Boycott, Divestment, Sanction & Normalization

The West is burying itself in the rubble of Gaza

Strategic protest

A collective approach to normalization

Title: Protocol for Arab and Muslim States on Normalization with Israel and Support for Palestinian Rights

Preamble:
Reaffirming the commitment of Arab and Muslim states to the rights and self-determination of the Palestinian people, recognizing the need for a just and lasting resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and acknowledging the desire for normalized relations with Israel that benefit our states and the cause of peace,

Article I: Purpose and Scope

Purpose: This protocol is established to provide a framework for Arab and Muslim states to engage with Israel in a manner that promotes peace, justice, and the rights of the Palestinian people.
Scope: This protocol outlines the principles and guidelines for the approval, negotiation, and oversight of normalization agreements with Israel, as well as actions in response to Israeli aggression against Palestinians.
Article II: Principles of Engagement with Israel

Respect for International Law: States shall ensure that any normalization agreements with Israel fully respect and comply with international law, including UN resolutions related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Support for Palestinian Rights: States shall prioritize the support of Palestinian rights, including the right to self-determination and the right of return, within the framework of a just and lasting solution.
Peaceful Coexistence: States shall encourage dialogue and cooperation with Israel based on the principles of peaceful coexistence and regional stability.
Article III: Approval and Negotiation of Normalization Agreements

Approval Process: Before entering into any normalization agreement with Israel, states shall seek the approval of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) or a designated regional body, ensuring that the agreement aligns with the principles outlined in this protocol.
Transparency: States shall conduct negotiations with Israel transparently and inclusively, involving Palestinian representatives or their chosen mediators, as appropriate.
Article IV: Oversight and Compliance

Oversight Mechanism: States shall establish a committee under the OIC or a designated regional body to oversee the implementation and compliance of normalization agreements and report regularly to the member states.
Compliance and Accountability: States shall take necessary measures to hold Israel accountable for any violations of agreements or international law. This may include suspension of trade, divestment, or other non-cooperation measures.
Article V: Response to Israeli Aggression

Immediate Response: In the event of Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people, states shall respond collectively by suspending any normalization activities with Israel.
Diplomatic Channels: States shall use diplomatic channels, OIC, and international forums to condemn aggression and seek a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
Reevaluation: States shall reevaluate their relations with Israel in light of its actions and commitment to peace and justice.
Article VI: Promotion of Peace and Resolution
States shall actively support diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving a just and lasting solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and promote peace and stability in the region.

Article VII: Amendment
This protocol may be amended or modified by consensus among the signatory states with the approval of the OIC or the designated regional body.

Article VIII: Ratification and Entry into Force
This protocol shall enter into force upon ratification by a majority of Arab and Muslim states and approval by the OIC or the designated regional body.

Article IX: Termination
Any state party may withdraw from this protocol with prior notice and in accordance with its internal procedures.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned states, being members of the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, adopt this Protocol for Arab and Muslim States on Normalization with Israel and Support for Palestinian Rights.

——
This protocol provides a structured framework for Arab and Muslim states to approach normalization with Israel while ensuring that the rights and interests of the Palestinian people are safeguarded. It establishes a unified approach to encourage Israel to adhere to international law and promote a just and lasting resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The protocol emphasizes transparency, accountability, and collective response in the event of Israeli aggression. It serves as a vital tool for promoting regional peace and cooperation.

Muslims in the West should protest in disciplined formation

Empty Pro-Palestinian rhetoric

You can put "Free Palestine" stickers on the doors of any shop or restaurant, take a picture of it and spread it on social media, congratulating them on their pro-Palestinian stance Thereby forcing the company to either acknowledge or disavow. If they remove it, spread THAT across social media.

Agitate until you get a positive response.

Make them take a stand

info@starbucks.com
Laxman.Narasimhan@starbucks.com
Dear Starbucks Team,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to express my sincere appreciation and support for the courageous stance taken by Starbucks unionized workers in their solidarity with the rights of Palestinians and their commitment to promoting peace in the Middle East.
As a loyal customer of Starbucks, I believe that a company's actions and values are of great significance. Your employees' decision to stand up for the rights of Palestinians and to advocate for peace is deeply commendable and meaningful to me. It is essential for companies to reflect international law, United Nations resolutions, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in their operations and ethical stance.
The commitment shown by your workers in supporting the oppressed and seeking justice aligns with the principles of fairness, equality, and human rights that I hold dear. Their dedication to raising awareness and advocating for a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a testament to the power of individuals to make a positive impact on the world.
I want to express my full support for these Starbucks unionized workers, and I stand with those who stand with the Palestinians. I believe it is crucial for companies like Starbucks to take a moral and ethical stand, and your employees are leading the way in making a difference.
I encourage Starbucks to continue supporting and engaging these workers, as well as taking a public stand with them to align the company's policies and actions with international principles of justice and human rights.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to seeing Starbucks continue to uphold these values and working toward a more just and peaceful world.

we've got over 11k people in here, so I hope that translates to at least half as many emails to starbucks

A recent appearance on the programme "Africa Today", on Press TV
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2023/10/23/713279/Africans-Israel-atrocities-Gaza

There is coordination between KSA, Russia, and China; that much is clear. They want to push the US out of the scenario as much as possible. China is calling for an immediate ceasefire and the convening of an "international conference for peace", which would bring in more parties (including China) to work towards a lasting resolution.
BRICS is trying to wrestle control over the issue from the US

I have seen an opinion that Russia and China are trying to draw the US into a war with Iran.
In my opinion, it is a little absurd to suggest that Russia and China are interested, or are trying to, incite a war with Iran. The US is the one sending a massive and apparently offensive force to the region. Both Russia and China undoubtedly perceive that Iran is under threat of attack, and it is in their interests to deter it.
MBS would be interested in it; I do not see that Russia or China would be.
Because a war with Iran would potentially bring some opportunistic benefits for China and Russia, does not itself constitute a motive; and evidence rather suggests the US being an agitator.
It should also be pointed out, that in the event of a war against Iran, the UAE would be a primary target for Tehran. All oil and transport through the Strait of Hormuz would halt completely. That is not in China's interest

You know, I have been saying for quite some time that the transition we are living through will be volatile. Nations will grapple with recalibrating their policies, their perspectives, and indeed, their whole paradigm for approaching the world; and this will be a very uneven, rocky process. This is partly due to the fact that the dominant global power is a covert one, the OCGFC, and their relationship with governments is discreet, opaque, and probably even condescending. They will often communicate through hints and misdirections. So, you have government officials, like a spouse trying to guess what their significant other wants, doing what they think is desired; and this is based on past experience, and the way they believe their relationship works. I don’t think, for instance, that the Pentagon itself is even clear on why they are building up forces in the Middle East. Israel does not have a plan for what they are supposed to do next. But everybody knows Iran has been in the sights for a long time, so they are wondering, “is this it? Is this when we are doing this? Are we doing this?” And the Biden Administration, I think, legitimately does not have the answer. They are operating on learned reflexes. Both Israel and Washington.

كما تعلمون، كنت أقول منذ فترة طويلة إن المرحلة الانتقالية التي نعيشها ستكون متقلبة. سوف تتصارع الأمم من أجل إعادة ضبط سياساتها، ووجهات نظرها، بل ونموذجها الكامل للتعامل مع العالم؛ وستكون هذه عملية صعبة ومتفاوتة للغاية. ويرجع هذا جزئيًا إلى حقيقة أن القوة العالمية المهيمنة هي قوة سرية، وهي OCGFC، وعلاقتها بالحكومات سرية، وغامضة، وربما حتى متعالية. غالبًا ما يتواصلون من خلال التلميحات والتوجيهات الخاطئة. لذلك، لديك مسؤولون حكوميون، مثل الزوج الذي يحاول تخمين ما يريده الآخر، ويفعلون ما يعتقدون أنه مرغوب فيه؛ وهذا يعتمد على الخبرة السابقة والطريقة التي يعتقدون أن علاقتهم بها تعمل. لا أعتقد، على سبيل المثال، أن البنتاغون نفسه لا يعرف حتى سبب قيامه بحشد قواته في الشرق الأوسط. ليس لدى إسرائيل خطة لما يفترض أن تفعله بعد ذلك. لكن الجميع يعلم أن إيران كانت في الأفق لفترة طويلة، لذلك يتساءلون: "هل هذا هو الحال؟ هل هذا عندما نفعل هذا؟ هل نحن نفعل هذا؟ وأعتقد أن إدارة بايدن لا تملك الجواب بشكل شرعي. إنهم يعملون على ردود الفعل المستفادة. كل من إسرائيل وواشنطن.

The right to defend Western Supremacy

The OCGFC and US isolation