Since you are all aware by now the inferior position that Scripture holds in Rabbinic Judaism—in general and compared to the Oral Torah (Talmud, Mishnah, Midrash, Kabbalah, Haggadah, Aggadah, homiletical interpretation of Rabbis)—let’s take a closer look about what the Rabbis have to say about the Old Testament prophets, kings and patriarchs.

First I shall start with these verse from the Talmud:

“Since God already gave the Torah to the Jewish people on Mt. Sinai we no longer pay attention to heavenly voices. God must submit to the decisions of a majority vote of the rabbis.” — BT Bava Metzia 59b

“The Holy One, Blessed be He, speaks Torah out of the mouths of all rabbis.”

— Haggadah 15b

The non-Biblical basis of Judaism is acknowledged in the Mishnah itself: 

“The laws concerning the Sabbath, Festal-offerings and acts of trespass are as mountains hanging by a hair, for they have scant Scriptural basis but many laws” —Mishnah Hagiga i, 8.

Now, onto the nonsense:

In BT Menachot 29b, the rabbis claim that God transported Moses into the future, to the yeshiva of the second-century Rabbi Akiva. Moses is depicted as sitting at the back of the class, listening  to the day's lesson, which is on the Mosaic law. Yet Moses can't understand the teaching that is being imparted by Rabbi Akiva! Here the Gemara itself is admitting that Talmudic Judaism had so diluted and distorted the Pentateuch with rabbinic traditions that Moses himself no longer recognized the teaching ascribed to him.

It is written in the Babylonian Talmud that the prophet Isaiah was justifiably killed for stating that the Israelites had unclean lips. 
—BT Yebamoth 49b.

About Noah, the Holy Bible teaches: Noah was a righteous man, blameless in his generation. Noah walked with God. (Genesis 6:9).

The Talmud falsely interprets the phrase “in his generation” to mean that in any other generation Noah would not be holy or significant: "Noah was only righteous in his generation; had he lived in the generation of Abraham, he would not have been considered significant at all.” [B.T. Sanhedrin 108a]

In Hebrew “blameless" denotes without flaw. Noah is a precursor of Abraham, not less than Abraham. What is required of Noah, God also requires of Abraham: to walk before Him and be blameless. The Talmud is wrong to denigrate Noah. And it gets worse. The rabbinic Midrash declares that no good was found in Noah (Midrash Rabbah: Genesis I [Soncino 1983, vol. 1], p. 289). This Midrash also teaches that Noah was an alcoholic who was castrated when he was on his way to have coitus. (Midrash Rabbah: Genesis I [Soncino 1983, vol. 1], pp. 290-291; 293). These texts give evidence for the fact that Judaism’s "Noahide Laws” are not a reference to the Biblical Noah, despite public dissimulation to the contrary. Judaism’s misnamed "Noahide Laws" are a Talmudic subterfuge. They are not of Noah or the Old Testament.

A typical example of Talmudic nonsense about Biblical patriarchs concerns King Solomon and the sacred Temple. Who could believe such rubbish about King Solomon and God's Temple except the self-deluding denizens of the synagogue? The Babylonian Talmud teaches that "hobgoblins" (mischievous devils) helped to build the Temple, and that King Solomon was succeeded as King of Israel not by Rehoboam as the Bible says, but by Ashmodeus, the king of the demons, as the Talmud says.

The sages inform us that "everyone helped in the construction of this Temple - even the spirits, the hobgoblins, the angels" (Shir Hashirim Rabba 1:5).

 ...Thereafter, although he (Solomon) is successful politically and militarily, his inner world begins to crumble till finally he is "replaced" by Ashmodeus, King of the underworld spirits (Talmud, Gittin 68b).

Yebamoth 63a also claims that Adam had sexual intercourse with all the animals in the Garden of Eden, and in Zohar 1:55a the Rabbis say that Adam engendered female demons from his spilled semen and that Eve copulated with Satan and conceived Cain.

Rabbi Chabad-Lubavitch (the founder of Hasidism) in his sicko ramblings also claims that Isaac was actually a female soul born into a male’s body until he prayed to god so that god would swap his soul from the soul of Eve to that of Abel (Source) (Source)

BT Shabbat 15c (also cf. Baba Metzia 33A), comes also gives three levels of study, ranked from lowest to highest, pointing to the place noscripture has in Judaism:

A. "He who occupies himself with Scripture gains merit that is no merit.

B. "He who occupies himself with Mishnah gains merit for which people receive a reward.

C. "He who occupies himself with Talmud—there is no source of merit greater than this.”

Here I conclude with Rabbi Yehiel Ben Joseph who says:

“Without the Talmud, we would not be able to understand passages in the Bible... God has handed this authority to the sages and tradition is a necessity as well as noscripture. The Sages also made enactments of their own... anyone who does not study the Talmud cannot understand Scripture."

Some of you may ask, well why do they try so hard to cling to noscripture?

It’s all a part of the Jewish plot to make their religion seem like it has some sort of basis in the original Written Torah so it doesn’t seem totally man-made and nonsensical.

They try so hard to hide all of this, but all the goyim will know the truth about this sicko religion soon enough. You will not fool us with your tricks, Jews. We will not let you try and get away with making it seem like Rabbinic Judaism has any basis in noscripture at all.

I want you to all know as well, that when a Jew like Uriel da Costa tried to place the Written Torah in a higher position than the ‘wisdom of the sages’, he was condemned by the Rabbinate on multiple occasions.

This is why the SSPX is the standard. The FSSP is already buckling to pressure, the difference between them and the Novus Ordo will in the future be indistinguishable.

Christmas in Munich, 1938.
At the beginning, the song "Silent Night, Holy Night" is sung while a girl is shown watching a nativity play. After that, children next to St. Nicholas sing the song "O Christmas Tree".

@Christianityandfascism

The Löwenbräukeller in Munich on the occasion of Hitler's visit on December 18, 1941.

@Christianityandfascism

Welcome to Immaculata Productions

Subscribe for daily updates of our films, podcasts and photography

@ImmaculataProductions

the Protestant conception of the Church as merely reducible to the community of believers is a bit like conceiving of the human body as merely reducible to a collection of bodily organs, bones and skin

what’s missing here for the body is the soul, i.e that internal principle whereby bodily members are unified as one, irreducibly whole living body.

for the Church, what’s missing is the Holy Spirit, Who as Pius XII beautifully remarks is the soul of the Catholic Church, the mystical Body of Christ