I did not “assume” your gender; I have determined it.

On the distinction between criticism of ideology vs criticism of ethnicity of the ideologue

The following article (just a random example, over the years I have seen many of these, and worse) alleges that Bolshevism was driven mostly by people of Jewish ethnicity or ancestry, and then insinuates that because Bolshevism was bad there must be something wrong with Jewish ethnicity or ancestry. The label Jew is used in the following article in a similar way to how Antivaxxer is used, without any standard or evidence (the author is the judge of what makes one a “Jew”) and without establishing any relevance to this attribute, as if being called Jew (like Antivaxxer) is of itself somehow incriminating. I suspect you can see that this is defective logic and it unfairly paints an entire ethnicity, and the history of German Nazism provides evidence how much harm such beliefs can cause. For another example, consider that people of Anglo-Saxon ethnicity were the only ethnicity to ever use nuclear weapons in war, against civilians; does this demonstrate that the Anglo-Saxon ethnicity is inherently defective, or evil? I suggest that all ethnicities have the capacity for evil, and there are psychopaths and murderers in every race, tribe or culture. So if there is something wrong with a political ideology, the rational task is to defeat the merits of the ideology, to show precisely why it is wrong. To attack the ethnicity of some of the ideologues instead of the ideology is a category mistake and leaves the problem of ideology unresolved.

https://www.heretical.com/miscellx/bolshies.html

The belief in grand narratives of world domination by an “evil elite” not only violates the principle of sufficient reason (no grand narrative can be rationally verified) but it implicitly affirms moral antagonism between classes: the “evil elite” vs. the oppressed masses. This self-categorisation, which is not based on consistent reasoning but on existential anxiety, is a confession of methodological inferiority with respect to the rulers, and gives them a rational basis to justify their claim to power precisely because people are shown to be susceptible to psychological manipulation and cannot be trusted to think rationally. The belief in grand narratives that violate the principle of sufficient reason in effect demonstrates the spiritual superiority of the elites, and constitutes the energetic source of their power, an affirmation of fundamental differences in the moral status of social classes and the implicit consent to be ruled. Unless you follow reason, no matter how much this hurts your feelings, you unwittingly choose slavery.

Any purported delegation of authority that would allow the WHO to impose legally enforceable directives on the citizens of a sovereign state, within the borders of their own state, would be legally void. The delegated authority to issue decrees with the force of law would exceed the constitutional authority of the parliament itself. The parliament is constitutionally bound to make laws in a particular way, usually by a majority vote of its members, so for anyone to issue enforceable decrees outside of this process would always be ultra vires.

Technically, the vote is only a gesture of consent to transfer your unit of sovereignty to someone else, for an irrevocable period of 4 years, and the representative is not obliged to obey your individual wishes.

Why is a 7 NEWS journalist (media worker) asking questions that could “undermine the vaccine rollout” and “public confidence in the health authorities”. Who told her to ask this question and why? Remember, the great reset needs your energy for change, not apathy but outrage, not peace but anxiety, you need to believe that great change is necessary, that YOU are the vanguard of spiritual revolution, cultural revolution, and only then they can direct this energy towards their ends. Ordo Ab Chao.

Narrative Alert! Another noticeable shift in the narrative. They used to religiously assert about any delays that they are caused by Covid. Now the declared cause is “Covid restrictions”.

No Pauline, nativist prioritarianism is the ideological bedrock of Nazism and racial supremacism, which is as Right Wing as it gets. But I do share your sentiment about non-natives being systematically degraded and left out. As a first generation migrant I was instantly made aware that I could never ‘belong’ here, that there is a secret value-hierarchy of who was here First, and who came here Last…

Ancestors of the alleged original owners of Australia were descendants of every human’s ancestors, our common ancestors, who belonged to the Earth. We are all related.

One way to covertly normalise Nazi ideology is to indoctrinate children with the dogma that native plants and animals are inherently good, special, in harmony, therefore worth protecting, and non-native animals and plants are pests and weeds that should be eradicated.

The linked paper covers a whole range of mechanisms via which Covid vaccines are likely to cause harm. For example, the above table shows cancers detected within a short period of time following vaccination, typically one month, but whereas the count for Covid vaccines includes only one year of data, the numbers for all other vaccines are a cumulative result for 31 years. https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas

The lockdown now makes sense. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/economy/more-consumer-woes-as-covid19-lockdown-in-shanghai-clog-supply/news-story/edf6638554797387f27f04206886f939

So covid lockdowns gave kids immunodeficiency of sorts because they were prevented from developing natural immunity to endemic viruses. Makes sense, but perhaps there is another reason kids have a deficient immune system after the Covid event.

High Speed Tunnel Vehicle

Here is a little design project I completed in 1997 at RMIT, a high speed “train” travelling in an evacuated tunnel/tube. The design was an attempt to simultaneously avoid the need to acquire private land (a major cost associated with surface rail) and to enable building a straighter (underground) path with lowered air resistance, which would in turn allow significantly higher travel speeds than any surface based maglev. A further cost saving was accomplished by avoiding Maglev technology in favour of fluid film (pneumatic) suspension. The two main doubts about HSTV: a) the psychological barrier associated with people travelling inside a pressurised fuselage, without windows to look out of, underground, in a vacuum environment; b) emergency management in case of breakdown. It is clear now that the psychological factor would be overcome in a similar manner to high rise elevators, but regarding the emergency management I had to design an air supply system (a continuous valve in the floor of the guideway activated pneumatically only by the presence of the vehicle above it) which would allow maintaining a continuous and unlimited supply of atmospheric air to the vehicle interior at any point along the travel path without compromising the vacuum environment during normal operation.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3799002

Remember the good old days when instead of a Digital ID, finger prints, retina scan and facial recognition we just used our ink signature to prove identity?

Fake identity was never a major issue. The identity of people who committed the greatest crimes against humanity, who destroyed nations and stole from all of us for centuries was never in question. They stole, tortured and killed openly, in broad daylight, under the guise of the good, with the blessing of the Church, with the approval of the Human Rights committees, and in compliance with the ‘law’. In short, knowledge of identity was never an obstacle to evil. There were indeed long periods in human history when people were not legally permitted to do what is objectively right, and only by concealing their identity they were able to counter the evils of their times.

This was unexpected. I just noticed:)

Private consumption and spending patterns are proprietary information. Defend it or lose it. If you have a smart meter at home, you can start there; put a time-limited licensing fee on any facility capable of harvesting your proprietary information. I did, and they never installed a smart meter.

It is a personal responsibility to show your face in any social context and not to cause harm to others. We know that self-defacement hurts others, especially children. Face masks dehumanise.