The evidence is mixed? Well, then you need to read about the post about 🇵🇸 terrorists in 🇮🇱
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ApartheidPalestine/89
This research reveals that the immigrants jumping the fence at Melilla are represented as wild and dangerous.
If you see a ⚠️🥵 and you still decide to go there, it's your fault if you die ... same like climbing walls ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LetzteGenerationTelegram/104
exactly like people dying in winter, because they use wrong clothes!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/452
or people going in terroristic country saying "why happened a terror attack?", smoking, drinking etc.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/TravelAdviceTelegram/90
Walls don't stop movements of people, since people can still move where there is police control by asking a legal migration.
The real problem is not about humans ... but about animals!
And from this point of view, we agree 100% with missing animal rights
Presently, Appendix I lists around 20 (sub)species that are, or could be, affected by current or future border fences. These include the large carnivores snow leopard and cheetah (Acinonyx juba- tus); four Asian large herbivores, namely wild yak (Bos grunniens), kouprey (Bos sauveli), Bukhara deer (Cervus elaphus yarkandensis) and the afore- mentioned Bactrian camel; a range of gazelles and other ungulates from North Africa and the Middle East;95 all four subspecies of gorilla;96 the Grevy’s zebra (Equus grevyi), native to Eastern Africa; and two South American ungulates
Wolves may face a more serious challenge. Out of 10 or 11 wolf packs currently pres- ent in Slovenia, five have their home ranges on both sides of the Slovenia–Croatia border.
So for sure we are against "Border fence construction at the Hungary–Croatia border: the fence consists of three layers of razor wiring on the Croatian side", because again there is wall and wall. We need to find an optimal way to keep illegal migration low, but at the same time respect animal rights
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ApartheidPalestine/89
This research reveals that the immigrants jumping the fence at Melilla are represented as wild and dangerous.
If you see a ⚠️🥵 and you still decide to go there, it's your fault if you die ... same like climbing walls ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LetzteGenerationTelegram/104
exactly like people dying in winter, because they use wrong clothes!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NatureFreaksDeutsch/452
or people going in terroristic country saying "why happened a terror attack?", smoking, drinking etc.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/TravelAdviceTelegram/90
Walls don't stop movements of people, since people can still move where there is police control by asking a legal migration.
The real problem is not about humans ... but about animals!
And from this point of view, we agree 100% with missing animal rights
Presently, Appendix I lists around 20 (sub)species that are, or could be, affected by current or future border fences. These include the large carnivores snow leopard and cheetah (Acinonyx juba- tus); four Asian large herbivores, namely wild yak (Bos grunniens), kouprey (Bos sauveli), Bukhara deer (Cervus elaphus yarkandensis) and the afore- mentioned Bactrian camel; a range of gazelles and other ungulates from North Africa and the Middle East;95 all four subspecies of gorilla;96 the Grevy’s zebra (Equus grevyi), native to Eastern Africa; and two South American ungulates
Wolves may face a more serious challenge. Out of 10 or 11 wolf packs currently pres- ent in Slovenia, five have their home ranges on both sides of the Slovenia–Croatia border.
So for sure we are against "Border fence construction at the Hungary–Croatia border: the fence consists of three layers of razor wiring on the Croatian side", because again there is wall and wall. We need to find an optimal way to keep illegal migration low, but at the same time respect animal rights
About "Terms such as “illegal immigrants,” Illegal aliens,” “illegal migrants” and “illegals” are problematic for several reasons"
Such terms are prejudicial and reinforce pre-existing negative attitudes toward foreign nationals or persons of a particular ethnicity, regardless of immigration status.
Nope, this has nothing to do with that, since like for everything you are doing, you first ask and then you get the help or job or whatever!
If you legally ask, you will get an approvation or you get a refuse
If you illegally don't ask, you automatically get a refuse, except if you are so lucky to reach the country and then due to laws maybe a country need to support you, even if you would not have the right to get support.
Remember that just giving 5 CHF to each person each day to 1 mio illegal migrants means almost 2 bio CHF each year. Without considering cost of security / support etc.
Such terms fuel the view that such people have limited or no rights https://perma.cc/GV73-782L —> they still have the right to legally ask and to legally cross the police border when they got approved ...
Plus like said previously, don't forget to talk about animals ... since human right organisation always talk about human rights (without considering that both migrants and the population / country have rights ...) but forget animal rights ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/340
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/709
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/573
and maybe they don't fight for all type of human rights too ..
Do we want to talk about human rights of not migrant people? that still live like shit and humanity give a shit to that, exactly they do with homeless ...
So if we want to talk about human rights, let we do properly by considering ALL PEOPLE ... If such poor people remain there, you give a shit ... if such people decide to do a migration, only in this case you see human rights for them
Yes, for sure between many illegal migrants we find true people needed help, but remember
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MigrationTelegram/477
Such terms are prejudicial and reinforce pre-existing negative attitudes toward foreign nationals or persons of a particular ethnicity, regardless of immigration status.
Nope, this has nothing to do with that, since like for everything you are doing, you first ask and then you get the help or job or whatever!
If you legally ask, you will get an approvation or you get a refuse
If you illegally don't ask, you automatically get a refuse, except if you are so lucky to reach the country and then due to laws maybe a country need to support you, even if you would not have the right to get support.
Remember that just giving 5 CHF to each person each day to 1 mio illegal migrants means almost 2 bio CHF each year. Without considering cost of security / support etc.
Such terms fuel the view that such people have limited or no rights https://perma.cc/GV73-782L —> they still have the right to legally ask and to legally cross the police border when they got approved ...
Plus like said previously, don't forget to talk about animals ... since human right organisation always talk about human rights (without considering that both migrants and the population / country have rights ...) but forget animal rights ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/340
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/709
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/573
and maybe they don't fight for all type of human rights too ..
Do we want to talk about human rights of not migrant people? that still live like shit and humanity give a shit to that, exactly they do with homeless ...
So if we want to talk about human rights, let we do properly by considering ALL PEOPLE ... If such poor people remain there, you give a shit ... if such people decide to do a migration, only in this case you see human rights for them
Yes, for sure between many illegal migrants we find true people needed help, but remember
https://news.1rj.ru/str/MigrationTelegram/477