“The ultimate test of our moral character can perhaps be revealed only when God is dead, when no one is watching, when we believe that there will be no judgement or metaphysical consequences for our actions. Only when everything is permitted we will find out who we really are, to what levels of depravity we are willing to stoop, or raise above.” https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3735301
Ssrn
Transcendental Theology for Non-Believers
Pope Benedict XVI argued that it is "necessary and reasonable to raise the question of God through the use of reason" and to understand "theology
People get angry because they fail to rationally prove the correctness of their ‘obviously correct’ view. What seems obvious to you may need to be rigorously defended from time to time, and most people who make a stand against trans-ideology do not seem to grasp this basic point. Some Australian politicians come to mind; they equivocate between logical categories but are too conceited or otherwise unwilling to accept that their simplistic traditionalist arguments are inadequate. It is also possible that some politicians and activists do not want to resolve this conflict but to sustain it, because they can profit from the enduring polarisation and adversity. Trans-ideology is easy to prove logically invalid: https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/70
Forwarded from Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (Zelenko Protocol) (Zev Zelenko)
This paper from 2010 describes how Dr. Ralph Baric and colleagues found an effective treatment approach to treat viruses like Covid.
This information was subsequently surpressed during the pandemic.
Dr. Ralph was involved in every step of bio-engineering the Covid-19 weapon.
https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1001176
@ZelenkoProtocol
This information was subsequently surpressed during the pandemic.
Dr. Ralph was involved in every step of bio-engineering the Covid-19 weapon.
https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1001176
@ZelenkoProtocol
journals.plos.org
Zn2+ Inhibits Coronavirus and Arterivirus RNA Polymerase Activity In Vitro and Zinc Ionophores Block the Replication of These Viruses…
Author Summary Positive-stranded RNA (+RNA) viruses include many important pathogens. They have evolved a variety of replication strategies, but are unified in the fact that an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) functions as the core enzyme of their RNA…
The idea that alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction justifies the invasion of another country was normalised many years ago, by NATO.
Humanity is the Ground of All Meaning
All your rights, all your values, including your value as a person, all meaning and sense, derive from your belonging to the Human kind: the kind of beings who possess reflexive conscousness vis-a-vis one another, and the capacity for rational thought, by means of which WE are able to collectively generate meaning. Humanity has the absolute priority over tribal, racial, cultural or ideological identity, because all these value-categories derive from and are conditional on being human, above all else. To ascribe any priority to your tribe, race, culture or ideology over the value of humanity is to negate the ground of these values, and thus to contradict and negate yourself. Tribalism, racialism, culturalism and ideologism all contradict themselves, negate themselves, refute their own priority, their moral status, their meaning and values. In order to be wholly yourself, to be a fully integrated being, to be fully human, absolutely valuable, of inviolable moral status, one must first abandon all contrary value commitments.
All your rights, all your values, including your value as a person, all meaning and sense, derive from your belonging to the Human kind: the kind of beings who possess reflexive conscousness vis-a-vis one another, and the capacity for rational thought, by means of which WE are able to collectively generate meaning. Humanity has the absolute priority over tribal, racial, cultural or ideological identity, because all these value-categories derive from and are conditional on being human, above all else. To ascribe any priority to your tribe, race, culture or ideology over the value of humanity is to negate the ground of these values, and thus to contradict and negate yourself. Tribalism, racialism, culturalism and ideologism all contradict themselves, negate themselves, refute their own priority, their moral status, their meaning and values. In order to be wholly yourself, to be a fully integrated being, to be fully human, absolutely valuable, of inviolable moral status, one must first abandon all contrary value commitments.
The Mouse Utopia Experiment is essentially an experiment in benevolent communism, or what some would call genuine Communism, something akin to the proposed Smart Cities (gulags with conveniences). The point of failure in these experiments appears to be the lack of ownership and exclusive control of personal space. Behold the Mouse Utopia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z760XNy4VM&feature=emb_imp_woyt
YouTube
Mouse Utopia Experiment
John Calhoun's Mouse Utopia, 195?
Limited Hangout of the “Freedom Movement”
The politicians who oppose vaccine mandates or any medical coercion during public health emergencies tend to limit their discourse only to the benefits vs risks vs options kind of arguments. Some argue that vaccines don’t work well enough and the threat of Covid is not serious enough to justify medical coercion. Others argue that other, more effective and safer treatment are available, and because of this the medical coercion is not necessary. One common feature of these views is that they do not (or no longer do) engage in absolute arguments of the kind that I am presenting: a) that vaccine mandates discriminate on the basis of healthy innate characteristics of the human race and in effect make our innate, healthy constitution illegal (are anti-human); b) that vaccine mandates violate the right to life by killing some people for the alleged benefit of the majority; c) that if we give up the right to free medical consent we give up all rights, because every other right can be medically subverted; d) that the delegation of emergency powers to anyone is ultra vires and void, because the rule by decree (by the CHO, Government or the WHO) exceeds the procedural limits of the Parliament itself and therefore cannot be legitimately delegated. All of the politicians who appear to resist vaccine mandates were informed by me personally about the scope of my arguments, including my paper on this topic published in the BMJ. I received no constructive responses. The effect of the arguments to which these politicians limit themselves is such that IF a far more lethal pathogen appeared and no alternatives treatments were available then medical coercion, vaccine mandates etc would be justified. So in avoiding the absolute arguments they are implicitly endorsing vaccine mandates in principle, just not under the present conditions. They are acting as if they are defending your freedom but they are leaving the door open to medical tyranny in future pandemics, perhaps later this year…
The politicians who oppose vaccine mandates or any medical coercion during public health emergencies tend to limit their discourse only to the benefits vs risks vs options kind of arguments. Some argue that vaccines don’t work well enough and the threat of Covid is not serious enough to justify medical coercion. Others argue that other, more effective and safer treatment are available, and because of this the medical coercion is not necessary. One common feature of these views is that they do not (or no longer do) engage in absolute arguments of the kind that I am presenting: a) that vaccine mandates discriminate on the basis of healthy innate characteristics of the human race and in effect make our innate, healthy constitution illegal (are anti-human); b) that vaccine mandates violate the right to life by killing some people for the alleged benefit of the majority; c) that if we give up the right to free medical consent we give up all rights, because every other right can be medically subverted; d) that the delegation of emergency powers to anyone is ultra vires and void, because the rule by decree (by the CHO, Government or the WHO) exceeds the procedural limits of the Parliament itself and therefore cannot be legitimately delegated. All of the politicians who appear to resist vaccine mandates were informed by me personally about the scope of my arguments, including my paper on this topic published in the BMJ. I received no constructive responses. The effect of the arguments to which these politicians limit themselves is such that IF a far more lethal pathogen appeared and no alternatives treatments were available then medical coercion, vaccine mandates etc would be justified. So in avoiding the absolute arguments they are implicitly endorsing vaccine mandates in principle, just not under the present conditions. They are acting as if they are defending your freedom but they are leaving the door open to medical tyranny in future pandemics, perhaps later this year…
RDA is starting to look like BLM/Antifa. Monica Smith never made any rational arguments, only demands. This is not about the right to free medical consent anymore, not about reason, public deliberation and resolution, but ideological polarisation and incremental radicalism. Can you see the progressive narrative shift towards nativist prioritarianism and tribalism?
The main problem with digital “passports” and cashless society is not that it is digital, but the fact that the people who are introducing these systems are a combination of amoral narcissists, sociopaths and the criminally insane. They are career murderers and professional liars. We have a moral obligation to reject any technology or practice that gives irrational people more control. The idea of “trusted identity” is refuted by the fact that the people who manage it are untrustworthy.
If CO2 emissions “per capita” matter, then we should not be calculating this measure for countries or regions, where huge underlying variability in emissions exists from person to person, but focus on specific demographics: politicians, CEOs of “green” corporations, Bankers, Media personalities, celebrities, and the top 0.01% according to wealth. Since personal wealth is the best determinant of the individual carbon footprint, we can infer that the people who are pushing the “green” agenda the hardest are precisely the biggest CO2 emitters and that in order to “save the planet:)” we must strip billionaires, bankers and politicians of their wealth! I mean, IF per capita emissions matter.
Human, military technology tested under the guise of UFO. Aliens are impossible: https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2020/12/09/why-alien-life-forms-are-impossible/
The Experts agree that their survival is more important than your survival, so in times of existential emergency please listen to the Experts.
Gaslighting is the hallmark of psychopaths. This is how they normalise abuse, by saying “oh, you are just too sensitive because you were abused.” This garbage pseudo-science from NZ gets a write up because it suits their sick agenda, whereas my work published in the BMJ does not even get a mention; it makes too much sense.
The essence of totalitarianism as expressed by Varlam Shalamov: “I saw what a weighty argument for the intellectual is the most ordinary slap in the face.” https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2018/06/12/forty-five-things-i-learned-in-the-gulag/
People who do not deliberate in good faith, who do not seek to genuinely understand one another and resolve disagreements, who are not open to the possibility that they could be wrong but assert their beliefs by coercion or force, no longer participate in the collective creation and preservation of meaning, which is an essential property of Humanity (understood as reflexively-conscious rational beings). They thus deny their humanity, and therefore voluntarily renounce their moral status.
If authority can exist only where there is responsibility, those who deny responsibility for ther actions implicitly deny their moral authority, and therefore their moral status, and therefore their human rights. Denial of personal responsibility for actions is metaphysical self-harm, it reduces the human to an animal (or reveals one as such).
People who do not deliberate in good faith, who do not seek to genuinely understand one another and resolve disagreements, who are not open to the possibility that they could be wrong but assert their beliefs by coercion or force, no longer participate in the collective creation and preservation of meaning, which is an essential property of Humanity (understood as reflexively-conscious rational beings). They thus deny their humanity, and therefore voluntarily renounce their moral status.
If authority can exist only where there is responsibility, those who deny responsibility for ther actions implicitly deny their moral authority, and therefore their moral status, and therefore their human rights. Denial of personal responsibility for actions is metaphysical self-harm, it reduces the human to an animal (or reveals one as such).
The Paris Review
Forty-Five Things I Learned in the Gulag
Varlam Shalamov claimed not to have learned anything from the Gulag except how to wheel a loaded barrow. But one of his fragmentary writings, dated 1961, tells us more.
Let me help you Brendan. Male is a functional kind characterised by the capacity to produce sperm, and Female is a functional kind characterised by the capacity to produce eggs. Sex (Male or Female) is attributed to a human body if the relevant capacity could be realised in one’s lifetime under conditions of anatomical completeness, sexual maturity and the optimal state of health. ‘Woman’ is then an adult female, and ‘Man’ is an adult human male, as proven here: https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2018/01/27/functionalist-defence-binary-gender/ This alone makes me more qualified than Brendan Murphy, or anyone else in the government, to be the Health Minister. Brendan should quit because his ignorance of basic biological facts is a danger to public health.
The Essence of Fascism
The essence of Fascism is the collusion of the State apparatus and the Corporate managerial class to freely transgress the human rights of individuals, allegedly in the interests of the Greater Good or the Collective (which are invariably limited to the interests of the fascist elite). The purest form of Fascism is called Communism.
The essence of Fascism is the collusion of the State apparatus and the Corporate managerial class to freely transgress the human rights of individuals, allegedly in the interests of the Greater Good or the Collective (which are invariably limited to the interests of the fascist elite). The purest form of Fascism is called Communism.