She's claiming that the problem with Facebook is that they don't censor enough.

Acting on 3% of "hate speech and divisive political content" to acting on 100% is a 33 fold increase in censorship. This is what she's actually advocating.

So what we have here is a pre-positioned mover that was assigned to the entity in 2019 ahead of the 2020 election for specific intelligence purposes.

We already know that intelligence agencies across the world work with Facebook & Tech Giants for user & online demographics, CounterIntel & surveillance efforts. Everybody does, and I discussed this much earlier in the channel.

The headline of the most recent WSJ article published after the hearing today says "tougher regulations" but what the content of the article demonstrates is that the Federal Government is attempting to publicly & legally assume full-access control of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp etc for persistent surveillance - even though they’ve been working with Zuck a while already. He’s cool with it too btw.

Frances Haugen was "hired" 2 years ago to work on "election integrity" and counterespionage with Facebook. Now she's gathered a ton of internal documents and come out as a “whistleblower” to testify before Congress that the Federal Government should create a special Surveillance entity that has full access to all Facebook systems and user data to maintain accountability.

She advocates to repeal Section 230 so that Big Tech can be “held liable” if it doesn't promote content per recommendations set forth by Federal "guidelines" derived by their full access audit and oversight entity.

Basically if Zuck doesn't promote what content "they" want promoted he can get his peepee slapped. That’s fine with him, cause he’s already doing it and that’s the whole point of this - to make it legal & get the public perception on board with it.

Oh and she's going to benefit handsomely for this.

She even has a GoFundMe so you can contribute to her European tour 🙄

Because that’s right, she wants to also work European regulators for persistent surveillance.

And yachts are expensive so everybody pony up!

^This is the way (of communists)

Oh and surprise surprise -

Zuckerberg has been calling for all this to happen himself, and lawmakers are "shocked" at how much unanimity there is in this decision to essentially "federalize" the large tech platforms.

^^^ would you look at that. 👀

In “OTA” Intelligence they call this Controlled Opposition.

Tell me you’re a political operative without telling me you’re a political operative.

As JP stated, “When you're represented by Jen Psaki's PR firm, and Eric Ciaramella's legal team, you are definitely a true whistleblower and not a political influence agent.” 🤡

Who let the Karen play Spy Game?

The whole charade is literally painful to observe. She even has a GoFundMe, I just can’t.

A buddy of mine nailed it, “It’s like the inverse of The Emperors New Clothes…. Everybody’s naked, but pretending they’re not.”

Clothed or naked, either way this is just plain ugly, and pitiful really.

All angst aside from this absolutely ridiculous attempt to pull one over on the unsuspecting populace, by which the ghosts of all legit political operatives past are now rolling their collective eyeballs….
<sighs..>

You were all banned yesterday.