Who Owns You?

Have you ever considered why the government borrows money at interest to cover any shortfall in its budget, instead of just printing the same amount, interest free to the public? Can the government be trusted to borrow unlimited money, created by the banks, at interest (to be paid by you), but the Parliament cannot be trusted to authorise creation of the same amount of money interest free?

This is a great question to ask all those defenders of your freedom who are so so anti-establishment. Great way to unmask their true allegiance and know who is just controlled opposition. And this rabbit hole goes much deeper: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3737447

My submission to “Public hearings regarding a new international instrument on pandemic preparedness and response” (World Health Organisation) 13.04.2022

https://inb.who.int/home/written-submissions


I am a philosopher of ethics and an expert on vaccine mandates: https://jme.bmj.com/content/48/4/240

I submit, on the following grounds, that the new international instrument must explicitly prohibit any discrimination on the basis of vaccination status.

1. Vaccine mandates imply that all humans are born in a defective, inherently harmful state that must be biotechnologically augmented to allow our unrestricted participation in society, and this constitutes discrimination on the basis of healthy, innate characteristics of the human race.

2. Discrimination against the unvaccinated denies the right to free medical consent. This must not be allowed under any circumstances, because without the right to free medical consent we have no rights at all; every other right can be subverted by medical coercion.

3. Vaccines are known to occasionally cause deaths of healthy people. Discrimination against the unvaccinated amounts to a violation of the right to life, because a small percentage of the targeted individuals are expected to die as a result of this coercive treatment. It may be objected that viruses also kill people, but these two categories of deaths are not ethically equivalent. Infection with viruses is not mandated, whereas deaths resulting from mandatory vaccination are mandated deaths, a legalised killing of some people for the prospective benefit of the majority.

I believe we agree that the right to life must not be violated, in which case vaccine mandates are inconsistent with the fundamental moral commitments of The WHO.

Why write off good debt via hyperinflation? The creditors want to be paid, therefore hyperinflation is generally not in their interest, whereas deflation amplifies the exchange value of their financial assets. For this reason I expect monetary contraction and price deflation comparable to the Great Depression rather than hyperinflation.

“I’m from the LGBTI community but I’ve never felt more discriminated against in my life than I have in the past year since vaccines were introduced.” Says the person interviewed in this article. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/unvaccinated-australians-question-why-they-are-still-unable-to-work-due-to-unfair-mandates/news-story/8b22ad83e645f7974201fcf3675fdeb8

This is true (even a broken clock is sometimes right). Refusing to wear a mask is an issue of preserving the socially reflexive human relations. The face is the essence of personhood vis-a-vis one another, and personhood vis-a-vis one another is the essence of humanity. Face masks dehumanise. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3840787

It is not your job to convince anyone else that they are wrong; it is their own challenge to overcome falsity. The world is made only of the truth, not of falsity, and everything that stands for falsity will perish.

Only when everything is permitted we will find out who we really are, to what levels of depravity we are willing to stoop, or rise above. The inhuman things we do dehumanise us, turning us into animals, and ultimately to stone.

I would never vote for anyone who wants to be a politician.

Australians have not yet been humiliated enough to overcome their authoritarian dependency programming. The lessons of history have not been learned by the hopeful, rat-trained majority. I expect today’s election to be a step towards further humiliation, to more suffering. I have noticed this on the faces of people the day after each past election, it is a look of shame, and silent evasion of one another’s gaze, a tacit agreement not to talk about what they did yesterday. Today is a repetition of this 4-yearly ritual, which involves a metaphysical self-rape of the population. All forms of transcendence involve great suffering and more suffering is surely coming. Am I too pessimistic, cynical or a realist?

Why would a farm dog agree to participate in a ‘democratic’ system with the sheep?

If Morrison wins, this will be an endorsement of the recent abuses, lies, criminality. If Albanese wins, this will be an endorsement of a digital gulag-style, collectivised “prosperity”. The situation is Lose-Lose, because this is the binary mindset (actually, unary, they only disagree on the things that don’t really matter) of the Australian majority. So to all the people out there i care about, keep your sprits up, because for the next 4 years you will witness carnage, but this is apparently a necessary lesson. We must suffer through it for the sake of others who have not yet learned to let go of falsity.

Only monkeypox can save Australia now;)

I am looking forward to the next 4 years of government lies, economic devastation, abuse, humiliation and death. It will be so much easier to endure, knowing that most people are ok with it. The bonus is that I did not give up my sovereignty for collective representation, did not empower the authority of the state, so I will continue to be an independent observer of this ‘animal farm democracy’.

Let me clarify one point. The government does not represent you, they never have, they never could, they never will. Collective representation of conflicting views violates the law of non-contradiction and is therefore absurd, literal non-sense. They only tricked you to consent to be obediently ruled by them. And for this reason they don’t teach the laws of logic in schools.

“Tonight, the Australian people have voted for change.” (Anthony Albanese) I can’t believe he is already making threats. 😂

In the spirit of universal reconciliation, I expect Anthony Albanese to write our shared human ancestors into the Commonwealth Constitution as the Original Owners of the Earth. Our moral sovereignty was never ceded (apart from those who voted yesterday).

Collective representation collateralises your identity. The vote was a four-year contract for your soul.

Yuval Noah Harari, the WEF ‘philosopher’ of the Great Reset, tells us that a new class of useless, powerless people will emerge due to technological progress. This would be trivially true (useless and powerless people always existed) unless his ‘prediction’ carried an implicit moral judgement: that ‘useless people’ have a lower moral status (intrinsically subhuman) than ‘useful people’ (human). We must therefore understand Harari’s message not as a statement of fact but as a moral manifesto, or more precisely, a statement of utilitarian anti-morality, which is not at all original: it is historically associated with fascism as the pseudo-morality that motivated its crimes against humanity. In the following article I explain why this utilitarian view is pseudo-moral and self-defeating. https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2020/05/31/what-is-the-value-of-useless-people/