jewish scapegoat blood ritual. DO NOT wear this under any circumstances.
When Christianity was introduced, people were already wearing crosses, the (((enemies))) very mischievously took this as an opportunity to weaponize this symbol against the gentiles - by putting a scapegoat on it, the fictional one whom they call the Nazarene, Rabbi Joshua. This is a form of Kabbalah magick. Not only mocking the late Vedic teacher Radomir, but cursing him. Even worse is when one puts such necklaces on children, who are bioenergetically far more sensitive to the damages that will be caused from wearing such crosses, that is pure child abuse.
There are many factors one has to consider if they wear a cross, the kind of cross, the shape, material, the intentions of the wearer, whether it has been charged and how, because ultimately - the cross is a tool. I do encourage people to adorn such symbols, just be cautious of these facts.
🔥26👍12🤣9❤5💩4🙏4👏2👎1
On UFO Propulsion, Reactionless Drives, "Anti-Gravity", Debunking Newtonian Physics
A reactionless drive is a hypothetical propulsion system that would allow a spacecraft to move through space without emitting any kind of exhaust or propellant. All conventional methods of propulsion rely on some form of external mass to push/pull against, whether it's a sail being blown by the wind, the wheels of a car rolling against the ground, the propellers of an aircraft pulling on the atmosphere, a rocket thruster blasting out exhaust - these systems simply conserve the momentum which they inherited from another mass (atmosphere, ground, rocket fuel, etc). This is in contrast to a Reactionless Drive, which does not require rocks or propellers.
The Thorson Inertial Propulsion Drive is one such system. Suppose there were a fast rotating wheel with a mass attached along the edge of the wheel. Because of the off-center mass, the wheel would wobble uncontrollably due to centrifugal forces, and if the wheel were not fixed in space it would fly off uncontrollably. In order to harness the centrifugal force to provide thrust in a single direction, we simply alter the shape of the path of center of mass's rotation by attaching this wheel to the edge of a larger wheel spinning half as fast - now the path of rotation formed not circular - but somewhat resembling a mirrored Fibonacci spiral, sort of heart shaped. From this point forward, we loop a tube by this shape, with a coil wrapping around it, fill it with mercury and mix it with ferromagnetic substances, and cool it. Now we run high voltage electricity through the coil and we have an electromagnetic mass driver which by means of superconductivity could accelerate the mercury mass at super high speeds providing enormous thrust in a single direction.
(We will discuss Newton's physics and electromagnetic levitation in a future post)
A reactionless drive is a hypothetical propulsion system that would allow a spacecraft to move through space without emitting any kind of exhaust or propellant. All conventional methods of propulsion rely on some form of external mass to push/pull against, whether it's a sail being blown by the wind, the wheels of a car rolling against the ground, the propellers of an aircraft pulling on the atmosphere, a rocket thruster blasting out exhaust - these systems simply conserve the momentum which they inherited from another mass (atmosphere, ground, rocket fuel, etc). This is in contrast to a Reactionless Drive, which does not require rocks or propellers.
The Thorson Inertial Propulsion Drive is one such system. Suppose there were a fast rotating wheel with a mass attached along the edge of the wheel. Because of the off-center mass, the wheel would wobble uncontrollably due to centrifugal forces, and if the wheel were not fixed in space it would fly off uncontrollably. In order to harness the centrifugal force to provide thrust in a single direction, we simply alter the shape of the path of center of mass's rotation by attaching this wheel to the edge of a larger wheel spinning half as fast - now the path of rotation formed not circular - but somewhat resembling a mirrored Fibonacci spiral, sort of heart shaped. From this point forward, we loop a tube by this shape, with a coil wrapping around it, fill it with mercury and mix it with ferromagnetic substances, and cool it. Now we run high voltage electricity through the coil and we have an electromagnetic mass driver which by means of superconductivity could accelerate the mercury mass at super high speeds providing enormous thrust in a single direction.
(We will discuss Newton's physics and electromagnetic levitation in a future post)
❤15👍6🔥5
All credit goes to Brandson Thornson who created this device. His website is rexresearch.com/thornson/thornson.htm, here you will find an in depth explanation and videos of experiments including one of him powering a canoe and pushing a pendulum using the Reactionless Drive. I must add that this is only one form of Reactionless Drive among many others such as the Dean Drive and the Gyroscopic Inertial Thruster.
This system of propulsion does not pertain to electromagnetic "anti-gravity" levitation, which despite also relying on mercury and non-Newtonian physics, operates on completely different principles from Reactionless Drives. Though such devices do exist and have been created by amateurs such as Alexey Chekurkov who has thoroughly documented such levitation machines and has published schematics on how to build your own, whose work I will show in the next post on this topic.
This system of propulsion does not pertain to electromagnetic "anti-gravity" levitation, which despite also relying on mercury and non-Newtonian physics, operates on completely different principles from Reactionless Drives. Though such devices do exist and have been created by amateurs such as Alexey Chekurkov who has thoroughly documented such levitation machines and has published schematics on how to build your own, whose work I will show in the next post on this topic.
👍7🤯7🔥4❤1
I already know many of you are writing nasty comments, before you do - why do you think these "evil" symbols are used by the elites in their subliminal programming? Why do they hide them in TV shows, movies, music videos? If one were secretly controlling the world and all media, why would one leave hints only to be discovered by truth-seekers?
The answer is simple, It's a massive psychological operation, a trap to lead truthers astray.
So listen carefully, as I am going to tell you something you will not read anywhere else on the internet. These symbols, which most will call "evil", have nothing to do with the elites or NWO, absolutely none of them, not even the pentagram or the number '666'. Those who understand these symbols will be enchanted by their cosmic powers.
Why do the elites hide these symbols in their programming? Because they know the best way to hide them, to make sure no one uses them - is by making people fear them. This psychological operation which they have waged is so effective, that even atheistic and new age "truth-seekers" are afraid to look at these symbols, believing that they are evil.
They demonized these symbols to hide them from you. World War Two was a massive psychological operation. 80 years ago a swastika could have been found anywhere in Europe. Today it is possible to face jail time in Zionist Europe for brandishing it among many other "white power" symbols, which in fact have absolutely zero to do with Nazism "white supremacy". The Swastika can be found all the way from South America to Asia and even in Africa. Many if not most of these ancient symbols represent the Sun in some form (or rather Sol), 666, black sun and the sun cross, even the all-seeing eye. The pentagram represents the transit of Venus. Baphomet represents the 7 hermetic principles of the universe. The serpent represents kundalini energy coiled at the base of the spine, which has 33 columns.
I will not going into details of every symbol, but if you are curious feel free to ask.
THESE DO NOT BELONG TO THEM
The answer is simple, It's a massive psychological operation, a trap to lead truthers astray.
So listen carefully, as I am going to tell you something you will not read anywhere else on the internet. These symbols, which most will call "evil", have nothing to do with the elites or NWO, absolutely none of them, not even the pentagram or the number '666'. Those who understand these symbols will be enchanted by their cosmic powers.
Why do the elites hide these symbols in their programming? Because they know the best way to hide them, to make sure no one uses them - is by making people fear them. This psychological operation which they have waged is so effective, that even atheistic and new age "truth-seekers" are afraid to look at these symbols, believing that they are evil.
They demonized these symbols to hide them from you. World War Two was a massive psychological operation. 80 years ago a swastika could have been found anywhere in Europe. Today it is possible to face jail time in Zionist Europe for brandishing it among many other "white power" symbols, which in fact have absolutely zero to do with Nazism "white supremacy". The Swastika can be found all the way from South America to Asia and even in Africa. Many if not most of these ancient symbols represent the Sun in some form (or rather Sol), 666, black sun and the sun cross, even the all-seeing eye. The pentagram represents the transit of Venus. Baphomet represents the 7 hermetic principles of the universe. The serpent represents kundalini energy coiled at the base of the spine, which has 33 columns.
I will not going into details of every symbol, but if you are curious feel free to ask.
THESE DO NOT BELONG TO THEM
🔥45👍26🤣10❤8🤔5👏4🤯1
The Hoax of "Ancient" Egypt
There are lots of things which can disprove the antiquity of so called "Ancient" Egypt, such as all of the fake concrete structures and pillars built in the early 20th century with rebar sticking out, the fake Abu Simbel statues - which were already conveniently pre-cut when they had to be relocated in the 60s, all of the "excavation" photos from the 30s showing palm trees poking out of "ancient" sands, which will all require their own posts in due time, but I digress, as that is not the topic of today
What I want to bring your attention to, are 4 of the 37 horoscopes found in Dendera, Esna, and other temples, which are claimed by historians to be over 2000 years old, however as we investigate this does not seem to be the case. The great thing about astronomical data, is that it cannot be fabricated the way written documents or structures can be. For a long time the dates of these horoscopes were unable to be dated until Anatoly Fomenko applied his mathematical methods to the horoscopes and was able to unlock key astronomical data to be able to date them. The following images are taken from Chapter 17 of "History: Fiction or Science?", by Anatoly Fomenko. The four images you see here are four horoscopes, found in temples in Dendera and Esna, as well as their corresponding verification tables (compliance matrices) to prove the deciphered solutions of the horoscopes. What is shocking is that the astronomical data of these horoscopes can be calculated to the dates of 22nd to 26th of April 1168, 20th of March 1185, 31st of March to 3rd of April 1394, and 6th to 8th of May 1404, with an average accuracy of 3 days. These are just four horoscopes among many others which have been deciphered, with the oldest one being from the 18th century.
This is not the only astronomical inconsistency ignored by historians, as many people recorded zodiacs as well as various events such as eclipses and comets, by using these, and some mathematics, we can unlock the true timeline of history.
There are lots of things which can disprove the antiquity of so called "Ancient" Egypt, such as all of the fake concrete structures and pillars built in the early 20th century with rebar sticking out, the fake Abu Simbel statues - which were already conveniently pre-cut when they had to be relocated in the 60s, all of the "excavation" photos from the 30s showing palm trees poking out of "ancient" sands, which will all require their own posts in due time, but I digress, as that is not the topic of today
What I want to bring your attention to, are 4 of the 37 horoscopes found in Dendera, Esna, and other temples, which are claimed by historians to be over 2000 years old, however as we investigate this does not seem to be the case. The great thing about astronomical data, is that it cannot be fabricated the way written documents or structures can be. For a long time the dates of these horoscopes were unable to be dated until Anatoly Fomenko applied his mathematical methods to the horoscopes and was able to unlock key astronomical data to be able to date them. The following images are taken from Chapter 17 of "History: Fiction or Science?", by Anatoly Fomenko. The four images you see here are four horoscopes, found in temples in Dendera and Esna, as well as their corresponding verification tables (compliance matrices) to prove the deciphered solutions of the horoscopes. What is shocking is that the astronomical data of these horoscopes can be calculated to the dates of 22nd to 26th of April 1168, 20th of March 1185, 31st of March to 3rd of April 1394, and 6th to 8th of May 1404, with an average accuracy of 3 days. These are just four horoscopes among many others which have been deciphered, with the oldest one being from the 18th century.
This is not the only astronomical inconsistency ignored by historians, as many people recorded zodiacs as well as various events such as eclipses and comets, by using these, and some mathematics, we can unlock the true timeline of history.
👍18❤7🔥3🤔1
Mudflood Research, Tartaria, True Aryan History
3N17-EN-5.pdf
"The vocabulary of Egyptian astronomical symbols once applied to horoscopes from temples allows for extraction of unique dates of eclipses. Astronomical data therein contained is sufficient for unique dating. There are symbols allowing for astronomical interpretation and the symbols do not change from one temple horoscope to another. The horoscopes from temples contain data about eclipses visible in Egypt allowing their exact pinpointing on the time axis"
Here are the sources to the four Egyptian horoscopes, from which the images from the post above were extracted, which are taken from "History: Fiction or Science?", which has been translated into English and I highly recommend you read all of the books. If not for Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko and his colleagues, we would not be having any talk today regarding Tartaria or false history. All credit goes to him.
On another note, what I find most hilarious about all of this is watching people argue over whether or not the Egyptians were black or white, or if aliens built the pyramids. The fact that this is even allowed to publicly be talked about on mainstream media such as The History Channel, goes to show that all discussion regarding "Ancient" Egypt is a psyop to reinforce the narrative of falsified (((Scaligerian Chronology))).
Here are the sources to the four Egyptian horoscopes, from which the images from the post above were extracted, which are taken from "History: Fiction or Science?", which has been translated into English and I highly recommend you read all of the books. If not for Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko and his colleagues, we would not be having any talk today regarding Tartaria or false history. All credit goes to him.
On another note, what I find most hilarious about all of this is watching people argue over whether or not the Egyptians were black or white, or if aliens built the pyramids. The fact that this is even allowed to publicly be talked about on mainstream media such as The History Channel, goes to show that all discussion regarding "Ancient" Egypt is a psyop to reinforce the narrative of falsified (((Scaligerian Chronology))).
🔥16👍9💯2
Yahweh is Reptilian Dragon
There are several physical denoscriptions of the God of Israel in the Bible. The Judeo-Christian religion is adamant on the idea of their God being an immaterial transcendent omnipresent being. Yet the Bible has several physical denoscriptions of Yahweh, describing him as a fire-breathing, winged, reptilian dragon.
The word "אפּים" (apayim) is a dual noun referring to nostrils. This word is notable because it's used with the adjective "ארוך", meaning long. We see several denoscriptions in the Bible describing Yahweh's long nostrils and his ability to breathe fire.
Job 41:19-21 Flames stream from his mouth; sparks of fire shoot out. Smoke pours from his nostrils as from a boiling pot over burning reeds. His breath sets coals ablaze, and flames dart from his mouth.
Deuteronomy 32:22 "For a fire is kindled in my nostrils, and shall burn to the lowest hell, and it shall consume the Earth with with her increase, and set ablaze the foundations of the mountains."
Psalm 18:8 "Smoke went up from his nostrils and devouring fire from out of his mouth. Coals flamed forth from him".
Here are 6 verses from Psalms which describe a Yahweh with wings, 17:8, 36:8, 57:2, 61:5, 63:8, 91:4.
Zechariah 6:1, Deuteronomy 33:2. Judges 5:4,Habakkuk 3:3 - Imply Yahweh's dwellings on copper mountains.
Perhaps this is why in Exodus, Yahweh required a massive portable tent, the tabernacle, which was his Earthly dwelling place. Why else would he demand animal and human sacrifices? Remember, after Moses' brutal military campaign against the gentile Midianites, they had stolen 675,000 sheep, 72,000 cattle, 61,000 donkeys and kidnapped 32,000 virgin girls. Yahweh demanded 0.1% of all the spoils, with the remainder to be divided in half between the soldiers, and the priests. Yahweh would receive 808 animals, and 32 human virgin girls. Maybe this is why we have many folk tales of a fire-breathing dragon which make it's home in the mountains, siting on treasures and often holding a virgin girl hostage.
There are several physical denoscriptions of the God of Israel in the Bible. The Judeo-Christian religion is adamant on the idea of their God being an immaterial transcendent omnipresent being. Yet the Bible has several physical denoscriptions of Yahweh, describing him as a fire-breathing, winged, reptilian dragon.
The word "אפּים" (apayim) is a dual noun referring to nostrils. This word is notable because it's used with the adjective "ארוך", meaning long. We see several denoscriptions in the Bible describing Yahweh's long nostrils and his ability to breathe fire.
Job 41:19-21 Flames stream from his mouth; sparks of fire shoot out. Smoke pours from his nostrils as from a boiling pot over burning reeds. His breath sets coals ablaze, and flames dart from his mouth.
Deuteronomy 32:22 "For a fire is kindled in my nostrils, and shall burn to the lowest hell, and it shall consume the Earth with with her increase, and set ablaze the foundations of the mountains."
Psalm 18:8 "Smoke went up from his nostrils and devouring fire from out of his mouth. Coals flamed forth from him".
Here are 6 verses from Psalms which describe a Yahweh with wings, 17:8, 36:8, 57:2, 61:5, 63:8, 91:4.
Zechariah 6:1, Deuteronomy 33:2. Judges 5:4,Habakkuk 3:3 - Imply Yahweh's dwellings on copper mountains.
Perhaps this is why in Exodus, Yahweh required a massive portable tent, the tabernacle, which was his Earthly dwelling place. Why else would he demand animal and human sacrifices? Remember, after Moses' brutal military campaign against the gentile Midianites, they had stolen 675,000 sheep, 72,000 cattle, 61,000 donkeys and kidnapped 32,000 virgin girls. Yahweh demanded 0.1% of all the spoils, with the remainder to be divided in half between the soldiers, and the priests. Yahweh would receive 808 animals, and 32 human virgin girls. Maybe this is why we have many folk tales of a fire-breathing dragon which make it's home in the mountains, siting on treasures and often holding a virgin girl hostage.
👍36💩23🤣13❤7👎7🤔6🫡3🔥2🎉2👏1🤮1
Mistranslation of the Bible
The entire Hebrew religion is based off of lies, this isn't better demonstrated than with the very beginning of their "holy" book. In every single translation of the Bible, Genesis 1:1 reads "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth", yet the actual grammatically correct Biblical Hebrew reads this as "In a beginning, Gods created the heavens and the Earth".
Let's break down the grammar a bit.
In Hebrew there is a definite article "he" (ה), or "the" in English, and it is omitted. So to describe an indefinite noun in Hebrew, "a" in English, the article "he" is simply omitted, in linguistics this is called zero-morpheme, where the absence of a morpheme indicates a grammatical meaning, so the proper translation according to Hebrew grammar should be indefinite "a beginning" in English.
Next, moving forward, the word "Elohim" (אלוהים) is a plural noun, it should literally translate as "Gods" in English, yet it has never been translated as such. Many scholars dismiss this as a grammatical irregularity, yet the singular form of "Elohim" is "Eloah", and this singular form is in fact used multiple times in the Bible, and for some reason the authors of the Bible chose not to use this in Genesis, only using it to refer to other Gods.
https://biblehub.com/text/genesis/1-1.htm
Here is a website used for translating the Hebrew Bible into English, it shows the exact conjugation and declension of every single word. This page literally shows that "Elohim" is declined in the plural, yet due to the severe cognitive dissonance of the translator, they decided decided to go with "God" instead. This is the same mental gymnastics that the Christian religion is based on today. It amuses me to watch people argue over the most accurate version of the Bible, but not a single version addresses this mistranslation, why trust any of them?
The entire Hebrew religion is based off of lies, this isn't better demonstrated than with the very beginning of their "holy" book. In every single translation of the Bible, Genesis 1:1 reads "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the Earth", yet the actual grammatically correct Biblical Hebrew reads this as "In a beginning, Gods created the heavens and the Earth".
Let's break down the grammar a bit.
In Hebrew there is a definite article "he" (ה), or "the" in English, and it is omitted. So to describe an indefinite noun in Hebrew, "a" in English, the article "he" is simply omitted, in linguistics this is called zero-morpheme, where the absence of a morpheme indicates a grammatical meaning, so the proper translation according to Hebrew grammar should be indefinite "a beginning" in English.
Next, moving forward, the word "Elohim" (אלוהים) is a plural noun, it should literally translate as "Gods" in English, yet it has never been translated as such. Many scholars dismiss this as a grammatical irregularity, yet the singular form of "Elohim" is "Eloah", and this singular form is in fact used multiple times in the Bible, and for some reason the authors of the Bible chose not to use this in Genesis, only using it to refer to other Gods.
https://biblehub.com/text/genesis/1-1.htm
Here is a website used for translating the Hebrew Bible into English, it shows the exact conjugation and declension of every single word. This page literally shows that "Elohim" is declined in the plural, yet due to the severe cognitive dissonance of the translator, they decided decided to go with "God" instead. This is the same mental gymnastics that the Christian religion is based on today. It amuses me to watch people argue over the most accurate version of the Bible, but not a single version addresses this mistranslation, why trust any of them?
👍32👏10🤣8❤5🔥5💯5👎3🥰1🎉1
Oldest Swastika in the World Was Found in Ukraine
The Swastika, which is often associated with German Nazism, has nothing to do with such. Not only is this symbol found all around the world, it's ironically most prominently found in Slavic countries, with the oldest one in the world being found in Mezine, Ukraine. It was engraved on mammoth ivory and is allegedly 20,000 years old.
On the right is an extract from the Slavo-Aryan vedas featuring various ancient Swastikas. These ancient texts were deemed "extremist material" in the Russian Federation, possession of which can lead to imprisonment.
The word Swastika itself derives from Proto Slavic (Sanskrit) language. The root Swa- refers to the heavens (center of galaxy), with a derivational suffix -tika likely referring to motion. The names Svarog and Svarga both derive from the same root.
In conclusion, this symbol has nothing to do with Germany or Neo-Nazism. This symbol finds it's home far north on the continent of Da'Arya, otherwise known as Hyperborea.
The Swastika, which is often associated with German Nazism, has nothing to do with such. Not only is this symbol found all around the world, it's ironically most prominently found in Slavic countries, with the oldest one in the world being found in Mezine, Ukraine. It was engraved on mammoth ivory and is allegedly 20,000 years old.
On the right is an extract from the Slavo-Aryan vedas featuring various ancient Swastikas. These ancient texts were deemed "extremist material" in the Russian Federation, possession of which can lead to imprisonment.
The word Swastika itself derives from Proto Slavic (Sanskrit) language. The root Swa- refers to the heavens (center of galaxy), with a derivational suffix -tika likely referring to motion. The names Svarog and Svarga both derive from the same root.
In conclusion, this symbol has nothing to do with Germany or Neo-Nazism. This symbol finds it's home far north on the continent of Da'Arya, otherwise known as Hyperborea.
👏23👍21💩13❤6🤔3💯2🔥1
Here is an engraving by Matthias Gottfried Eichler from 1799, View of Moscow from the Balcony of the Imperial Palace in the Kremlin towards the Orphanage.
At first glance nothing seems out of the ordinary, until we notice the Kremlin wall is buried to the top, none of the ground is paved, walls are destroyed with shrubs and other plantlife growing rampantly.
This is not one engraving, I've covered other artists of the same era who all identically portray these medieval cities in total ruins. Those who are adamant on modern chronology and a global flood being fake don't have anything to address this fact. Was it some kind of art trend in the past to depict every single city as having been abandoned in ruins?
Were the rulers of the past this negligent to maintain their cities? After all, how could they possibly construct such enormous architecture yet fail to pave a road or cut a bush.
That's how we know they didn't build it, but inherited it from a previous civilization who left it all abandoned.
At first glance nothing seems out of the ordinary, until we notice the Kremlin wall is buried to the top, none of the ground is paved, walls are destroyed with shrubs and other plantlife growing rampantly.
This is not one engraving, I've covered other artists of the same era who all identically portray these medieval cities in total ruins. Those who are adamant on modern chronology and a global flood being fake don't have anything to address this fact. Was it some kind of art trend in the past to depict every single city as having been abandoned in ruins?
Were the rulers of the past this negligent to maintain their cities? After all, how could they possibly construct such enormous architecture yet fail to pave a road or cut a bush.
That's how we know they didn't build it, but inherited it from a previous civilization who left it all abandoned.
👍38❤11💯5😁1👌1