Technically, the vote is only a gesture of consent to transfer your unit of sovereignty to someone else, for an irrevocable period of 4 years, and the representative is not obliged to obey your individual wishes.

Why is a 7 NEWS journalist (media worker) asking questions that could “undermine the vaccine rollout” and “public confidence in the health authorities”. Who told her to ask this question and why? Remember, the great reset needs your energy for change, not apathy but outrage, not peace but anxiety, you need to believe that great change is necessary, that YOU are the vanguard of spiritual revolution, cultural revolution, and only then they can direct this energy towards their ends. Ordo Ab Chao.

Narrative Alert! Another noticeable shift in the narrative. They used to religiously assert about any delays that they are caused by Covid. Now the declared cause is “Covid restrictions”.

No Pauline, nativist prioritarianism is the ideological bedrock of Nazism and racial supremacism, which is as Right Wing as it gets. But I do share your sentiment about non-natives being systematically degraded and left out. As a first generation migrant I was instantly made aware that I could never ‘belong’ here, that there is a secret value-hierarchy of who was here First, and who came here Last…

Ancestors of the alleged original owners of Australia were descendants of every human’s ancestors, our common ancestors, who belonged to the Earth. We are all related.

One way to covertly normalise Nazi ideology is to indoctrinate children with the dogma that native plants and animals are inherently good, special, in harmony, therefore worth protecting, and non-native animals and plants are pests and weeds that should be eradicated.

The linked paper covers a whole range of mechanisms via which Covid vaccines are likely to cause harm. For example, the above table shows cancers detected within a short period of time following vaccination, typically one month, but whereas the count for Covid vaccines includes only one year of data, the numbers for all other vaccines are a cumulative result for 31 years. https://www.authorea.com/users/455597/articles/552937-innate-immune-suppression-by-sars-cov-2-mrna-vaccinations-the-role-of-g-quadruplexes-exosomes-and-micrornas

The lockdown now makes sense. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/economy/more-consumer-woes-as-covid19-lockdown-in-shanghai-clog-supply/news-story/edf6638554797387f27f04206886f939

So covid lockdowns gave kids immunodeficiency of sorts because they were prevented from developing natural immunity to endemic viruses. Makes sense, but perhaps there is another reason kids have a deficient immune system after the Covid event.

High Speed Tunnel Vehicle

Here is a little design project I completed in 1997 at RMIT, a high speed “train” travelling in an evacuated tunnel/tube. The design was an attempt to simultaneously avoid the need to acquire private land (a major cost associated with surface rail) and to enable building a straighter (underground) path with lowered air resistance, which would in turn allow significantly higher travel speeds than any surface based maglev. A further cost saving was accomplished by avoiding Maglev technology in favour of fluid film (pneumatic) suspension. The two main doubts about HSTV: a) the psychological barrier associated with people travelling inside a pressurised fuselage, without windows to look out of, underground, in a vacuum environment; b) emergency management in case of breakdown. It is clear now that the psychological factor would be overcome in a similar manner to high rise elevators, but regarding the emergency management I had to design an air supply system (a continuous valve in the floor of the guideway activated pneumatically only by the presence of the vehicle above it) which would allow maintaining a continuous and unlimited supply of atmospheric air to the vehicle interior at any point along the travel path without compromising the vacuum environment during normal operation.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3799002

Remember the good old days when instead of a Digital ID, finger prints, retina scan and facial recognition we just used our ink signature to prove identity?

Fake identity was never a major issue. The identity of people who committed the greatest crimes against humanity, who destroyed nations and stole from all of us for centuries was never in question. They stole, tortured and killed openly, in broad daylight, under the guise of the good, with the blessing of the Church, with the approval of the Human Rights committees, and in compliance with the ‘law’. In short, knowledge of identity was never an obstacle to evil. There were indeed long periods in human history when people were not legally permitted to do what is objectively right, and only by concealing their identity they were able to counter the evils of their times.

This was unexpected. I just noticed:)

Private consumption and spending patterns are proprietary information. Defend it or lose it. If you have a smart meter at home, you can start there; put a time-limited licensing fee on any facility capable of harvesting your proprietary information. I did, and they never installed a smart meter.

It is a personal responsibility to show your face in any social context and not to cause harm to others. We know that self-defacement hurts others, especially children. Face masks dehumanise.

The idea of ‘national soul’ is another core Nazi concept, a remand of tribal, pagan prejudice, which is opposed to any universal conception of humanity, or ‘human soul’. The West is simply Rationality (Aristotle) and pan-humanism (Kant), the only cultural sphere that has consciously attempted to overcome its own tribal prejudice and has become conscious of its own racism (philosophically, if not always in practice), but this western idea has spread all around the world, and every country is now to various degrees Western, because all nations are (at least ostensibly) committed to formal rationality, expressed though modern science and the rules of political discourse, and to pan-humanism. Despite our errors, failures, contradictions, animalistic nostalgia and the remnant, tribal prejudices we all live in a Western world (philosophically speaking), but few have perfected their pan-humanist conduct in social life and politics. The alleged divide between West and East misrepresents territorial and economic interests of different factions of the West as a spiritual or philosophical conflict, which it is not. The only outstanding conflict is between rationality and non-sense, between right vs wrong.

Non-sense can never be Virtue or Duty, and this is why pre-modern spiritual and imperial ethics are collectively defeated by western Rationalism (Immanuel Kant), as a the objectively right ethical framework. This does not negate those dogmas of ancient ethics that happen to coincide with rational ethics, despite their cultural frameworks being procedurally defective (dogmas and spiritual insights violate the principle of sufficient reason and therefore the law of non-contradiction).

When a doctor tells you that your child is in an abnormal state (sickness) you do not accuse them of hating your child; the doctor states a fact. Similarly, when you describe a female pretending to be a male as a female, or male pretending to be a female as a male, or transgenderism as a pathological abnormality of the binary sexual function, it does not follow that you hate that person, or discriminate against facts, but state the facts. We can sympathise with people afflicted with abnormalities without normalising those abnormalities, what would in turn cause harm to healthy people. For example, when females are forced to compete against males in female sports, or strip naked in front of male strangers in a female change-room, this amounts to prejudice against females. To normalise the unhealthy or abnormal is to pathologise and injure that which is healthy.

“You will own nothing and be happy hungry.” (WEF apologises for any inconvenience caused by a typo in the earlier version of their agenda documentation.)

I have explained the issues with paganism, naturalism and animism here: https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/949 The idea of belonging to a tribe is distinct from tribalism, insofar as one does not identify with the tribe in a special way compared to the rest of humanity. The issue of ‘National Soul’ is that it precludes belonging of non-natives on the basis of rational understanding but only on the basis of familial relations and at the very least on submission to the tribal/cultural norms, which (apart from the laws of sense/logic) are always, invariably dogmatic and of themselves amount to nativist prioritarianism. This is of course not a black a white matter, and there are degrees of ‘priority’ that various tribes may demand, and the word tribe is also used informally, to designate people you know, agree with and like, but I use the term tribe/tribalism only in the sense of traditional, familial, biological relation. There is another issue with tribalism in this stronger sense of the term. Members identifying with traditional, especially ancient tribes, have little if any interest in other cultures, they would rather avoid them and don’t want to study them (insular, escapist behaviour), whereas people who have altogether relinquished or lost any tribal identity seek out other cultures and view them with fascination and awe, they want to get to know them, and I suggest there is a profound lesson in this difference. Tribalism seems to be a form of intoxication, an echo chamber based on energetic animal connection, and i very much understand its attraction, i feel it. It is incredibly powerful, a kind of bliss of belonging, but nevertheless a metaphysical dead end, precluding growth beyond the confines of the norms imposed by the tribal conditioning. Rational consciousness freed from tribalism demands more, seeks more, is ready to grown beyond mere culture and custom into universal being, and this kind of pan-humanist connection is our deepest yearning, our ideal, unbounded by blood, signified in religions by the idea of God.

I do understand the issue of mass migration, when two tribal/cultural systems are forcibly mixed without adequate preparation and the will to transcend the ancient cultural norms in favour of rational deliberation and agreement on the basis of the rules of sense/nonsense. There is also the legitimate issue of ‘economic nationalism’ where migration allows free access to the tax wallet created and owned by others, so mass migration can be (and usually is) parasitic. https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2019/09/25/inclusion-without-belonging-ontology-of-the-migrant/